AJP - Regu AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 274: R1619-R1625, 1998;
0363-6119/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kompanowska-Jezierska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kompanowska-Jezierska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Vol. 274, Issue 6, R1619-R1625, June 1998

Mechanism of vasopressin natriuresis in the dog: role of vasopressin receptors and prostaglandins

Elzbieta Kompanowska-Jezierska, Claus Emmeluth, Lisbeth Grove, Poul Christensen, Janusz Sadowski, and Peter Bie

Department of Medical Physiology, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; and Laboratory of Renal and Body Fluid Physiology, Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Renal effects of physiological amounts of vasopressin were studied in conscious dogs during servocontrolled overhydration (2% body wt). During infusion of vasopressin (50 pg · min-1 · kg body wt-1), plasma vasopressin concentration increased to 2.30 ± 0.20 pg/ml compared with 0.12 ± 0.03 pg/ml during control (water diuresis). With vasopressin infusion, urine flow was significantly lower (0.30 ± 0.10 ml/min) and sodium excretion (UNaV) was significantly higher (58.0 ± 15.8 µmol/min) than without vasopressin (4.6 ± 0.4 ml/min and 14.4 ± 4.1 µmol/min, respectively). Deamino-[Cys1,D-Arg8]vasopressin, a V2 receptor agonist (4 pg · min-1 · kg-1), mimicked the antidiuretic response (0.20 ± 0.03 ml/min) without changing UNaV (9.7 ± 4.4 µmol/min). Indomethacin given during arginine vasopressin (AVP) infusion suppressed prostaglandin E2 excretion, intensified the antidiuresis (0.10 ± 0.02 ml/min), and abolished the natriuresis (13.4 ± 3.7 µmol/min). During AVP infusion, UNaV was highly correlated (r = 0.85) with prostaglandin E2 excretion. Blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentration, and the rate of proximal tubule reabsorption (derived from lithium clearance) were similar in all series. The data indicate that, in the dog, physiological amounts of vasopressin can induce natriuresis, probably through activation of non-V2 receptors and the intrarenal synthesis of prostaglandins.

sodium excretion; indomethacin; deamino-[Cys1,D-Arg8]vasopressin; urinary concentration; lithium clearance

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

EVIDENCE HAS ACCUMULATED over the years that antidiuretic hormone [arginine vasopressin (AVP)], in addition to its principal action promoting water reabsorption in the collecting system of the nephron, can induce natriuresis in the dog (5, 8, 12, 16, 20, 30) and rat (2, 3, 18, 22, 23).

The mechanism of AVP natriuresis is unclear. Early studies suggested that the natriuretic effect is mediated by some humoral natriuretic substance (17, 21), presumably prostaglandins (PGs) (17). A decade ago, Bie and co-workers (5) showed that natriuresis occurred during infusions of AVP that raised the AVP plasma level to within the physiological range and that the response to deamino-[Cys1,D-Arg8]vasopressin (dDAVP), a specific agonist of vasopressin V2 receptor, did not include a natriuretic effect. Because PGs are natriuretic and AVP stimulates their intrarenal synthesis via V1 receptors (reviewed in Refs. 11 and 25), the principal renal PG, PGE2, has emerged as a possible mediator of AVP natriuresis.

The present study of the effect of physiological amounts of vasopressin in conscious dogs was designed to explore simultaneously a broad spectrum of factors that could contribute to natriuresis. Experiments were conducted under conditions of sustained servocontrolled hydration, and this protocol eliminated the possibility of natriuresis secondary to a progressing volume expansion or dissipation of medullary hypertonicity. The dose of vasopressin was fixed at a low level so as not to influence mean arterial blood pressure (BP) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Administration of dDAVP was used as a means to stimulate vasopressin V2 receptors without V1 receptor activation. Measurement of PGE2 excretion in different experimental series was included to expose the role of PG synthesis in the response to AVP.

    MATERIAL AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The study was designed to examine the action of approximately equipotent antidiuretic doses of AVP and the specific agonist of V2 receptors, dDAVP, under conditions of near complete suppression of endogenous secretion of AVP by water loading and constant body fluid volume. Vasopressin infusion was performed with or without blockade of PG synthesis with indomethacin (Indo). To avoid any major changes in the corticomedullary solute gradient, the infusion of antidiuretic peptides was started just before water loading.

