|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762; and 2 Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The goals of this study were to determine
if suppression of neutrophil accumulation and TNF-
production in the
peritoneal cavity occurs in mice exposed to a chemical stressor
[ethanol (EtOH)], to evaluate the role of EtOH-induced
increases in endogenous glucocorticoids in any such suppression, and to
determine if decreased tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) production
is responsible for decreases in neutrophil accumulation in EtOH-treated
mice. An inflammatory response induced in the peritoneal cavity of mice by administration of heat-killed
Propionibacterium
acnes (P. acnes) was suppressed by a single dose of EtOH
given 1 h before administration of the bacteria, as indicated by
decreased accumulation of neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity. The
concentration of TNF-
in the peritoneal cavity was also decreased by
EtOH, but exogenous TNF-
did not prevent the suppression of
neutrophil accumulation. The glucocorticoid antagonist RU-486 did not
prevent the suppression of neutrophil accumulation in mice treated with
EtOH, but RU-486 did block suppression of neutrophil accumulation
caused by administration of exogenous corticosterone. The suppression
of neutrophil accumulation caused by exogenous corticosterone was less
than produced by EtOH. These observations suggest that the increase in
endogenous corticosterone induced by EtOH may explain some of the
suppression of neutrophil accumulation, but other neuroendocrine
mediators (or EtOH per se) are sufficient to cause the full suppressive
effect when the action of corticosterone is blocked by RU-486. The
results also demonstrate that EtOH decreases TNF-
production, but
this is not the mechanism by which neutrophil accumulation is decreased in this model.
corticosterone; inflammation; tumor necrosis factor-
; peritoneal
cavity
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MANY STRESSORS INDUCE neuroendocrine responses that can be immunosuppressive. However, chemical stressors have received relatively little attention. Ethanol (EtOH) is an effective chemical stressor in humans (3, 13, 47, 57) and in rodent models (5, 43). Because a substantial number of adults and 44% of college students are reported to be binge drinkers in the United States (27, 49), many individuals are exposed to this stress. Acute exposure to EtOH suppresses the accumulation of neutrophils at inflammatory sites in the skin in humans (4, 19, 20) and rabbits (35) and in the lungs in rats (31). Acute exposure to EtOH also activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading to elevated concentrations of glucocorticoids in rodents (5, 25, 43). This has also been noted in human subjects in almost all studies in which peak blood EtOH levels were greater than ~0.15% (3, 13, 47, 57) but not in studies in which blood EtOH levels were <0.15% (18, 39, 40, 48, 56, 57). However, it is not known if the stress response induced by acute exposure to EtOH is responsible for suppression of inflammation.
Glucocorticoids at pharmacological levels inhibit neutrophil
accumulation in the peritoneal cavity (37). Elevated glucocorticoid levels in rats with experimental cholestasis have been implicated in
suppressed neutrophil accumulation in subcutaneous air pouches (44).
There is also evidence from a particularly well-designed study that
endogenous glucocorticoids, at levels that could be induced by some
stressors, may regulate production of TNF-
in response to bacterial
endotoxin (11). Tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) is thought to be an
important mediator of neutrophil accumulation at inflammatory sites in
some situations (10). Therefore, it seems possible that EtOH suppresses
neutrophil accumulation by increasing glucocorticoid levels, which may
decrease TNF-
production or act by other mechanisms to decrease
accumulation. However, it is not clear if the levels of glucocorticoids
induced by EtOH would suppress TNF-
production or if this
suppression alone would inhibit accumulation of neutrophils.
A mouse model for binge drinking that has been characterized and used in a number of studies in this laboratory (5, 21, 22, 50, 51, 53, 54) was also used for the study described here. In this model, EtOH doses of 3-7 g/kg administered intragastrically (by gavage) produce blood EtOH concentrations of ~0.18-0.48%. Behavioral changes at these doses range from no grossly detectable behavioral effect to severe ataxia and loss of the righting reflex (in some, but not all animals). Clinical chemistry and histological studies indicate no meaningful nutritional, metabolic, or histological abnormalities, except at the 7 g/kg dose (5). At this dose, a slight, transient elevation of liver enzymes (suggesting mild liver damage) and focal necrosis and hemorrhage in the stomach or ileum were noted in some animals. The higher doses used in this model (6 and 7 g/kg) produce blood EtOH levels not typically attained in binge drinkers, except those who have developed some degree of tolerance to EtOH. However, it seems advisable to include these doses to represent the many individuals who do attain such blood levels, to compensate for the lower sensitivity of mice than humans for the neurological and lethal effects of EtOH (14, 36), and to compensate for the more rapid clearance of EtOH by mice than by humans (2, 14, 54).
The purpose of the study described here was to determine the role of
EtOH-induced glucocorticoids in the suppression of neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity in response to heat-killed Propionibacterium
acnes, a potent inflammatory stimulus.
