AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 274: R1496-R1499, 1998;
0363-6119/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heller, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, K.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heller, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, K.-D.
Vol. 274, Issue 5, R1496-R1499, May 1998

SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
Theta values for C16O18O and C18O2 related to respective pulmonary diffusing capacities

Hartmut Heller and Klaus-Dieter Schuster

Department of Physiology, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The single-breath diffusing capacities for singly and doubly 18O-labeled CO2, DLC16O18O and DLC18O2, as well as for NO, were determined in seven anesthetized rabbits to investigate whether the theoretically predicted ratio of specific blood uptake rates of both isotopic CO2 species, theta C18O2/theta C16O18O = 2.0, can be derived from the measured values of DLC16O18O and DLC18O2. Data of DL were obtained by inflating the lungs with gas mixtures containing 0.35% C16O18O or 0.8% C18O2 or 0.05% NO in nitrogen, with breath-holding periods of 0.05-0.5 s and 2-12 s for the CO2 and NO tests, respectively. theta C18O2/theta C16O18O was calculated by applying the double-reciprocal Roughton-Forster equation to DL values obtained in each animal and by assuming that NO diffusing capacity represents the gas conductance of the alveolar-capillary membrane. The measured ratio was theta C18O2/theta C16O18O = 1.9 ± 0.2 (mean ± SD), thus comparing reasonably with the predicted one. Therefore, our findings provide evidence that the greater value of DLC18O2 is mainly due to the twofold higher probability (or theta value) for C18O2 than for C16O18O to disappear within red blood cells via isotopic exchange reactions.

artificially ventilated rabbits; oxygen-labeled carbon dioxide; single-breath method

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

IN PREVIOUS STUDIES (13, 14), singly and doubly 18O-labeled CO2, C16O18O and C18O2, were introduced to determine the pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide in man. The major advantage of this approach is that the rapid dilution of 18O in the large water pool (55 M) by isotopic exchange between CO2-bicarbonate and water limits the development of significant back pressures of indicator gases within pulmonary capillary blood. The author obtained a ratio of diffusing capacities of the human lung for C16O18O (DLC16O18O) and C18O2 (DLC18O2) of 1.28.

Because the oxygens in bicarbonate are symmetrical (HC16O18O16O- from C16O18O and HC18O16O18O- from C18O2), there is a one in three chance in the case of C16O18O but a two in three chance for C18O2 that the 18O label will be in the water pool because of the hydration-dehydration reactions of CO2-bicarbonate interconversion that is catalyzed by carbonic anhydrase of red blood cells (RBC) and pulmonary tissue. Because of this twofold higher probability of label removal for C18O2 than for C16O18O, it was concluded (14) that the estimated difference between DLC18O2 and DLC16O18O is explainable by a higher kinetics of disappearance via isotopic exchange for C18O2 than for C16O18O. In addition, the author stated that, by supposing equal diffusion kinetics of both isotopic species and due to DLC18O2> DLC16O18O, the value of DLC18O2 can be considered to provide a lower limit of the true conductance of the alveolar-capillary membrane for CO2.

The present work was undertaken to examine the premises of these interpretations in an animal study. We used the familiar double-reciprocal Roughton-Forster relationship (12) for data analysis
<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>D<SC>l</SC></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>Dm</DE></FR> + <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>&thgr; ⋅ Vc</DE></FR> (1)
where DL is the overall pulmonary diffusing capacity for a test gas and the components Dm and theta  · Vc represent the true conductance of the alveolar-capillary membrane and the rate at which the RBC in 1 ml of pulmonary capillary blood will absorb the test gas (theta ) related to the total pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc), respectively.

If it is true that singly and doubly 18O-labeled CO2 diffuse with very similar facility into pulmonary capillary blood (DmC16O18O approx  DmC18O2) but that C18O2 is removed within the CO2-bicarbonate interconversion with a twofold higher probability than C16O18O, then theta C18O2/theta C16O18O approx  2 should apply. By use of Eq. 1, the ratio of specific uptake rates by RBC for both isotopic CO2 species can be derived from
<FR><NU>&thgr;<SUB>C<SUP>18</SUP>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB></NU><DE>&thgr;<SUB>C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>D<SC>l</SC><SUB>C<SUP>18</SUP>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> ⋅ (Dm<SUB>C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB> − D<SC>l</SC><SUB>C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB>)</NU><DE>D<SC>l</SC><SUB>C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB> ⋅ (Dm<SUB>C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB> − D<SC>l</SC><SUB>C<SUP>18</SUP>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>)</DE></FR> (2)
We estimated the membrane diffusing capacity DmC16O18O by calculating DmC16O18O = 12.3 × pulmonary diffusing capacity of NO (DLNO), falling back on the theoretical prediction that gases permeate lung tissue at rates proportional to their solubilities in the lung [estimated from the solubility constants in water: alpha CO2/alpha NO = 15.2 (1, 17)] and inversely proportional to the square roots of molecular weights (<RAD><RCD>30</RCD></RAD>/<RAD><RCD>46</RCD></RAD> = 0.81). Because of the very rapid binding of NO to hemoglobin (4, 11), it is usually expected that alveolar-capillary transfer of NO is mainly limited by diffusion (2, 7, 10, 11), leading to 1/(theta · Vc) right-arrow 0 and DLNO approx  DmNO.

