AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 276: R203-R212, 1999;
0363-6119/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minson, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minson, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Vol. 276, Issue 1, R203-R212, January 1999

Age, splanchnic vasoconstriction, and heat stress during tilting

Christopher T. Minson, Stacey L. Wladkowski, James A. Pawelczyk, and W. Larry Kenney

Noll Physiological Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-6900

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

During upright tilting, blood is translocated to the dependent veins of the legs and compensatory circulatory adjustments are necessary to maintain arterial pressure. For examination of the effect of age on these responses, seven young (23 ± 1 yr) and seven older (70 ± 3 yr) men were head-up tilted to 60° in a thermoneutral condition and during passive heating with water-perfused suits. Measurements included heart rate (HR), cardiac output (Qc; acetylene rebreathing technique), central venous pressure (CVP), blood pressures, forearm blood flow (venous occlusion plethysmography), splanchnic and renal blood flows (indocyanine green and p-aminohippurate clearance), and esophageal and mean skin temperatures. In response to tilting in the thermoneutral condition, CVP and stroke volume decreased to a greater extent in the young men, but HR increased more, such that the fall in Qc was similar between the two groups in the upright posture. The rise in splanchnic vascular resistance (SVR) was greater in the older men, but the young men increased forearm vascular resistance (FVR) to a greater extent than the older men. The fall in Qc during combined heat stress and tilting was greater in the young compared with older men. Only four of the young men versus six of the older men were able to finish the second tilt without becoming presyncopal. In summary, the older men relied on a greater increase in SVR to compensate for a reduced ability to constrict the skin and muscle circulations (as determined by changes in FVR) during head-up tilting.

aging; splanchnic vascular resistance; renal vascular resistance; gravity; orthostatic challenge

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

ON ASSUMPTION OF the upright posture, pooling of blood in the legs decreases venous return to the heart, effectively lowering stroke volume (SV). Orthostatic tachycardia mediated by arterial baroreceptor unloading limits the fall in cardiac output (Qc). Total peripheral vascular resistance (TPR) is also increased to maintain mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), primarily through vasoconstriction of muscle, renal, splanchnic, and skin vascular beds (19, 27).

Numerous investigations have compared the hemodynamic responses to tilting in young and older subjects (11, 19, 30, 31). Even when factors that often are associated with aging, such as decreased activity level, increased resting blood pressure (BP), obesity, and the presence of cardiovascular disease, are controlled, age-related differences in autonomic-circulatory control are still evident. A blunted heart rate (HR) response and a smaller increase in muscle and cutaneous resistance are commonly reported (11, 30, 31). However, decreases in SV and Qc during an orthostatic challenge are less in older individuals (11, 30, 31), although the exact mechanism for this difference has not been determined. It has been suggested that the stiffness of arterial and venous blood vessels is greater in older individuals, blunting venous pooling and the drop in SV and Qc in the upright posture (35). In addition, it is possible that an augmented increase in splanchnic vascular resistance (SVR) could partially account for these observations by its effects on TPR and translocation of blood from the compliant hepatic circulation.

Rowell and colleagues (25) examined the effect of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) on the control of splanchnic vasoconstriction, determined that the rise in SVR accounted for approximately one-third of the rise in TPR, and estimated that the parallel increase in muscle and cutaneous vascular resistance could also account for one-third of the rise in TPR. Despite the numerous studies investigating an effect of age on the hemodynamic responses to an orthostatic challenge, there have not been any studies that have examined how chronological age may alter the control of the splanchnic circulation during tilting.

In a series of studies, we previously investigated the influence of age on the splanchnic circulation. When young and older groups of men exercised in a warm environment, the older men responded with an attenuated decrease in splanchnic and renal blood flows (15), a difference that was not observed in a thermoneutral condition at the same exercise intensity. It was subsequently shown in a second study that this difference in the heat was unaffected by endurance exercise training in older men (10). In addition, we recently reported that older men redistribute less blood flow from the splanchnic and renal circulations during direct passive heating to the limits of thermal tolerance (21). In short, differences in splanchnic vasoconstriction with age are only apparent during heat stress. These studies illustrate the close relationship between visceral vasoconstriction and cutaneous vasodilation in a warm environment. Passive heating results in a peripheral distribution of blood volume (BV) and may differentially affect splanchnic vasoconstriction in older compared with younger men during an orthostatic challenge. Therefore, in addition to comparing the hemodynamic adjustments to upright tilting, we investigated how passive heating during tilting might modify these responses. Thus passive heating provides a greater stress to blood pressure (BP) maintenance to better elucidate an effect of aging during an orthostatic challenge.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Subjects

All procedures used in this investigation were approved in advance by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects of the Office of Regulatory Compliance of The Pennsylvania State University. After approved informed consent procedures, seven young (19-28 yr old) and seven older (64-81 yr old) men were recruited to participate in the study. Experiments were carried out during the late fall and winter months in Pennsylvania (November to March); therefore, we considered all subjects unacclimatized to heat, avoiding the potentially confounding effects of acclimatization on their responses to the heat stress.