In addition, the role of glucocorticoid-induced suppression of TNF-
production in decreasing neutrophil accumulation in EtOH-treated mice
was evaluated. The data indicate that glucocorticoids play only a minor
role in suppression of neutrophil accumulation by EtOH. A brief period
of suppressed TNF-
production occurs, but this does not explain the
inhibition of neutrophil accumulation observed in EtOH-treated mice.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Female B6C3F1 mice were purchased through the National Cancer Institute's animal program. All mice were quarantined for 2 wk for recovery from shipping stress and adaptation to their new environment before being used for experimental purposes. The mice were 8-12 wk of age and were specific pathogen free. Sentinel mice housed in the same animal room were free of adventitious agents during the period of the study. The mice were housed in an American Association of Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-approved facility with temperature- and humidity-controlled conditions and a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. Mice were given food (Purina Lab Chow) and water ad libitum. Care and use of animals followed the National Institutes Health Guide and the policies of the Animal Resources Advisory Committee of Louisiana State University Medical Center.Administration of Test Agents
Mice were given a 32% (vol/vol) solution of EtOH (high-performance liquid chromatography grade; Quantum Chemicals, Pittsburgh, PA) in tissue culture-grade culture water. The EtOH was administered by gavage using the volume required to achieve the desired dose according to the weight of each mouse. EtOH was administered 1 h before heat-killed P. acnes. This time was selected because EtOH blood levels and the neuroendocrine response to EtOH peak ~1 h after dosing in our model (5). Mice receiving the vehicle instead of EtOH were given water by gavage, using the same volume and the same time of administration as for EtOH. Naive control groups were left undisturbed. The binge drinking model used in this study has been characterized previously (5). EtOH doses of 5-7 g/kg produce peak blood levels of ~0.25-0.5% associated with behavioral changes ranging from mild ataxia (5 g/kg) to severe ataxia with loss of the righting reflex in a few of the animals (7 g/kg) (5). EtOH activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in mice, and doses of 5-7 g/kg induce similar peak blood corticosterone levels (~1,000 ng/ml compared with ~100 ng/ml in undisturbed mice). However, the duration of elevated corticosterone levels is dose dependent (5).Heat-killed P. acnes from Ribi
ImmunoChem Research was used in initial experiments to induce a
localized inflammatory response in the peritoneal cavity. However, this
product was discontinued, so P. acnes
(ATCC 6919) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
(Rockville, MD). The bacteria were grown anaerobically in reinforced
clostridial medium (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). The bacteria were
heat killed at 63°C for 1 h. The bacterial cells were pelleted by
centrifugation at 11,950 g at 4°C.
The cells were washed twice with PBS, frozen at
80°C, and
lyophilized using a Flexi-dry freeze drier (FTS Systems, Stoneridge,
NY).
Before intraperitoneal injection, heat-killed bacteria were suspended
in PBS containing 0.5% methylcellulose with 0.1% Tween 80. A vortex
mixer was used to uniformly suspend the bacteria in this preparation.
Mice in the vehicle groups were given the same PBS solution without
P.
acnes. In later experiments that involved exogenous TNF-
, heat-killed bacteria were placed in RPMI
1640 and a homogenous suspension was prepared by sonication. The
optimum dose of P. acnes was
determined in preliminary experiments, the results of which indicated
that a dose of 0.03-0.3 mg yielded similar numbers and percentages
of neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity. Therefore, a dose of 0.3 mg of
heat-killed bacteria was used in the remaining experiments. Bacteria
were administered 1 h after EtOH, because it had previously been shown
that this is the time point at which the neuroendocrine response to
EtOH and EtOH blood levels reach peak values in our model (5).
To evaluate the effects of glucocorticoids on neutrophil chemotaxis and
TNF-
production, 18 mg/kg of corticosterone suspended in 10%
-clycodextrin (Sigma) in Hanks' balanced salt solution was injected
subcutaneously 1 h before administration of
P.
acnes. This method produces peak blood
corticosterone levels and kinetics similar to those noted in mice
treated with EtOH at 7 g/kg (5).
RU-486, a glucocorticoid antagonist (obtained through the National Cancer Institute Chemical Synthesis Program from Research Biomedical, Natick, MA), was suspended in PBS with 0.5% methylcellulose and 0.1% Tween 80 and was administered 1 h before the EtOH dose. The mice were given 200 mg/kg, because our previous studies suggest this dose completely blocks some immunologic effects of elevated levels of glucocorticoids caused by the EtOH (50, 51). Mice in the vehicle groups were given the vehicle solution without RU-486.
Recombinant murine TNF-
was obtained from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA).
It was used undiluted in one experiment (1 µg · 0.1 ml
1 · mouse
1)
and diluted in PBS with 0.1% BSA 1/10 (0.1 µg · 0.1 ml
1 · mouse
1)
in a second experiment. The vehicle control groups received PBS with
0.1% BSA (the vehicle in which the product was supplied).
Collection of Peritoneal Fluid and Cells
Mice were euthanized by exposure to carbon dioxide, and peritoneal cells were collected by lavage using either 7 or 1 ml of ice-cold lavage fluid (PBS with 10% fetal bovine serum). The 7-ml volume was used to collect cells, and the 1-ml volume was used for TNF-
assays.
Peritoneal cells were washed and resuspended in 1 ml of FACS buffer
(PBS with 0.1% sodium azide and 0.1% BSA). Cell density was
determined using an electronic cell counter (model Zf, Coulter
Instruments, Hialeah, FL). A total of
106 cells in 150 µl of FACS
buffer was placed into each well of a 96-well microtiter U-bottom plate
for labeling before flow cytometry.
