AJP - Regu AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 263: R206-R214, 1992;
0363-6119/92 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verotta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiner, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verotta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiner, L. B.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 263, Issue 1 206-R214, Copyright © 1992 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparing responses when each response is a curve

D. Verotta and L. B. Sheiner
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143.

We describe, generalize, and demonstrate the application of a method (W. H. Lawton, A. Sylvestre, and M. S. Maggio, Technometrics 14: 513-532, 1972) that can be used to partially analyze population data. The data from each subject consist of a series of responses observed at distinct values of a predictor variable. The method assumes that all subjects' data originate from a common process but differ because the "units" of predictor and response variables differ among subjects. For example, if the predictor variable is time, time can be "faster" or "slower" from subject to subject. We deal with two different problems. In the first one the response at x for the ith subject is of the form beta 1i + beta 2iG[(x - beta 3i)/beta 4i] + epsilon, where G(x) is a mathematical "shape" function (of the predictor variable x) representing the process and epsilon is observation error. The units of observed and predictor variable are then defined by the values of beta 1i, beta 2i and beta 3i, beta 4i, respectively. In particular beta 1i and beta 3i express shifts and beta 2i, beta 4i express scales of the observed and predictor variables, respectively. In the second problem the response at x for the ith subject is of the form beta 1i + beta 2i integral of x0 G[(s - beta 3i)/beta 4i].Hi(x - s) ds + epsilon, where Hi(x) is a known function. In both problems, the method estimates the common "shape" function G(x) nonparametrically and the parameters beta 1i, beta 2i, beta 3i, and beta 4i for each subject.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online