Vol. 281, Issue 6, R1764-R1768, December 2001
Cold strain index applied to exercising men in cold-wet
conditions
John W.
Castellani,
Andrew J.
Young,
Catherine
O'Brien,
Dean A.
Stulz,
Michael N.
Sawka, and
Kent B.
Pandolf
United States Army Research Institute of Environmental
Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5007
A cold strain index (CSI) based on rectal (Tre) and
mean skin temperatures (
sk) using data from seminude
resting subjects has been proposed (Moran DS, Castellani JW, O'Brien
C, Young AJ, and Pandolf KB. Am J Physiol Regulatory
Integrative Comp Physiol 277: R556-R564, 1999). The current
study determined whether CSI could provide meaningful data for clothed
subjects exercising in the cold with compromised insulation. Ten men
exercised in cold-wet conditions (CW) for 6 h before (D0) and
after 3 days of exhaustive exercise (D3). Each hour of CW consisted of
10 min of standing in rain (5.4 cm/h, 5°C air) followed by 45 min of walking (1.34 m/s, 5.4 m/s wind, 5°C air). The change in
Tre across time was greater (P < 0.05) on
D3 than on D0, and the change in
sk was less
(P < 0.05) on D3 than on D0. Although CSI increased across time, the index at the end of both trials (D3 = 4.6 ± 0.6; D0 = 4.2 ± 0.8) was similar (P > 0.05). Thus, while
sk was 1.3°C higher
(P < 0.05) and Tre was 0.3°C lower
(P < 0.05) on D3 than on D0, CSI did not discriminate
the greater heat loss that occurred on D3. These findings indicate that
when vasoconstrictor responses to cold are altered, such as after
exhaustive exercise, CSI does not adequately quantify the different
physiological strain between treatments. CSI may be useful for
indicating increased strain across time, but its utility as a marker of
strain between different treatments or studies is uncertain because no
independent measure of strain has been used to determine to what extent
CSI is a valid and reliable measure of strain.
core temperature; hypothermia; rating of perceived exertion; skin
temperature; thermal sensation; thermoregulation