For TNF-
quantification, the peritoneal fluid was removed using 1 ml
of lavage fluid. The fluid was then centrifuged at 250 g for 5 min at room temperature to
pellet the cells and leave the soluble components in the supernatant
fluid. One hundred microliters of the supernatant was used in an assay
for TNF-
(described below). In the experiments involving exogenous
TNF-
, lavage was done with 1 ml followed by 7 ml. The samples were
centrifuged, and the supernatant from the 1-ml sample was used for
analysis of TNF-
concentration. The cell pellets were then pooled in
a final volume of 1 ml of FACS buffer for counting and labeling for
flow cytometry. In some experiments, 20-µl samples of cell
preparations were centrifuged onto microscope slides with the use of a
cytospin III centrifuge (Shandon Instruments). These preparations were stained, and differential cell counts were performed.
Flow Cytometry
The RB6-8C5 hybridoma cell line was kindly provided by Dr. R. L. Coffman (DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA). The antibody produced by these cells selectively depletes mature neutrophils and eosinophils (8, 42) when administered to mice. It recognizes the Gr-1 antigen, which has been shown to be a member of the Ly6G family (15). High-level expression of this antigen has been reported only on mature granulocytes (23). Monoclonal antibody from the RB6-8C5 cell line was produced and purified by the National Cell Culture Center (Minneapolis, MN). The antibody was supplied as a solution at 6.8 mg/ml in PBS. It was diluted in FACS buffer to a concentration of 0.34 mg/ml, and 4 µl of this solution was added to 106 peritoneal cells/well in a 96-well plate. The cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C in the dark and then washed three times with FACS buffer. Two and one-half microliters of FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-labeled anti-rat IgG2b (PharMingen) was added to each well and incubated for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. One-hundred fifty microliters of red blood cell lysis buffer (4.13 g of NH4Cl + 0.5 g of Na2CO3 + 0.03 g of EDTA in 500 ml of water, pH 7.0) was added to each well and incubated for 5 min at 37°C. The labeled cells were washed twice and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After one wash the cells were suspended in 150 µl of FACS buffer and analyzed using a flow cytometer (Facscalibur, Becton-Dickinson, or Epics Profile, Coulter). Purified rat IgG2b (heterogeneous from serum) (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was added to a sample from each group of mice at the same concentration used for RB6-8C5 to evaluate nonspecific binding. Nonspecific binding was <2.5% in all experiments (data not shown). Eosinophils were assessed on cytospin preparations, and they represented <1% of total cells in the peritoneal cavity in both control and treated mice.Assessment of TNF-
Production by Peritoneal
Macrophages In Vitro
(30). A corticosterone stock solution (4 mg/ml in dimethyl
sulfoxide) was diluted first in PBS, then with complete medium to
achieve the desired final concentration. Corticosterone or EtOH (in
complete medium) was added to some wells, vehicle solution was added to control wells, and the wells were adjusted to a volume of 190 µl by
the addition of complete medium. Then the cells were stimulated at 0.02 mg/ml (in complete medium) with the same preparation of heat-killed
P. acnes used in the in vivo studies
involving exogenous TNF-
. Preliminary experiments indicated peak
levels of TNF-
production at 4 h after stimulation. Because this
time point also corresponds reasonably well to the time frame of in
vivo effects of EtOH, it was selected for use in these experiments.
Thus culture supernatants were harvested 4 h after addition of
P. acnes, and TNF-
was quantified
by ELISA as described below. In one experiment, replicate wells
containing EtOH were prepared, and supernatant samples were obtained at
1, 2, 3, and 4 h of incubation for determination of EtOH concentration.
EtOH was quantified using a commercially available enzymatic method
(Sigma) as described previously (5).
TNF-
Analysis
in the lavage
fluid was determined by comparison to standards included in the kit.
Statistical Analysis
ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test was used to determine significant differences between the control group and all other groups. Bonferroni's post hoc test was used to compare each group to all other groups. Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis was also performed. Substantial differences between Kruskal-Wallis results and parametric ANOVA results would indicate that the data violated the assumptions of parametric ANOVA. However, this did not occur for any of the data in this study. Values of P
0.05 were
regarded as significant. All statistical analyses were performed using
InStat statistics software (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ethanol Inhibits P. acnes-Induced Neutrophil Accumulation in the Peritoneal Cavity
Time course of the effects of EtOH on neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity. Mice were given EtOH at 6.0 g/kg, and heat-killed P. acnes was administered 1 h later. Samples were taken by peritoneal lavage. A cytogram illustrating flow cytometric analysis of peritoneal cells with the RB6-8C5 antibody is shown in Fig. 1. The distinction between labeled and unlabeled populations is clear as is the difference between control and EtOH-treated animals.
|
The results shown in Fig. 2 demonstrate that neutrophils progressively accumulate in the peritoneal cavity from 1 to 4 h after administration of bacteria. However, accumulation of neutrophils at 1, 1.5, and 2.25 h was significantly decreased in mice treated with EtOH at 6.0 g/kg. This effect of EtOH was no longer evident 4 or 8 h after administration of bacteria (5 or 9 h after EtOH administration). It is interesting that this dose of EtOH is mostly cleared within 4 h, and the increased concentration of corticosterone caused by EtOH also returns to near normal values within this timespan (5).
|
Dose-response study. The results shown in Fig. 3 demonstrate that EtOH at a dose of 5, 6, or 7 g/kg significantly suppresses the accumulation of neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity 2.25 h after administration of P. acnes.
