AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 276: R1397-R1407, 1999;
0363-6119/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, C. A.
Vol. 276, Issue 5, R1397-R1407, May 1999

Endogenous thermoregulatory rhythms of squirrel monkeys in thermoneutrality and cold

Edward L. Robinson and Charles A. Fuller

Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8519


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Whole body heat production (HP) and heat loss (HL) were examined to determine if the free-running circadian rhythm in body temperature (Tb) results from coordinated changes in HP and HL rhythms in thermoneutrality (27°C) as well as mild cold (17°C). Squirrel monkey metabolism (n = 6) was monitored by both indirect and direct calorimetry, with telemetered measurement of Tb and activity. Feeding was also measured. Rhythms of HP, HL, and conductance were tightly coupled with the circadian Tb rhythm at both ambient temperatures (TA). At 17°C, increased HP compensated for higher HL at all phases of the Tb rhythm, resulting in only minor changes to Tb. Parallel compensatory changes of HP and HL were seen at all rhythm phases at both TA. Similar time courses of Tb, HP, and HL in their respective rhythms and the relative stability of Tb during both active and rest periods suggest action of the circadian timing system on Tb set point.

body temperature; direct calorimetry; indirect calorimetry; metabolism; heat production; heat loss; nonhuman primates; conductance


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PRIMATES, INCLUDING HUMANS, typically possess a robust circadian rhythm of body temperature (Tb). In the absence of external time cues, or zeitgebers, Tb rises and falls in a daily, or circadian, rhythm with a period of ~24 h. Changes in thermoregulatory effectors that contribute to this rhythm have been described and include heat production (HP), or metabolic rate (4, 17, 18, 21, 28, 37); heat loss (HL), including vascular changes (19, 42), skin temperature changes (18, 48), and thermal conductance (C); and whole-body HL rhythms (4, 5, 37).

In thermoneutrality, HP increases near the beginning of the active period (alpha ) and increased HL is phase delayed, resulting in net heat gain and producing a large increase in Tb. Similarly, decreased HP, followed by decreased HL, produces a net HL from the body around the beginning of the rest period (rho ), resulting in a large decrease in Tb (4, 5, 37). Combined, these changes in heat content produce the circadian rhythm in Tb.

Rhythms in both colonic and hypothalamic Tb have been shown for squirrel monkeys (14), and Tb rhythms have been shown in a variety of other homeotherms (for a recent review, see Ref. 36). However, relatively few studies have examined thermoregulatory rhythms at ambient temperatures (TA) outside the thermoneutral zone. For example, in primates, changes in brain or Tb means and amplitudes with TA have been shown in pig-tailed macaques (45) and squirrel monkeys (14, 15). Changes in the period of the Tb rhythm due to TA were also observed in the pig-tailed macaques.

Although changes in HP and thermal C rhythms have been demonstrated outside of thermoneutrality, the interrelationships of the whole body HP, HL, and Tb rhythms have not, to our knowledge, been examined in the cold. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the free-running circadian Tb rhythm results from coordinated rhythms of HP and HL in mild cold as well as in thermoneutrality. In addition, rhythm properties, representing output of the circadian timing system (CTS), might be expected to change due to altered Tb homeostasis in the cold.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protocol. Six adult male squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) with an average body mass of 1.05 kg (0.90-1.17 kg) were studied. Animals were conditioned to constant light (LL) for at least 7 days before the experiment. TA during acclimation was 27 ± 3°C. Ambient light intensity from an overhead cool white fluorescent fixture averaged 200 lx in the cage. The animal was provided with a pelleted diet (190-mg banana pellets, no. F0035; Bioserv) and water ad libitum.

At the beginning of an experiment, the animal was weighed and placed unrestrained into the calorimeter for a 24-h acclimation period. Thermoneutrality studies were conducted at 27 ± 1°C (43). For cold studies, TA was 17 ± 1°C, below thermal neutrality and presenting a mild cold stress previously shown to increase resting HP by ~60% (43). Light in the calorimeter was from a fiber-optic light with a quartz halogen source (Dolan-Jenner Fiber Lite 180) and averaged 200 lx. To reduce the effects of transients (16), we discarded data from the initial 24-h acclimation period, after which 6 days of data were collected at 10-min intervals by a microcomputer data acquisition system (Dataquest III, Data Sciences). The calorimeter was opened for waste removal and visual inspection of the monkey at ~36-h intervals. Data for the subsequent hour were discarded. Additional short gaps in the data resulted from loss of the telemetry signal and from sampling of inlet air.

Measurements. Tb and activity were measured as previously described (37), using a biotelemetry transmitter implanted in the peritoneum. HP was determined by measuring oxygen consumption. In this study, CO2 production was not measured, and an average respiratory quotient of 0.79 was assumed based on previous measurements (5 monkeys over 6 days). Continuous measurements of relative humidity were used to determine evaporative HL (EHL) and to correct gas measurements to fraction in dry air. Dry HL (DHL) was measured using direct calorimetry. Total HL was calculated as the sum of DHL and EHL. Total body thermal C was calculated at 10-min intervals as C = HP/(Tb - TA) using the formula of Bradley and Deavers (9) for total whole body C.

Food and water were available ad libitum. Animals were supplied with a tap switch that operated an automated feeder (Gerbrands G5100). Feeding was monitored continuously.

Data analysis. Average waveforms were determined by eduction of the data for each variable based on the rhythm period (tau ) for each animal. This procedure averages all data for a variable at the same rhythm phase, resulting in an average waveform (30). The reference phase for an animal's rhythms, nominally 0° circadian phase (CP), was defined as the ascending median crossing for Tb. Average waveforms were calculated after weighted interpolation to 144 points per cycle (2.5 per point) for each animal. Rhythm means and acrophases (phi ), or estimated phase angles of rhythm peaks, were determined from original data using the cosinor method (22, 23). This method also estimates rhythm amplitude from the fitted cosine function. Differences in rhythm means, phi , and amplitudes between TA were tested by multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) (SPSS). Differences between TAs that were significantly different from zero were accepted based on Pillais' trace statistic for multiple comparisons of Tb, HP, HL, feeding, and C, and on univariate F tests for individual variables, assuming critical probabilities of 0.05. Because activity measurements were sensitive to the quality of radio reception and, in some cases, were made with different transmitters at the two TA, quantitative comparisons of activity were not possible.

