AJP - Regu Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R1083-R1089, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00112.2005
0363-6119/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, J. M.

SLEEP AND TEMPERATURE REGULATION

State-dependent effects of light-dark cycle on somatosensory and visual cortex EEG in rats

Tadanobu Yasuda, Kyo Yasuda, Richard A. Brown, and James M. Krueger

Department of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Physiology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington

Submitted 15 February 2005 ; accepted in final form 8 June 2005

Somatosensory (SSctx) and visual cortex (Vctx) EEG were evaluated in rats under a 12:12-h light-dark (LD) cycle and under constant light (LL) or constant dark (DD) in each sleep or wake state. Under LD conditions during light period, relative Vctx EEG slow-wave activity (SWA) was higher than that of the SSctx, whereas during dark period, relative Vctx EEG SWA was lower than in the SSctx. These effects were state specific, occurring only during non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS). Under LL conditions, the duration of REMS and NREMS during the period that would have been dark if the LD cycle had continued (subjective dark period) was greater than under LD conditions. DD conditions had little effect on the duration of NREMS and REMS. SSctx and Vctx EEG SWA were suppressed by LL during the subjective dark period; however, the degree of Vctx SWA suppression was smaller than that of the SSctx. DD conditions during the subjective light period enhanced SSctx SWA, whereas Vctx SWA was suppressed. Under LL conditions during the subjective dark period, Vctx EEG power was higher than that of the SSctx across a broad frequency range during NREMS, REMS, and wakefulness. During DD, SSctx EEG power during NREMS was higher than that of the Vctx in the delta wave band, whereas SSctx power during REMS and wakefulness was higher than that of the Vctx in frequencies higher than 8 Hz. We concluded that the SSctx and Vctx EEGs are differentially affected by light during subsequent sleep. Results provide support for the notion that regional sleep intensity is dependent on prior regional afferent input.

slow-wave activity; electroencephalogram power; fast Fourier transform analyses; primary cortex



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. M. Krueger, Dept. of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Pharmacology and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State Univ., PO Box 646520, Pullman, WA 99164-6520 (e-mail: krueger{at}vetmed.wsu.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.