AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 254: R655-R658, 1988;
0363-6119/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schramm, L. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schramm, L. P.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 254, Issue 4 655-R658, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Spinally mediated inhibition of abdominal and lumbar sympathetic activities

R. F. Taylor and L. P. Schramm
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Renal, splenic, and lumbar sympathetic nerve activities were recorded in the paralyzed, anesthetized, artificially ventilated, and spinally transected rat. Electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral funiculus caudal to the spinal transection was used to generate stimulus-response curves for changes in sympathetic activity in each of the three sympathetic nerves using five stimulus frequencies. In all rats, spinal stimulation inhibited sympathetic activity in renal and splenogastric nerves by approximately 50%. In grouped data, threshold frequency for inhibition of renal and splenogastric sympathetic nerve activity was 5 Hz, and inhibitions were maximal (50-60%) at 10 Hz. In contrast, activity in the lumbar sympathetic chain was inhibited in only two of five rats, and grouped data did not exhibit any statistically significant inhibitions. We conclude that lumbar sympathetic activity which remains after spinal transection can be inhibited only marginally by spinal stimulation, which substantially reduces renal and splenogastric sympathetic activity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. Pan, M. R. Zahner, E. Kulikowicz, and L. P. Schramm
Effects of corticospinal tract stimulation on renal sympathetic nerve activity in rats with intact and chronically lesioned spinal cords
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R178 - R184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
Y. Yanagiya, T. Sato, T. Kawada, M. Inagaki, T. Tatewaki, C. Zheng, A. Kamiya, H. Takaki, M. Sugimachi, and K. Sunagawa
Bionic epidural stimulation restores arterial pressure regulation during orthostasis
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 984 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online