HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 288/5/R1339    most recent 00038.2004v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hunt, B. E. Articles by Farquhar, W. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hunt, B. E. Articles by Farquhar, W. B.

NEUROHUMORAL CONTROL OF CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION

Nonlinearities and asymmetries of the human cardiovagal baroreflex

¹Research and Training Institute, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston; ²Department of Exercise Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts; and ³Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

Submitted 20 January 2004 ; accepted in final form 24 December 2004

To determine whether an approach such as the modified Oxford technique can consistently produce data that reveal the nonlinear nature of the cardiovagal baroreflex and to ascertain whether the model parameters provide unique insight into baroreflex function, we retrospectively examined 91 baroreflex trials (38 subjects, 27 men and 11 women, ages 22–72 yr). The modified Oxford technique (bolus sodium nitroprusside followed by bolus phenylephrine) was used to perturb blood pressure, and the resulting systolic blood pressure-R-R interval responses were plotted and modeled using a linear, a four-parameter symmetric, and a five-parameter asymmetric model. Several issues, such as the effect of data averaging, various approaches to gain estimation, and the predictive value of model parameters, were examined during reflex modeling. Sigmoid models accounted for a greater amount of the variance than did the linear model: linear r² = 0.81 ± 0.01, four-parameter r² = 0.90 ± 0.08, and five-parameter r² = 0.90 ± 0.08 (P < 0.05, linear vs. sigmoid models). Data averaging did not affect model fits. Although the four gain estimates (linear remodel, 1st derivative, peak, and set point) were statistically related, the set point gain was significantly lower than other estimates (P < 0.05). Subgroup comparisons between young and older healthy subjects revealed differences in all indexes of cardiovagal baroreflex gain, as well as R-R interval operating range and curvature parameters. In conclusion, the modified Oxford technique consistently reveals the nonlinear nature of the human cardiovagal baroreflex. Moreover, of the parameters produced by the symmetric sigmoid model, only the response range provides unique information beyond that of reflex gain.

sigmoid; mathematical modeling; autonomic nervous system; modified Oxford

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Studinger, R. Goldstein, and J. A. Taylor Mechanical and neural contributions to hysteresis in the cardiac vagal limb of the arterial baroreflex J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 1041 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]