AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R289-R293, 1997;
0363-6119/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, I.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 272, Issue 1 289-R293, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Stimulation of fluid intake by nutrients: oil is less effective than carbohydrate

I. Ramirez
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-3308, USA.

It has been thought that the ability of nutrients to reinforce ingestion is related to their ability to provide metabolizable energy. This implies that the reinforcing effect of carbohydrate should be similar to that of fat. To test this concept, rats were trained in an apparatus that infused water or nutritive solutions/suspensions into their stomachs every time they drank a sapid solution. Each training trial lasted for 1 day. Successive training trials were interspersed by 1-day periods in which the rats were infused with plain water and offered plain water or a tastant different from the training taste (i.e., taste paired with vehicle infusion). Three different sapid solutions were used: a sweet solution (saccharin), a nonsweet solution (NaCl), and a mixture of sweet and nonsweet. Starch or maltodextrin infusions strongly and consistently stimulated intake of these solutions. Oil infusions also significantly stimulated intake, but feebly and less consistently. Indeed, in the one experiment in which the only sapid fluid offered was saccharin, oil infusions had no significant effect. Two different oil suspensions (one fine and one coarse) were equally ineffective in stimulating saccharin intake. To determine whether some unsuspected flaw in the infusion experiments somehow produced invalid results, an additional experiment was conducted in which rats ingested starch or oil suspensions by mouth. Consistent with the infusion experiments, starch stimulated ingestion to a much greater degree than did oil. It is concluded that intragastric infusion of triglyceride oil is a less potent reinforcer of ingestion than is equicaloric infusion of carbohydrate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Sclafani and J. I. Glendinning
Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): R712 - R720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
F. Lucas, K. Ackroff, and A. Sclafani
High-fat diet preference and overeating mediated by postingestive factors in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): R1511 - R1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online