AJP - Regu Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 297: R1066-R1074, 2009. First published August 5, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00241.2009
0363-6119/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/4/R1066    most recent
00241.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Milsom, W. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Milsom, W. K.

Articles

Control of respiration in flight muscle from the high-altitude bar-headed goose and low-altitude birds

Graham R. Scott, Jeffrey G. Richards, and William K. Milsom

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Submitted May 1, 2009 ; accepted in final form August 2, 2009

Bar-headed geese fly at altitudes of up to 9,000 m on their biannual migration over the Himalayas. To determine whether the flight muscle of this species has evolved to facilitate exercise at high altitude, we compared the respiratory properties of permeabilized muscle fibers from bar-headed geese and several low-altitude waterfowl species. Respiratory capacities were assessed for maximal ADP stimulation (with single or multiple inputs to the electron transport system) and cytochrome oxidase excess capacity (with an exogenous electron donor) and were generally 20–40% higher in bar-headed geese when creatine was present. When respiration rates were extrapolated to the entire pectoral muscle mass, bar-headed geese had a higher mass-specific aerobic capacity. This may represent a surplus capacity that counteracts the depressive effects of hypoxia on mitochondrial respiration. However, there were no differences in activity for mitochondrial or glycolytic enzymes measured in homogenized muscle. The [ADP] leading to half-maximal stimulation (Km) was approximately twofold higher in bar-headed geese (10 vs. 4–6 µM), and, while creatine reduced Km by 30% in this species, it had no effect on Km in low-altitude birds. Mitochondrial creatine kinase may therefore contribute to the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation in flight muscle of bar-headed geese, which could promote efficient coupling of ATP supply and demand. However, this was not based on differences in creatine kinase activity in isolated mitochondria or homogenized muscle. The unique differences in bar-headed geese existed without prior exercise or hypoxia exposure and were not a result of phylogenetic history, and may, therefore, be important evolutionary specializations for high-altitude flight.

high-altitude adaptation; hypoxia tolerance; mitochondrial metabolism; phylogenetically independent contrasts; physiological evolution



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. R. Scott, Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (e-mail: scott{at}zoology.ubc.ca).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.