Before participating in the experimental protocol, each subject underwent a screening procedure that included the following: 1) a physical exam by a physician, 2) measurement of skin folds as an estimate of adiposity (1), 3) a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), 4) blood tests to establish that hepatic and renal function were normal, 5) measurement of supine, seated, and standing BP, and 6) a maximal graded exercise test on a treadmill with a 12-lead ECG and BP measurements. All subjects were healthy nonsmokers who were not currently taking any medications. Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Subject characteristics

Experimental Procedures

On the day of an experiment, subjects reported to the laboratory in a fasted state at 0700. Subjects were weighed before and after the experimental protocol on a scale accurate to ±10 g, and pre- to postexperiment weight loss was <0.5 kg. A 20-gauge peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC; model no. 71956, SoloPICC catheter, SoloPak) had been inserted by a cardiologist a few days before the experiment in either the basilic or cephalic vein of the right arm and advanced into the superior vena cava to the level of the third or fourth intercostal space. Placement of the PICC was verified by a chest X-ray, and adjustment to the placement was made if necessary, followed by a second X-ray. The PICC was connected to a pressure transducer (model no. 42647-05, Transpac IV, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) and taped to the subject in a plane delineated by a line drawn through the catheter tip (as determined from the X-ray) and the midaxillary line. The transducer was calibrated before and after the experiment using a water manometer. A second catheter was inserted into a forearm or hand vein of the right arm for infusion of a solution containing indocyanine green (ICG; Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ) and p-aminohippurate (PAH; Merck) for the measurement of splanchnic blood flow (SBF) and renal blood flow (RBF). A third catheter was inserted into the antecubital vein of the left arm for venous sampling. After instrumentation (described below) was completed, subjects were dressed in a water-perfused suit and a plastic coverall to inhibit evaporative cooling. Subjects wore only thin shorts under the water-perfused suit, which covered the entire surface of the body with the exception of the head, feet, and arms below the elbow. The subjects were placed on the tilt table in the supine position with their feet flat against the footboard. Thermoneutral water (~34°C) was then circulated through the suit to keep the subject from becoming overheated during the remainder of the set-up procedure. The baseline period consisted of 50 min during which thermoneutral water from a water bath was circulated through the water-perfused suit. At the end of the baseline period, the first 60° head-up tilt was performed for 20 min. Subjects were raised passively from the supine position to the upright posture in 3-5 s using a hydraulically driven tilt table (model no. OT-9003, Omni Technologies). The subjects were then returned to the supine position for a second baseline period of 10 min. After the second baseline period, warm water (41°C) was circulated through the water-perfused suit for 30 min (heating period), followed by the second 60°C head-up tilt for 20 min or until the subject showed signs of syncope. The subjects were then rapidly cooled by circulating cool water (~20°C) until they recovered.

Measurements

Esophageal temperature (Tes), mean skin temperature (<OVL>T</OVL>sk), HR (from a 3-lead ECG), and central venous pressure (CVP) (via the PICC) were measured continuously throughout the entire protocol. Other data were collected at 10-min intervals during the baseline period and every 5 min during the two tilts and second baseline and heating periods. A 7-ml venous blood draw and the measurement of Qc were made simultaneously, followed by BP and forearm blood flow (FBF) measurements. Pilot work determined that this sequence of data collection allowed sufficient time after BP and FBF measurements for ICG and PAH concentrations at the sampling site to be in equilibrium with the rest of the circulation.

Temperatures. <OVL>T</OVL>sk was calculated as the electronic average of eight copper-constantan thermocouples placed on the upper and lower chest, upper and lower back, stomach, shoulder, thigh, and calf. Tes was measured at the level of the right atrium from a thermistor located in the lumen of a sealed pediatric feeding tube. During placement, subjects drank 5 ml/kg body wt of water to ensure that they were adequately hydrated before the experimental procedures. The fluid was ingested ~1.5 h before the start of the experiment.

FBF. Two BP cuffs and a mercury-in-Silastic strain gauge were placed on the left arm for venous occlusion plethysmography (39). Each FBF determination comprised the average slope of three or more separate measurements. The upper BP cuff was also used for the measurement of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) by brachial auscultation. MAP was calculated as (0.33 · SBP) + (0.67 · DBP). Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was calculated from the ratio of (MAP - CVP)/FBF.

Qc. Qc was determined by an acetylene rebreathing technique (28, 34) using a mass spectrometer to measure gas concentrations. SV was calculated as Qc divided by HR. Total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated as (MAP - CVP/ Qc).

SBF and RBF. For measurement of SBF without catheterization of the hepatic vein, an estimate of the resting extraction ratio (ER) for ICG is needed. Studies using younger subjects have assumed a dye extraction of 0.85 (7). However, the individual hepatic extraction of dyes can vary among subjects and presents a potential source of error, particularly among subjects of differing ages (3). We measured the ER in each subject by an intravenous bolus injection technique based on a two-compartment model of ICG removal from the plasma by the liver (8). This procedure was performed on a separate day after subject screening and at least 5 days before the experimental protocol. Subjects were supine for a minimum of 30 min before withdrawal of an aliquot of blood to serve as a spectrophotometer blank and the bolus injection of 0.5 mg/kg body wt ICG. Five minutes after injection, a 5-ml venous sample was collected in a lithium heparin tube, followed by venous samples every 3 min for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 20 min, and the plasma concentration of ICG was measured by spectrophotometry (absorbance of 805 nm and again at 910 nm to test for turbidity). A separate ER was calculated for each subject from the two slopes of the plasma disappearance curve of ICG by computer program (Sigma Plot, San Rafael, CA) using the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm. In addition, plasma volume (PV) and BV were also measured in nine of the subjects (5 old and 4 young men) on a separate day by Evans blue dye. PV was determined in the remaining five subjects from the extrapolated zero-time concentration of the ICG disappearance curve. The correlation between PV measurements using these two methods has been estimated to be between 85 and 93% (8). Subsequent changes in PV and BV were calculated from the changes in hematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin measured in triplicate, in accordance with the procedure of Dill and Costill (5).