We applied the single-breath method to artificially ventilated rabbits to determine values of DLC16O18O, DLC18O2, and DLNO. If our assumptions are valid, the calculated ratio of specific blood uptake rates should compare reasonably with the theoretically predicted value of theta C18O2/theta C16O18O approx  2.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Single-breath maneuvers were performed on seven adult Chinchilla cross-breed rabbits weighing 2.8-3.7 kg under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia (20 mg · kg-1 · h-1 iv). The animals were paralyzed by alcuronium (0.1 mg · kg-1 · h-1 iv), endotracheally intubated (2.5-3.5 mm ID), and artificially ventilated with room air by a computerized ventilatory servo system. The animals were instrumented with carotid arterial and ear vein cannulas for blood gas analyses, determinations of the hemoglobin concentration of blood ([Hb]), and the administration of drugs.

Test gases. To avoid the formation of oxidation products of NO and to enable the comparison of DL values of the three test gases, three O2-free gas mixtures, containing 0.35% C16O18O or 0.8% C18O2 or 0.05% NO in N2, were prepared and stored in gas-tight flexible aluminum bags. Pure NO was led through diluted KOH, subsequently collected with a KOH-containing syringe, and finally injected into the aluminum bags, which had been repeatedly washed out with N2. To avoid an artificial isotopic exchange with water, pure C16O18O or pure C18O2 was dried within a trap and led into the N2-containing aluminum bags.

Protocol of experiments. Before the series of single-breath experiments, pressure-volume curves were recorded. For this purpose, the lungs were inflated and deflated by specific volume steps and the airway pressure was measured during short breath-holds by a differential pressure transducer. The residual volume (VR) was set at the lung volume attained at -20 cmH2O of airway pressure. It was calculated from the argon (Ar) washout produced by inflating the rabbit lungs with the Ar-free test gas mixtures (see Table 1). Anatomic and apparatus dead spaces were determined in separate expirograms for the three test gases and were used to calculate the effective inflation and deflation times (13).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Animal characteristics and experimental parameters

In each animal, the series of C16O18O, C18O2, and NO experiments were performed in random order, starting the single-breath maneuvers from VR in each case. The respective times for inflation and deflation were set at 0.6 s for C16O18O and C18O2 and at 0.8 s for NO. For the two isotopic CO2 species, experiments with breath-holding periods of 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.50 s were used to calculate DL (13, 14). The NO single-breath maneuvers were performed with breath-holding periods of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 s. The lungs of the rabbits were inflated with 30-47 ml of the C16O18O- or C18O2-containing gas mixtures and with 30-55 ml of the NO-containing test gas. After breath holding, the total expired gas was sampled by deflating the lungs via a spiral stainless steel tube (3.5 mm ID, length 5 m). The gas stored within this tube was dried by freezing and was continuously sucked into the inlet system of a respiratory magnetic sector mass spectrometer (M3; Varian MAT, Bremen, Germany). As shown in Table 1, the ratio of inflation volumes for the CO2 and NO experiments was varied between 0.73 and 1.34 to examine the influence of changes in pulmonary capillary blood volume (and thus of Hb content) on the theta C18O2/theta C16O18O determinations.

Apart from this gas-sampling procedure, continuous recordings of alveolar partial pressures of O2 and C16O2 (unlabeled CO2) by mass spectrometry were used to check ventilatory conditions.

