AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R1346-R1351, 1997;
0363-6119/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sapolsky, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sapolsky, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, E. M.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 273, Issue 4 1346-R1351, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Insulin-like growth factor I is suppressed in socially subordinate male baboons

R. M. Sapolsky and E. M. Spencer
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I is a potent growth-promoting and anabolic hormone with major roles in cellular growth and differentiation, protein metabolism and muscle physiology, wound healing, erythropoiesis, and immune stimulation. Few, if any, studies have examined social or psychological factors that could give rise to individual differences in IGF-I levels. As part of a long-term psychoendocrine study of a population of male baboons living freely in a national reserve in East Africa, we examined the relationship between social rank and IGF-I concentrations. We observed that social subordinance was associated with a relative suppression of IGF-I concentrations; no rank-related differences in concentrations of IGF-II or IGF-binding protein were observed. Extensive psychoendocrine literature suggests that the individual differences in IGF-I profiles were a consequence, rather than a cause, of the rank difference. We were able to rule out a number of possible proximal explanations for the rank-IGF-I correlation: 1) the correlation was not a function of age (which involves both an adolescent spurt in IGF-I concentrations as well as a decline in concentrations in aged individuals); 2) the IGF-I suppression in subordinate individuals could not be explained by the basal hypercortisolism typical of such subordinate animals; and 3) neither differences in the quality or quantity of food consumed, in basal testosterone concentrations, nor in genetics could explain the rank difference. Although the mediating mechanisms responsible for this rank difference were not discernible in this study, the magnitude of difference in IGF-I levels among baboons of differing ranks might be of physiological significance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online