During the experimental trial, SBF and RBF were determined simultaneously from continuous infusion of ICG and PAH, respectively. These methods and the potential sources of error have been analyzed in detail previously (27, 36) and will only be discussed briefly. After a 20-ml blood draw to serve as a blank, intravenous injection of a priming dose of ICG (0.10 mg/kg body wt) and PAH (8.0 mg/kg body wt) was followed by a constant infusion of 0.5 mg/ml ICG and 12 mg/ml PAH at a rate of 1.0 ml/min. As described above, blood was drawn every 10 min after the start of infusion during the baseline period. To allow for dye equilibration, only the 40- and 50-min samples were used to calculate baseline values. Plasma concentrations of ICG were measured spectrophotometrically (as described above), and plasma concentrations of PAH were determined by colorimetry with the color reagent N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediammonium dichloride (2).

Although hepatic extraction of ICG remains constant during periods of heat stress (29), SBF changes during passive heating and orthostatic challenges. Corrections for the resulting non-steady-state condition were necessary because the dye removal rate no longer equaled the dye infusion rate. Therefore, splanchnic plasma flow (SPF) was calculated from the rate of change of dye concentration as follows
SPF = {I − [(C<SUB>a2</SUB> − C<SUB>a1</SUB>)/d<SUB><IT>t</IT></SUB>] ⋅ PV}/(ER ⋅ C<SUB>a</SUB>)
where I is the infusion rate (0.5 mg/min), Ca2 and Ca1 are peripheral venous (equal to arterial) dye concentrations at times 2 and 1, respectively, dt is the time difference between samples (5 min during heating and recovery), and Ca is the arterial dye concentration. SBF was calculated as SPF/(1 - Hct), and SVR was calculated from the ratio (MAP - CVP)/SBF.

Because of the short protocol and the rapid changes in RBF, urine collection of PAH (preferred method to measure RBF) was not possible in this study. In the absence of urine collection, a potential source of error, namely the extrarenal extraction of PAH, becomes a concern. Furthermore, the same constraints for the measurement of SBF exist for the measurement of RBF; specifically, the assumption of equality between excretion rate and infusion rate does not hold as long as plasma concentration is not constant (36). To overcome these drawbacks, we made corrections to account for the changes in the plasma concentration of the solute infused, according to the expression (38)
RPF = {I − [(C<SUB>a2</SUB> − C<SUB>a1</SUB>)/d<SUB><IT>t</IT></SUB>] ⋅ V<SUB>d</SUB>}/C<SUB>a</SUB>
where RPF is renal plasma flow, I is 12 mg/min, Ca2 and Ca1 are the plasma concentrations at the beginning and end of the clearance period, Ca is the arterial concentration of PAH (equal to venous concentration at sampling site), and Vd is the volume of distribution (28% for both groups). RBF was calculated as RPF/(1 - Hct) and converted to renal vascular resistance (RVR) as (MAP - CVP)/RBF. This method of determining RBF has proven to be a reliable method for comparing changes in RBF between young and older men in our lab (10, 15, 17).

Data Analysis

Missing data points. All of the subjects tested were able to complete the first tilt without a significant drop in arterial pressure (>15 mmHg) and without showing signs of presyncope. During the second tilt, however, only four of the seven young subjects were able to complete the full 20-min tilt (young finishers). Two of the young nonfinishers (YNF) completed 15 min of the second tilt, and the remaining YNF only finished 5 min. In contrast, six of the seven older men finished the second tilt, and the one older subject that did not finish the tilt [old nonfinisher (ONF)] completed the first 15 min. The data from the YNF and ONF subjects were included in the statistics performed, and the time points measured after these subjects became hypotensive were treated as missing values. To ensure that the inclusion of data from the subjects who were unable to finish the second tilt did not alter the conclusions of the study, the data were also analyzed with these subjects excluded. The deletion of these data did not affect the results of any of the comparisons despite the reduced power of the statistics; therefore only the analyses including all subjects are presented.

Statistical analyses. Student's t-test was applied to determine the significance of the differences in the subjects' physical characteristics and baseline physiological variables. Two-way (age × time) repeated-measures ANOVA were performed on all variables as a change from the period immediately before each tilt (i.e., baseline 1 and the end of passive heating) to identify the effects of tilting and as a change from baseline 2 to identify the effect of passive heat stress on the variables measured. When significance in the repeated-measures ANOVA was achieved, Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc analyses were performed to locate the differences. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. All data are presented as means ± SE.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Subject Characteristics

The physical characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1. The young and older men differed in age by ~45 yr. The older men were significantly heavier and had a higher percent body fat and a lower maximum O2 consumption VO2 max (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in height or body surface area. Because we recruited only normally active subjects (i.e., nonsedentary and non-endurance trained), all subjects were between the 25th and 75th percentile rankings for their respective age groups for anthropometric and VO2 max values. Although there was no significant difference observed in the measured PV, the older men had a lower calculated BV (P < 0.05), due in part to their lower measured Hct values (young, 42 ± 1%; old, 37 ± 2%; P < 0.05).

Physiological Variables at Baseline Periods

There were no baseline temperature differences observed between the two groups of men. Qc was significantly lower at baseline in the older men (young, 6.7 ± 0.2 l/min; old, 5.6 ± 0.2 l/min; P < 0.05), due to a lower resting SV (young, 113 ± 7 ml/beat; old, 89 ± 6 ml/beat; P < 0.05) and despite no differences observed for HR or CVP. Baseline values for FVR and SVR were similar between the two groups, although resting RVR was significantly higher in the older men [young, 64 ± 7 resistance units (mmHg · min · ml-1); old, 86 ± 4 resistance units; P < 0.05) most likely due to a lower RBF, because no differences in MAP were observed. TPR was also higher in the older men (young, 13 ± 1 resistance units; old, 18 ± 1 resistance units; P < 0.05), as was resting SBP, although significance was not achieved for pulse pressure (PP) or DBP (P < 0.10 for both variables).