The experiments were performed on seven conscious female beagle dogs weighing 9.5-13 kg and maintained on a fixed diet of commercial dog food (Febo Professional, Euskirchen, Germany) that provided a daily intake of sodium of ~6 mmol/kg body wt; free access to tap water was allowed.

Experimental procedures. In all animals, both common carotid arteries had been placed in skin loops while animals were under general anesthesia, with the use of sterile surgical technique. The dogs were trained to accept catheterization and to rest quietly for several hours supported in the upright position by a canvas sling. Each dog was used in each of four experimental protocols (see below) at intervals of >1 wk.

On the morning before each experiment, sterile catheters (Intracath, Deseret, UT) were placed in the external jugular and the saphenous veins and used for drug infusions and venous blood sampling, respectively. A short catheter placed in an exteriorized carotid artery allowed for measurement of arterial pressure using a Statham P50 transducer and for sampling of arterial blood. Heart rate was determined from the electrocardiogram. A modified indwelling Foley catheter was inserted into the urinary bladder.

Immediately after instrumentation, a constant infusion of antidiuretic peptide (AVP or dDAVP) or vehicle was initiated and continued throughout the experiment. To measure the GFR, a bolus of inulin or creatinine was injected (8 or ~14 mg/kg, respectively, in 7.4 ml of isotonic saline), followed by a continuous infusion that delivered 9.6 mg · kg-1 · h-1 of inulin or ~14 mg · kg-1 · h-1 of creatinine in a volume of 7.2 ml/h throughout the experiment.

At the time of bolus injection, the dogs were given a load of 20 ml water/kg body wt via a gastric tube. The state of overhydration was kept constant throughout the experiment by use of a servo system that maintained constant body weight (±0.2%) irrespective of the diuresis by delivering intravenously, at the appropriate rate, a hypotonic solution containing 40 mM glucose and 25 mM urea (4).

Plasma AVP levels and the variables characterizing excretion of water and solutes as well as urine concentration were measured for 150 min (5 30-min periods) beginning from the time point ~90 min after water loading and the start of AVP or dDAVP infusion. All the parameters leveled off during the 150 min of observation, and the data presented here refer to the last 30-min period representing a steady-state situation. Along with urine collections, venous blood samples were withdrawn for determination of plasma osmolality, Na+, K+, Li+, and inulin or creatinine. During antidiuresis, the bladder catheter was flushed two times with 10 ml of distilled water and then with 20 ml of air at the end of each period. Arterial blood samples for AVP and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) determination were drawn from the carotid artery at 30, 60, 120, and 150 min and were immediately centrifuged at 4°C. Plasma was stored at -18°C until analysis.

The following series of experiments was performed in seven dogs: 1) control, i.e., a state of water diuresis (vehicle infusion at a rate of 0.75 ml · kg-1 · h-1), 2) antidiuresis by AVP (50 pg · kg-1 · min-1), 3) antidiuresis by dDAVP (4 pg · kg-1 · min-1), and 4) antidiuresis (AVP, 50 pg · kg-1 · min-1) combined with inhibition of PG synthesis (intravenous bolus injection of Indo, 4 mg/kg, given after the first urine collection period).

Analyses and statistics. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed for creatinine using the method of Bonsnes and Taussky (6) or for inulin using a chemical method based on fructose determination after acid hydrolysis of inulin (19). Plasma and urine Na+ and K+ concentrations were determined using a flame photometer (IL 343; Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA), osmolalities were determined by a freezing-point osmometer (Osmomat, Gonotec, Berlin, Germany), and plasma and urinary (endogenous) Li+ concentrations were determined by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer 5100 PC, Norwalk, CT) provided with an HGA furnace and an AS60 autosampler and using pyrocoated graphite tubes and argon as a purge gas. Renal clearances of all substances were calculated from the standard formulas. The fractional proximal Na+ reabsorption was calculated as (GFR - CLi) × PNa/(GFR × PNa), where CLi is the clearance of endogenous lithium, PNa is plasma sodium concentration, and GFR × PNa is filtered sodium load.