|
Role of corticosterone in EtOH-induced decreases in neutrophil accumulation. Results shown in Fig. 4 demonstrate that the glucocorticoid antagonist RU-486 did not prevent the EtOH (6 g/kg)-induced decrease in neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity measured 2.25 h after administration of bacteria. It seemed possible that the effects of RU-486 might be more evident at an earlier time point, so neutrophil accumulation was also assessed 1 h after administration of P. acnes. Even at this early time point (when the concentration of RU-486 was probably greater than at 2.25 h), RU-486 did not prevent the EtOH-induced suppression of neutrophil accumulation (Fig. 4).
|
Direct administration of exogenous corticosterone (18 mg/kg) caused a significant decrease in neutrophil accumulation measured 2.25 h after administration of P. acnes, and this decrease was blocked by RU-486 (Fig. 5). Similar suppression of neutrophil accumulation by corticosterone was noted in a second experiment, and the relative amount of suppression was also similar when evaluated 1 h after administration of P. acnes (data not shown). Corticosterone values were determined at two time points after administration of corticosterone at 18 mg/kg to confirm that the expected levels were attained at the time this study was in progress (data not shown). The results were comparable to those noted in our previous study (50).
|
Data in Figs. 3 and 5 indicate that EtOH at 6 or 7 g/kg decreases neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity by 58 and 82%, respectively. Corticosterone (18 mg/kg) caused a smaller decrease (44%), although corticosterone concentrations and kinetics were comparable in mice treated with corticosterone and mice treated with EtOH at 7 g/kg (5, 50). In a previous study in this laboratory, a parameter whose suppression is completely caused by increased endogenous glucocorticoid concentrations (expression of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules on B cells) was suppressed equally by EtOH and corticosterone using the same protocol as used in the present study (50).
Role of Suppressed TNF-
Production in EtOH-Induced
Suppression of Neutrophil Accumulation
production in vivo. P. acnes induced the
production of TNF-
in the peritoneal cavity at 1.00 or 2.25 h after
administration of the bacteria (Fig. 6). At
2.25 h TNF-
production was suppressed by EtOH (6 g/kg) but not by
exogenous corticosterone. However, TNF-
production measured 1 h
after administration of bacteria was suppressed by corticosterone. In
an additional experiment, EtOH (6 g/kg) also suppressed TNF-
production 1 h after administration of P. acnes (435 ± 98 pg/ml in the vehicle control group
vs. 12 ± 8 pg/ml in the EtOH-treated group). As already noted,
corticosterone was administered according to a protocol developed in
this lab that produces peak corticosterone blood levels and kinetics
that are essentially the same as observed in mice treated with EtOH at
7 g/kg. Thus administration of corticosterone in this manner results in
a somewhat greater exposure than noted in mice given EtOH at 6 g/kg
(the dose used in most experiments in this study) (5, 50). Even so,
EtOH suppressed TNF-
production to a similar degree and for a longer
period of time than did corticosterone.
|
Effects of EtOH on TNF-
production are primarily
indirect. Although the previous experiments
demonstrated that corticosterone is not completely responsible for the
suppression of TNF-
production in EtOH-treated mice, it remained
unclear if other indirect effects (e.g., other neuroendocrine mediators
induced by EtOH) were responsible for this suppression or if EtOH acted
directly on peritoneal cells to suppress TNF-
production. To address
this issue, resident peritoneal cells were exposed to EtOH in vitro.
The results shown in Fig. 7 demonstrate
that EtOH, at concentrations achieved in our model in vivo (5), does
not directly affect TNF-
production induced by heat-killed
P. acnes in vitro. To demonstrate that suppression can be detected in this system, corticosterone was added to
some wells. Concentrations of corticosterone from 75 to 200 ng/ml
substantially suppressed TNF-
production measured 4 h after the
addition of P. acnes. These
concentrations were selected because they span the range of the peak
corticosterone concentration noted in EtOH-treated mice (~1,000
ng/ml), when it is taken into account that ~90% of corticosterone is
bound to various proteins in vivo and is not available to bind to
intracellular receptors (16). Thus the concentration range used here in
vitro includes the expected concentration of free corticosterone in vivo in EtOH-treated mice (1,000 ng/ml × 10% = 100 ng/ml). To confirm that the failure of EtOH to suppress TNF-
production was not
caused by rapid loss to evaporation, EtOH concentrations in culture
supernatants were monitored during one experiment (Fig. 7). The results
indicate little evaporative loss during a 4-h period.
|
EtOH-induced suppression of TNF-
production does
not explain suppression of neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal
cavity. The role of TNF-
in EtOH-induced suppression
of neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity was evaluated by
administering exogenous TNF-
(recombinant murine) at the same time
(Fig.
8A) or
0.5 h after (Fig. 8B) administration
of P. acnes. In the first experiment, the TNF-
dose was 1 µg/mouse, and this did not reverse the effects of EtOH on P. acnes-induced neutrophil
accumulation. However, analysis of peritoneal TNF-
levels indicated
that this dose produced concentrations much higher than induced by
P. acnes (data not shown). Therefore,
a TNF-
dose of 0.1 µg/mouse was used in the second experiment.
This dose yielded TNF-
concentrations of 1,222 ± 98 pg/ml in the peritoneal cavity (determined by ELISA). However, this did
not prevent the EtOH-induced decrease in neutrophil accumulation (Fig.
