AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 270: R1099-R1108, 1996;
0363-6119/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. J.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 270, Issue 5 1099-R1108, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Interaction of type I and type II corticosteroid receptor stimulation on carcass energy and carcass water

B. D. White, G. L. Edwards and R. J. Martin
Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.

The effects of chronic type I and type II corticosteroid receptor stimulation were examined in adrenalectomized Sprague-Dawley rats to quantify the relative contribution of body energy and body water changes to changes in body weight. Adrenalectomy caused a decrease in both body energy and water. Aldosterone (type I agonist) treatment increased body weight gain and returned energy accretion to the level of sham-operated animals. However, most of the change in body weight (72%) was attributable to a change in body water. The aldosterone-induced increase in body weight gain and carcass water were attenuated by RU-28362 (type II receptor agonist) infusion, suggesting that type II receptor stimulation can antagonize the effect of type I receptor stimulation. Changes in carcass water were paralleled by changes in soluble carcass sodium. Despite alterations in soluble body sodium, no measurable differences in cumulative sodium retention were found. These findings confirm previous studies suggesting an effect of type I receptor stimulation on energy accretion. However, they also caution that changes in body weight cannot be equated with changes in body energy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online