For hormone determination, plasma samples were initially extracted on silica columns (Sep-Pak C18; Waters, Milford, MA), and subsequently hormones were determined by RIA. AVP was determined by RIA as described by Sakurai et al. (28), with minor modifications (15). The recovery of unlabeled vasopressin was 83%; no correction was made for the loss during extraction. The detection limit was ~0.09 pg/ml. Because more than one-half of the samples contained undetectable amounts of vasopressin, they were set at the limit of detection to enable statistical analysis. This reduced the scatter but falsely increased the mean value, which would have been lower with an ideal assay. The RIA for ANP was performed by the method of Schütten and co-workers (29). Urine PGE2 was measured by RIA as described by Christensen and Leyssac (10) and evaluated by Christensen et al. (9), with minor modifications.

The data are presented as means ± SE. Differences in mean values between series were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. In case of variance inhomogeneity, as indicated by Bartlett's test, the data were transformed logarithmically before ANOVA (31). When F values indicated significance, differences were identified by a sequential variant of the studentized range method (Newman-Keuls test).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Plasma AVP levels and the associated values of water and solute excretion and urine concentration recorded at the end experiments, i.e., after an almost 4-h exposure to AVP or dDAVP, are shown in Fig. 1. Controlled sustained hydration (2% body wt) in the vehicle series resulted in extremely low plasma AVP (mean 0.12 pg/ml) and excretion of a large volume of dilute urine [mean urine osmolality (Uosm) 53 mosmol/kg H2O]. When plasma AVP levels under identical hydration in the same dogs were maintained at a mean of 2.3 pg/ml by exogenous hormone infusion (AVP series), persistent antidiuresis was observed, with appreciable free water reabsorption and Uosm exceeding 900 mosmol/kg (Fig. 1). Remarkably, mean osmolal clearance (Cosm) was the same as in the water diuresis series (Fig. 1), indicating that the AVP-mediated antidiuresis was solely dependent on an increase in water reabsorption ("pure" antidiuresis). It will be shown below that Cosm was preserved owing to an increase in sodium excretion (UNaV). Uosm was highest when PG synthesis was inhibited in animals infused with AVP (AVP + Indo), evidently due to a large concentration in the urine of nonelectrolytes (urea). As expected, plasma AVP was very low in animals given dDAVP, whereas in the AVP + Indo series, it was similar to the series in which AVP was given alone.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Osmolal clearance (Cosm, solid bars), free water clearance (CH2O = urine flow - Cosm; open bars), and plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) during steady states after water loading without and with concomitant infusion of AVP or deamino-[Cys1,D-Arg8]vasopressin (dDAVP). Ind, indomethacin (see MATERIAL AND METHODS). A: Cosm and CH2O. * Cosm significantly different from AVP group (P < 0.05). Inset: urine osmolality (Uosm) and percent contribution of 2× sodium concentration (hatched bars), 2× potassium concentration (dotted bars), and nonelectrolytes, mostly urea (open bars). B: plasma concentration of vasopressin in the 4 series. * Significantly different from water diuresis and dDAVP series (P < 0.05).

Figure 2 collects data for UNaV and variables that usually determine its magnitude, such as arterial BP and GFR. To suitably relate natriuresis to the excretion of total solutes (UosmV), data for excretion of Na+ (UNaV) together with its attendant monovalent anion (U2NaV) are given rather than UNaV. In hydrated dogs given AVP alone, U2NaV was several times higher than in the three other groups. In this series, sodium salts constituted >40% of the excreted solutes (UosmV); the increment in U2NaV can be construed as a factor preventing a decrease in UosmV or Cosm. Indeed, such a decrease did occur in the dDAVP and AVP + Indo series in which UNaV was similar to that observed during water diuresis (Figs. 1 and 2). In the AVP series, Na+ salts were the main ionic component of the urine, in contrast to the dDAVP series in which the contribution of sodium and potassium was similar (see Fig. 1, inset). A comparison of urine composition and flow between these two antidiuretic series shows that UNaV was 5.1-fold higher with AVP than with dDAVP infusion, due to a 2.7-fold higher sodium concentration (UNa) and only a 1.9-fold higher urine flow (V). In all four experimental series, BP and GFR, potential determinants of UNaV, were similar (Fig. 2). The similarity of proximal reabsorption (estimated from Li+ clearance) suggested no differences in the fluid outflow from the proximal tubule (data not shown).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Solute excretion (A), glomerular filtration rate (GFR, B), and blood pressure (MABP, C) during steady states after water loading without and with concomitant infusion of vasopressin or dDAVP (see MATERIAL AND METHODS). A: total solute excretion (UosmV, whole bar length) and Na+ + anion excretion (U2NaV, hatched portion of bar) in 4 experimental series. * Significantly different from AVP series (P < 0.05).

