HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 291/2/R245    most recent 00920.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sherman, J. J. Articles by LeResche, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sherman, J. J. Articles by LeResche, L.

INVITED REVIEW

CALL FOR PAPERS
Sex and Gender Differences in Pain and Inflammation

Does experimental pain response vary across the menstrual cycle? A methodological review

Department of Oral Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

The findings on sex differences in human experimental pain research are inconsistent. One possible factor contributing to the inconsistent findings is the female hormonal cycle, as hormone levels may affect pain sensitivity. A number of studies suggest that women's responses to experimentally evoked pain vary across the menstrual cycle. However, at least an equal number of studies suggest a lack of variability. The purpose of this article is to review the literature with emphasis on what we believe could be the reasons for the inconsistent findings, namely, differences in populations sampled, timing of experimental sessions across the menstrual cycle, and nomenclature used to identify the time (phases) in the cycle when measurements were done, nature of the pain stimuli chosen, and outcomes measured. These inconsistencies and other methodological problems associated with most experimental pain studies make it difficult to draw inferences from this literature. For the science to improve, replication of significant findings using standardized timing of sessions, pain stimulus procedures, outcomes, and hormonal assessment is necessary.

laboratory pain; acute pain; estrogen

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Heitkemper and M. E. Jarrett Update on Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Gender Differences Nutr Clin Pract, June 1, 2008; 23(3): 275 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Stening, O. Eriksson, L. Wahren, G. Berg, M. Hammar, and A. Blomqvist Pain sensations to the cold pressor test in normally menstruating women: comparison with men and relation to menstrual phase and serum sex steroid levels Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1711 - R1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Berkley, S. S. Zalcman, and V. R. Simon Sex and gender differences in pain and inflammation: a rapidly maturing field Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): R241 - R244. [Full Text] [PDF]