Mass spectrometry. The mass spectrometer used was modified to measure also isotopic ratios (15). The relevant gases NO, O2, C16O2, Ar, C16O18O, and C18O2 were recorded at two ion collectors and one double collector, which were set at the following mass-to-charge ratios (m/e): 30 (NO), 32 (O2), 44 (C16O2), and 46 (C16O18O). We determined C16O2 at the first plate of the double collector, C16O18O at the second plate, and C18O2 at the second plate of the same double collector (m/e = 48) by repeatedly changing the accelerating voltage (peak jump). In the same way, Ar (m/e = 40) was measured at the C16O2 44-ion collector. To avoid drift errors and cross-talk effects (6, 11, 13), the dry sample gas was repeatedly compared with a reference gas that only differed in the content of test gases, and by subtracting the background of the mass peaks. The concentrations of C16O18O and C18O2 were obtained in terms of the difference to natural abundance. The signal-to-noise ratios were 1,656:1 at 3,500 parts per million (ppm) C16O18O, 1,905:1 at 8,000 ppm C18O2, and 1,351:1 at 500 ppm NO.

Calculations for DL. We used the partial pressures of the three test gases obtained from that end-tidal portion of the gas sample where the concentration of test gases remained unchanged. These values were processed by applying the DL calculations on the basis of a coupled system of three differential equations defining gas transfer during inflation, breath holding, and deflation, as previously described in detail (13).

Statistics. Averaged data are given as mean ± SD values. The comparison between the calculated ratios of specific blood uptake rates and the theoretically predicted value theta C18O2/theta C16O18O approx  2 was carried out using the Wilcoxon test (one-sample mu-tilde test). Multiple regression analysis was performed on theta C18O2/theta C16O18O versus [Hb] and ratios of inflation volume.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Figure 1 shows the time course of alveolar-capillary transfer of test gases in a semilogarithmic plot of ratios of alveolar partial pressures at overall times t and zero (PA/PA0) related to the overall time period of experiments. PA0 values were derived by calculating the dilution of inspired test gases within the alveolar volume (1.5 mmHg < PA0,C16O18O < 2.0 mmHg; 4 mmHg < PA0,C18O2 < 5 mmHg; 0.22 mmHg < PA0,NO < 0.26 mmHg). C16O18O as well as C18O2 were removed according to the following biexponential relationships, where t is time in seconds
P<SC>a</SC><SUB>C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB>/P<SC>a</SC><SUB>0,C<SUP>16</SUP>O<SUP>18</SUP>O</SUB> = 0.995 ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−3.4 ⋅ <IT>t</IT></SUP> + 0.005 ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−0.02 ⋅ <IT>t</IT></SUP> (3)
P<SC>a</SC><SUB>C<SUP>18</SUP>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>/P<SC>a</SC><SUB>0,C<SUP>18</SUP>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> = 0.9995 ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−4.6 ⋅ <IT>t</IT></SUP> + 0.0005 ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−0.02 ⋅ <IT>t</IT></SUP> (4)
but NO disappeared monoexponentially from alveolar space
P<SC>a</SC><SUB>NO</SUB>/P<SC>a</SC><SUB>0,NO</SUB> = 0.93 ⋅ <IT>e</IT><SUP>−0.56 ⋅ <IT>t</IT></SUP> (5)
During the initial phase (t < 3 s), the ratios of PA to PA0 of C16O18O and C18O2 were reduced to less than 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. The pulmonary diffusing capacities for both CO2 species were calculated from this fast component by subtracting the partial pressure of the remaining residues from the respective PAC16O18O values of the fast phase (13, 14). The smallest PAC16O18O values, measured during the slow phase (t > 3 s), came close to the level of natural abundance of C16O18O, whereas the smallest PA0,C18O2 values determined during the same phase of label removal were 20 times higher than the natural C18O2 abundance. By contrast to the biexponential kinetics, >99% of the inhaled NO disappeared from alveolar gas after a time period of 10 s.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Semilogarithmic plot of removal of C16O18O (+), C18O2 (open circle ), and NO (square ) from alveolar space versus overall time available for gas transfer (inflation, breath holding, and deflation) obtained from performing 105 single-breath maneuvers on 7 rabbits. Ordinate: log of ratios of alveolar partial pressures at overall times t and zero (PA/PA0).

The DL data of each rabbit are listed in Table 2. The overall mean ± SD values are DLC16O18O = 9.9 ± 1.6 ml · mmHg-1 · min-1, DLC18O2 = 13.3 ± 2.1 ml · mmHg-1 · min-1, and DLNO = 1.8 ± 0.4 ml · mmHg-1 · min-1. During the single-breath maneuvers and due to the inflation of the rabbit lungs with the O2-free indicator gas mixtures [VR/inflation volume = 12.7 ml/(30-55 ml)], the end-tidal PO2 values averaged 24 ± 4 mmHg. However, after each maneuver the continuous recording of ventilatory conditions by mass spectrometry showed a fast recovery of alveolar PO2 to normal values.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Single-breath diffusing capacities for C16O18O2 , C18O2, and NO as well as the corresponding ratio of specific blood uptake rates of both isotopic CO2 species