8). It should be noted that the dose of TNF-
used in this study is
comparable to doses shown to induce accumulation of neutrophils in the
peritoneal cavity of mice and rats (38, 46). The number of neutrophils
per peritoneal cavity is lower in Fig. 8 than in the other experiments
shown. This may have been caused by the use of a different preparation
of P. acnes than used for previous experiments. In the experiments shown in Fig. 8, heat-killed
P. acnes was sonicated in RPMI 1640, not suspended in a methylcellulose-Tween 80 solution as in previous
experiments. This change was made to allow more direct comparison of
these data with data from in vitro studies (such as those in Fig. 7),
which are continuing. In any case, the sonicated P. acnes preparation induced significant accumulation of
neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity and this was inhibited by EtOH.
The inhibition was not reversed by TNF-
.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results presented here demonstrate that acute administration of EtOH suppresses accumulation of neutrophils in response to an inflammatory stimulus in a mouse model for binge drinking. In conjunction with previous reports from studies with rats (31) and humans (4, 19, 20), this suggests that suppression of neutrophil accumulation at inflammatory sites may be a common feature of acute EtOH toxicity. Because attraction of phagocytic cells to the site of infection is a key feature of resistance to the infections most often associated with excessive alcohol consumption (pneumonia and tuberculosis) (29, 32), it seems possible that decreased accumulation of neutrophils could be an important mechanism for the increased incidence of such infections in alcoholics. In addition, it has been noted that the incidence of infections in victims of penetrating abdominal trauma is increased by EtOH exposure (17). Another study failed to note such an association (24), but it should be noted that all victims of penetrating abdominal trauma are given antibiotics, which would be expected to obscure the immunosuppressive effects of EtOH.
The results of the present study demonstrate a dramatic but transient decrease in neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity. This occurs at blood EtOH concentrations that are relevant for humans. EtOH at 5 g/kg produces peak blood EtOH concentrations of 0.25-0.30% (5, 54), and concentrations in this range are not unusual in human binge drinkers (9). It is interesting that the essentially normal numbers of neutrophils in EtOH-treated mice 4 h after P. acnes (5 h after EtOH) correspond to the clearance of EtOH from the blood and with the cessation of the EtOH-induced neuroendocrine stress response (5). This suggests that EtOH or the neuroendocrine mediators induced by EtOH must be present to decrease neutrophil accumulation and that this effect does not persist after EtOH has been cleared or the EtOH-induced stress response has subsided. Although the duration of this effect is just a few hours in mice, it should be noted that humans clear EtOH two to three times more slowly than mice (5, 14, 36) and that blood levels of 0.23% (which are less than the ~0.4% expected in our mice dosed with EtOH at 6 g/kg) (5) require ~8 h to be cleared in humans (26). In addition, human binge drinkers frequently continue to ingest EtOH for a period of several hours.
Further studies are needed to determine the potential impact of transient decreases in neutrophil accumulation on host resistance to infection in our mouse model. Previous studies in other models suggest that the early stages of an infection are often critical in determining the outcome (7, 55), and in some cases the role of neutrophils early in the infection is critical (7, 8).
It has previously been documented that acute administration of EtOH
suppresses inflammation and TNF-
production in the lungs in a rat
model (31) and that acute administration of EtOH induces a
neuroendocrine stress response in rats (43) as well as mice (5, 6) and
humans (3, 13, 47, 57). Although it is known that mediators of stress
responses, such as glucocorticoids, can suppress inflammation (37) and
TNF-
production (11), the role of glucocorticoids in EtOH-induced
suppression of inflammation had not previously been determined.
The data presented here are open to at least two different interpretations. It should be noted that RU-486 failed to block the suppression of neutrophil accumulation in EtOH-treated mice and there was considerably less suppression in mice treated with exogenous corticosterone than in mice treated with EtOH. This is the case although the cumulative corticosterone exposure was greater in mice treated with exogenous corticosterone than in mice treated with EtOH at 6 g/kg (5, 50). This might be interpreted as indicating that corticosterone plays only a very minor role in the effects of EtOH on neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity. However, it is interesting that the experiments with RU-486 actually suggest that glucocorticoids play no role, whereas the experiments with exogenous corticosterone suggest that corticosterone should contribute substantially to the overall suppression, although it cannot account for all of it. This apparent conflict can be resolved if one assumes that EtOH suppresses neutrophil accumulation by at least two independent mechanisms. In this case the elimination of one mechanism (e.g., elimination of the effects of corticosterone by administration of RU-486) would not be expected to block the suppression, because the other mechanism(s) would still be operating. However, administration of corticosterone alone would reveal its effects. The stress response induced by EtOH leads to increases in the levels of a number of neuroendocrine mediators that have been shown to affect various components of the immune system (1, 34, 43). For example, we have noted that suppression of natural killer (NK) cell activity in this mouse model for binge drinking is mediated by corticosterone and catecholamines as well as a minor direct effect of EtOH (51-53). The mediators responsible for EtOH-induced suppression of neutrophil accumulation by EtOH remain to be elucidated, and this matter is currently under investigation using an in vitro system with P. acnes-activated peritoneal cells. It should also be noted that it remains possible that EtOH (or one of its metabolites) could act directly on relevant cell types in the peritoneal cavity or blood to prevent neutrophil accumulation. These matters are currently under investigation.