PG excretion was remarkably high during water diuresis (Fig. 3), but because large variations in V invalidate the rate of excretion of PGs as an index of their intrarenal synthesis (16, 20, 32), the value cannot be compared with those measured in the three other series. An extremely low PG excretion in animals given Indo confirms the assumption that effective inhibition of PG synthesis was obtained by Indo. Mean PG excretion was highest in the AVP series in which major natriuresis was observed. It became gradually lower (as Uosm became gradually higher) in the AVP, dDAVP, and AVP + Indo series. Within the AVP series, PG excretion and UNaV were highly correlated (r = 0.85) (Fig. 4); the correlation with V was apparently smaller (r = 0.67).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Urinary excretion of prostaglandins (PG) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) during steady states after water loading without and with concomitant infusion of vasopressin or dDAVP (see MATERIAL AND METHODS). * Significantly different from AVP + Ind series at P < 0.05.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Correlation between sodium excretion (UNaV) and PG excretion (PGex) during steady state after water loading with concomitant infusion of vasopressin. Regression line (solid line; y = 26.33x + 0.02, r = 0.851) and 5% confidence limits (dotted lines) are shown.

Plasma ANP concentration did not differ significantly among the four experimental series (Fig. 3).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

An increase in UNaV related to vasopressin was demonstrated in this study in conscious dogs. The natriuresis was associated with a low dose of exogenous peptide, producing plasma levels well within the physiological range. Moreover, the experiments were designed to clearly separate the natriuretic effect of AVP per se from the possible influences of overhydration and extracellular volume expansion. Superimposition of these factors may have engendered controversies regarding specificity and interpretation of the AVP-mediated natriuresis in many past studies. To avoid this, the degree of hydration applied was modest (2% body wt) and yet sufficient to suppress endogenous AVP secretion, as confirmed by determination of plasma concentration. Second, owing to the servocontrol of the body weight of the animals throughout the experiments, a steady state of body fluid volume was achieved and maintained in all experimental series. Third, the protocol used here, in which AVP was administered from the very beginning ("hormone first") rather than during an ongoing water diuresis ("hydration first"), was not associated with a partial dissipation of the corticomedullary solute gradient, which in itself could induce natriuresis (see below).

The AVP natriuresis was apparent at the beginning of urine collection i.e., 90 min after the start of hormone infusion, and tended to increase modestly until the end of experiment (240 min of AVP infusion). These data are in accord with those obtained by Cowley et al. (12), who observed AVP natriuresis in dogs with servocontrolled body fluid volume. The rate of hormone infusion was sevenfold higher and the estimated plasma concentration was about fivefold higher than measured in this study. It should be emphasized that with their chronic infusion experiments, AVP natriuresis disappeared after 1 day. Obviously, the present investigation of the mechanism of AVP natriuresis concerns the early effect only.

The state of water diuresis subsequent to hydration ("water diuresis" series) was the necessary time control for the principal AVP series. However, such a control cannot be regarded as optimal. A massive flow along the collecting system of the tubular fluid (with presumably low UNa i.e., unfavorable gradient for its reabsorption) may result in natriuresis. The dDAVP series, included with the aim of avoiding stimulation of vasopressin V1 receptors, provided a more adequate "antidiuretic" control for AVP administration. Remarkably, specific stimulation of only V2 receptors failed to induce natriuresis, a finding highlighted by the fact that the intratubular hydraulic conditions in this series were presumably very similar to those of the AVP series. It appears therefore that stimulation of non-V2 receptors is a prerequisite for, although not necessarily the only cause of, AVP natriuresis.

Activation of vasopressin receptors could lead to natriuresis via a number of mechanisms. Because the dose of AVP applied was subpressor and mean arterial BP was similar in all experimental series, a pressure natriuresis can safely be excluded. AVP has occasionally been reported to increase GFR (13), possibly by constriction of the efferent arteriole of the glomerulus, and in one study the natriuresis observed after prolonged infusions of AVP was associated with increasing GFR (30). However, in the present experiments the modest dose of AVP did not measureably change GFR.

