AJP - Regu AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 268: R423-R427, 1995;
0363-6119/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seeley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seeley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Woods, S. C.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 268, Issue 2 423-R427, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Neuropeptide Y fails to increase intraoral intake in rats

R. J. Seeley, C. J. Payne and S. C. Woods
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has a potent orexigenic effect when administered either into the third ventricle or directly into hypothalamic nuclei, but the mechanism by which NPY increases intakes is poorly understood. The present study tested the ability of NPY to increase intake of the rat in the intraoral intake test, which focuses on the highly stereotyped consummatory phase of ingestion by introducing a 0.1 M sucrose solution directly into the oral cavity of rats via indwelling intraoral cannulas. Doses of 3, 9.5, and 30 micrograms of NPY, when administered into the third ventricle, all failed to change intraoral intake compared with a saline control. Food deprivation (24 h), however, nearly doubled intraoral intake. Additionally, in separate experiments, 9.5 micrograms of NPY significantly increased both 1-h food intake and 1-h bottle intake of 0.1 M sucrose. These results are consistent with two conclusions. 1) NPY does not affect the consummatory phase of ingestion. 2) NPY administration does not completely mimic the stimulus state associated with food deprivation, since food deprivation but not NPY administration increases intake in the intraoral intake test.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online