It has been shown that TNF-
can be involved in the accumulation of
neutrophils at sites of inflammation within or near the time frame
during which EtOH affects this process (30, 45, 46). Thus it seemed
possible that EtOH-induced decreases in TNF-
production could
explain the decreased neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneal cavity
noted in EtOH-treated mice. However, exogenous TNF-
did not prevent
the suppression of neutrophil accumulation by EtOH. The intraperitoneal
TNF-
levels achieved were within a range of physiological values
reported in inflammatory responses (12) and were greater than those
induced by P. acnes in the present
study. Therefore, it seems very unlikely that EtOH-induced suppression
of TNF-
production is responsible for the decrease in neutrophil
accumulation noted in EtOH-treated mice. It remains possible that EtOH
acts by suppressing the response to TNF-
or that suppression of the
production of or response to other chemotactic factors (e.g.,
leukotriene B4, interleukin-8, or
cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant) is involved. These
mediators can apparently induce neutrophil accumulation in some cases,
even in the absence of TNF-
(28, 41, 46). It has also been shown
that macrophage inflammatory protein 2 can cause an influx of
neutrophils to an inflammatory site, and production of this mediator is
not inhibited by glucocorticoids (33). It should also be noted that the
profound suppression of TNF-
production noted in EtOH-treated mice
would be expected to affect other host resistance mechanisms known to be mediated by this important cytokine. Further studies are needed to
more carefully examine the role of glucocorticoids in suppression of
TNF-
production by EtOH.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Grant AA-09505 and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant ES-09158. S. B. Pruett is supported by a Research Career Development Award from NIAAA.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests: S. B. Pruett, Dept. of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, LSU School of Medicine, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130.
Received 23 January 1998; accepted in final form 27 May 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ader, R.,
D. Felten,
and
N. Cohen.
Interactions between the brain and the immune system.
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
30:
561-602,
1990[Medline].
2.
Andrews, L. S.,
and
R. Snyder.
Toxic effects of solvents and vapors.
In: Casarett and Doull's Toxicology (4th ed.), edited by M. O. Amdur,
J. Doull,
and C. D. Klaassen. New York: Pergamon, 1991, p. 681-722.
3.
Bellet, S.,
L. Roman,
O. DeCastro,
and
M. Herrera.
Effect of acute ethanol intake on plasma 11 hydroxycorticosteroid levels.
Metabolism
19:
664-667,
1970[Medline].
4.
Brayton, R. G.,
P. E. Stokes,
M. S. Schwartz,
and
D. B. Louria.
Effect of alcohol and various diseases on leukocyte mobilization, phagocytosis, and intracellular bacterial killing.
N. Engl. J. Med.
282:
123-128,
1970.
5.
Carson, E.,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Development and characterization of a binge drinking model in mice for evaluation of the immunological effects of ethanol.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
20:
132-138,
1996[Medline].
6.
Cicero, T. J.
Neuroendocrinological effects of alcohol.
Annu. Rev. Med.
32:
123-142,
1981[Medline].
7.
Conlan, J. W.,
and
R. J. North.
Neutrophil-mediated dissolution of infected host cells as a defense strategy against a facultative intacellular bacterium.
J. Exp. Med.
174:
741-744,
1991
8.
Czuprynski, C. J.,
J. F. Brown,
N. Maroushek,
R. D. Wagner,
and
H. Steinburg.
Administration of anti-granulocyte mAb RB6-8C5 impairs the resistance of mice to Listeria monocytogenes infection.
J. Immunol.
152:
1836-1846,
1994[Abstract].
9.
Dunbar, J. A.,
J. Hagart,
B. Martin,
S. Ogston,
and
M. S. Devgun.
Drivers, binge drinking, and gammaglutamyltranspeptidase.
Br. Med. J.
285:
1083,
1982.
10.
Durum, S. K.,
and
J. J. Oppenheim.
Proinflammatory cytokines and immunity.
In: Fundamental Immunology, edited by W. E. Paul. New York: Raven, 1993, p. 807-812.
11.
Fantuzzi, G.,
E. Di Santo,
S. Sacco,
F. Benigni,
and
P. Ghezzi.
Role of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in the regulation of TNF production in mice.
J. Immunol.
155:
3552-3555,
1995[Abstract].
12.
Fantuzzi, G.,
S. Sacco,
P. Ghezzi,
and
C. A. Dinarello.
Physiological and cytokine responses in IL-1
-deficient mice after zymosan-induced inflammation.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 42):
R400-R406,
1997
13.
Fazekas, I. G.
Hydrocortisone content of human blood, and alcohol content of blood and urine, after wine consumption.
Quart. J. Studies Alcohol.
27:
439-446,
1966[Medline].
14.
Finn, D. A.,
M. Bejanian,
B. L. Jones,
P. J. Syapin,
and
R. L. Alkana.
Temperature affects ethanol lethality in C57BL/6, LS, and SS mice.
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
34:
375-380,
1989[Medline].
15.
Fleming, T. J.,
M. L. Fleming,
and
T. R. Malek.
Selective expression of Ly-6G on myeloid lineage cells in mouse bone marrow. RB6-8C5 mAb to granulocyte-differentiation antigen (Gr-1) detects members of the Ly-6 family.
J. Immunol.
151:
2399-2408,
1993[Abstract].