It has been found that AVP may stimulate the release of the atrial natriuretic factor (ANP), probably via V1 receptors (24). However, under our experimental conditions no such stimulation was observed. Indeed, plasma ANP tended to be lower in the AVP series than, for instance, in the dDAVP series. This seems to exclude the possibility that ANP could act as a mediator of AVP natriuresis.

Vasopressin infusion has been reported to inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (30). However, this effect was apparently due to body fluid expansion because it was not observed when the fluid volume was servocontrolled (12). Therefore, it appears unlikely that a vasopressin-mediated inhibition of the release of renin played a significant role in our experiments.

AVP is also a known stimulator of intrarenal biosynthesis of PG via V1 receptors; a similar role of V2 receptors is controversial (reviewed in detail in Ref. 11). The renal excretion of PGE2, the major renal PG, is commonly regarded as a reliable index of the intrarenal PG synthesis under most experimental conditions. One notable exception is that when diuresis varies considerably, PG excretion increases with increasing V (16, 20, 32). It is very probable that relatively high PG excretion in our water diuresis series was related to the high V, which was 15-45 times higher than that seen in the three antidiuretic series.

When only antidiuretic conditions are compared, it is apparent that PGE2 excretion was highest in the AVP series, compatible with stimulation of PG synthesis via vasopressin V1 receptors. Within this series, PG excretion was highly correlated with UNaV, more than with V. Lower PG excretion in the dDAVP series presumably reflected some baseline intrarenal synthesis. UNaV was similarly low with the basal PG activity (dDAVP series) and during major inhibition of PG synthesis with Indo (AVP + Indo), suggesting no tonic PG-dependent natriuresis at a normal activity level.

Previous data documenting the relationship between UNaV and PG were thoroughly discussed in recent reviews (11, 25), and the discussion may be used as a basis for a possible explanation of the AVP natriuresis observed in the present study. In hydrated dogs receiving AVP infusion, augmented synthesis of PG, especially of PGE2, the major renal species, could increase UNaV by a number of mechanisms. An obvious one would be a direct inhibition of sodium reabsorption in the cortical and medullary collecting duct, as reported from studies with isolated microperfused tubule segments. An inhibition by PG of AVP-dependent NaCl reabsorption in the medullary ascending limb of the loop of Henle, an action well documented in some species (albeit not in the dog), may have contributed to overall inhibition of NaCl reabsorption both directly and by reducing interstitial hypertonicity of the renal medulla. Partial dissipation of medullary hypertonicity after activation of PG biosynthesis could occur by other, perhaps more important, mechanisms. Earlier studies have indicated that most PGs (including PGE2) and arachidonic acid increase glomerular juxtamedullary blood flow more than superficial cortical flow. Thus flow through the vasa recta could increase considerably and lead to a "washout" of medullary solutes. Still another mechanism for reduction of medullary hypertonicity would involve a documented reduction by PGs of collecting duct cell permeability to urea and limitation of urea back diffusion in this segment. A reduction of the corticomedullary osmolar gradient would impair tubular reabsorption of NaCl. Decreased tonicity of medullary tissue would reduce reabsorption of water from descending limbs of the loops of Henle, leading to increased delivery of fluid with a lower sodium concentration to more distal tubule sites.

Our data cannot distinguish among the various mechanisms potentially responsible for natriuresis. However, the observation in the AVP series that the increase in UNaV was to a large extent due to an increase in UNa and to a less extent to an increase in urine volume speaks in favor of an important role of direct inhibition of tubular NaCl transport. Data of the literature suggest distal nephron segments as sites of transport inhibition, in accordance with our measurements suggesting the constancy of proximal reabsorption.

A possible PG mediation of AVP natriuresis in the dog was first suggested by Fejes-Toth and co-workers (17). Lote and co-workers (23) studied the role of PG in the rat and concluded that PGE2 was not involved in the natriuresis. However, their data indicated that with an AVP infusion rate of 50 pmol · h-1 · kg body wt-1, Indo significantly attenuated the observed increase in UNaV. Important species differences may be expected: studies of microdissected cortical collecting ducts indicated that PGE2 inhibited cAMP accumulation induced by AVP in the rabbit but not in the rat kidney (7). Others have reported very slight (3) or nonexistent (27) AVP natriuresis in the rat, and sodium retention was reported from some studies in humans (1, 26).