By applying Eq. 2 to the individual mean values of DL, we calculated the ratios of specific blood uptake rates of both stable isotopic CO2 molecules in each rabbit (see Table 2), averaging theta C18O2 /theta C16O18O = 1.9 ± 0.2. This result is not significantly different from the theoretically predicted value of theta C18O2/theta C16O18O approx  2.0 (Wilcoxon test, alpha  = 0.05). Furthermore, there was no dependence of individual mean values of theta C18O2/theta C16O18O on the ratios of inflation volume for the CO2 and NO experiments and the [Hb] of blood (correlation coefficient of multiple regression analysis: 0.503, n = 7, P < 0.6).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the pulmonary diffusing capacities of the 18O-labeled stable isotopic species of carbon dioxide, DLC18O2 and DLC16O18O, reflect the corresponding ratio of specific blood uptake rates of both test gases, theta C18O2/theta C16O18O. Our data provide evidence that the higher kinetics of disappearance from alveolar gas found for C18O2 compared with C16O18O is mainly due to the higher removal rate of C18O2 via the above-mentioned CO2-bicarbonate interconversion. This is based on the finding that the calculated ratio theta C18O2/theta C16O18O = 1.9 ± 0.2 compares reasonably with its predicted value (2.0). Because Eq. 2 was applied to data of DLC16O18O and DLNO, the calculation DmC16O18O = 12.3 · DLNO is also confirmed.

The assumption that the pulmonary diffusing capacity of NO should provide a very close estimate of the true conductance of the alveolar-capillary membrane has already been used in recent studies (2, 7, 10, 11). It is mainly based on the observation that there is a very rapid binding of NO to Hb, the reaction of which is 280 times faster than that of CO (4). Therefore, it was hypothesized that NO that enters the RBC is almost entirely bound by Hb (11). By taking this aspect into account, as well as allowing for the fact that NO solubility is greater than O2 solubility, we expect theta NO values to be >14 ml · ml-1 · mmHg-1 · min-1, as has recently been determined for O2 (9). This value is greater than the corresponding value of theta NO = 4 ml · ml-1 · mmHg-1 · min-1 that can be derived from the study of Carlsen and Comroe (3), who measured red cell kinetics by rapid mixing technique. However, this technique may have been seriously biased by diffusion limitation from unstirred layers (9). Therefore, we used theta NO > 14 ml · ml-1 · mmHg-1 · min-1 to estimate DmNO: on the basis of the double-reciprocal equation of Roughton and Forster (12), the overall mean value of DLNO = 1.8 ml · mmHg-1 · min-1 found in the present study and a reliable value of pulmonary capillary blood volume in rabbits, 3 ml, we obtained DmNO < 1.9 ml · mmHg-1 · min-1. Thus, by using the value of DLNO, the true NO conductance of the alveolar-capillary membrane is, at worst, underestimated by 6%.

This evaluation is important to interpreting the deviation between the measured ratio DLC16O18O/DLNO = 5.5 and the theoretically predicted value of 12.3 that would apply if the alveolar-capillary transfer of C16O18O were also predominantly diffusion limited [1/(theta C16O18O · Vc)right-arrow0]. From the similarity of DLNO to DmNO it can be derived that this deviation is mainly caused by a significant contribution of the specific C16O18O blood uptake conductance [1/(theta C16O18O · Vc)] to the overall resistance to alveolar-capillary transfer of C16O18O(1/DLC16O18O). By using the Roughton-Forster equation again and referring to DmC16O18O = 12.3 · DLNO, one obtains that the overall rate of disappearance of C16O18O from alveolar space is limited by 55% because of the label removal within RBC. The corresponding value for C18O2 amounts to 40%.

The RBC act as a sink to remove 18O-labeled CO2 via the CO2-bicarbonate interconversion, and RBC also act as a sink to very rapidly bind NO to Hb. Therefore, determinations of the single-breath diffusing capacities of both isotopic CO2 species and NO might have been biased by using different inflation volumes during the CO2 and NO tests, because pulmonary capillary Hb content changes because of various inflation volumes applied to artificially ventilated animals (11). Our finding that ratios of theta were independent of variations in inflation volume provides evidence that the specific blood uptake rates of test gases used are much too high to be influenced by such variations.