16.
Fleshner, M.,
T. Deak,
R. L. Spencer,
M. L. Laudenslager,
L. R. Watkins,
and
S. F. Maier.
A long term increase in basal levels of corticosterone and a decrease in corticosterone binding globulin after acute stressor exposure.
Endocrinology
136:
5336-5342,
1995[Abstract].
17.
Gentilello, L. M.,
R. A. Cobean,
A. P. Walker,
E. E. Moore,
M. J. Wertz,
and
E. P. Dellinger.
Acute ethanol intoxication increases the risk of infection following penetrating abdominal trauma.
J. Trauma
34:
669-675,
1993[Medline].
18.
Gianoulakis, C.,
D. Beliveau,
P. Angelogianni,
M. Meaney,
J. Thavundayil,
V. Tawar,
and
M. Dumas.
Different pituitary
-endorphin and adrenal cortisol response to ethanol in individuals with high and low risk for future development of alcoholism.
Life Sci.
45:
1097-1109,
1989[Medline].
19.
Gluckman, S. J.,
V. C. Dvorak,
and
R. R. MacGregor.
Host defenses during prolonged alcohol consumption in a controlled environment.
Arch. Intern. Med.
137:
1539-1543,
1977
20.
Gluckman, S. J.,
and
R. R. MacGregor.
Effect of acute alcohol intoxication on granulocyte mobilization and kinetics.
Blood
52:
551-559,
1978
21.
Han, Y. C.,
T. L. Lin,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Thymic atrophy caused by ethanol in a mouse model for binge drinking: involvement of endogenous glucocorticoids.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
123:
16-25,
1993[Medline].
22.
Han, Y.-C.,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Mechanisms of ethanol-induced suppression of a primary antibody response in a mouse model for binge drinking.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
275:
950-957,
1995
23.
Hestdal, K.,
F. W. Ruscetti,
J. N. Ihle,
S. E. Jacobsen,
C. M. Dubois,
W. C. Kopp,
D. L. Longo,
and
J. R. Keller.
Characterization and regulation of RB6-8C5 antigen expression on murine bone marrow cells.
J. Immunol.
147:
22-28,
1991[Abstract].
24.
Jurkovich, G. J.,
F. P. Rivara,
J. G. Gurney,
C. Fligner,
R. Ries,
B. A. Mueller,
and
M. Copass.
The effect of acute alcohol intoxication and chronic alcohol abuse on outcome from trauma.
JAMA
270:
51-56,
1993
25.
Kalant, H.
Stress-related effects of ethanol in mammals.
Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.
9:
265-272,
1990[Medline].
26.
Korsten, M. A.,
S. Matsuzaki,
and
L. Feinman.
High blood acetaldehyde levels after ethanol administration. Difference between alcoholic and non-alcoholic subjects.
N. Engl. J. Med.
292:
386-389,
1975[Abstract].
27.
Liu, S.,
P. Z. Siegel,
R. D. Brewer,
A. H. Mokdad,
D. A. Sleet,
and
M. Serdula.
Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving. Results from a national self-reported survey of health behaviors.
JAMA
277:
122-125,
1997
28.
Loike, J. D.,
J. el Khoury,
L. Cao,
C. P. Richards,
H. Rascoff,
J. T. Mandeville,
F. R. Maxfield,
and
S. C. Silverstein.
Fibrin regulates neutrophil migration in response to interleukin 8, leukotriene B4, tumor necrosis factor, and formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine.
J. Exp. Med.
181:
1763-1772,
1995
29.
MacGregor, R. R.
Alcohol and immune defense.
JAMA
256:
1474-1479,
1986
30.
Malaviya, R.,
T. Ikeda,
E. Ross,
and
S. N. Abraham.
Mast cell modulation of neutrophil influx and bacterial clearance at sites of infection through TNF-
.
Nature
381:
77-80,
1996[Medline].
31.
Nelson, S.,
G. J. Bagby,
B. G. Bainton,
and
W. G. Summer.
The effects of acute and chronic alcoholism on tumor necrosis factor and the inflammatory response.
J. Infect. Dis.
160:
422-429,
1989[Medline].
32.
Nelson, S.,
C. Mason,
G. Bagby,
and
W. Summer.
Alcohol, tumor necrosis factor, and tuberculosis.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
19:
17-23,
1995[Medline].
33.
O'Leary, E. C.,
and
S. H. Zuckerman.
Glucocorticoid-mediated inhibition of neutrophil emigration in an endotoxin-induced rat pulmonary inflammation model occurs without an effect on airway MIP-2 levels.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
16:
267-274,
1997[Abstract].
34.
Patel, V. A.,
and
L. A. Pohorecky.
Acute and chronic ethanol treatment on beta-endorphin and catecholamine levels.
Alcohol
6:
59-63,
1989[Medline].
35.
Pickrell, K. L.
The effect of alcoholic intoxication and ether anesthesia on resistance to pneumococcal infection.
Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.
63:
238-260,
1938.
36.
Rall, T. W.
Hypnotics and sedatives; ethanol.
In: Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, edited by A. G. Gilman,
T. W. Rall,
A. S. Nies,
and P. Taylor. New York: Pergamon, 1990, p. 370-378.
37.
