AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 260: R192-R199, 1991;
0363-6119/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, I.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 260, Issue 1 192-R199, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Chemoreception for an insoluble nonvolatile substance: starch taste?

I. Ramirez
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-3308.

Substances that are insoluble in both water and lipids, such as starch, are commonly assumed to be tasteless. Starch was suspended in water with a viscous gum. Rats given a choice of fluid containing starch and the same fluid without starch consistently preferred fluids containing starch. Rats were able to detect as little as 0.5% starch from several species of plants (corn, rice, wheat, and potato). In contrast, rats ignored comparable concentrations of cellulose suspended in water. Rats were also capable of choosing the fluid containing higher levels of starch when given a choice of 1 vs. 2% starch or 0.5 vs. 1% starch. This ability to detect starch did not appear to be mediated by salivary alpha-amylase because 1) raw starch is highly resistant to hydrolysis by salivary amylase, 2) starch preference was not correlated with the susceptibility of the starch to hydrolysis by salivary amylase, and 3) starch preference was not blocked by partial or extensive desalivation. Attempts to extract impurities with either organic solvents or water did not provide any evidence that such impurities contribute to starch preference. These experiments point to a seemingly novel form of chemoreception that could be useful to animals that need to identify starch-rich foods.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Sclafani, S. Zukerman, J. I. Glendinning, and R. F. Margolskee
Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of {alpha}-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1504 - R1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
B. I. MacKinnon, M. E. Frank, T. P. Hettinger, and B. G. Rehnberg
Taste Qualities of Solutions Preferred by Hamsters
Chem Senses, February 1, 1999; 24(1): 23 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online