AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 255: R693-R698, 1988;
0363-6119/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasser, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hasser, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, V. S.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 255, Issue 5 693-R698, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Neurogenic and humoral factors maintaining arterial pressure in conscious dogs

E. M. Hasser and V. S. Bishop
Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7764.

This study examined the contribution of each primary pressor system to resting arterial pressure and the ability of each to maintain pressure in the absence of the other systems in conscious dogs. In dogs with intact carotid sinus baroreflexes, ganglionic blockade (GB) reduced blood pressure by 13 +/- 3 mmHg, whereas blockade of the renin-angiotensin (RAS) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) systems did not significantly alter arterial pressure. After removal of the other two systems, the depressor response to blockade of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) with hexamethonium and atropine was significantly augmented (-33 +/- 3 mmHg), whereas captopril (CAP) blockade of the RAS reduced pressure 14 +/- 4 mmHg, and AVP blockade decreased pressure 12 +/- 2 mmHg. In sinoaortic-denervated (SAD) dogs, the SNS exhibited a greater contribution (28 +/- 4 mmHg) to resting pressure compared with intact, and the role of the RAS (10 +/- 2 mmHg) was also augmented, whereas the effects of AVP blockade were unaltered. Effects of GB and CAP were unaltered after blockade of the other systems in SAD animals, whereas the depressor response to AVP antagonist (-13 +/- 2 mmHg) was significantly augmented. Results indicate the SNS is the primary pressor system in resting intact or SAD conscious dogs, whereas the RAS also contributes to resting blood pressure in SAD animals. The ability of the SNS alone to maintain arterial pressure after acute removal of the other systems is also significantly greater than that of AVP or the RAS.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online