Tilt and Passive Heating Effects

The within-group differences during heating and tilting are presented in Table 2. The data were averaged for the last 10 min of each of the following periods: baseline 1, tilt 1, the end of passive heating, and tilt 2. During thermoneutral tilting, HR increased in both groups but CVP and SV decreased such that a significant fall in Qc was observed after the change to an upright posture in the young and older groups of men (P < 0.05). Increases in SVR and RVR were also observed in both groups of men, resulting from significant decreases in splanchnic and renal blood flows and no change in MAP. In the young men, FVR increased and FBF decreased significantly during both tilts; however, no differences were observed for these variables in the older men. All variables measured returned to baseline levels after the first tilt because there were no within-group differences observed between the two baseline measurements for either subject group.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Hemodynamic responses by group and phase of experiment

Passive heating resulted in significant increases in HR, SVR, RVR, and FBF and significant decreases in CVP, FVR, SBF, and RBF in both groups of men. A significant increase in Qc with heating was observed in the young but not the older men. Passive heating did not alter MAP in either group. The combined heat and tilt resulted in changes similar to those observed during the thermoneutral tilt; however, the magnitude of changes during tilting differed in some variables as an effect of the heat stress. The fall in Qc during the second tilt was greater in the young men, primarily due to a larger fall in SV and despite a greater increase in HR than those observed in the first tilt. In the older men, HR increased more during the second tilt but the decline in SV and Qc did not differ between the two tilts.

Age Effects

The average group responses and SE for the variables measured during the experimental protocol are displayed versus time and phase of the experiment in Figs. 1-4. Because it was necessary to allow for ICG and PAH equilibration in the blood after the start of infusion, only the last two baseline measurements (i.e., at 40 and 50 min of baseline) are presented. The asterisks above the time points represent a significant difference during tilting from the young men and take into account differences in the pretilt values (i.e., a change from baseline 1 for tilt 1 or the end of heating for tilt 2). Delta represents a main effect of age throughout the protocol (i.e., a difference in young and older men at all time points).

Temperature responses. Because the water-perfused suit is designed to tightly control skin temperature and the subjects were unable to dissipate much heat through sweating due to the plastic coverall, there were no differences observed between the groups of men for <OVL>T</OVL>sk throughout the entire protocol (Fig. 1). There were also no differences observed in Tes during any phase of the experiment. Therefore, the calculated mean body temperature (data not shown) also did not differ between the two groups. As expected, both temperature variables were significantly higher during the heating period (P < 0.05).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Esophageal temperature and mean skin temperature during last 10 min of baseline, first 20-min tilt, last 10 min of second baseline, 30 min of heating, and second 20-min tilt. Shown are means (lines) and SE (shaded areas). Horizontal lines extend baseline values of each age group. As expected based on the design of the protocol, no differences were observed between young and older men for either temperature variable.

Cardiac responses. Qc and SV were significantly lower in the older men throughout all phases of the experiment (Fig. 2). There was no difference observed for Qc during the first tilt, although the older men had a smaller increase in HR (young, 14 ± 3 beats/min; old, 8 ± 4 beats/min; P < 0.05) and less of a fall in CVP (young, -4.0 ± 0.6 mmHg; old, -2.3 ± 0.6 mmHg; P < 0.05) and SV (young, -51 ± 5 ml/min; old, -39 ± 5 ml/min; P < 0.05). Passive heating caused the young men to have a significantly higher Qc during the last 10 min of heating, due in part to their maintenance of SV at baseline values despite a fall in CVP. A greater chronotropic response to tilting during the first 15 min (young, 30 ± 5 beats/min; old, 20 ± 4 beats/min; P < 0.05) and a greater fall in SV (-57 ± 8 ml/beat; -30 ± 6 ml/beat; P < 0.05) and CVP (young, -2.9 ± 0.5 mmHg; old, -2.0 ± 0.6 mmHg; P < 0.05) in the young men was also observed, compared with the older men in the combined heat and tilt, such that the fall in Qc during the second tilt was significantly greater in the young men (young, -2.4 ± 0.4 l/min; old, -1.2 ± 0.2 l/min; P < 0.05).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, and central venous pressure (CVP) from baseline during last 10 min of baseline, first 20-min tilt, last 10 min of second baseline, 30 min of heating, and second 20-min tilt. Shown are means (lines) and SE (shaded areas). Horizontal lines extend baseline values of each age group. Cardiac output was lower in older men during last 10 min of heating, and fall in cardiac output from end of heating was greater in young men during second tilt. Heart rate increased more during tilts in young men, but decline in stroke volume and CVP was also greater in young men. * Significant difference from young men at time points indicated; Delta , significant difference between 2 groups below bracket (i.e., throughout protocol).

