|
|
||||||||
2 Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6; and 1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Contraction and relaxation of airway
smooth muscles is mediated, in part, by G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs) and dysfunction of these receptors has been implicated in
asthma. Phosphorylation of GPCRs, by G protein-coupled receptor kinase
(GRK), is an important mechanism involved in the dampening of GPCR
signaling. To determine whether this mechanism might play a role in
airway smooth muscle physiology, we examined the airway pressure time
index and heart rate (HR) responses to intravenous administration of
the cholinergic agonist methacholine (MCh) in genetically altered mice
lacking one copy of GRK2 (GRK2 +/
), homozygous GRK3 knockout
(GRK3
/
), and wild-type littermates. (GRK2
/
mice die in utero.) GRK3
/
mice
demonstrated a significant enhancement in the airway response to 100 and 250 µg/kg doses of MCh compared with wild-type and GRK2 +/
mice. GRK3
/
mice also displayed an enhanced sensitivity of the airway smooth muscle response to MCh. In addition, GRK3
/
mice displayed an altered HR recovery from MCh-induced
bradycardia. Although direct stimulation of cardiac muscarinic
receptors measured as vagal stimulation-induced bradycardia was similar
in GRK3
/
and wild-type mice, the baroreflex increase in
HR associated with sodium nitroprusside-induced hypotension was
significantly greater in GRK3
/
than wild-type mice.
Therefore, these data demonstrate that in the mouse, GRK3 may be
involved in modulating the cholinergic response of airway smooth muscle
and in regulating the chronotropic component of the baroreceptor reflex.
transgenic mice; methacholine; cardiac baroreflex; bronchial hyperreactivity; airway responsiveness; asthma
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G PROTEIN-COUPLED receptors (GPCRs) are membrane
proteins characterized by seven transmembrane spanning domains that
mediate the actions of many extracellular signals. GPCRs interact with heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding regulatory proteins (G
proteins) that modulate a variety of second messenger systems or ionic
conductances to effect physiological responses (28). The signaling
event produced by agonist activation of GPCRs is rapidly attenuated by
phosphorylation of the receptor and its subsequent uncoupling from the
signal transduction mechanism. There is substantial biochemical
evidence implicating G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in the
phosphorylation and acute desensitization of agonist-activated GPCRs
(24). There are six members in the GRK family; the relative importance
of each GRK, in each tissue, is governed by a number of factors and is,
at present, incompletely defined. Nevertheless, there is evidence to
indicate that these kinases can play an integral role in vivo. Jaber et
al. (17) showed that GRK2 is critical for normal cardiac development in mice. Furthermore, Koch et al. (19) demonstrated that cardiac-specific overexpression of GRK2 reduces agonist-induced myocardial contractility and adenylyl cyclase activity and reduces functional coupling of
-adrenergic receptors. In the same study, mice
expressing a GRK2 inhibitor displayed enhanced cardiac contractility.
Recently, a primary role for GRK3 desensitization of odorant receptors
was demonstrated (23).
Contractile and relaxant agonists exert their effects on airway smooth
muscle through GPCR binding; dysfunction of these receptors has been
implicated in asthma, an inflammatory disease characterized by
hyperresponsiveness to bronchoconstrictors and hyporesponsiveness to
bronchodilators (3). Dysfunction of
M3 muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) located on airway smooth muscle cells may play a role in the
pathophysiology of asthma. In the A/J mouse, which is a genetic model
of airway hyperreactivity, heightened muscarinic receptor affinity and
coupling is believed to be responsible for the exaggerated airway
response to acetylcholine (11). Severe asthmatics also display a
decreased responsiveness to
2-adrenergic receptor
(
2-AR) agonists, and, although
the mechanism for this functional hyporesponsiveness is unknown, there
is some evidence to suggest that uncoupling of the receptor from its
signal transduction mechanism is involved (1). Thus regulation of GPCRs
(specifically, muscarinic and adrenergic) may play an important role in
the pathogenesis of asthma.
2- And
2-ARs are phosphorylated by
GRKs in vitro (reviewed in Ref. 24). Because of technical difficulties,
many GPCRs have not yet been tested for the ability to undergo
phosphorylation by GRKs. However, tissue culture experiments have
demonstrated that GRK2 and GRK3 phosphorylate and desensitize human
M2 and human M3 mAChRs (6). We
hypothesized that GRK2 and GRK3 may be modulators of these muscarinic
receptors in vivo and may therefore play an important role in
desensitizing agonist-activated muscarinic receptors on airway smooth
muscle cells. Unfortunately, selective GRK antagonists do not, as yet,
exist. However, transgenic mice having a disruption of the GRK2 or GRK3
gene represent a powerful model in which to explore the in vivo role of
GRKs in the modulation of airway reactivity.
