AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 258: R10-R20, 1990;
0363-6119/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Foreman, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Foreman, R. D.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 258, Issue 1 10-R20, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Urinary bladder and hindlimb stimuli inhibit T1-T6 spinal and spinoreticular cells

S. F. Hobbs, U. T. Oh, T. J. Brennan, M. J. Chandler, K. S. Kim and R. D. Foreman
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Oklahoma, Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.

Upper thoracic spinal neurons are primarily excited by cardiopulmonary spinal afferent input but are excited and inhibited by splanchnic afferent input. These data suggest that the greater the number of segments between a spinal neuron and spinal afferent input the greater the probability that the afferent input will inhibit the spinal neuron. Based on this idea we hypothesized that visceral (urinary bladder) and somatic (hindlimb) afferent input would inhibit upper thoracic spinal neurons. To test this hypothesis the activities of 69 spinal and 27 spinoreticular tract neurons in 45 alpha-chloralose-anesthetized cats were studied. Only neurons excited by both visceral and somatic thoracic afferent input were studied. Urinary bladder distension (UBD) inhibited 48 (50%), excited 6 (6%), and did not affect 41 (43%) of these neurons. Also, UBD inhibited the excitatory responses of these cells to noxious visceral and somatic stimuli. Hindlimb pinch also inhibited greater than 50% of the neurons. These data indicate that visceral and somatic afferent input to the lumbosacral spinal cord inhibits the activity of upper thoracic neurons. This inhibitory effect may play a role in localization of sensory and motor responses to noxious stimuli.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online