Vascular resistance responses. RVR and TPR were significantly higher in the older men throughout all phases of the experiment (Fig. 3). In the thermoneutral condition, a greater increase in FVR was observed by 10 min of tilting in the young compared with older men (young, 10.5 ± 2.8 resistance units; old, 3.5 ± 3.2 resistance units; P < 0.05). However, the increase in SVR from baseline 1 was greater in the older men during the first 5 min of the tilt (young, 28.0 ± 4.7 resistance units; old, 40.3 ± 7.2 resistance units; P < 0.05). No differences were observed between the two groups of men during the passive heat stress for the first 20 min. By the end of the heat stress, FVR was significantly lower in the young compared with the older men (young, 7.5 ± 1.6 resistance units; old, 12.8 ± 4.0 resistance units; P < 0.05). Consistent with the thermoneutral condition, tilting during heat stress resulted in greater increases in the young men, but only for the first 10 min of tilting. A greater increase in SVR for the first 10 min was observed in the older men (young, 24.1 ± 10.7 resistance units; old, 55 ± 11.3 resistance units; P < 0.05).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Forearm vascular resistance (FVR), splanchnic vascular resistance (SVR), renal vascular resistance (RVR), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) during last 10 min of baseline, first 20-min tilt, last 10 min of second baseline, 30 min of heating, and second 20-min tilt. Shown are means (lines) and SE (shaded areas). Horizontal lines extend baseline values of each age group. Units, resistance units (mmHg · min · ml-1). FVR increased more during both tilts in younger men than in older men but was lower by end of heating period. Increase in SVR was greater in older men during first tilt and for first 10 min of second tilt. RVR and TPR were higher throughout protocol in older men. * Significant difference from young men at time points indicated; Delta , significant difference between 2 groups below bracket (i.e., throughout protocol).

Pressure responses. SBP, DBP, and MAP were significantly higher in the older men throughout the protocol (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). However, arterial pressures were well maintained throughout the protocol in both groups of men, and no age differences in response to tilting or heat stress were observed.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic and diastolic pressures, and pulse pressure (PP) during last 10 min of baseline, first 20-min tilt, last 10 min of second baseline, 30 min of heating, and second 20-min tilt. Shown are means (lines) and SE (shaded areas). Horizontal lines extend baseline values of each age group. MAP was well maintained by subjects who were able to complete the entire protocol. Blood pressures were higher in older men throughout protocol, and fall in PP was less in older men during second tilt. * Significant difference from young men at time points indicated; Delta , significant difference between 2 groups below bracket (i.e., throughout protocol).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The major finding in our study was that the older men increased vasoconstriction of the splanchnic vascular bed to a greater extent than the young men during 60° upright tilting in thermoneutral and directly heated conditions. This augmented rise in SVR compensated for a lesser ability of the older men to increase FVR, such that MAP was maintained as well or better than in the young men, particularly when the tilt was combined with heat stress.

There is a large body of evidence that age-related changes in autonomic control may alter the mechanisms by which responses to an orthostatic challenge occur. Many (11, 30, 31), but not all (33) studies agree that the rise in FVR, used to represent changes in resistance of the muscle and skin circulations, is attenuated during an orthostatic challenge as an effect of healthy aging but that tolerance to an orthostatic stress is not compromised. Furthermore, it has been shown in numerous investigations and is confirmed in the present study that the orthostatic challenge-induced reflex increase in chronotropic function is blunted ~10% in older subjects (11, 30, 31, 33). With 44% less of an increase in FVR by the end of the tilt, the older men must have increased vascular resistance either by constricting another circulation to a greater extent or by having less of a fall in Qc than the young men if MAP was to be maintained. Although Qc and SV were lower in our older subjects throughout the protocol, SV decreased 14 mmHg more from baseline during tilting in the young subjects, such that the fall in Qc with the assumption of the upright posture was only slightly (not significantly) less in the older subjects. In this construct, the remaining regional circulations capable of significantly altering TPR are the renal and splanchnic circulations. RVR was higher in the older men, consistent with the age-related reduction in RBF (17, 37), but the increase in RVR was similar between the groups and thereby could not account for the maintenance of MAP. Therefore, the 8% greater increase in SVR observed in the older men is consistent with the requisite changes in systemic hemodynamics to partially account for the maintenance of BP.

The contrariety of the reflex hemodynamic responses in the young and older men to tilting may reflect differences in the stimulation applied to the baroreceptors. Previous studies using acute and chronic levels of LBNP sufficient to lower CVP without affecting MAP or PP have suggested that the increase in FVR is primarily influenced by the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors and that the increase in SVR is under the dual control of the arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptor populations (9, 13). In our study, CVP fell 1.7 mmHg more in the young men than in the older men during the assumption of the upright posture, suggesting less of a stimulus to the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors in the older men. This may partially explain the attenuated increase in FVR in the older subjects. It is important to note that a more recent study has shown that low levels of LBNP alter aortic distention, suggesting that the arterial baroreceptors may also affect FVR (32). However, the change in PP was similar between the two groups of men in the first tilt. In this context, the stimulus to increase FVR was not greater in the young men. Furthermore, this suggests that the lower reflex tachycardia in the older men could not be explained by the lesser removal of the inhibitory influence of this baroreceptor population on chronotropic function (13). It is more likely that a reduced beta -receptor responsiveness with aging (18) may have resulted in the attenuated HR response in the older men. Therefore, the larger increase in SVR in the older men cannot be explained on the basis of the CVP and PP responses described above. It is plausible that the older men have adapted to the stress of maintaining an upright posture with an augmented splanchnic vasoconstrictor response for a given change in CVP or PP to compensate for a reduced ability to increase resistance in the muscle and skin circulations.

