AJP - Regu Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R1764-R1768, 2001;
0363-6119/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castellani, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pandolf, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castellani, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pandolf, K. B.
Vol. 281, Issue 6, R1764-R1768, December 2001

Cold strain index applied to exercising men in cold-wet conditions

John W. Castellani, Andrew J. Young, Catherine O'Brien, Dean A. Stulz, Michael N. Sawka, and Kent B. Pandolf

United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5007

A cold strain index (CSI) based on rectal (Tre) and mean skin temperatures (<A><AC>T</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>sk) using data from seminude resting subjects has been proposed (Moran DS, Castellani JW, O'Brien C, Young AJ, and Pandolf KB. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 277: R556-R564, 1999). The current study determined whether CSI could provide meaningful data for clothed subjects exercising in the cold with compromised insulation. Ten men exercised in cold-wet conditions (CW) for 6 h before (D0) and after 3 days of exhaustive exercise (D3). Each hour of CW consisted of 10 min of standing in rain (5.4 cm/h, 5°C air) followed by 45 min of walking (1.34 m/s, 5.4 m/s wind, 5°C air). The change in Tre across time was greater (P < 0.05) on D3 than on D0, and the change in <A><AC>T</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>sk was less (P < 0.05) on D3 than on D0. Although CSI increased across time, the index at the end of both trials (D3 = 4.6 ± 0.6; D0 = 4.2 ± 0.8) was similar (P > 0.05). Thus, while <A><AC>T</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>sk was 1.3°C higher (P < 0.05) and Tre was 0.3°C lower (P < 0.05) on D3 than on D0, CSI did not discriminate the greater heat loss that occurred on D3. These findings indicate that when vasoconstrictor responses to cold are altered, such as after exhaustive exercise, CSI does not adequately quantify the different physiological strain between treatments. CSI may be useful for indicating increased strain across time, but its utility as a marker of strain between different treatments or studies is uncertain because no independent measure of strain has been used to determine to what extent CSI is a valid and reliable measure of strain.

core temperature; hypothermia; rating of perceived exertion; skin temperature; thermal sensation; thermoregulation


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. RODAHL
Occupational Health Conditions in Extreme Environments
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2003; 47(3): 241 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online