AJP - Regu AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278: R44-R49, 2000;
0363-6119/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weller, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weller, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. P.
Vol. 278, Issue 1, R44-R49, January 2000

Ontogeny of hypertonic preabsorptive inhibitory control of intake in neonatal rats

Aron Weller1, Ludmila Tsitolovskya1, Iris H. Gispan1, and Gerard P. Smith2

1 Developmental Psychobiology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel; and 2 Department of Psychiatry, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University and E. W. Bourne Research Laboratory, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Westchester Division, White Plains, New York 10605

The ontogenetic development of postingestive inhibitory control of ingestion by the osmotic load of a preload was examined in rats. On postnatal days 6 (P6) and 12 (P12), pups were deprived for either 6 or 24 h. Gastric preloads (5% body wt) of water, mannitol (a sugar alcohol that is not absorbed) in six concentrations [from 0.125 M (hypotonic) to 1.0 M (hypertonic)], or sham preloads were administered 5 min before a 30-min intake test. Compared with sham treatment, isotonic mannitol (0.25 M), a probe of volumetric control, significantly reduced intake on P12, but not on P6. Compared with isotonic mannitol, the three highest hypertonic concentrations (0.5, 0.66, and 1.0 M) significantly decreased intake on P12, at both levels of deprivation. On P6, 0.66 and 1.0 M mannitol reduced intake after 24 h, but not after 6 h, of deprivation. Thus, on P6, the hypertonic control was detectable only after prolonged deprivation and the volumetric control was not present. On P12, both controls were observed and the hypertonic control was more potent than on P6.

mannitol; osmotic load; satiety; independent ingestion





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online