HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 296/2/R402    most recent 90772.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steinback, C. D. Articles by Shoemaker, J. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Steinback, C. D. Articles by Shoemaker, J. K.

ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY

Hypercapnic vs. hypoxic control of cardiovascular, cardiovagal, and sympathetic function

¹School of Kinesiology and ²Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 12 September 2008 ; accepted in final form 9 December 2008

We compared the integrated cardiovascular and autonomic responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia to test the hypothesis that these stimuli differentially affect muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) discharge patterns and cardiovagal and sympathetic baroreflex function in a manner related to ventilatory chemoreflex sensitivity. Six males and six females underwent 5 min of hypoxia (end-tidal PO₂ = 45 Torr) and 5 min of hypercapnia (end-tidal PCO₂ = +8 Torr from baseline), causing similar ventilatory responses. A downward right shift in cardiovagal set point was observed during both conditions, which was strongly related to the change in inspiratory time (Ti) from baseline to hypercapnia (r² = 0.67, P = 0.007) and hypoxia (r² = 0.79, P < 0.001). Cardiovagal baroreflex gain was decreased during hypoxia (20.1 ± 6.9 vs. 8.9 ± 5.1 ms/mmHg, P < 0.001) but not hypercapnia (26.7 ± 12.7 vs. 23.0 ± 9.1 ms/mmHg). Both hypoxia and hypercapnia increased MSNA burst amplitude, whereas hypoxia, but not hypercapnia, also increased in MSNA burst frequency (21 ± 9 vs. 28 ± 7 bursts/min, P = 0.03) and total MSNA (4.56 ± 3.07 vs. 7.37 ± 3.26 mV/min, P = 0.002). However, neither hypercapnia nor hypoxia affected sympathetic burst probability or baroreflex gain. Hypoxia also caused a greater reduction in total peripheral resistance (P = 0.04), a greater increase in heart rate (P = 0.002), and a trend for a greater cardiac output response (P = 0.06) compared with hypercapnia. Nonetheless, central venous pressure remained unchanged during either condition. These results suggest that hypercapnia and hypoxia exert differential effects on cardiovagal, but not sympathetic, baroreflex gain and set point in a manner not related to ventilatory chemoreflex sensitivity. Furthermore, the data suggest that the individual's respiratory pattern to hypoxia or hypercapnia, as reflected in the inspiratory time, was a strong determinant of cardiovagal baroreflex set- point rather than the total ventilatory chemoreflex gain per se.

respiration; autonomic nervous system; sympathetic nerve activity; baroreflex