It has also been reported that the shift in thoracic BV during orthostasis, measured using transthoracic impedance, is less in older men, contributing to less of a reduction in SV (6, 31). This was surprising because these investigators reported less sequestration of blood from the periphery with age but similar increases in leg BV in young and older subjects during tilting. If the increase in leg BV is similar during orthostasis and the total volume of blood available is less in older men, then a greater fall in central BV would be expected, because a larger proportion of the BV would be in the dependent veins on assumption of the upright posture. A subsequent study reported no difference in the transthoracic shift of BV but still reported that SV fell less in the older subjects (33). An augmented left ventricular contractility was suggested as a potential mechanism to explain this phenomenon. However, this rationale does not seem likely, because others have reported a relative inability of elderly subjects to reduce end-systolic volume during a 60° head-up tilt (29). Therefore, an alternative hypothesis supported by the results of the present study suggests that greater splanchnic vasoconstriction caused more blood to be shifted from the compliant hepatic circulation in the older men, serving to limit the fall in CVP, filling pressure, and, in turn, SV. However, it is unlikely that the ~8% greater increase in SVR in the older men could account for all the difference observed in CVP and SV. The trend toward a higher mean and diastolic pressure in our older subjects suggests that stiffening of the arterial tree is evident. The smaller reduction in CVP and SV in the older men supports the concept that this has also occurred on the venous side, although no direct evidence is available in the present study.

The additional stress imposed by passive heating during the second tilt was designed to explore further the hemodynamic responses to tilting by providing a more severe challenge to the maintenance of BP. In the present study, the heat stress was designed to result in similar increases in <OVL>T</OVL>sk and Tes in the two groups of men. The responses to the heat stress were very similar between the two groups, with the notable exceptions of a greater decline in FVR in the young men [due to a larger increase in skin blood flow (SkBF)] and an increase in Qc, a response not observed in the older men. Rowell and colleagues (23, 26) have previously described the existence of an inotropic response to an elevation in skin temperature before a significant increase in core temperature is observed; however, recent work in our lab (21) suggests that this response may be diminished in older individuals, which may explain this difference. Quantitatively, the other responses to the heat stress were similar between the groups.

It is interesting to note that SVR was higher in both groups of men during the second tilt, providing evidence that both groups of men had a reserve of splanchnic vasoconstriction during thermoneutral tilting that aided in maintaining MAP when heat stress was combined with orthostasis. However, the greater increase in SVR and less of a fall in CVP in the older men was only evident for the first 10 min when they were tilted in the heated condition. Although we have previously shown that older men do not redistribute as much blood flow from the splanchnic circulation during exercise in the heat (10) or direct passive heating (21), older men appear to redistribute as much flow from the splanchnic region as the young men during an upright tilt in the heat. Taken together, these data suggest that splanchnic vasoconstriction is not compromised with advanced age, but that a tight coupling of the highly compliant cutaneous and splanchnic circulations exist. Therefore, the higher SkBF in the young men during heat stress or exercise (10, 21) provides a greater stimulus for splanchnic vasoconstriction. The high SkBF and translocation of blood to the more compliant dependent veins with heating in the upright position in the young men, however, appears to decrease venous return to such an extent that CVP, SV, and Qc are compromised even with relatively mild levels of heat stress.

The greater decline in SV in the young subjects during the tilt in the heated condition may have resulted from greater pooling of blood in the cutaneous veins that is consistent with a larger increase in SkBF for a given rise in skin and core temperatures (14, 16). Although it has been shown that during direct passive heating skin retains the ability to vasoconstrict in response to LBNP and tilting, the vasoconstriction does not completely override heat-induced vasodilation (12, 13). It is not known why the young subjects who were unable to finish the second tilt did not increase SVR to an even greater extent to maintain pressure. It is possible that the maximal amount of vasoconstriction under these conditions had occurred. Alternatively, it is possible that the clearance technique used to measure SBF was not reliable during the period of severe hypotension, most likely affecting ER, such that an accurate measurement of SVR in the subjects at that time was not possible.

In summary, we compared the complex hemodynamic responses to upright tilt in young and older men in thermoneutral and passively heated conditions. The compensatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system to maintain MAP during orthostasis differed as an effect of age. The young men relied on a greater increase in resistance of the muscle and cutaneous circulations to overcome a greater fall in CVP and SV. The older men relied on a greater increase in SVR to compensate for a reduced ability to increase muscle and skin vascular resistance. With the addition of heat stress, Qc in the young men was increased so that on the assumption of the upright posture, the decline in Qc was greater than in the older men.

Perspectives

The greater decreases in CVP and SV during tilting in young men suggest that there is more pooling of blood in the dependent veins compared with older men. The greater splanchnic vasoconstriction in older men during tilting in the thermoneutral condition may contribute to the better maintenance of CVP and SV but does not account for all of the differences observed. This provides evidence that venous pooling of blood in older individuals is less and is most likely due to reduced venous compliance, although more direct studies are needed. The higher SkBF in young subjects for a given level of heat stress appears to make them more susceptible to orthostatic intolerance in the heat than healthy older subjects. However, a greater reliance of older individuals to increase SVR to maintain MAP during an orthostatic challenge, as suggested in the present investigation, may partially explain the incidence of orthostatic intolerance associated with factors that affect the ability to constrict this circulation. Excessive splanchnic blood pooling appears to be an important initial event in the development of postprandial hypotension and unexplained syncope. Furthermore, certain vasoactive medications could have profound effects on the ability to maintain MAP during an orthostatic challenge if they effectively limit the ability to increase SVR. Because older subjects do not appear to be able to increase FVR to the extent observed in the young subjects, a reduced ability to increase SVR could have detrimental effects on MAP on standing in certain patient populations.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The valiant effort by the subjects is greatly appreciated. The authors also appreciate the assistance of Jane Pierzga, Carla Thomas, Esther Brooks, and Bill Farquhar and the scientific input of Dr. E. R. Buskirk and Dr. T. R. McConnell. The authors further thank Beckton-Dickinson for supplying the ICG and Merck Pharmaceuticals for supplying the PAH. The nursing care provided by the staff of the General Clinical Research Center at the Noll Physiological Research Laboratory is appreciated.

