AJP - Regu AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (June 3, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.90827.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/2/R382    most recent
90827.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darling, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darling, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, S.
Submitted on October 10, 2008
Revised on May 13, 2009
Accepted on May 29, 2009

2-Deoxy-D-glucose, but not mercaptoacetate, increases food intake in decerebrate rats

Rebecca A. Darling1 and Sue Ritter1*

1 Washington State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sjr{at}vetmed.wsu.edu.

We examined food intake in chronically maintained decerebrate rats in response to two antimetabolic drugs known to stimulate food intake, 2-mercaptoacetate (MA) and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG). MA reduces fatty acid oxidation and 2DG reduces glucose utilization. Because previous work has shown that insulin-induced hypoglycemia increases food intake in decerebrate rats, we predicted that 2DG would have this same effect. MA-induced feeding requires vagal sensory neurons that terminate in the hindbrain. Cholecystokinin-induced suppression of feeding, which likewise requires vagal sensory neurons, has been shown to suppress food intake in decerebrate rats. Therefore, we predicted that MA's effects on feeding would also persist in decerebrate rats. In our experiments, the test diet (40% milk, diluted with water) was infused intraorally through a chronic cheek fistula. We found that sham controls consumed 258% and 230% of their baseline milk intake in response to 2DG and MA, respectively. Decerebrates consumed 239% of their baseline milk intake in response to 2DG, but did not increase their intake in response to MA. Since decerebration separates the hindbrain from the forebrain, these results indicate that 2DG-induced glucoprivation is capable of acting within the hindbrain to activate fundamental reflex circuitry for consummatory feeding responses, as shown previously for hypoglycemia. In contrast, MA affects food consumption only after forebrain processing of MA-induced vagal afferent signals and in the presence of intact ascending and descending neural pathways.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.