|
|
||||||||
AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 272, Issue 4 1210-R1218, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society
ARTICLES |
A. C. Spector, S. Markison, S. J. St John and M. Garcea
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.
Although rats treat the taste of sucrose and maltose as perceptually similar, they nonetheless appear to be able to distinguish between the two sugars, as suggested from prior work examining the cross-generalization of conditioned taste aversions. This study explictly tested whether rats could behaviorally discriminate sucrose from maltose and examined the relative importance of the gustatory input of the seventh and ninth cranial nerves in maintaining such performance. Water-restricted rats were presurgically trained in a conditioned avoidance task to suppress licking to sucrose or maltose and to maintain licking to the other sugar. Concentration (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 M) was varied to make intensity an irrelevant cue. Stimuli were randomly presented in 5-s trials during 50-min sessions. Bilateral transection of the chorda tympani nerve (CT) or the glossopharyngeal nerve or sham surgery did not disrupt discrimination performance. In contrast, combined transection of the CT and greater superficial petrosal nerve, which collectively removes the taste input of the seventh cranial nerve, caused severe impairments in sugar discriminability. In these rats, performance was more disturbed at the lower concentrations. These findings confirm that rats can discriminate sucrose from maltose and that this capability relies heavily on the taste input of the seventh cranial nerve. Although the input of the ninth cranial nerve is unnecessary, it may help sustain partial competence in this task, especially at high concentrations, in the combined absence of the CT and greater superficial petrosal nerve.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. C. Geran and S. P. Travers Single Neurons in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Respond Selectively to Bitter Taste Stimuli J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2513 - 2527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Lemon and D. V. Smith Influence of response variability on the coding performance of central gustatory neurons. J. Neurosci., July 12, 2006; 26(28): 7433 - 7443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Geran, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector Nerve regeneration-induced recovery of quinine avoidance after complete gustatory deafferentation of the tongue Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): R1235 - R1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Lemon, S. M. Brasser, and D. V. Smith Alcohol Activates a Sucrose-Responsive Gustatory Neural Pathway J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 536 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Lemon, T. Imoto, and D. V. Smith Differential Gurmarin Suppression of Sweet Taste Responses in Rat Solitary Nucleus Neurons J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 911 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Gilbertson, J. D. Boughter Jr, H. Zhang, and D. V. Smith Distribution of Gustatory Sensitivities in Rat Taste Cells: Whole-Cell Responses to Apical Chemical Stimulation J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4931 - 4941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |