AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 293: R379-R391, 2007. First published May 9, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00161.2007
0363-6119/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/1/R379    most recent
00161.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Milsom, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Milsom, W. K.

ENVIRONMENTAL, EXERCISE AND RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY

Control of breathing and adaptation to high altitude in the bar-headed goose

Graham R. Scott and William K. Milsom

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Submitted 5 March 2007 ; accepted in final form 8 May 2007

The bar-headed goose flies over the Himalayan mountains on its migratory route between South and Central Asia, reaching altitudes of up to 9,000 m. We compared control of breathing in this species with that of low-altitude waterfowl by exposing birds to step decreases in inspired O2 under both poikilocapnic and isocapnic conditions. Bar-headed geese breathed substantially more than both greylag geese and pekin ducks during severe environmental (poikilocapnic) hypoxia (5% inspired O2). This was entirely due to an enhanced tidal volume response to hypoxia, which would have further improved parabronchial (effective) ventilation. Consequently, O2 loading into the blood and arterial PO2 were substantially improved. Because air convection requirements were similar between species at 5% inspired O2, it was the enhanced tidal volume response (not total ventilation per se) that improved O2 loading in bar-headed geese. Other observations suggest that bar-headed geese depress metabolism less than low-altitude birds during hypoxia and also may be capable of generating higher inspiratory airflows. There were no differences between species in ventilatory sensitivities to isocapnic hypoxia, the hypoxia-induced changes in blood CO2 tensions or pH, or hypercapnic ventilatory sensitivities. Overall, our results suggest that evolutionary changes in the respiratory control system of bar-headed geese enhance O2 loading into the blood and may contribute to this species' exceptional ability to fly high.

hypoxic ventilatory response; birds; respiration; metabolism; carbon dioxide



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. R. Scott, Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (e-mail: scott{at}zoology.ubc.ca)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.