AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 258, Issue 2 298-R308, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Body size, medullary thickness, and urine concentrating ability in mammals

C. A. Beuchat
Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.

B. H. Blake (Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Comp. Physiol. 58: 413-419, 1977.) and W. A. Calder and E. J. Braun (Am. J. Physiol. 244 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 13): R601-R606, 1983.) have predicted that urine concentrating ability of mammals should decline with increasing body mass (M, in kg) as M-0.08. Edwards (29), on the other hand, speculated that concentrating ability should be independent of body mass. Using information compiled from the literature for 245 species of mammals, I examined the scaling of urine concentrating ability with body mass. Maximum urine concentration (Uosm, in mosmol/kgH2O) declined exponentially with body mass as Uosm = 2,564 M-0.097, and generally only the smallest species (less than 400 g) could produce urine with an osmolality greater than 4,000 mosmol/kgH2O. Medullary thickness (MT, in mm) and, therefore, the length of the loop of Henle, increased with body mass as MT = 8.147 M0.129. The thickness of the medulla relative to the size of the kidney (RMT), however, declined with body size (RMT = 5.408 M-0.108). The relative thickness of the medulla accounted for only 59% of the variability among species in concentrating ability, indicating that there are other morphological or physiological factors that significantly influence urine concentrating ability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Hartman Bakken, L. G. Herrera M., R. M. Carroll, J. Ayala-Berdon, J. E. Schondube, and C. Martinez del Rio A nectar-feeding mammal avoids body fluid disturbances by varying renal function Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1855 - F1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Pannabecker, W. H. Dantzler, H. E. Layton, and A. T. Layton Role of three-dimensional architecture in the urine concentrating mechanism of the rat renal inner medulla Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1271 - F1285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Dickinson, K. Moritz, E. M. Wintour, D. W. Walker, and M. M. Kett A comparative study of renal function in the desert-adapted spiny mouse and the laboratory-adapted C57BL/6 mouse: response to dietary salt load Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1093 - F1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Dickinson, D. W. Walker, L. Cullen-McEwen, E. M. Wintour, and K. Moritz The spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus) completes nephrogenesis before birth Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): F273 - F279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Layton, J. M. Davies, G. Casotti, and E. J. Braun Mathematical model of an avian urine concentrating mechanism Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): F1139 - F1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Thomas Inner medullary lactate production and accumulation: a vasa recta model Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): F468 - F481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]