AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 260: R546-R552, 1991;
0363-6119/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Billington, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Billington, C. J.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 260, Issue 3 546-R552, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Food deprivation-induced vs. drug-induced feeding: a behavioral evaluation

A. S. Levine, M. A. Kuskowski, M. Grace and C. J. Billington
Department of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis 55417.

Several neuroactive substances including neuropeptide Y (NPY), muscimol, and norepinephrine (NE) stimulate feeding in satiated rats. In the present study, we observed the behavioral patterns of rats stimulated to eat by food deprivation or by intracerebroventricular (icv) injection of orexigenic agents to explore the hypothesis that such agents produce a behavioral state resembling hunger. Animals that were food deprived for 24 h spent the majority of their time eating (35%), drinking (5%), resting (44%), and moving (13%) when food was available. If food was removed and substituted with a chewable substrate (plastic tube), they chewed on tubes for a brief period (5%) but spent most of their time moving (14%) or resting (77%). In the absence of food or tubes, they briefly moved about the cage (4%) and spent almost all of their time resting (94%). The patterns observed with the orexigenic drugs were different, particularly in the absence of food. NPY-injected rats were more active than deprived rats, spending 22% of their time moving in the presence of food, 47% in the presence of tubes, and 37% in the absence of food or tubes. Rats injected with muscimol demonstrated a marked increase in the time spent chewing and eating. These rats spent 67% of their time eating in the presence of food and chewed 25% of the time in the absence of either food or tubes. NE-injected rats also chewed when tubes were present (17%) or when no food or tubes were present (10%). Lag sequential analysis further documented differences in behavioral patterns amongst the various treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online