AJP - Regu Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 262: R289-R294, 1992;
0363-6119/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartle, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartle, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, A. S.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 262, Issue 2 289-R294, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Area postrema stimulation induces differential renal hemodynamics with two anesthetics

D. K. Hartle and A. S. Soliman
Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

The effect of area postrema stimulation (APS) on blood pressure, renal blood flow (RBF), and renal vascular resistance was compared in urethan-anesthetized and pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased in a frequency-dependent manner during APS in both urethan- and pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Although no significant differences occurred in the maximum percent change in MAP between groups, marked differences occurred in RBF and calculated renal vascular resistance (RVR) changes. In urethan-anesthetized rats, RBF and MAP increased during APS, but RVR did not change. In contrast, APS significantly decreased RBF (-26.5 +/- 1.9%) while increasing RVR (+99.4 +/- 11.4%) in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. The increase in RVR in the pentobarbital-anesthetized group during APS was eliminated by prior ganglionic blockade. It was concluded that the anesthetic agent employed can significantly alter the degree to which APS can activate renal vasomotion in the rat.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online