For each animal, onsets of alpha  and rho  were determined from average waveform eductions for each variable as the ascending and descending median crossings, respectively. Phase angles for alpha  and rho  onsets were standardized to degrees of the individual animal's tau , equal to a 360° cycle, relative to Tb alpha  onset, defined as zero degrees CP at each TA. Differences in onset of alpha  and rho , in degrees CP, and in alpha  and rho  means were tested using MANOVA.

The periods of individual rhythms were determined by spectral analysis using both the periodogram method (13, 47) and the linear-nonlinear least squares method (39). A single best period estimate for the animal (tau ) was obtained from Tb, HP, and HL period estimates, which generally agreed to within one sampling interval. Period estimates were also obtained for activity, feeding, and calculated C. We compared tau  between TA using paired t-tests (SPSS).

Statistically significant ultradian rhythms were also quantified using linear-nonlinear least squares fits, fitting multiple periods. The circadian component was satisfactorily filtered by ignoring significant periods of >18 h. The fractions of total ultradian amplitude, relative to the summed amplitude of ultradian and circadian components, were compared between TA by evaluating individual differences between 17 and 27°C using MANOVA.

Cumulative sums over the course of average rhythms and average rhythm totals were calculated for HP, HL, and feeding. Rates of HP and HL (in W/kg) were converted to kJ/kg by assuming data at 10-min sample intervals approximated an average over the subsequent interval. Total activity was also calculated from average waveforms at each TA. Cumulative activity was calculated as proportion of total average rhythm activity for each animal at each TA. Differences in total HP and HL, and feeding between TA, were tested by MANOVA.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Rhythms in thermoneutrality. Figure 1 shows three days of data from a monkey in thermoneutrality (27°C). All variables show circadian rhythmicity, with free-running periods of ~25.2 h. A consolidated alpha  is seen with simultaneous elevations in all variables. Tb during alpha  is between ~38.3 and 39°C and exhibits small increases when the animal is active. HP and HL have robust circadian rhythms and also exhibit changes in parallel with activity. Similar changes of amplitude are seen in the HP and HL rhythms, and the time courses of HP and HL changes are similar. Peaks in HP and HL of ~8 W/kg are seen in alpha , and both HP and HL fall to ~3-3.5 W/kg when the animal is relatively inactive. C shows maxima of ~0.6 W · kg-1 · °C-1, corresponding to the time of peaks in activity, HP, and HL. Minima of the Tb, HP, HL, activity, and C rhythms occur at about the same phase during rho . Tb is ~37°C during rho , consistently lower than during alpha . Minimal HP and HL during rho  are ~3 W/kg, and minimal C during rho  is ~0.3 W · kg-1 · °C-1. Brief episodes of elevated HP, HL, and C are also seen during rho . Feeding and activity counts indicate that the animal is awake at these times.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.   Data from a squirrel monkey in thermoneutrality [ambient temperature (TA) = 27°C] over 3 consecutive days in constant light (LL). Free-running rhythms are shown for (from top to bottom) measured body temperature (Tb), heat production (HP), whole body heat loss (HL), calculated thermal conductance (C), activity, and feeding. Rhythms show coupling and consolidated active and rest periods. HP, HL, and C changes are roughly in phase with Tb changes. PDT, Pacific Daylight Time.

Rhythms in mild cold. Rhythms for the same monkey during mild cold exposure (TA = 17°C) are shown in Fig. 2. Free-running circadian rhythms are seen in all variables; however, tau  are slightly shorter, ~24.8 h, than in thermoneutrality. Slightly shorter periods were seen in the cold in five monkeys, and no change was seen in one. In this monkey, alpha  appears more consolidated than in thermoneutrality; however, a bimodal alpha  is shown by HP, HL, C, and activity during the third cycle. Tb during alpha  is slightly elevated (39-39.5°C) compared with thermoneutrality. At low TA, alpha  Tb was higher in five monkeys and lower in one monkey. Tb in rho  was slightly elevated in this monkey (37.5-38.5°C) compared with thermoneutrality, as it was in two other monkeys. However, Tb during rho  was lower in the other three monkeys at low TA. HP and HL were markedly elevated in low TA. HP and HL during alpha  were between 7 and 8 W/kg and during rho  were between 3.5 and 5.5 W/kg. C was rhythmic at low TA but was reduced in both alpha  and rho  compared with that at thermoneutrality. Feeding and activity counts indicate periodic arousal during rho . During these episodes, marked increases in HL were seen, showing greater elevation than during similar episodes in thermoneutrality. Increases in HP and C also occurred at the start of these waking periods, similar to the pattern in thermoneutrality.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.   Data from a squirrel monkey in mild cold (TA = 17°C) over 3 consecutive days in LL. Although HP and HL are increased and C is reduced, amplitudes and phase relationships are similar to rhythms for this animal in thermoneutrality (see Fig. 1).

