AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 252: R794-R800, 1987;
0363-6119/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiorotto, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klish, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiorotto, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Klish, W. J.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 252, Issue 4 794-R800, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Total body electrical conductivity measurements: effects of body composition and geometry

M. L. Fiorotto, W. J. Cochran, R. C. Funk, H. P. Sheng and W. J. Klish

This study used an animal model to analyze the effect of body geometry and chemical composition on the calibration of a total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC) instrument developed to measure the body composition of human infants. The TOBEC signal (adjusted for length) of infant miniature pigs from 10 to 33 days of age correlated highly with their chemically analyzed fat-free mass (FFM; r = 0.998) and total body water contents (TBW; r = 0.998); 95% prediction intervals (approximately +/- 2 SEE) for individual measurements were +/- 0.16 kg FFM and +/- 0.12 liter water. These values were significantly improved (+/- 0.08 kg and +/- 0.06 liter, respectively) by accounting for individual variability in weight/length2. The effect of variations in the composition of FFM on the TOBEC measurements was evaluated by comparing the response of the infant piglets with that of adult rabbits of similar size. The differences in composition, primarily TBW and Na content, were insufficient to alter the electrical properties of FFM appreciably. Thus the TOBEC used under the conditions defined in this study accurately predicted the FFM and TBW content of infant miniature pigs. The calibration derived from the piglets will be applicable to the interpretation of the TOBEC measurements of human infants provided their FFM is of comparable shape to that of the piglets. Differences in composition are likely to be of consequence only if the proportion of fat within the FFM and the FFM density are widely divergent. This, however, does not appear to be the case.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Z. Mei, L. M Grummer-Strawn, A. Pietrobelli, A. Goulding, M. I Goran, and W. H Dietz
Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2002; 75(6): 978 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. I. Goran
Measurement Issues Related to Studies of Childhood Obesity: Assessment of Body Composition, Body Fat Distribution, Physical Activity, and Food Intake
Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101(3): 505 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online