    FOOTNOTES

This study was supported by National Institute on Aging Grant R01-AG-07004-09, American College of Sports Medicine Foundation Grant for Doctoral Students, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NAGW-4839 and also by National Institutes of Health Grant M01-RR-10732. S. L. Wladkowski was supported by National Institute of General Medical Sciences predoctoral training Grant T32-GM-08619.

Address for reprint requests: C. T. Minson, Dept. of Anesthesia Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905.

Received 30 October 1997; accepted in final form 24 September 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Allen, T. H., M. T. Peng, K. P. Chen, T. F. Huang, C. Chang, and H. S. Fang. Prediction of adiposity from skinfolds and the curvilinear relationship between external and internal adiposity. Metab. Clin. Exp. 5: 346-352, 1956.

2.   Bratton, A. C., and E. K. Marshall. A new coupling component for sulfonylamide determination. J. Biol. Chem. 128: 537-550, 1938.

3.   Caesar, J., S. Shaldon, L. Chiandussi, L. Guevara, and S. Sherlock. The use of indocyanine green in the measurement of hepatic blood flow and as a test of hepatic function. Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 21: 43-57, 1961.

4.   Davy, K. P., and D. R. Seals. Total blood volume in healthy young and older men. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 2059-2062, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Dill, D. B., and D. L. Costill. Calculation of percentage changes in volume of blood, plasma, and red cell in dehydration. J. Appl. Physiol. 37: 247-248, 1974[Free Full Text].

6.   Ebert, T. J., C. V. Hughes, F. E. Tristani, J. A. Barney, and J. J. Smith. Effect of age and coronary heart disease on the circulatory responses to graded lower body negative pressure. Cardiovasc. Res. 16: 663-669, 1982[Medline].

7.   Escourrour, P., B. Raffestin, Y. Papelier, E. Pussard, and L. B. and Rowell. Cardiopulmonary and carotid baroreflex control of splanchnic and forearm circulations. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 33): H777-H782, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Grainger, S. L., P. W. N. Keeling, I. M. H. Brown, J. H. Marigold, and R. P. H. Thompson. Clearance and noninvasive determination of the hepatic extraction of indocyanine green in baboons and man. Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 64: 207-212, 1983[Medline].

9.   Hirsh, A. T., D. J. Levenson, S. S. Cutler, V. J. Dzau, and M. A. Creager. Regional vascular responses to prolonged lower body negative pressure in normal subjects. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 26): H219-H225, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Ho, C. W., J. L. Beard, P. A. Farrell, C. T. Minson, and W. L. Kenney. Age, fitness, and regional blood flow during exercise in the heat. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 1126-1135, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Jansen, R. W. M. M., J. W. M. Lenders, T. Thien, and W. H. L. Hoefnagels. The influence of age and blood pressure on the hemodynamic and humoral response to head-up tilt. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 37: 528-532, 1989[Medline].

12.   Johnson, J. M., M. Niederberger, L. B. Rowell, M. M. Eisman, and G. L. Brengelmann. Competition between cutaneous vasodilator and vasoconstrictor reflexes in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 35: 798-803, 1973[Free Full Text].

13.   Johnson, J. M., L. B. Rowell, M. Niederberger, and M. M. Eisman. Human splanchnic and forearm vasoconstrictor responses to reductions of right atrial and aortic pressures. Circ. Res. 34: 515-524, 1974[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Kenney, W. L. Control of heat-induced vasodilation in relation to age. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 120-125, 1988.

15.   Kenney, W. L., and C.-W. Ho. Age alters regional distribution of blood flow during moderate-intensity exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 79: 1112-1119, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Kenney, W. L., C. G. Tankersley, D. L. Newswanger, D. E. Hyde, and S. M. Puhl. Age and hypohydration independently influence the peripheral vascular response to heat stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 68: 1902-1908, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Kenney, W. L., and D. H. Zappe. Effect of age on renal blood flow during exercise. Aging (Milano) 6: 293-302, 1994[Medline].

18.   Lakatta, E. G. Cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms in advanced age. Physiol. Rev. 73: 413-467, 1993[Free Full Text].

19.   Lee, T. D., R. D. Lindeman, M. J. Yiengst, and N. W. Shock. Influence of age on the cardiovascular and renal responses to tilting. J. Appl. Physiol. 21: 55-61, 1966[Free Full Text].

20.   Lind, A. R., C. S. Leithead, and G. W. McNicol. Cardiovascular changes during syncope induced by tilting men in the heat. J. Appl. Physiol. 25: 268-276, 1968[Free Full Text].

21.   Minson, C. T., S. L. Wladkowski, A. F. Cardell, J. A. Pawelczyk, and W. L. Kenney. Age alters the cardiovascular response to direct passive heating. J. Appl. Physiol. 84: 1323-1332, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Pawelczyk, J. A., and P. B. Raven. Reductions in central venous pressure improve carotid baroreflex responses in conscious man. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 26): H1389-H1395, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Rowell, L. B. Human cardiovascular adjustments to exercise, and thermal stress. Physiol. Rev. 54: 75-159, 1974[Free Full Text].

24.   Rowell, L. B., G. L. Brengelmann, J. R. Blackmon, and J. A. Murray. Redistribution of blood flow during sustained high skin temperature in resting man. J. Appl. Physiol. 28: 413-420, 1970.