Average rhythms in thermoneutrality and cold. Figure 3 shows normalized average rhythms for six monkeys in thermoneutrality (TA = 27°C) and during mild cold exposure (TA = 17°C). Circadian rhythms are apparent for all variables. In the cold, however, HP and HL are elevated, whereas C is depressed. Rhythm means, means for alpha  and rho  periods, and rhythm minima and maxima are summarized in Fig. 4A, as well as average rhythm amplitudes (Fig. 4B) and tau  (Fig. 4C). Rhythm means showed a significant effect of TA in MANOVA (Pillais' trace = 0.99, F5,1 = 346.1, P < 0.05). Means during alpha  also showed a significant effect of TA (Pillais' trace = 0.99, F5,1 = 1,806.4, P < 0.05), as did means during rho  (Pillais' trace = 0.99, F5,1 = 488.4, P < 0.05). Rhythm minima were significantly affected by TA (Pillais' trace = 0.99, F4,2 = 45.1, P < 0.05). Feeding minima were omitted from the comparison, because all were zero. Rhythm maxima did not show a significant effect of TA overall (Pillais' trace = 0.99, F5,1 = 122.0, P = 0.069); however, individual F tests showed effects on thermoregulatory effectors, HP, HL, and C. The feeding maximum was also significantly elevated in the cold. Rhythm amplitude estimated by the cosinor method did not show a significant effect of TA in multivariate tests (Pillais' trace = 0.99, F5,1 = 74.7, P = 0.088); however, Tb and C rhythm amplitudes were significantly altered. Rhythm ranges, calculated from the minima and maxima shown in Fig. 4, showed a significant effect of TA (Pillais' trace = 1.0, F4,2 = 383.8, P < 0.01), similarly attributable to changes in Tb and C rhythms.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.   Average waveforms (±SE) for 6 monkeys are shown for both thermoneutrality (TA = 27°C, gray lines) and mild cold (TA = 17°C, black lines). Phase angle was standardized to each animal's rhythm period (tau ) and interpolated before averaging of values for all animals (n = 6). Changes due to TA include increased amplitude of Tb rhythm, elevated HP and HL, and decreased amplitude of C rhythm. However, rhythm phasing and most rhythm amplitudes are similar.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.   A: means ± SE for rhythms, means for active (alpha ) and rest (rho ) periods, and rhythm minima and maxima. B: mean ± SE rhythm amplitudes. C: mean ± SE tau . Means at 27°C are shown by light hatching and means at 17°C by dark hatching. Statistically significant differences between TA are indicated (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01).

Mean ± SE Tb at 27°C was 37.88 ± 0.09°C and at 17°C was 38.08 ± 0.20°C. Individual differences between TA were not significant in a univariate F test. On average, Tb during alpha  was 38.69 ± 0.22°C at 17°C and 38.36 ± 0.07°C at 27°C, but differences were not statistically significant. Tb during rho  was 37.24 ± 0.21°C in mild cold and 37.29 ± 0.10°C in thermoneutrality, and the difference also did not reach statistical significance. Maximum Tb at 27°C was 38.79 ± 0.05°C and 39.05 ± 0.24°C at 17°C. Differences were not significant. Minimum Tb at 17°C (36.81 ± 0.24°C), however, was significantly decreased relative to that at 27°C (37.89 ± 0.09°C, F1,5 = 30.6, P < 0.01). Amplitude of the Tb rhythm was 0.746 ± 0.03°C at 27°C and 0.96 ± 0.05°C at 17°C. Significantly increased rhythm amplitude was seen in the cold (F1,5 = 37.8, P < 0.01). Similarly, the range of the Tb rhythm was significantly greater at 17°C (F1,5 = 134.2, P < 0.001). Individual cycle amplitudes from cosinor analysis showed a slight transient increase in Tb rhythm amplitude over the first five cycles in cold compared with those in thermoneutrality. A linear least squares fit of differences between 17 and 27°C against cycle number demonstrated significantly increasing amplitude (intercept = 0.05, slope = 0.05, Pearson r2 = 0.776, P < 0.05). Cycle means showed no significant difference between TA. No other significant differences in either cycle means or amplitudes over time were seen.

Both HP and HL continued to show robust rhythmicity in mild cold and were conspicuously elevated at all phases of their rhythms. Means for both the HP and HL rhythms were significantly elevated at low TA, as expected based on a prior study of Stitt and Hardy (43). In thermoneutrality, mean HP was 4.82 ± 0.20 W/kg, and in mild cold it was 6.16 ± 0.40 W/kg. Differences were statistically significant (F1,15 = 19.8, P < 0.01). Mean HL at 27°C was 4.64 ± 0.21 W/kg and at 17°C was 6.17 ± 0.28 W/kg, and differences were significant (F1,5 = 43.5, P = 0.001).

Increased HP and HL were seen during both alpha  and rho . Mean alpha  HP was 7.08 ± 0.54 W/kg at 17°C and 5.60 ± 0.30 W/kg at 27°C. Differences were statistically significant (F1,5 = 12.7, P < 0.05). Means during alpha  were also significantly different for HL (F1,5 = 26.7, P < 0.01). At 17°C, mean alpha  HL was 7.00 ± 0.39 W/kg, and at 27°C it was 5.39 ± 0.31 W/kg. Average rho  HP in thermoneutrality was 3.90 ± 0.17 W/kg, and in mild cold it was 5.25 ± 0.26 W/kg (F1,5 = 14.1, P < 0.05). Average rho  HL was 3.79 ± 0.18 W/kg at 27°C and 5.25 ± 0.26 W/kg at 17°C (F1,5 = 32.9, P < 0.01).

Elevated HP and HL were also demonstrated by increases in both minima and maxima. Minimum HP increased significantly from 3.30 ± 0.20 W/kg at 27°C to 4.37 ± 0.29 W/kg at 17°C (F1,5 = 10.0, P < 0.05). Maximum HP was 6.55 ± 0.36 W/kg at 27°C and 8.27 ± 0.70 W/kg at 17°C (F1,5 = 14.1, P < 0.05). Minimum HL at 27°C was 3.06 ± 0.14 W/kg, and at 17°C it was 4.52 ± 0.15 W/kg (F1,5 = 84.2, P < 0.001). Maximum HL was 6.25 ± 0.37 W/kg at 27°C and 8.13 ± 0.49 W/kg at 17°C (F1,5 = 22.4, P < 0.01). Neither amplitudes nor ranges of the HP and HL rhythms differed significantly between TA.

Whole body C was conspicuously reduced at low TA. Animals observed in low TA typically exhibited piloerection and adopted a more hunched posture when resting. The rhythm mean of C in thermoneutrality was 0.44 ± 0.02 W · kg-1 · °C-1, and mean C in mild cold was 0.30 ± 0.02 W · kg-1 · °C-1. Differences were statistically significant (F1,5 = 70.3, P < 0.001).

Unlike the HP and HL rhythms, the C rhythm appeared to be reduced in amplitude at low TA due to disproportionate reduction of alpha  values. Mean C during alpha  was 0.50 ± 0.024 W · kg-1 · °C-1 at 27°C and 0.33 ± 0.028 W · kg-1 · °C-1 at 17°C (F1,5 = 115.4, P < 0.001). During rho , mean C was 0.38 ± 0.016 W · kg-1 · °C-1 at 27°C and 0.27 ± 0.018 W · kg-1 · °C-1 at 17°C (F1,5 = 25.3, P < 0.01).

Minimum and maximum C were significantly reduced in the cold. At 27°C, minimum C was 0.32 ± 0.02 W · kg-1 · °C-1 and the maximum was 0.57 ± 0.03 W · kg-1 · °C-1. At 17°C, minimum C was reduced to 0.22 ± 0.02 W · kg-1 · °C-1 (F1,5 = 19.6, P < 0.01) and the maximum was reduced to 0.39 ± 0.04 W · kg-1 · °C-1 (F1,5 = 115.2, P < 0.001). The C rhythm amplitude at 27°C was 0.087 ± 0.018 W · kg-1 · °C-1, and at 17°C it was 0.043 ± 0.010 W · kg-1 · °C-1 (F1,5 = 9.8, P < 0.05). The rhythm ranges, calculated from minima and maxima, also differed significantly between TA (F1,5 = 8.4, P < 0.05).

For feeding, rhythm means and amplitudes were not significantly different between TA. Mean feeding at 27°C was 2.68 ± 0.27 counts per 10-min interval, and at 17°C it was 3.29 ± 0.44 counts per 10-min interval, not significantly different. However, feeding during both alpha  and rho  increased significantly in separate tests of differences between TA. During alpha  at 27°C, mean pellet delivery was 4.1 ± 0.4 pellets per 10-min sampling interval, which increased to 5.6 ± 0.9 pellets per 10-min sampling interval at 17°C (F1,5 = 6.9, P < 0.05). At 27°C, feeding during rho  averaged 0.9 ± 0.1 pellets per 10-min sampling interval, and at 17°C it was 1.3 ± 0.2 pellets per 10-min sampling interval (F1,5 = 16.5, P = 0.01). Increased ingestion and energy intake are thus suggested at low TA, but different wastage of delivered food pellets, although not observed, was not measured. The amplitude of the feeding rhythm appeared to be greater in the cold, 2.61 ± 0.37 counts in 10 min, compared with 1.82 ± 0.18 counts in 10 min in thermoneutrality, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

tau . The tau  estimated by the periodogram method are shown in Fig. 4C. Periods were significantly shorter (P < 0.05 in paired t-tests) at low TA, with similar reductions for Tb (-0.5 ± 0.1 h), HP (-0.4 ± 0.1 h), HL (-0.5 ± 0.1 h), and C (-0.4 ± 0.1 h). Periods did not differ significantly between TA for feeding or activity (not shown). Smaller decreases were seen using estimates from the linear-nonlinear least squares method. Using this method, changes in tau  were significant only for Tb (-0.3 ± 0.1 h) and HL (-0.3 ± 0.1 h). Neither method showed significant differences in tau  for activity or feeding. Differences in estimates are likely attributable to the small number of cycles evaluated.

Onsets of alpha  and rho  and calculated phi . Although shorter tau  were seen at low TA, evidence for conservation of rhythm internal organization is shown in Fig. 5. Relative phase angles of alpha  onsets, rho  onsets, and phi  are shown in degrees of each animal's tau  at both TA. The overall organization of rhythms is similar at the two TA. Close coupling of all rhythms is evident, and similar timing relative to the Tb rhythm is shown. TA did not significantly affect relative alpha  onsets. Difference in phi  was significant only for HL (F1,5 = 7.96, P < 0.05), showing an advanced peak at low TA. Difference in rho  onsets was significant only for feeding (F1,5 = 7.4, P < 0.05).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5.   Averages ± SE for relative duration of alpha , time of alpha  onset, time of alpha  end (rho  onset), and time of rhythm acrophases (phi ; n = 6). Bars indicate alpha  at 27°C (open bars) and at 17°C (shaded bars). Markers show calculated phi  at 27°C () and at 17°C (open circle ). Statistically significant differences between TA are indicated (* P < 0.05).

Ultradian rhythms. Ultradian rhythms were seen for all variables at both TA. Most animals showed significant periods of 12-13 h, most likely due to bimodal alpha , and significant periods between 2 and 8 h were also seen in some animals. The fraction of total amplitude accounted for by ultradians, although generally higher at 17°C, did not change significantly between TA for any variable. Ultradians accounted for 49% (±3.3) of Tb amplitude in thermoneutrality and 43% (±1.6) in cold. For HP, HL, and C, ultradians comprised 54% (±3.0), 53% (±2.7), and 55% (±5.4) of amplitude in thermoneutrality, respectively. In the cold, ultradians increased to 66% (±4.8) of total amplitude for HP, 59% (±1.3) for HL, and 77% (±4.9) for C. Activity and feeding ultradians showed little effect of TA. For feeding, the percentage of total amplitude was 62% at both TA (±4.8 at 27°C, ±4.0 at 17°C). Activity ultradians increased slightly from 58% (±3.3) to 62% (±7.8) at low TA.