Perspectives

The present animal study revealed that the ratio of pulmonary diffusing capacities of the two 18O-labeled stable isotopic CO2 molecules, C16O18O and C18O2, effectively reflects the difference between the specific blood uptake rates for both isotopic CO2 species, thus confirming the assumptions previously made (13, 14) with respect to interpreting the corresponding ratio of diffusing capacities of C16O18O and C18O2 in man. By using the classical Roughton-Forster equation and an estimated value of the true conductance of the alveolar-capillary membrane for C16O18O, we were able to show that the mean blood uptake resistances of C16O18O and C18O2 contribute to the overall resistance to alveolar-capillary gas transfer at levels of 55 and 40%, respectively. In reviewing the pertinent literature, the latter value (of C18O2) compares very closely with the corresponding mean value for CO (42% contribution by blood uptake resistance) that we calculated from studies in humans using 169 subjects (5, 8, 12, 16). Thus we found that the blood uptake resistances to C18O2 and CO equally contribute to the corresponding overall resistances to alveolar-capillary gas transfer.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are very grateful for the valuable technical assistance provided by Christa Pusch, Barbara Schreiber, and Bernd Eixmann.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: H. Heller, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Bonn, Nussallee 11, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.

Received 11 August 1997; accepted in final form 21 January 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Austin, W. H., E. Lacombe, P. W. Rand, and M. Chatterjee. Solubility of carbon dioxide in serum from 15 to 38 C. J. Appl. Physiol. 18: 301-304, 1963[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Borland, C. D. R., and T. W. Higenbottam. A simultaneous single breath measurement of pulmonary diffusing capacity with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. Eur. Respir. J. 2: 56-63, 1989[Abstract].

3.   Carlsen, E., and J. H. Comroe. The rate of uptake of carbon monoxide and of nitric oxide by normal human erythrocytes and experimentally produced spherocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 42: 83-107, 1958[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Cassoly, R., and Q. H. Gibson. Conformation, co-operativity and ligand binding in human hemoglobin. J. Mol. Biol. 91: 301-313, 1975[Medline].

5.   Cotes, J. E., and A. M. Hall. Normal Values for Respiratory Function in Man. Milan, Italy: Panminerva Medica, 1969, p. 327-343.

6.   Gerster, R. Cinétique de l'échange des atomes d'oxygène en phase hétérogène entre C18O2 et H2O. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 22: 339-348, 1971.

7.   Guénard, H., N. Varène, and P. Vaida. Determination of lung capillary blood volume and membrane diffusing capacity in man by the measurements of NO and CO transfer. Respir. Physiol. 70: 113-120, 1987[Medline].

8.   Hamer, N. A. Variations in the components of the diffusing capacity as the lung expands. Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 24: 275-285, 1963.

9.   Heidelberger, E., and R. B. Reeves. O2 transfer kinetics in a whole blood unicellular thin layer. J. Appl. Physiol. 68: 1854-1864, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Manier, G., J. Moinard, P. Téchoueyres, N. Varène, and H. Guénard. Pulmonary diffusion limitation after prolonged strenuous exercise. Respir. Physiol. 83: 143-154, 1991[Medline].

11.   Meyer, M., K.-D. Schuster, H. Schulz, M. Mohr, and J. Piiper. Pulmonary diffusing capacities for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide determined by rebreathing in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 68: 2344-2357, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Roughton, F. J. W., and R. E. Forster. Relative importance of diffusion and chemical reaction rates in determining rate of exchange of gases in the human lung, with special reference to true diffusing capacity of pulmonary membrane and volume of blood in the lung capillaries. J. Appl. Physiol. 11: 290-302, 1957[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Schuster, K.-D. Kinetics of pulmonary CO2 transfer studied by using labeled carbon dioxide C16O18O. Respir. Physiol. 60: 21-37, 1985[Medline].

14.   Schuster, K.-D. Diffusion limitation and limitation by chemical reactions during alveolar-capillary transfer of oxygen-labeled CO2. Respir. Physiol. 67: 13-22, 1987[Medline].

15.   Schuster, K.-D., K. P. Pflug, H. Förstel, and J. P. Pichotka. Recent Developments in Mass Spectrometry in Biochemistry and Medicine. New York: Plenum, 1979, p. 451-462.

16.   Werner, F., and H. Kolmer. The CO single breath transfer factor of the lung. Pflügers Arch. 393: 269-274, 1982[Medline].

17.   Wilhelm, E., R. Baltino, and J. Wilcock. Low-pressure solubility of gases in liquid water. Chem. Rev. 77: 219-262, 1977.


AJP Regul Integr Compar Physiol 274(5):R1496-R1499
0363-6119/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heller, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, K.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heller, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, K.-D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online