To test our hypothesis, airway and heart rate (HR) responses to
intravenous administration of methacholine (MCh) were assessed in GRK2
+/
, GRK3
/
, and wild-type mice. Due to the
embryonic lethality of the GRK2 homozygote (
/
) genotype,
only GRK2 heterozygote (+/
) mice were available for study (17).
MCh was used as a direct agonist of muscarinic receptors, presumably
located on airway smooth muscle cells and cardiac pacemaker cells, to
cause airway narrowing and bradycardia, respectively. Airway responses were estimated as the time-integrated change in peak airway pressure, denoted as airway pressure time index (APTI) (20).
Our results demonstrate that in the absence of the GRK3 gene mice
display an enhanced cholinergic airway responsiveness that is
accompanied by an altered HR recovery from MCh-induced bradycardia. Further studies suggest that the changes in the HR recovery of the GRK3
/
mice are due to an effect on the baroreceptor reflex rather than an adaptation of cardiac muscarinic receptor signaling pathways. Mice lacking one copy of GRK2 (GRK2 +/
) showed no
significant differences in either respiratory or cardiac parameters evaluated.
These results are consistent with a role for GRK3 in desensitizing the airway response to MCh and in regulating the chronotropic component of the baroreceptor reflex in mice.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genotyping: Southern blot analysis. Mouse tail DNA was isolated after overnight digestion with proteinase K in 1% SDS at 65°C. Approximately 10 µg of DNA was digested overnight with EcoR I, separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and transferred to Nytran membranes. The 5' probe was a 189-bp EcoR I-Hind III fragment located 5' to the targeting vector. The 3' probe was a 200-bp DNA fragment that was PCR amplified with primers 5'-TATAGTGCACACCAGCTC-3' and 5'-CACTGAGGTGGCTGAGAG-3'. All DNAs used as probes were gel purified and labeled with [32P]dCTP using Stratgene's random primer labeling kit. Prehybridization and hybridization were done at 55°C in 4× SSC, 25% formamide, 1% SDS, 50 µg/ml tRNA, and 10% dextran sulfate. After overnight hybridization, the filters were washed initially in 2× SSC, 1% SDS at 65°C. The final wash was in 0.2× SSC, 0.2% SDS at 70°C. The filters were exposed to X-R Kodak film for up to 3 days (23).
General. GRK3
/
, GRK2
+/
, and wild-type mice, bred from a background of C57B and
129SvJ strains, were acclimated to an ambient temperature of
21-22°C and a photoperiod between 0600 and 2000; they were fed
standard mouse chow and allowed free access to water. Experiments were
carried out from 0800 to 1800. All experimental procedures conformed to
the guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care and were approved
by the Queen's University Animal Care Committee.
Animal experimentation. Mice were
anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium
(60 mg/kg) diluted 50% with saline. Once an appropriate plane of
anesthesia was achieved, mice were surgically prepared with a
tracheotomy, into which a specially fabricated stainless steel cannula
was inserted, and mechanical ventilation was initiated. Access to the
abdominal vena cava was obtained through a longitudinal abdominal
incision, and a catheter containing 5% heparin saline (Hepalean,
Organon Teknika) was inserted and fixed in place with cyanoacrylate
(26). The abdominal incision was closed, and the catheter, which is designed to minimize dead space (<10 µl), was used for intravenous administration of anesthetic and other drugs (injection volumes of 1 ml/kg). In respiratory protocols, mice were paralyzed with pancuronium
bromide (1 mg/kg) to prevent respiratory efforts. Additional doses of
pancuronium were administered as necessary, and additional doses of
anesthetic were administered at regular time intervals after paralysis.
The mice were ventilated by a small animal ventilator (1 ml maximum
volume; Harvard Apparatus) with 100% oxygen at a constant volume of
8-10 ml/kg and a frequency of 130 breaths/min. These ventilator
settings result in a peak airway pressure of 6-8
cmH2O and were previously shown to
provide normal arterial blood gases (20). Measurement of airway
pressure (Paw) was made at a
side port of the tracheal cannula connected to a Validyne differential
pressure transducer. Electrocardiogram electrodes were placed
subcutaneously for the measurement of HR. Paw and electrocardiogram signals
were acquired by a computer data acquisition package (CODAS DATAQ,
Akron, OH) at a sampling frequency of 1,000 samples · s
1 · channel
1.
Acquired data was analyzed using peak detection software and data were
imported to a spreadsheet for calculation of HR and APTI.
