AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 240: R282-R288, 1981;
0363-6119/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brace, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Power, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brace, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Power, G. G.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 240, Issue 5 282-R288, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Thoracic duct lymph flow and protein flux dynamics: responses to intravascular saline

R. A. Brace and G. G. Power

Fluid and protein flux responses in the left thoracic duct and vasculature were measured in pentobarbital-anesthetized, nephrectomized, adult dogs before and after four successive intravascular saline infusions of 2% of body weight each. We found three main characteristics of the thoracic lymph flow and protein flux responses to the intravenous saline: 1) lymph flow reached a peak and then decreased by approximately 40% after each infusion; 2) the maximum lymph flow occurred 5-7 min after terminating each infusion; and 3) the lymph-to-plasma protein concentration ratio fell more than may be expected from the distribution of the infused saline. We were unable to explain these experimental data with a simple two-compartment mathematical model representing the vascular and interstitial spaces. To adequately explain the data, the model had to be expanded to four compartments representing a vascular compartment, two interstitial compartments each with different capillary protein permeabilities, and a lymphatic compartment. We also found it necessary to include interstitial stress relaxation, a nonlinear function curve for lymph flow versus interstitial fluid pressure, and a complaint lymphatic system.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online