In summary, the present results indicate that in hydrated dogs physiological amounts of AVP induce natriuresis, at least within the first hours of exposure to the hormone. The natriuresis was specifically related to the peptide action and not to the consequence of hydration or extracellular volume expansion per se. It was present in the absence of any increase in arterial BP, GFR, or plasma ANP activity. On the other hand, the data provide evidence that AVP natriuresis was mediated by PGs.

Perspectives

Vasopressin released in response to an increase in plasma osmolality helps to correct the primary abnormality mainly by promoting water reabsorption via its hydroosmotic effect on the collecting system. Another way of bringing body fluid tonicity back toward normal would be disposal of solutes. Vasopressin natriuresis could serve as such an auxiliary mechanism; its advantage is that it is rapid in onset. Its short duration (from several hours to 1 day) may not be a homeostatic disadvantage, because persisting antidiuresis leads to extracellular volume expansion and ultimately elevation of BP, both situations inducing natriuresis by mechanisms not directly related to the hormone.

Despite the present evidence suggesting the role of vasopressin V1 receptors and intrarenal PG, the exact mechanism of AVP natriuresis has not been satisfactorily elucidated. Application of specific agonists and antagonists of vasopressin V1 and V2 receptors, in addition to dDAVP, could help accomplish this goal. This would help to clarify the degree of overlap between the water-retaining control system in which vasopressin is the main effector and the sodium-retaining control systems dominated by renin, angiotensin, and aldosterone.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: P. Bie, Dept. of Medical Physiology, Rm. 6.5.16, 3 Blegdamsvej, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Received 8 April 1997; accepted in final form 20 February 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Andersen, L. J., J. L. Andersen, H. J. Schütten, J. Warberg, and P. Bie. Antidiuretic effect of subnormal levels of arginine vasopressin in normal man. Am. J. Physiol. 259 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 28): R53-R60, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Atherton, J. C., R. Green, and S. Thomas. Influence of lysine-vasopressin dosage on the time course of changes in renal tissue and urinary composition in the conscious rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 213: 291-309, 1971[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Balment, R. J., M. J. Brimble, M. L. Forsling, and C. J. Musabayane. Natriuretic response of the rat to plasma concentration of arginine vasopressin within the physiological range. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 325: 517-526, 1984.

4.   Bie, P. Studies of cerebral osmoreceptors in anesthetized dogs: the effect of intravenous and intracarotid infusion of hyperosmolar sodium chloride solutions during sustained water diuresis. Acta Physiol. Scand. 96: 306-318, 1976[Medline].

5.   Bie, P., M. Munksdorf, and J. Warberg. Renal effects of overhydration during vasopressin infusion in conscious dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 247 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 16): F103-F109, 1984.

6.   Bonsnes, R. W., and H. H. Taussky. On the colorimetric determination of creatinine by the Jaffé reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 158: 581-591, 1945[Free Full Text].

7.   Chabardes, D., C. Brich-Ghannam, M. Montegut, and S. Siaume-Perez. Effect of PGE2 and alpha -adrenergic agonists on AVP-dependent cAMP levels in rabbit and rat CCT. Am. J. Physiol. 255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24): F43-F48, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Chan, W. J., and W. H. Sawyer. Saluretic actions of neurohypophysial peptides in conscious dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 201: 799-803, 1961.

9.   Christensen, P., K. Green, and P. P. Leyssac. The relationship between urinary prostaglandin excretion rates and urine flow in conscious rats. Evaluation of the radioimmunoassay by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Acta Physiol. Scand. 117: 41-47, 1983[Medline].

10.   Christensen, P., and P. P. Leyssac. A specific radioimmunoassay for PGE2 using antibody with high specificity and a Sephadex LH-20 microcolumn for the separation of prostaglandins. Prostaglandins 11: 399-420, 1976[Medline].

11.   Conrad, K. P., and M. J. Dunn. Renal prostaglandins and other eicosanoids. In: Handbook of Physiology. Renal Physiology. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1992, sect. 8, vol. II, chapt. 35, p. 1707-1757.

12.   Cowley, A. W., Jr., D. C. Merrill, E. W. Quillen, Jr., and M. M. Skelton. Long-term blood pressure and metabolic effects of vasopressin with servo-controlled fluid volume. Am. J. Physiol 247 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 16): R537-R545, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Edwards, R. M., W. Trizna, and L. B. Kinter. Renal microvascular effects of vasopressin and vasopressin antagonists. Am. J. Physiol. 256 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 25): F274-F278, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Emmeluth, C., C. Drummer, R. Gerzer, and P. Bie. Roles of cephalic Na+ concentration and urodilatin in control of renal Na+ excretion. Am. J. Physiol. 262 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 31): F513-F516, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Emmeluth, C., C. Drummer, R. Gerzer, and P. Bie. Natriuresis in conscious dogs caused by increased carotid [Na+] during angiotensin II and aldosterone blockade. Acta Physiol. Scand. 151: 403-411, 1994[Medline].

16.   Fejes-Toth, G., J. Filep, and V. Mann. Effect of vasopressin on prostaglandin excretion in conscious dogs. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 344: 389-397, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Fejes-Toth, G., A. Magyar, and D. J. Walter. Renal response to vasopressin after inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Am. J. Physiol. 232 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 1): F416-F423, 1977.

18.   Fejes-Toth, G., and G. Szenasi. The effect of vasopressin on renal tubular 22Na efflux in the rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 318: 1-7, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Jung, K., S. Klotzek, and B. Schulze. Refinements of assays for low concentrations of inulin in serum. Nephron 54: 360-361, 1990[Medline].

20.   Kirschenbaum, M. A., and E. R. Serros. Effects of alterations in urine flow rate on prostaglandin E excretion in conscious dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 238 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 7): F107-F111, 1980.

21.   Kurzmann, N. A., P. W. Rogers, S. Boonjarern, and J. A. L. Arruda. Effect of infusion of pharmacologic amounts of vasopressin on renal electrolyte excretion. Am. J. Physiol. 228: 890-894, 1975.

22.   Lote, C. J., A. J. McVicar, and D. D. G. Smyth. Effects of vasopressin-glycine and vasopressin-glycine-lysine-arginine on renal function in the rat. J. Endocrinol. 108: 255-260, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Lote, C. J., A. Thewles, and J. A. Wood. Vasopressin-induced natriuresis in the conscious rat: role of blood pressure, renal prostaglandin synthesis and the peptide ANF. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 411: 481-491, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Manning, P. T., D. Schwartz, N. C. Katzube, S. W. Holmberg, and P. Needleman. Vasopressin-stimulated release of atriopeptin: endocrine antagonists in fluid homeostasis. Science 229: 395-397, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Mene, P., and M. J. Dunn. Vascular, glomerular and tubular effects of angiotensin II, kinins and prostaglandins. In: The Kidney: Physiology and Pathophysiology, edited by D. W. Seldin, and G. Giebisch. New York: Raven Press, 1992, p. 1205-1248.

26.   Noormohamed, F. H., and A. F. Lant. Sodium retaining action of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) in hydrated man (Abstract). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 452: 87P, 1992.

27.   Plange-Rhule, J., and J. C. Atherton. Natriuretic effect of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in chronically instrumented conscious rats: fact or artefact? (Abstract). J. Physiol. (Lond.) 452: 82P, 1992.

28.   Sakurai, H., A. Kanai, K. Momura, H. Demura, and K. Shizume. A simple and highly sensitive radioimmunoassay for 8-arginine vasopressin in human plasma using reversed-phase C18 silica column. J. Tokyo Women's Med. Coll. 56: 394-403, 1986.

29.   Schütten, H. J., A. C. Johannessen, C. Torp-Pedersen, K. Sander-Jensen, P. Bie, and J. Warberg. Central venous pressure---a physiological stimulus for secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide in humans? Acta Physiol. Scand. 131: 265-272, 1987[Medline].

30.   Smith, M. J., Jr., A. W. Cowley, Jr., A. C. Guyton, and D. Manning, Jr. Acute and chronic effects of vasopressin on blood pressure, electrolytes, and fluid volumes. Am. J. Physiol. 237 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 6): F232-F240, 1979.

31.   Winer, B. J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

32.   Wright, L. F., S. G. Rosenblatt, and M. D. Lifschitz. High urine flow rate increases prostaglandin E excretion in the conscious dog. Prostaglandins 22: 21-34, 1981[Medline].


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Compar Physiol 274(6):R1619-R1625
0002-9513/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kompanowska-Jezierska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kompanowska-Jezierska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online