A second group of mice was used to study cardiovascular parameters. For studies involving vagal stimulation, the right vagus nerve was isolated from the carotid artery and prepared for electrical stimulation. Activation of vagal efferents was achieved by placing the nerve on a stimulating electrode immersed in mineral oil or covered in low-melting-point wax. The proximal end of the vagus was crushed, and the nerve was activated with a supramaximal stimulus (16 V, 2-ms duration), to ensure recruitment of all vagal efferents for a period of 10 s, and at various stimulus frequencies (10, 15, and 20 pulses/s).
Experimental protocols. Increasing
doses of MCh (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 250 µg/kg) were injected
intravenously into anesthetized, paralyzed (pancuronium bromide, 0.4 mg/kg), and ventilated mice. Respiratory efforts were closely monitored
to prevent their interference with accurate measurement of tracheal
pressure. Mice were hyperinflated 2 min before each MCh injection to
establish a constant volume history and respiratory mechanics. Each MCh
injection was separated by a 7- to 10-min period. Tracheal pressure and
HR data were acquired immediately before, during, and after MCh
injection. APTI was calculated as the time-integrated change in peak
airway pressure (see Measurements/data
analysis). This airway reactivity protocol was
conducted on five GRK2 +/
mice and five age-matched wild-type controls, as well as seven GRK3
/
mice and three
age-matched wild-type controls. Measurements from each of the wild-type
controls, which did not differ significantly, were pooled for graphical and statistical analyses.
To assess HR responses, a second group of mice was used, and multiple
consecutive protocols were employed due to the limited number of mice
available. The protocols were designed to build on the prior
pharmacological blockade of each protocol. An MCh injection protocol,
similar to that used with the first group of animals, was performed in
six GRK3
/
and eight age-matched wild-type mice, which
were not under the influence of pancuronium. Mice were injected with a
10- µg/kg and, after recovery, a 25-µg/kg dose of MCh. To assess
the baroreflex response, a 500-µg/kg bolus injection of the
vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was administered to induce a
transient hypotension. All injections were separated by a 7- to 10-min
recovery period. HR data were acquired for 30 s before each injection
and 2 min after.
After the injection protocols, the right vagus nerve was isolated and a stimulus frequency versus HR response protocol was conducted. The vagus nerve was stimulated for 10 s at 15, 10, and 20 pulses/s (in that order) with a 5-min recovery between stimulations. HR data were acquired for 30 s before and 1 min after stimulation.
Subsequently, cardiac M2 receptors
were again activated by a 10 pulse/s vagal nerve stimulation 2 min
before and 2 min after a 1 mg/kg injection of propranolol (specific
-AR antagonist). The postpropranolol stimulation served as a control
for a gallamine cumulative dose-response protocol; thus
-ARs were
blocked during the gallamine-vagal stimulation protocol. The cumulative
dose of gallamine was increased in half log increments (from 0.01 to 10 mg/kg), and successive gallamine injections were followed every 2 min
by 10 pulses/s vagal nerve stimulation. HR data were acquired 30 s
before, during, and 30 s after vagal nerve stimulation.
Measurements/data analysis. Airway responses were estimated as the time-integrated change in peak airway pressure, denoted as APTI (20). The change in Paw was calculated as the difference between the breath-by-breath Paw and the average Paw measured 15 s before injection. The APTI value is the sum of the differences measured for 80 s after MCh injection.
Nonlinear regression analysis was conducted on raw data from the MCh protocol for each mouse using an equation of the form y = a · ekx. The dose of MCh required to elicit an airway response of magnitude 40 or 70 cmH2O/s was calculated using the results from the curve fitting procedure. These values were chosen because they represent 50 and 85% of the average APTI response to 250 µg/kg MCh in wild-type mice (82.4 ± 12.5 cmH2O/s).
The time to HR recovery was calculated as the difference between the time at which HR reached a minimum and the time at which HR returned to within 90% of preinjection control HR. The percent change in HR was calculated on the basis of the preinjection HR and the minimum HR.
Control HR was calculated as the average of 5 s of data acquired just before injection of any agonist or antagonist. HR was measured for 60 s after MCh or SNP injections. At a given time period after injection, for example 30 s, HR was calculated as an average of 2 s of data, in this case between 29 and 31 s postinjection. Two minutes after injection of propranolol, 5 s of data was averaged to calculate postpropranolol HR.
For vagal stimulation protocols, 5 s of data before stimulation was averaged for control HR. HR during the entire 10-s stimulation period was averaged to obtain "stimulation" HR value. During vagal stimulation (stimulus frequency to HR response protocol), the decrease in HR was calculated for 2-s intervals from 0 to 10 s of stimulation; as well, the recovery HR was averaged over 2-s intervals from 0 to 10 s after the cessation of vagal stimulation, and this value was compared with control HR.
