AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 267: R387-R399, 1994;
0363-6119/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gebber, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Orer, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gebber, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Orer, H. S.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 267, Issue 2 387-R399, Copyright © 1994 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Differential relationships among the 10-Hz rhythmic discharges of sympathetic nerves with different targets

G. L. Gebber, S. Zhong, S. M. Barman, Y. Paitel and H. S. Orer
Department of Pharmacology/Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1317.

Partial coherence analysis was used to remove the influences of the central circuits controlling a sympathetic nerve (as reflected by its discharges) on the coherence of the 10-Hz discharges of other sympathetic nerves in unanesthetized decerebrate or urethan-anesthetized cats. In many cases, partialization reduced but did not eliminate the sharp peak near 10 Hz in the coherence functions relating the discharges of sympathetic nerve pairs. This observation implies that the central sources of the 10-Hz rhythmic discharges of any nerve are not identical to those responsible for the rhythm recorded from any other nerve. Partial coherence analysis also revealed differential relationships among the 10-Hz rhythmic discharges of sympathetic nerves with different targets. Importantly, the pattern of differential relationships observed in one experiment could be the reverse of that in the next. Although the basis for the differential relationships is not yet clear, nonuniform coupling of multiple brain stem 10-Hz oscillators and/or nonuniform cross talk between spinal circuits controlling different sympathetic nerves may be involved.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online