Ribeiro, R. A.,
M. V. Souza-Filho,
M. H. Souza,
S. H. Oliveira,
C. H. Costa,
F. Q. Cunha,
and
H. S. Ferreira.
Role of resident mast cells and macrophages in the neutrophil migration enhanced by LTB4, fMLP, and C5a des arg.
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.
112:
27-35,
1997[Medline].
38.
Sayers, T. J.,
T. A. Wiltrout,
C. A. Bull,
A. C. Denn,
A. M. Pilaro,
and
B. Lokesh.
Effect of cytokines on polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration in the mouse. Prostaglandin- and leukotriene-independent induction of infiltration by IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor.
J. Immunol.
141:
1670-1677,
1988[Abstract].
39.
Shuckit, M. A.
Differences in plasma cortisol after ingestion of ethanol in relatives of alcoholics and controls: preliminary results.
J. Clin. Psychiatry
45:
374-376,
1984[Medline].
40.
Shuckit, M. A.,
E. Gold,
and
C. Risch.
Plasma cortisol levels following ethanol in sons of alcoholics and controls.
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
44:
942-945,
1987
41.
Souza, M. H.,
A. A. Melo-Filho,
M. F. Rocha,
D. M. Lyerly,
F. Q. Cunha,
A. A. Lima,
and
R. A. Ribeiro.
The involvement of macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor and lipoxygenase products on the neutrophil recruitment induced by Clostridium difficile toxin B.
Immunology
91:
281-288,
1997[Medline].
42.
Tepper, R. I.,
R. L. Coffman,
and
P. Leder.
An eosinophil-dependent mechanism for the antitumor effect of interleukin-4.
Science
257:
548-551,
1992
43.
Thiagarajan, A. B.,
I. N. Mefford,
and
R. L. Eskay.
Single-dose ethanol administration activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: exploration of the mechanism of action.
Neuroendocrinology
50:
427-432,
1989[Medline].
44.
Tjandra, K.,
P. Kubes,
K. Rioux,
and
M. G. Swain.
Endogenous glucocorticoids inhibit neutrophil recruitment to inflammatory sites in cholestatic rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
270 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 33):
G821-G825,
1996
45.
Tuosto, L.,
E. Cundari,
M. Saveria,
G. Montani,
and
E. Piccolella.
Analysis of susceptibility of mature human T lymphocytes to dexamethasone-induced apoptosis.
Eur. J. Immunol.
24:
1061-1065,
1994[Medline].
46.
Utsunomiya, I.,
M. Ito,
K. Watanabe,
S. Tsurufuji,
K. Matsushima,
and
S. Oh.
Infiltration of neutrophils by intrapleural injection of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1, and interleukin-8 in rats, and its modification by actinomycin D.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
117:
611-614,
1996[Medline].
47.
Välimäki, M. J.,
M. Härkönen,
C. J. P. Eriksson,
and
R. H. Ylikahri.
Sex hormones and adrencortical steroids in men acutely intoxicated with ethanol.
Alcohol
1:
89-93,
1984[Medline].
48.
Waltman, C.,
L. S. Blevins,
G. Boyd,
and
G. S. Wand.
The effects of mild ethanol intoxication on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in nonalcoholic men.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
77:
518-522,
1993[Abstract].
49.
Wechsler, H.,
A. Davenport,
G. Dowdall,
B. Moeykens,
and
S. Castillo.
Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college.
JAMA
272:
1672-1677,
1994
50.
Weiss, P. A.,
S. D. Collier,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Role of glucocorticoids in ethanol-induced decreases in expression of MHC class II molecules on B cells and selective decreases in spleen cell number.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
139:
153-162,
1996[Medline].
51.
Wu, W.-J.,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Involvement of catecholamines and glucocorticoids in ethanol-induced suppression of splenic natural killer cell activity in a mouse model for binge drinking.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
21:
1030-1036,
1997[Medline].
52.
Wu, W.-J.,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Suppression of splenic natural killer cell activity in a mouse model for binge drinking. I. Direct effects of ethanol and its major metabolites are not primarily responsible for decreased NK cell activity.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
278:
1325-1330,
1996
53.
Wu, W.-J.,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Suppression of splenic natural killer cell activity in a mouse model for binge drinking. II. Role of the neuroendocrine system.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
278:
1331-1339,
1996
54.
Wu, W.-J.,
R. M. Wolcott,
and
S. B. Pruett.
Ethanol decreases the number and activity of splenic natural killer cells in a mouse model for binge drinking.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
271:
722-729,
1994
55.
Yao, L.,
J. W. Berman,
S. M. Factor,
and
F. D. Lowy.
Correlation of histopathologic changes with cytokine expression in an experimental murine model of bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus infection.
Infect. Immun.
65:
3889-3995,
1997[Abstract].
56.
Yap, M.,
D. J. Mascord,
G. A. Starmer,
and
J. B. Whitfield.
Studies on the chronopharmacology of ethanol.
Alcohol Alcohol.
28:
17-24,
1993
57.
Ylikahri, R. H.,
M. O. Huttunen,
M. Härkönen,
T. Leino,
T. Helenius,
K. Liewendahl,
and
S.-L. Karonen.
Acute effects of alcohol on anterior pituitary secretion of tropic hormones.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
46:
715-720,
1978
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Gill REPORTED LEVELS OF ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AND BINGE DRINKING WITHIN THE UK UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT POPULATION OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2002; 37(2): 109 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |