AJP - Regu AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 268: R796-R807, 1995;
0363-6119/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ledderhos, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ledderhos, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, A. W., Jr

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 268, Issue 3 796-R807, Copyright © 1995 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

In vivo diuretic actions of renal vasopressin V1 receptor stimulation in rats

C. Ledderhos, D. L. Mattson, M. M. Skelton and A. W. Cowley Jr
Institute of Physiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.

The specific vasopressin V1 receptor agonist (V1AG; [Phe2,Ile3,Orn8]vasopressin) was infused (2.0 ng.kg-1.min-1) into the renal medullary interstitial space to determine the effects of selective medullary V1 receptor stimulation on sodium and water excretion in normal rats. Responses were compared with those of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and vasopressin V2 receptor stimulation resulting from infusion of a V1 receptor antagonist with AVP. Medullary infusion of V1AG or AVP in euvolemic rats produced no changes in hemodynamics or glomerular filtration rate. V1AG increased urine flow > 60% in euvolemic rats, whereas no change was observed with AVP. This response could not be explained by a rise of arterial pressure or by volume retention. With V2 stimulation in euvolemic rats, urine flow was decreased. In water diuretic rats, V1AG produced no change, whereas AVP infusion decreased urine flow. The results provide in vivo evidence that tubular V1 vasopressin receptor activity results in increased urine flow and thereby modulates the antidiuretic actions of vasopressin in the euvolemic state.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online