HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 293/2/R867    most recent 00081.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilbert, C. Articles by Ancel, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gilbert, C. Articles by Ancel, A.

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY PHYSIOLOGY

Role of huddling on the energetic of growth in a newborn altricial mammal

¹Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC)-Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie (DEPE), UMR 7178, Université Louis Pasteur (ULP), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Strasbourg; ²IPHC-DEPE, UMR 7178, ULP, CNRS, Faculté des Sciences et des Techniques de Nancy I, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy; ³Département d'Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, UMR 5176, CNRS et Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Brunoy, France

Submitted 5 February 2007 ; accepted in final form 19 April 2007

Huddling is considered as a social strategy to reduce thermal stress and promote growth in newborn altricial mammals. So far, the role of huddling on the allocation of saved energy has not been quantified nor have the related impacts on body temperature rhythms. To determine the energy partitioning of rabbit pups either raised alone or in groups of eight, four, or two individuals, when thermoregulatory inefficient (TI) and efficient (TE), we first investigated their total energy expenditure and body composition. We then monitored body temperature and activity rhythms to test whether huddling may impact these rhythms, centered on the suckling event. Pups in a group of eight utilized 40% less energy for thermogenesis when TI than did pups alone and 32% less energy when TE. Pups in groups of eight and four had significantly lower thermoregulatory costs in the TI period, whereas pups in groups of two, four, and eight had lower costs during the TE period. Huddling pups could therefore channel the energy saved into processes of growth and accrued more fat mass (on average 4.5 ± 1.4 g) than isolated pups, which lost 0.7 g of fat. Pups in groups of four and eight had a body temperature significantly higher by 0.8°C than pups in groups of two and one when TI, whereas no more differences were noted when the TE period was reached. Moreover, pups alone showed an endogenous circadian body temperature rhythm that differed when compared with that of huddling pups, with no rise before suckling. Thus huddling enables pups to invest the saved energy into growth and to regulate their body temperature to be more competitive during nursing, particularly at the early time when they are TI.

huddling behavior; energy expenditure; body temperature; rabbit pups

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Giroud, M. Perret, C. Gilbert, A. Zahariev, J. Goudable, Y. Le Maho, H. Oudart, I. Momken, F. Aujard, and S. Blanc Dietary palmitate and linoleate oxidations, oxidative stress, and DNA damage differ according to season in mouse lemurs exposed to a chronic food deprivation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2009; 297(4): R950 - R959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]