Statistical analysis. Statistical
analyses were carried out using the computer software package SYSTAT
for Windows. Values presented are means ± SE. To determine
differences between or among mouse genotypes, a two-way ANOVA was used
and differences were identified using a contrast matrix. To determine
differences within a protocol for a mouse genotype, a paired two-tailed
t-test was used unless more than two
cases existed, in which case a one-way ANOVA for repeated measures was
used and differences were identified with a Tukey honest significant
difference post hoc test. Results were considered
significantly different if P
0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Airway response to MCh. To assess
airway reactivity, increasing doses of MCh were used to initiate
muscarinic receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction. Paralysis of
respiratory muscles was imperative to prevent confounding pressure
changes associated with respiratory efforts. GRK3
/
mice
demonstrated a significant enhancement in the airway response at both
the 100- and 250-µg/kg doses of MCh compared with wild-type and GRK2
+/
mice (Fig.
1A).
The calculated dose of MCh required to reach an airway response that
was 50 and 85% of the wild-type maximal response was less in the GRK3
/
phenotype (Fig. 1B).
All mouse genotypes displayed a dose-dependent increase in airway
response to MCh. However, as hypothesized, GRK3
/
mice
displayed a more pronounced airway response to high doses of MCh,
suggesting that GRK3 contributes to desensitization of the muscarinic
receptor-mediated airway response.
|
HR response to MCh. Initial analysis
of HR data from the airway study (where mice were paralyzed by
pancuronium) suggested that GRK3
/
mice have an altered
HR response to MCh. However, pancuronium is an antagonist of
M2 muscarinic receptors (16) and
thereby reduces the bradycardia associated with MCh exposure. To avoid
the potential confounding effect of pancuronium, we evaluated the HR
response to MCh in eight wild-type and 6 GRK3
/
age- and
litter-matched mice in which pancuronium was omitted. In this protocol,
a lower dose of MCh was required to achieve levels of bradycardia
similar to those of the airway study.
HR responses in age- and litter-matched
controls. To confirm the HR recovery findings of the
airway study, 10- and 25-µg/kg doses of MCh were injected into age-
and litter-matched GRK3
/
and wild-type mice that were
not under the influence of pancuronium. The HR response to 10 µg/kg
MCh was not different between GRK3
/
and wild-type mice
(data not shown). However, the time required for recovery of HR (to
90% of control value) after 25 µg/kg MCh injection was significantly
less in GRK3
/
mice (10.1 ± 2.5 s) compared with that
of wild-type mice (18.8 ± 2.7 s) (Fig.
2A). Minimum HRs were not different between genotypes (237 ± 18 in GRK
/
vs. 250 ± 8 beats/min for wild-type mice).
Interestingly, MCh-induced bradycardia was followed by HRs which, in
GRK3
/
mice, consistently exceeded their control HR (Fig.
2B). In contrast, HR of the
wild-type mice returned only to their control values (Fig.
2B). Note that before each MCh
injection control HRs were not different between wild-type (394 ± 38 beats/min) or GRK3
/
mice (HR 367 ± 18 beats/min).
These data corroborate the findings of the airway study and imply that
MCh-induced bradycardia was reversed by an additional process that
caused a relative tachycardia.
|
HR baroreflex responses to SNP. To
assess whether baroreflexes contribute to the observed HR recovery
differences, SNP was administered to induce a substantial, but
transient, hypotension. Through a non-GPCR mechanism, SNP liberates
nitric oxide, causing rapid, transient relaxation of vascular smooth
muscle cells and concomitant hypotension (13). GRK3
/
mice displayed a consistently greater increase in HR than wild-type
mice after SNP injection, and the percent difference from the control
value reached statistical significance (Fig.
3). Although blood pressure was not
measured (limited by the number of knockout mice available for the
study) the administered dose of 500 µg/kg SNP elicited a HR change
consistent with initiation of a baroreflex response and this was true
in both GRK3
/
and wild-type mice (Fig. 3). This 500 µg/kg dose of SNP is 50-fold the dose that, when administered to
rats, induces a 25-mmHg decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and an
immediate baroreflex increase in HR (27). Furthermore, Ma et al. (21) showed that in anesthetized Webster mice, MAP dropped from 87 to 40 mmHg with a 1,333-µg/kg injection of SNP. The mean resting HR for the
GRK3
/
mice (362 ± 22 beats/min) tended to be lower than the wild-type mice (410 ± 36 beats/min), although this did not
reach statistical significance.
|
HR responses to vagal stimulation.
After the injection protocols, the right vagus nerve was isolated and a
stimulus-frequency versus HR-response protocol was conducted. Vagal
nerve stimulation provides an opportunity to selectively stimulate
cardiac M2 receptors and thus to
determine if their altered regulation contributes to the HR recovery
differences identified in GRK3
/
mice. During vagal
stimulation, GRK3
/
and wild-type mice decreased HR
similarly, on both a relative and an absolute basis (Fig.
4A). The
time course of the recovery of HR was also comparable for GRK3
/
and wild-type mice (Fig.
4B). These data suggest that
regulation of cardiac M2 receptors
is not different in GRK3
/
mice compared with wild-type mice.
|
To further rule out any potential differences in cardiac
M2 receptors, the HR response to
vagal stimulation was assessed in the presence of increasing doses of
the selective M2 antagonist gallamine. The gallamine dose response was performed in the presence of
-adrenergic blockade with propranolol (see below). Gallamine caused
a dose-dependent blockade of the decrease in HR associated with vagal
stimulation, and this was similar for GRK3
/
and wild-type mice (Fig. 4C).
HR responses to
-AR block. To
determine if
-ARs contributed to the differences in the HR recovery
observed in GRK3
/
mice, a 1 mg/kg injection of the
-AR antagonist propranolol was administered. Resting HR decreased
significantly in wild-type but not GRK3
/
mice after
propranolol injection (Fig. 5), suggestive
of tonic
-adrenergic input in the former, but not in the latter,
group. Resting HR was almost identical in the GRK3
/
(426 ± 25 beats/min) and wild-type (415 ± 20 beats/min) mice after
-adrenergic block (Fig. 5). During
-AR block, vagal stimulation
caused similar HR decreases and HR recovery in GRK3
/
and
wild-type mice (data not shown). Thus
-AR regulation does not seem
to contribute to the enhanced HR recovery observed in GRK3
/
mice.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GRK3
/
mice display an enhanced airway response to MCh
injection, suggesting that GRK3 may be an important kinase for
quenching airway responsiveness mediated by muscarinic receptors in
vivo. Although the airway response to MCh in GRK2 +/
mice was
not different from wild-type mice, it is difficult to speculate on the
potential role of GRK2 in desensitization of airway reactivity because
it is not possible to study homozygote GRK2 knockout mice. MCh is known
to activate M3 receptors to cause
airway smooth muscle contraction in many species (reviewed
in Ref. 2). Our results are consistent with, but not proof of, a role
for GRK3 in the phosphorylation and thereby desensitization of
M3 receptors on airway/lung smooth muscle cells of mice. The absence of GRK3 in the knockout mouse may
diminish the desensitization of muscarinic receptors leading to an
enhanced bronchoconstrictor response. This speculation is supported by
biochemical evidence suggesting that GRK3 is expressed in the lung.
Benovic et al. (4) showed GRK3 mRNA to be present in bovine lung. Although mRNA for GRK3 is typically present at lower levels than GRK2 (4), the physiological relevance of the kinase depends not only on its abundance, but on its distribution, ability to recognize a receptor as a substrate, ability to translocate to the membrane-bound receptor, and the ability of the receptor substrate to activate the kinase (25). Although GRK3 mRNA transcripts could not be detected in primary cultures of human airway smooth muscle cells (22), these cells are known to dedifferentiate and change phenotype after several passages (12, 14). Preliminary Western studies from our laboratory (unpublished data) demonstrate the presence of GRK3 in murine lung homogenate, and these results support its potential physiological role revealed in our studies.
Airway responses were estimated as the time-integrated change in peak airway pressure (denoted as APTI), a measure that others have validated for its ability to provide a reasonable index of airway responsiveness (11, 20) as assessed by the more specific mechanical variables of resistance and compliance. This is especially true for small species at high respiratory frequencies in which tracheal pressure closely parallels changes in lung or respiratory resistance (29). Our use of the term airway responsiveness reflects the ubiquitous use of this term with respect to a decrement in lung function (e.g., spirometry, resistance, or APTI) in response to smooth muscle contractile agonists. It does not indicate the anatomic site of action of agonist or of GRK3. Indeed, on the basis of our data it is not possible to identify the location of action of MCh and we are unaware of evidence as to the distribution of muscarinic receptor subtypes within the murine lung. Despite some controversy regarding airway versus parenchymal sites of action, there is substantial evidence in other species to indicate that M3 muscarinic receptors mediate contraction of airway smooth muscle and lead to increased airway resistance or airway narrowing (2, 5). Muscarinic receptor subtypes have been characterized in murine tracheal smooth muscle, and M3 receptors have been implicated as the primary subtype leading to contractile signal transduction (10). If one speculates that receptor distribution in mouse airways is similar to other mammals, then it is likely that M3 muscarinic receptors located on airway smooth muscle cells contribute to the bronchoconstrictor response to MCh in mice.
Deburrman et al. (6) showed that both the
M2 and
M3 subtypes of the muscarinic
receptor are phosphorylated and desensitized by GRK3. Thus GRK3
modulation of M2 receptors could
also modulate airway responsiveness (10).
M2 receptors couple to
Gi to inhibit adenylate cyclase,
and thus activation of M2
receptors on airway smooth muscle could inhibit any tonic
Gs-coupled relaxation (i.e.,
2-AR) (8, 18). It is unclear
whether GRK3 modulates M2 and/or M3 receptors of murine airways.
However, given the magnitude of the enhanced airway response in GRK3
/
mice, it is unlikely that our results could be totally
explained by loss of M2 receptor inhibition of bronchodilation or by loss of
M2 autoinhibitory receptors, which
limit further release of ACh from vagal postganglionic efferents (10).
Interestingly, regulation of muscarinic receptors was shown to be
involved in airway hyperresponsiveness in the A/J mouse (11).
Given the pharmacological properties of MCh, it is reasonable to assume
that the airway response observed in this study was mediated primarily
through muscarinic receptors. On this basis and the basis of the
enhanced response of the APTI in GRK3
/
mice, we
speculate that GRK3 modulates muscarinic receptors in murine airways to
dampen lung responsiveness.
HR responses. MCh presumably acts at
cardiac M2 mAChRs to decrease HR
and at vascular M3 mAChRs to cause
vasodilatation. If GRK3 was crucial for phosphorylating and thus
desensitizing cardiac M2 mAChRs in
vivo, then one might expect that during MCh injection, GRK3
/
mice would have a more pronounced decrease in HR and a
longer recovery period compared with wild-type mice. There was no
evidence to support these assumptions. In fact, HR in GRK3
/
mice significantly exceeded control HR after MCh
injection, whereas this HR "overshoot" did not occur in wild-type
mice. These results suggest at least two mechanistic possibilities.
First, GRK3 may be important for desensitizing the baroreflex response to the vasodilatation-induced decrease in MAP subsequent to MCh injection. The baroreflex response is mediated through multiple central
nervous system structures, some of which activate adrenergic neurons in
this reflex pathway (15). Second, cardiac
M2 mAChRs or their signal
transduction mechanisms may have adapted during development in the GRK3
/
mice.
The increase in HR after SNP administration is indicative of the
baroreflex loop. GRK3
/
mice displayed a significantly greater percentage increase in HR compared with wild-type mice after
SNP administration. This may reflect an altered regulation of the
baroreflex control loop in the GRK3
/
mice. However, because blood pressure was not measured, it is not possible to differentiate between an altered blood pressure response to SNP versus
a change in the baroreceptor reflex loop gain. Interestingly, the
mechanism responsible for this difference between the wild-type and
GRK3
/
mice response to SNP is also true for the
baroreceptor response to MCh-induced hypotension. Although suggestive,
it remains to be determined what role GRK3
/
plays in the
quenching of the cardiac component of the baroreceptor reflex.
Although
1-ARs mediate the
effects of cardiac sympathetic efferents, it is unlikely, given our
results with propranolol, that GRK3 regulates cardiac
-AR activity.
If cardiac
-ARs were desensitized by GRK3 then one would expect a
greater resting HR in the GRK3
/
mice compared with the
wild-type mice; however, an opposite trend was observed.
We rejected the possibility that altered regulation of cardiac
M2 mAChRs contributed to the
distinct HR response observed in GRK3
/
mice on the basis
of the vagal stimulation (i.e., selective activation of cardiac
M2 receptors) and gallamine
dose-response protocols. These protocols demonstrated that the HR
response to vagal nerve stimulation and the inhibitory action of the
M2 antagonist gallamine on
decrease in HR were similar for GRK3
/
and wild-type mice. Because the vagus nerve was crushed cranial to the stimulation site, vasodilatation and baroreflex responses were prevented from reflexively affecting HR.
Of interest, although not statistically significant, was the tendency
for GRK3
/
mice to have a lower resting HR. This
difference was emphasized by the lack of response to propranolol in the
GRK3
/
mice. These data suggest that the tonic
sympathetic outflow from central cardiorespiratory centers may be
diminished in GRK3
/
mice. This is in contrast to that
observed for wild-type mice or reported for other strains where
-block has a reasonably strong influence on resting HR (7).
In summary, these data provide evidence of a physiological role for
GRK3 in the modulation of airway reactivity and cardiac baroreflex
chronotropy. GRK3
/
mice display enhanced airway responsiveness to intravenous MCh and a potentiated baroreflex chronotropic response to hypotension.
Perspectives
Despite the opportunity for knockout mice to adapt to and compensate for the absence of GRK3 protein, we found significant differences in airway and cardiac responses between knockout and wild-type mice. This study provides corroborative, physiological evidence that GRKs are important mediators of agonist-induced desensitization of GPCRs in both the periphery and the central nervous system. Previous studies have not addressed an in vivo physiological role for GRK3 in modulating airway reactivity. Although the role of M3 receptors in the pathophysiology of asthma has not been defined, several studies have reported that asthmatics have an enhanced vagal efferent tone to airway smooth muscle and that muscarinic contraction plays an important role in the bronchospasm associated with acute asthma (9). Our study demonstrates that GRK3 plays a role in desensitizing the murine airway response to MCh in vivo. If GRK3 were to play a similar role in human airways, then alterations in GRK3 expression, or function, could contribute to the airway hyperresponsiveness of asthma.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Sandra Vincent and Heather Lockett for excellent technical help.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
J. K. L. Walker is the recipient of a joint postdoctoral fellowship from the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada and the Canadian Lung Association. R. J. Lefkowitz is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-16037 and an Unrestricted Cardiovascular Grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. M. G. Caron is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS-19576 and an Unrestricted Neuroscience Grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. J. T. Fisher is supported by grants from the Ontario Thoracic Society and MRC Canada.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. T. Fisher, Dept. Physiology, Queen's Univ., Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 (E-mail: fisherjt{at}post.queensu.ca).
Received 9 July 1998; accepted in final form 22 January 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bai, T. R.
Beta2 adrenergic receptors in asthma: a current perspective.
Lung
170:
125-141,
1992[Medline].
2.
Barnes, P. J.
Muscarinic receptors in airways: recent developments.
J. Appl. Physiol.
68:
1777-1785,
1990
3.
Barnes, P. J.
Neural mechanisms in asthma.
Br. Med. Bull.
48:
149-168,
1992
4.
Benovic, J. L,
J. J. Onorato,
J. L. Arriza,
W. C. Stone,
M. Lohse,
N. A. Jenkins,
D. J. Gilbert,
N. G. Copeland,
M. G. Caron,
and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
Cloning, expression and chromosomal localization of
-adrenergic receptor kinase 2.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:
14939-14946,
1991
5.
Cabezas, G. A.,
P. D. Graf,
and
J. A. Nadel.
Sympathetic versus parasympathetic regulation of airways in dogs.
J. Appl. Physiol.
31:
651-655,
1971
6.
Debburman, S. K.,
P. Kunapuli,
J. L. Benovic,
and
M. M. Hosey.
Agonist-dependent phosphorylation of human muscarinic receptors in Spodoptera frugiperda insect cell membranes by G protein-coupled receptor kinases.
Mol. Pharmacol.
47:
224-233,
1995[Abstract].
7.
Desai, K. H.,
R. Sato,
E. Schauble,
G. S. Barsh,
B. K. Kobilka,
and
D. Bernstein.
Cardiovascular indexes in the mouse at rest and with exercise: new tools to study models of cardiac disease.
Am. J. Physiol.
272 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 41):
H1053-H1061,
1997
8.
Fernandes, L. B.,
A. D. Fryer,
and
C. A. Hirshman.
M2 muscarinic receptors inhibit isoproterenol-induced relaxation of canine airway smooth muscle.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
262:
119-126,
1992
9.
Fryer, A. D.,
and
D. B. Jacoby.
Effect of inflammatory cell mediators on M2 muscarinic receptors in the lungs.
Life Sci.
52:
529-536,
1993[Medline].
10.
Garssem, J.,
H. Van Loveren,
C. M. Gierveld,
H. Van Der Vliet,
and
F. P. Nijkamp.
Functional characterization of muscarinic receptors in murine airways.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
109:
53-60,
1993[Medline].
11.
Gavett, S. G.,
and
M. Wills-Karp.
Elevated lung G protein levels and muscarinic receptor affinity in a mouse model of airway hyperreactivity.
Am. J. Physiol.
265 (Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 9):
L493-L500,
1993
12.
Gaylinn, B. D.,
T. J. Eddinger,
P. A. Martino,
P. L. Monical,
D. F. Hunt,
and
R. A. Murphy.
Expression of nonmuscle myosin and light chains in smooth muscle.
Am. J. Physiol.
257 (Cell Physiol. 26):
C997-C1004,
1989
13.
Goodman, L. S.,
and
A. G. Gilman.
The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 797-798.
14.
Halayko, A. J.,
H. Salari,
X. Ma,
and
N. L. Stephens.
Markers of airway smooth muscle cell phenotype.
Am. J. Physiol.
270 (Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 14):
L1040-L1051,
1996
15.
Head, G. A. Central monoamine neurons and
cardiovascular control. Kidney Int.
41, Suppl. 37: S8-S13, 1992.
16.
Hou, V. Y.,
C. A. Hirshman,
and
C. W. Emala.
Neuromuscular relaxants as antagonists for M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors.
Anesthesiology
88:
744-750,
1998[Medline].
17.
Jaber, M.,
W. J. Koch,
H. A. Rockman,
B. Smith,
R. A. Bond,
K. K. Sulik,
J. Ross, Jr.,
R. J. Lefkowitz,
M. G. Caron,
and
B. Giros.
Essential role of
-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 in cardiac development and function.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:
12974-12979,
1996
18.
Jones, C. A.,
J. M. Madison,
M. Tom-Moy,
and
J. K. Brown.
Muscarinic cholinergic inhibition of adenylate cyclase in airway smooth muscle.
Am. J. Physiol.
253 (Cell Physiol. 22):
C97-C104,
1987
19.
Koch, W. J.,
H. A. Rockman,
P. Samama,
R. Hamilton,
R. A. Bond,
C. A. Milano,
and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
Cardiac function in mice overexpressing the
-adrenergic receptor kinase or
ARK inhibitor.
Science
268:
1350-1353,
1995
20.
Levitt, R. C.,
and
W. Mitzner.
Expression of airway hyperreactivity to acetylcholine as a simple autosomal trait in mice.
FASEB J.
2:
2605-2608,
1988[Abstract].
21.
Ma, X. Y.,
R. A. Shaffer,
F. M. Abboud,
and
M. W. Chapleau.
Functional genomics: analysis of afferent, central and efferent components of baroreceptor reflex in mice (Abstract).
FASEB J.
1:
A359,
1998.
22.
McGraw, D. W.,
and
S. B. Liggett.
Heterogeneity in
2-adrenergic receptor kinase expression in the lung accounts for cell-specific desensitization of the
2-adrenergic receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:
7338-7344,
1997
23.
Peppel, K.,
I. Boekhoff,
P. McDonald,
H. Breer,
M. G. Caron,
and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 (GRK3) gene disruption leads to loss of odorant receptor desensitization.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:
25425-25428,
1997
24.
Pitcher, J. A.,
N. J. Freedman,
and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
G protein-coupled receptor kinases.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:
653-692,
1998[Medline].
25.
Premont, R. T.,
J. Inglese,
and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
Protein kinases that phosphorylate activated G protein-coupled receptors.
FASEB J.
9:
175-182,
1995[Abstract].
26.
Walker, J. K. L.,
and
D. B. Jennings.
Ventilatory effects of angiotensin and vasopressin in conscious rats.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
74:
1258-1264,
1996[Medline].
27.
Walker, J. K. L., and D. B. Jennings.
Ventilatory effects of pressor and depressor agents in conscious
rats. Can. J. Physiol.
Pharmacol. In
press.
28.
Watson, S.,
and
S. Arkinstall.
The G-Protein Linked Receptor Facts-Book (1st ed.). San Diego: Academic, 1994.
29.
Widdicombe, J. G.
Regulation of tracheobronchial smooth muscle.
Physiol. Rev.
43:
1-37,
1963
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. C. H. Wang, K. A. Mihlbachler, A. C. Brunnett, and S. B. Liggett Targeted transgenesis reveals discrete attenuator functions of GRK and PKA in airway {beta}2-adrenergic receptor physiologic signaling PNAS, September 1, 2009; 106(35): 15007 - 15012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Deshpande, B. S. Theriot, R. B. Penn, and J. K. L. Walker {beta}-Arrestins specifically constrain {beta}2-adrenergic receptor signaling and function in airway smooth muscle FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2134 - 2141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Brass, J. W. Hollingsworth, E. McElvania-Tekippe, S. Garantziotis, I. Hossain, and D. A. Schwartz CD14 is an essential mediator of LPS-induced airway disease Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): L77 - L83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. L. Walker, R. R. Gainetdinov, D. S. Feldman, P. K. McFawn, M. G. Caron, R. J. Lefkowitz, R. T. Premont, and J. T. Fisher G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 regulates airway responses induced by muscarinic receptor activation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): L312 - L319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Hardouin, K. N. Richmond, A. Zimmerman, S. E. Hamilton, E. O. Feigl, and N. M. Nathanson Altered Cardiovascular Responses in Mice Lacking the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2002; 301(1): 129 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Volgyesi, L. N. Tremblay, P. Webster, N. Zamel, and A. S. Slutsky A new ventilator for monitoring lung mechanics in small animals J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2000; 89(2): 413 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Bohn, R. J. Lefkowitz, R. R. Gainetdinov, K. Peppel, M. G. Caron, and F. Lin Enhanced Morphine Analgesia in Mice Lacking -Arrestin 2 Science, December 24, 1999; 286(5449): 2495 - 2498. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |