AJP - Regu AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R339-R342, 1998;
0363-6119/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heller, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, K.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heller, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, K.-D.
Vol. 275, Issue 1, R339-R342, July 1998

SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
Single-breath CO diffusing capacity influenced by initial alveolar partial pressure of CO

Hartmut Heller and Klaus-Dieter Schuster

Department of Physiology, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of incorrect determinations of the initial alveolar partial pressure of carbon monoxide (CO) at the beginning of breath holding (PIACO) on the pulmonary CO diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO). Single-breath maneuvers were performed on 14 anesthetized and artificially ventilated rabbits, using 0.2% CO in nitrogen as the indicator gas mixture. Inflation and deflation procedures were carried out in an identical manner on each animal, with inflation always starting from residual volume. End-tidal partial pressure of CO was determined by respiratory mass spectrometry and was used to calculate DLCO values with the application of the three-equation (method 1), as well as the conventional (method 2), solution. In each rabbit, method 2 caused DLCO values to be overestimated when compared with method 1, and this overestimation decreased with increasing time intervals of CO uptake. Because we were able to recalculate this deviation using PIACO values that were obtained by taking the diffusive removal of CO during inflation into account, we concluded that errors in estimating PIACO by applying method 2 significantly contribute to the discrepancy between both methods.

conventional solution of breath holding equation; rabbit; three-equation methodology; breath holding; pulmonary CO diffusing capacity of the lung





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online