25.   Rowell, L. B., G. L. Brengelmann, J. R. Blackmon, R. D. Twiss, and F. Kusumi. Splanchnic blood flow and metabolism in heat stressed man. J. Appl. Physiol. 24: 475-484, 1968[Free Full Text].

26.   Rowell, L. B., G. L. Brengelmann, and J. A. Murray. Cardiovascular responses to sustained high skin temperature in resting man. J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 673-680, 1969[Free Full Text].

27.   Rowell, L. B., J. R. Detry, J. R. Blackmon, and C. Wyss. Importance of the splanchnic vascular bed in human blood pressure regulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 32: 213-220, 1972[Free Full Text].

28.   Sackner, M. A., D. Greeneltch, M. S. Heiman, S. Epstein, and N. Atkins. Diffusing capacity, membrane diffusing capacity, capillary blood volume, pulmonary tissue volume, and cardiac output measured by a rebreathing technique. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 111: 157-165, 1975[Medline].

29.   Shannon, R. P., K. A. Maher, J. T. Santinga, H. D. Royal, and J. Y. Wei. Comparison of differences in the hemodynamic response to passive postural stress in healthy subjects >70 years and <30 years of age. Am. J. Cardiol. 67: 1110-1116, 1991[Medline].

30.   Shiraki, K., M. K. Sagawa, N. Younda, and K. Miki. Physiological responses of aged men to head-up tilt during heat exposure. J. Appl. Physiol. 63: 576-581, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Smith, J. J., C. V. Hughes, M. J. Ptacin, J. A. Barney, F. E. Tristani, and T. J. Ebert. The effect of age on hemodynamic response to graded postural stress in normal men. J. Gerontol. 42: 406-411, 1987[Medline].

32.   Taylor, J. A., J. R. Halliwill, T. E. Brown, J. E. Hayano, and D. L. Eckberg. "Non-hypotensive" hypovolaemia reduces ascending aortic dimensions in humans. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 483: 289-298, 1995[Medline].

33.   Taylor, J. A., G. A. Hand, D. G. Johnson, and D. R. Seals. Sympathoadrenal-circulatory regulation of arterial pressure during orthostatic stress in young and older men. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 32): R1147-R1155, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Triebwasser, J. H., R. L. Johnson, R. P. Burpo, J. C. Campbell, W. C. Reardon, and C. G. Blomqvist. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by a modified acetylene rebreathing procedure utilizing mass spectrometer measurements. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 48: 203-209, 1977[Medline].

35.   Vaitkevicious, P. V., J. L. Fleg, J. H. Engel, F. C. O'Connor, J. C. Wright, L. E. Lakatta, F. C. P. Yin, and E. G. Lakatta. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation 88: 1456-1462, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Van Acker, B. A., G. C. M. Koomen, and L. Arisz. Drawbacks of the constant-infusion technique for measurement of renal function. Am. J. Physiol. 268 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 37): F543-F552, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Veith, R. C., J. A. Featherstone, O. A. Linares, and J. B. Halter. Age differences in plasma norepinephrine kinetics in humans. J. Gerontol. 41: 319-324, 1986[Medline].

38.   Wesson, L. G. Electrolyte excretion in relation to diurnal cycle of renal function. Medicine (Baltimore) 43: 547-592, 1964.

39.   Whitney, R. J. The measurement of volume changes in human limbs. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 121: 1-27, 1953.


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Compar Physiol 276(1):R203-R212
0002-9513/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. G. Crandall, T. E. Wilson, J. Marving, T. W. Vogelsang, A. Kjaer, B. Hesse, and N. H. Secher
Effects of passive heating on central blood volume and ventricular dimensions in humans
J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 293 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. E. Wilson, C. Tollund, C. C. Yoshiga, E. A. Dawson, P. Nissen, N. H. Secher, and C. G. Crandall
Effects of heat and cold stress on central vascular pressure relationships during orthostasis in humans
J. Physiol., November 15, 2007; 585(1): 279 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. W. Ramsey, B. J. Behnke, R. D. Prisby, and M. D. Delp
Effects of aging on adipose resistance artery vasoconstriction: possible implications for orthostatic blood pressure regulation
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1636 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Yamasaki, T. Ushida, T. Yokoyama, M. Ando, K. Yamashita, and T. Sato
Artificial Baroreflex: Clinical Application of a Bionic Baroreflex System
Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 634 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. E. Wilson, J. Cui, and C. G. Crandall
Mean body temperature does not modulate eccrine sweat rate during upright tilt
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 1207 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Pricher, L. A. Holowatz, J. T. Williams, J. M. Lockwood, and J. R. Halliwill
Regional hemodynamics during postexercise hypotension. I. Splanchnic and renal circulations
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2004; 97(6): 2065 - 2070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Stewart and L. D. Montgomery
Regional blood volume and peripheral blood flow in postural tachycardia syndrome
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1319 - H1327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. E. Wilson, N. T. Kuipers, E. A. McHugh, and C. A. Ray
Vestibular activation does not influence skin sympathetic nerve responses during whole body heating
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 540 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Scremin and W. L. Kenney
Aging and the skin blood flow response to the unloading of baroreceptors during heat and cold stress
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2004; 96(3): 1019 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
W. L. Kenney and T. A. Munce
Invited Review: Aging and human temperature regulation
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2003; 95(6): 2598 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Muller-Delp, S. A. Spier, M. W. Ramsey, L. A. Lesniewski, A. Papadopoulos, J. D. Humphrey, and M. D. Delp
Effects of aging on vasoconstrictor and mechanical properties of rat skeletal muscle arterioles
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): H1843 - H1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow