AJP - Regu Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 244: R235-R243, 1983;
0363-6119/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitelaw, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitelaw, K. D.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 244, Issue 2 235-R243, Copyright © 1983 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of cervical vagal stimulation on chicken heart rate and atrioventricular conduction

J. M. Goldberg, M. H. Johnson and K. D. Whitelaw

The effects of supramaximal stimulation of the right and left cervical vagi on heart rate, pacemaker localization, and atrioventricular (AV) conduction were investigated in 15 anesthetized open-chest chickens before and after atropine sulfate. Epicardial bipolar electrograms were recorded from selected atrial sites and right ventricle. A back lead electrocardiogram was also recorded. The effect of stimulation on atrioventricular conduction was evaluated during pacing from one of the right atrial recording sites. Supramaximal stimulation of either cervical vagus produced bradycardia but not cardiac arrest. Heart rate was reduced from an average spontaneous rate of 282 +/- 13 (SE)/min to 161 +/- 13/min with stimulation of the right and left cervical vagus. Pacemaker shifts occurred in over 50% of the vagal stimulations. The most frequent shift occurred to the lower AV node or ventricles. Pacemaker shifts to the AV junctional region producing almost simultaneous activation of the atria and ventricles were not observed. Vagal stimulation during atrial pacing produced minimal prolongation in AV conduction time [right vagus, 13 +/- 3 (SE) ms; left vagus, 8 +/- 2 ms]. Second and third degree heart blocks were not observed during pacing. Vagal stimulation after atropine indicates that the cervical vagi do not contain sympathetic fibers going to pacemaker or AV conduction tissues.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online