Average rhythm totals. Figure 6 shows accumulated totals over the course of average rhythms of HP, HL, and feeding. Also shown is the average time course of fractional activity accumulation, with the total activity in each TA assumed to equal one. Differences showed a significant effect of TA (Pillais' trace = 0.91, F3,3 = 10.0, P < 0.05). Univariate F tests showed significant increases in HP (F1,5 = 16.3, P = 0.01) and HL (F1,5 = 17.6, P < 0.01) but not in feeding. The time courses of HP and HL accumulation are conspicuously more linear at low TA, reflecting the relative difficulty in regulating HL. Activity accumulation, relative to total rhythm activity, follows strikingly similar time courses in both TA.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6.   Cumulative totals for average rhythms (±SE), comparing TA. Thermoneutrality is shown by gray lines and low TA by black lines. HP and HL are shown as total energy expenditure (kJ) based on rates in watts at 10-min intervals. Activity is standardized to fraction of each animal's total at each TA.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study tested the hypothesis that the free-running circadian Tb rhythm, in both mild cold and thermoneutrality, is regulated by coordinated changes in both HP and HL rhythms. Altered rhythm properties were also considered as a possible result of altered Tb homeostasis. The free-running Tb rhythm was shown to result from a phase offset between phase-coupled HP and HL rhythms of approximately equal amplitude in both TA. Although the magnitude of thermal exchange with the environment was substantially increased (HL) and a significant compensatory increase in metabolic rate (HP) occurred, the circadian organization of these thermoregulatory effectors was essentially unaltered at low TA. However, the results suggest that although circadian and homeostatic demands have separate and additive influences on effectors of Tb regulation, the CTS acts principally on Tb set point.

Homeostatic responses in defense of Tb. Transient decreases in Tb were observed during the initial acclimation day in at least three monkeys, as reported previously (16). However, after initial cold exposure, defense of Tb is evident in this study. Mean Tb, measured intra-abdominally, was not significantly changed by cold exposure, although it averaged slightly lower, by 0.2°C, in thermoneutrality. In squirrel monkeys in an LD 12:12 cycle, mean hypothalamic and colonic temperatures showed a tendency to increase with TA (14). In a larger monkey, the pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina), increased Tb was also seen with increasing TA (48). Responses of thermoregulatory effectors consistent with Tb homeostasis were seen at low TA. As expected, whole body HL was increased at all phases of the Tb rhythm. Compensatory increases in HP were also seen at all phases, and thus total HP was increased with the result that the Tb rhythm differed little from compared thermoneutrality. Whole body C was reduced at all phases of the Tb rhythm during cold exposure. Feeding was elevated in the cold, consistent with increased energy demand. Ability of the animals to remain in energy balance was shown by absence of significant body mass changes. Five animals showed a mean ± SE body weight increase of 0.6 ± 0.8% over 7 days in thermoneutrality and a decrease of 1.7 ± 1.0% in the cold. Hydration state, which may have changed due to cold-induced diuresis, was not determined.

Circadian rhythm of Tb is highly conserved in mild cold. Changes in the Tb rhythm were consistent with prior demonstration of reduced rho  Tb and greater rhythm amplitude at low TA (14). Increased amplitude of the Tb rhythm at low TA was due mainly to reduced rho  Tb. In an earlier study, ranges of hypothalamic and colonic temperature rhythms of squirrel monkeys in an LD cycle were greatest at 20°C, the lowest TA tested, and decreased as TA approached thermoneutrality (14). In contrast, in one study of humans, the amplitude of the rectal Tb rhythm was found to decrease with decreasing TA between 24 and 20°C but also when TA increased between 24 and 32°C (5).

Rhythmicity of metabolism is maintained in mild cold. Rhythms of metabolism have been well documented in many homeotherms and a few poikilotherms (6, 26, 36, 46). In this study, robust rhythms of HP and HL were seen in both thermoneutral and cold TA. In contrast, a prior study showed variable HP rhythms but highly regular Tb rhythms in restrained squirrel monkeys in thermoneutrality (18), demonstrating that metabolic rhythms are not necessary for a Tb rhythm to occur. Humans with metabolic disturbances (hyper- and hypometabolic) also show essentially normal Tb rhythms (1).

The temporal organization of HP and HL rhythms in this study, as well as the organization of the Tb rhythm, was largely unchanged in the cold despite altered thermoregulatory demands and elevated metabolism. In a previous study, Tb phi  was shown to be unaffected by TA in squirrel monkeys in an LD cycle (14). In the present study, phi  of free-running HP, C, or activity or feeding rhythms relative to the Tb rhythm phase were not significantly different at low TA. Significantly advanced rhythm phi  was only seen for HL. Furthermore, onsets of alpha  or rho  periods relative to Tb rhythm phase did not differ significantly between TA for HP, HL, C, or activity. Feeding alpha  onset did not differ significantly, but rho  onset was advanced in the cold, resulting in a shorter feeding period. In addition, although significantly increased HP and HL were seen at all times at 17°C (cf. Fig. 3), the amplitude of these rhythms did not change significantly, although rho  HP and HL appeared to be disproportionately increased. These increases generally coincided with intervals in which rho  Tb was below levels seen in thermoneutrality. A rhythm in C persisted below thermoneutrality, but with decreased amplitude, as seen in prior studies (5, 6, 48). The C rhythm was approximately in phase with the HP and HL rhythms at both TA. Continued rhythmicity of C can be shown to result from rhythmicity of Tb and metabolism at low TA. Reduced amplitude of the C rhythm in the cold relative to the HL rhythm is, however, the result of disproportionate increase in the temperature gradient between Tb and TA compared with the changes in Tb and HP, from which it is calculated. The temperature gradient increased on average 87%, as opposed to increases of 27% in HP and 0.3% in Tb.

Decreased tau  in mild cold. Shorter tau  may have been a response to TA, as seen by Tokura and Aschoff (45) for the pig-tailed macaque, but this was not systematic for squirrel monkeys (7). In the pig-tailed macaque, shorter tau  were seen at 17°C compared with 32°C after step changes in TA. Effects of TA on period have also been reported in other species (3, 20). Because our studies examined neutral and cold TA in separate experiments, other explanations cannot be ruled out, including prior photoperiod, time of year, aging changes, or endogenous annual rhythms. Prior photoperiod was controlled, however, and regressions of tau  change against time of year (27°C, February-July; 17°C, May, July, and September-November) or against aging changes between studies at different TA (1-13 mo) were not significant. It is also unlikely that free-running circannual rhythms would be in the same relative phases at each TA for the five monkeys in this study that showed period changes. Although in this study core Tb was measured intra-abdominally, prior studies showed hypothalamic temperature in squirrel monkeys, although more closely regulated, to decrease in parallel with colonic temperature when TA was reduced (14, 15). The tau  changes observed might thus be due to incomplete temperature compensation of the CTS due to slight alterations to the Tb rhythm and hypothalamic temperatures.

Evidence for rhythmicity of Tb set point. Although the mechanism by which the CTS produces the daily Tb rhythm remains unknown, our data clearly indicate that it involves a regulated change in Tb that does not depend on environmental heat load. Aschoff has proposed that the CTS acts primarily on Tb set point in generating the daily Tb rhythm (2). Prior demonstration of an attenuated Tb rhythm increase in rats given antipyretics provides another line of evidence for set point control by the CTS (41). We believe the set point hypothesis is the most parsimonious basis for interpretation of our results.

Relative constancy of Tb is seen during both alpha  and rho . Both alpha  and rho  Tb are clearly regulated at both TA through autonomic control of both HP and HL. Changes in HP are compensated by changes in HL, and the reverse is also seen. During non-steady-state transitions between alpha  and rho  Tb, we provide evidence for reciprocal augmentation and inhibition of effectors, measured here as whole body HP and HL, that is consistent with the classic model of feedback regulation of Tb (10).

Generation of the Tb rhythm by a phase offset between HP and HL rhythms was proposed some years ago by Metz et al. (29). The basis for this phase offset, as well as phase lock with the Tb rhythm can easily be explained through set point change. Excess HP during the daily Tb rise, with inhibited rise of HL, and the reverse, during the daily Tb fall, are consistent with set point change.

Is the Tb rhythm forced or regulated? For either the HP or HL rhythm to drive the Tb rhythm independently from set point change would require failure of compensatory HP and HL changes to maintain regulated Tb. We find no evidence of this in our data, however. At low TA, HL is chronically elevated. However, compensatory offset of HP acts to preserve Tb levels at all times of day, although in severe cold this compensation might not necessarily be successful. In thermoneutrality, we similarly see no evidence for uncompensated effects of HP (or HL) on Tb. Further suggesting a regulated change is the observation that Tb, HP, and HL rhythm timing is largely unchanged in mild cold.

Is HP under circadian regulation? Rhythms of metabolic rate are well known and may be nearly as ubiquitous as Tb rhythms in homeotherms (26). The role of independent rhythms in thermoregulatory effectors remains controversial, however (5, 6, 34, 36, 46). Various physiological rhythms that can alter effector responses have been discussed, including catecholamine (19, 42) and melatonin rhythms (27). An alternative proposal to Tb set point regulation in circadian rhythmicity is regulation of HP or heat content (46). Heat regulation, however, is problematic (11, 25), and there is a general consensus that temperature is sensed and regulated. Reduced TA is expected to reduce peripheral temperatures (48), thus altering heat distribution and content of the body. Nevertheless, the results of this study show that stereotypical rhythms of Tb, HP, and HL occur at low TA as well as in thermoneutrality, despite likely differences in tissue heat distribution and tonically elevated HP and HL. The implication appears to be that although rhythmic variation in HP clearly exists, it does not appear to be easily separable from the regulation of core Tb.

The amplitude of the HP and HL rhythms appears to be conserved between thermoneutrality and mild cold, given otherwise equivalent experimental conditions. However, restraint has been shown to attenuate the metabolic rhythm (18). A circadian rhythm of metabolism may promote energetic economy (8), but at least in squirrel monkeys, it appears to be produced as a part of Tb rhythm generation.

Anti-homeostatic hypothesis: Does circadian variation in thermoregulation "oppose" homeostatic regulation? Phase-dependent thermal preferences and thermoregulatory responses in rodents have been cited as evidence that the circadian Tb rhythm is generated by some unknown mechanism that acts to oppose homeostatic set point regulation (33-35). It has also been suggested that there is a single set point for homeostatic Tb regulation throughout the day and that Tb undergoes forced changes by the CTS, for which counteracting thermoregulatory responses are predicted (35). Although rodents and primates may differ, we do not find evidence for forced Tb changes in our data, as previously discussed. We believe the antihomeostatic, or non-set point, hypothesis for the Tb rhythm is unsatisfactory for explaining our results on the basis of several additional considerations.

Although TA differences in our experiment were forced rather than elective, we see no evidence that TA alters the basic temporal organization of either the Tb rhythm or the rhythmicity of autonomic effectors of Tb regulation at the whole body level. Furthermore, a reexamination of the rodent data (33-35) suggests that although lower TA are more frequently preferred around the times of maximal Tb, initiation of the rising and falling phases of the Tb rhythm is relatively independent of TA selection. Thus it is not clear how TA, as opposed to autonomic changes, relates to the underlying mechanism for circadian Tb rhythm generation.

Phase-dependent responses of Tb to TA (5, 18, 21, 35, 48), as well as phase-dependent thermoregulatory responses that might influence the response of Tb to TA, have been described. These include HP (4, 17, 18, 21, 28, 37), vascular changes (19, 42), skin temperature (18, 48), C, and whole body HL rhythms (4, 5, 37). Changes in effector gain have been thought to reinforce set point regulation (24) and may contribute to generation of the Tb rhythm (38).

Phase-dependent change of metabolic rate with cold exposure has also been described (35), in addition to the tendency for lower rho  Tb. In humans, a wider range of Tb is tolerated during rho  compared with alpha  with triggering homeostatic responses (44). Significantly, our results show that the differential increase in HP during rho  at low TA coincides with a fall in Tb below the level seen in thermoneutrality. Increased average HL and C are also seen at this time in our data, suggesting that autonomic mechanisms for heat conservation may be compromised, at least in a cold environment, although evidence exists for circadian alteration of related autonomic mechanisms in thermoneutrality, as previously discussed. We again suggest that the most parsimonious explanation is that set point regulation of Tb is active during rho  at low TA as well as in thermoneutrality, although possibly modified by circadian changes in tolerated Tb range, effector action, or both.

Hierarchical integration of CTS and Tb set point regulation. Evidence from lesion studies (12, 31, 32, 34) shows independent operation of Tb homeostasis and the generation of Tb rhythmicity by the CTS. The results of this study show that CTS organization of thermoregulatory rhythms is relatively independent of homeostatic responses to thermal challenge. The circadian organization of Tb, HP, and HL rhythms appears nearly stereotypical at both TA and responds little to minor alterations of the Tb rhythm or to homeostatic changes in peripheral effectors. Thus the relationship between the CTS and thermoregulatory systems appears to us to be hierarchical, with set point changes imposed by the CTS on thermoregulatory centers.

Does CTS determine set point rhythm or set point offsets? What is not apparent from this and prior studies showing continued rhythmicity of Tb after preoptic hypothalamic lesions (32, 40) is the nature of the CTS signal producing the Tb rhythm. On the basis of whole body HP and HL measurements, we can propose, however, that there are both steady-state alpha  and rho  phases and dynamic transitional phases of the Tb rhythm. Indeed, the circadian Tb rhythm might be most simply explained by two set point changes, one occurring at the beginning of alpha  and the other at the beginning of rho . The rate of Tb increase or decrease at these times, however, is also known to depend on masking factors, as with light and dark masking in squirrel monkeys (37) that produce more rapid transitions compared with LL. The time courses of increased and decreased Tb, HP, and HL in constant conditions do not, however, appear to depend on Tb homeostasis, as shown in the present study. Once elevated (alpha ) or depressed (rho ) Tb is established, it is possible that action of the CTS on Tb set point is no longer required, although other rhythms may continue to act on thermoregulatory effector responses.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. V. H. Demaria-Pesce for discussions and assistance with methodology and Drs. J. D. Miller and D. M. Murakami, who suggested improvements to the statistical analysis.


    FOOTNOTES

This research was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration grants NGT-50448, NAG 2-587, and NAG 2-840.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. A. Fuller, Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, Univ. of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, California 95616-8519 (E-mail: cafuller{at}ucdavis.edu).

Received 9 March 1998; accepted in final form 11 January 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Abe, K., N. Matsuura, M. Endo, H. Fujita, N. Fukushima, and Y. Nohara. Effect of changes in basal metabolic rate on the circadian rhythm of human body temperature. J. Interdiscip. Cycle Res. 13: 121-127, 1982.

2.   Aschoff, J. Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 25: 11-28, 1960[Medline].

3.   Aschoff, J. Circadian rhythms: general features and endocrinological aspects. In: Endocrine Rhythms, edited by D. T. Krieger. New York: Raven, 1979, p. 1-61.

4.   Aschoff, J., H. Biebach, A. Heise, and T. Schmidt. Day-night variation in heat balance. In: Heat Loss from Animals and Man, Assessment and Control, edited by J. L. Monteith, and L. E. Mount. London: Butterworths, 1974, p. 147-172.

5.   Aschoff, J., and A. Heise. Thermal conductance in man: its dependence on time of day and on ambient temperature. In: Advances in Climatic Physiology, edited by S. Itoh, K. Ogata, and H. Yoshimura. Tokyo: Igaku Shoin, 1972, p. 334-348.

6.   Aschoff, J., and H. Pohl. Rhythmic variations in energy metabolism. Federation Proc. 29: 1541-1552, 1970[Medline].

7.   Aschoff, J., and H. Tokura. Circadian activity rhythms in squirrel monkeys: entrainment by temperature cycles. J. Biol. Rhythms 1: 91-99, 1986.

8.  Berger, R. J., and N. H. Phillips. Comparative aspects of energy metabolism, body temperature and sleep. Acta Physiol. Scand. 133, Suppl. 574: 21-27, 1988.

9.   Bradley, S. R., and D. R. Deavers. A re-examination of the relationship between thermal conductance and body weight in mammals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 65A: 465-476, 1980.

10.   Burton, A. C. The operating characteristics of the human thermoregulatory mechanism. In: Temperature, Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry. New York: Reinhold, 1941, p. 522-528.

11.   Cabanac, M. Regulation and modulation in biology. A reexamination of temperature regulation. In: Thermoregulation. Tenth International Symposium on the Pharmacology of Thermoregulation, edited by C. M. Blatteis. New York: New York Acad. Sci., 1997, p. 21-31.

12.   Edgar, D. M. Circadian Timekeeping in the Squirrel Monkey: Neural and Photic Control of Sleep, Brain Temperature, and Drinking. (Ph.D. thesis). Riverside: Univ. of California, 1986.

13.   Enright, J. T. The search for rhythmicity in biological time-series. J. Theor. Biol. 8: 426-468, 1965[Medline].

14.   Fuller, C. A. Circadian brain and body temperature rhythms in the squirrel monkey. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 15): R242-R246, 1984.

15.   Fuller, C. A., and M. A. Baker. Selective regulation of brain and body temperatures in the squirrel monkey. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 14): R293-R297, 1983.

16.   Fuller, C. A., F. M. Sulzman, and M. C. Moore-Ede. Thermoregulation is impaired in an environment without circadian time cues. Science 199: 794-796, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Fuller, C. A., F. M. Sulzman, and M. C. Moore-Ede. Circadian control of thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. Am. J. Physiol. 236 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 5): R153-R161, 1979.

18.   Fuller, C. A., F. M. Sulzman, and M. C. Moore-Ede. Role of heat loss and heat production in generation of the circadian temperature rhythm of the squirrel monkey. Physiol. Behav. 34: 543-546, 1985[Medline].

19.   Gautherie, M. Circadian rhythm in the vasomotor oscillations of skin temperature in man. Int. J. Chronobiol. 1: 103-139, 1973[Medline].

20.   Gibbs, F. P. Temperature dependence of the rat circadian pacemaker. Am. J. Physiol. 241 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 10): R17-R20, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Graf, R. Diurnal changes of thermoregulatory functions in pigeons. I. Effector mechanisms. Pflügers Arch. 173: 173-179, 1980.

22.   Halberg, F., E. A. Johnson, W. Nelson, W. Runge, and R. Sothern. Autorhythmometry procedures for physiologic self-measurements and their analysis. Physiol. Teach. 1: 1-11, 1972.

23.   Halberg, F., Y. L. Tong, and E. A. Johnson. Circadian system phase: an aspect of temporal morphology; procedures and illustrative examples. In: The Cellular Aspects of Biorhythms, edited by H. von Mayersbach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1967, p. 20-48.

24.   Hardy, J. D. Physiology of temperature regulation. Physiol. Rev. 41: 521-606, 1961[Free Full Text].

25.   Hensel, H. Thermoreception and Temperature Regulation. London: Academic, 1981.

26.   Kayser, C., and A. Heusner. Le rythme nycthéméral de la dépense d'énergie. J. Physiol. Paris 59: 3-116, 1967[Medline].

27.   Kruchi, K., C. Cajochen, and A. Wirz-Justice. A relationship between heat loss and sleepiness: effects of postural change and melatonin administration. J. Appl. Physiol. 83: 134-139, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Kruchi, K., and A. Wirz-Justice. Circadian rhythm of heat production, heart rate, and skin and core temperature under unmasking conditions in men. Am. J. Physiol. 267 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 36): R819-R829, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Metz, B., C. Marx, G. Hiebel, P. Reys, and C. Kayser. Le rythme nicthéméral de la température et de la calorification. J. Physiol. Paris 44: 135-142, 1952.

30.   Moore-Ede, M. C., F. M. Sulzman, and C. A. Fuller. The Clocks That Time Us. Physiology of the Circadian Timing System. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1982.

31.   Osborne, A. R., and R. Refinetti. Effects of hypothalamic lesions on the body temperature rhythm of the golden hamster. Neuroreport 6: 2187-2192, 1995[Medline].

32.   Refinetti, R. Effects of suprachiasmatic lesions on temperature regulation in the golden hamster. Brain Res. Bull. 36: 81-84, 1995[Medline].

33.   Refinetti, R. Rhythms of temperature selection and body temperature are out of phase in the golden hamster. Behav. Neurosci. 109: 523-527, 1995[Medline].

34.   Refinetti, R. Homeostasis and circadian rhythmicity in the control of body temperature. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 813: 63-70, 1997[Free Full Text].

35.   Refinetti, R. Homeostatic and circadian control of body temperature in the fat-tailed gerbil. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 119: 295-300, 1998.

36.   Refinetti, R., and M. Menaker. The circadian rhythm of body temperature. Physiol. Behav. 51: 613-637, 1992[Medline].

37.   Robinson, E. L., V. H. Demaria-Pesce, and C. A. Fuller. Circadian rhythms of thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Am. J. Physiol. 265 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 34): R781-R785, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

38.   Robinson, E. L., and C. A. Fuller. Light masking of circadian rhythms of heat production, heat loss, and body temperature in squirrel monkeys. Am. J. Physiol. 276 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 45): R298-R307, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

39.   Rummel, J. A., J. Lee, and F. Halberg. Combined linear-nonlinear chronobiologic windows by least squares resolve neighboring components in a physiologic rhythm spectrum. In: Biorhythms and Human Reproduction, edited by M. Ferin, F. Halberg, R. M. Richart, and R. L. Vande Weile. New York: Wiley, 1974, p. 53-82.

40.   Satinoff, E., J. Liran, and R. Clapman. Aberrations of circadian body temperature rhythms in rats with medial preoptic lesions. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 11): R352-R357, 1982.

41.   Scales, W. E., and M. J. Kluger. Effect of antipyretic drugs on circadian rhythm in body temperature of rats. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 22): R306-R313, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

42.   Stephenson, L. A., C. B. Wenger, B. H. O'Donovan, and E. R. Nadel. Circadian rhythm in sweating and cutaneous blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 15): R321-R324, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

43.   Stitt, J. T., and J. D. Hardy. Thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J. Appl. Physiol. 31: 48-54, 1971[Free Full Text].

44.   Tayefeh, F., O. Plattner, D. I. Sessler, T. Ikeda, and D. Marder. Circadian changes in the sweating-to-vasoconstriction interthreshold range. Pflügers Arch. 435: 402-406, 1998[Medline].

45.   Tokura, H., and J. Aschoff. Effects of temperature on the circadian rhythm of pig-tailed macaques Macaca nemestrina. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 14): R800-R804, 1983.

46.   Webb, P. The physiology of heat regulation. Am. J. Physiol. 268 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 37): R838-R850, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

47.   Wever, R. A. The Circadian System of Man: Results of Experiments Under Temporal Isolation. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.

48.   Wurster, E. C., D. E. Murrish, and F. M. Sulzman. Circadian rhythms in body temperature of the pigtailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) exposed to different ambient temperatures. Am. J. Primatol. 9: 1-13, 1985.

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Compar Physiol 276(5):R1397-R1407
0002-9513/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. J. Kaiyala and D. S. Ramsay
Assessment of heat production, heat loss, and core temperature during nitrous oxide exposure: a new paradigm for studying drug effects and opponent responses
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): R692 - R701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content