|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201-3098
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unmyelinated (C) and myelinated (A) baroreceptor (BR) axons are present in rat aortic depressor nerve (ADN). With graded ADN electrical activation and anodal conduction blockade, reflex responses in anesthetized rats were assessed as changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). We tested the hypothesis that C-type BR inputs are effective at low frequencies because they outnumber A-type. Anodal current (Ian) reversibly eliminated all MAP and HR responses to A-selective stimuli. High intensities activated all ADN axons (A+C) and decreased MAP at lower frequencies (<10 Hz) than were effective with A-selective stimulation. Ian reduced only MAP responses to >10-Hz ADN stimulation. Burst patterns significantly augmented A- but not C-selective reflex responses despite identical numbers of shocks per second. A-selective stimuli failed to evoke significant bradycardia even at 200 Hz. Maximum intensity stimuli plus Ian (C selective) evoked less bradycardia than without Ian (A+C), indicating supra-additive summation unlike the occlusive summation for MAP responses. However, activation of reduced numbers of C-type BRs with all A-type BRs suggests a strong A to C interaction in reflex bradycardia responses. Surprisingly, Ian block of A-type conduction eliminated all reflex bradycardia at such submaximal intensities despite C conduction and depressor responses. A- and C-type BRs act synergistically, and A-type activity is absolutely required in cardiac but not in depressor pathways. Thus greater numbers do not appear to account for C-type BR efficacy, and critical interactions between these two sensory subtypes appear to occur differentially across cardiac and systemic baroreflex effector pathways.
baroreflex; C fiber; anodal block
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ARTERIAL BARORECEPTORS (BRs) convey systemic hemodynamic information to the central nervous system (CNS), where it is integrated and evokes reflex responses responsible for moment-to-moment cardiovascular regulation. Two major classes of BRs exist based on axonal conduction velocity: those connected to myelinated (A)-type and unmyelinated (C)-type axons. As with somatic sensory neurons, these two classes of BR have very different dynamic sensory discharge characteristics. A-type BRs generally have higher mean discharge rates, lower pressure thresholds, and higher sensitivities (24, 36). Largely on the basis of electrical stimulation studies (1, 2, 10-12, 15, 16, 21, 28), these two classes of BR have long been suggested to evoke very different baroreflex-response relationships separated by activation frequencies. Maximal electrical activation of all BRs evokes substantial reflex decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) or sympathetic efferent activity at frequencies as low as 1 or 2 Hz (1, 2, 10-12, 15, 16, 21, 28). However, selective activation of A-type BRs alone is consistently reported to require higher frequencies (10-fold) for reflex responses equivalent to the activation of all aortic depressor nerve (ADN) axons (A+C; e.g., see Ref. 15). Despite extensive experiments, the mechanism responsible remains unclear. At least two relatively simple hypotheses can be suggested. The first arises from the fact that the overwhelming majority (as much as 90%) of all BR (32) axons in the rat ADN is unmyelinated (3). Thus the low-frequency reflex efficacy of C-type BRs could be due simply to their overwhelming numerical predominance in the total BR neuron population. An alternative is that C-type synaptic input to the CNS, despite its relatively lower mean frequency, could evoke proportionately more powerful responses than A-type BR inputs centrally.
The focus of the present studies was to evaluate important aspects of these two hypotheses. As a first step, we studied responses to electrical stimuli to the ADN sufficient to activate both A- and C-type BR inputs (16, 31) and compared these to responses in which transmission to the CNS of A-type BR inputs was selectively and reversibly blocked by anodal current (Ian). Our studies are the first to report successful use of anodal block to isolate the reflex contribution of C-type BRs of ADN in the rat, a species with an extensive experimental base of BR and baroreflex studies. We then tested graded levels of activation of A- and C-type BRs to assess responsiveness to activation of portions of the BR population within BR subtypes with the use of baroreflex frequency-response relationships. Our findings suggest a differential integration of A- and C-type BR information and support the alternative hypothesis, the concept that C-type information has proportionately greater reflex impact than A-type information. Additionally, only baroreflex responses to A-type BR activation were found to show dynamic enhancement to temporally patterned stimulus trains. Thus our data suggest that the integration of A- and C-type BR input differs importantly in the regulation of heart rate (HR) and systemic arterial pressure. Such differences may indicate pathway-specific differentiation of BR subtype sensory processing. Overall, these studies indicate an interesting match in absolute frequency ranges for each BR subtype between sensory encoding and their respective reflex characteristics.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the University Animal Care and Use Committee with adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (B & K, Kent, WA; 250-450 g). Rats were anesthetized with a combination of urethan (800 mg/kg) and chloralose (80 mg/kg) with supplements of chloralose (10 mg/kg) and breathed spontaneously. At the end of experiments, rats were killed with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (300 mg/kg iv).
Baroreflex responses. For reflex studies, the cervical portion of the left ADN was isolated, and the nerve was placed on stimulating electrodes (bipolar, Teflon-insulated Pt-Ir wires) and covered with a petroleum jelly-mineral oil mixture. All other nerves were intact. The stimulating electrodes were connected to a computer-controlled programmable stimulator (AMPI Master-8) through a stimulus isolation unit. The stimulus parameters selected for this study were based on direct observations of the ADN electroneurogram (ENG) in companion studies in which intensity-action potential recruitment was measured (15). From the range of intensities studied in that series we selected two stimulation intensities, a low and a high level for most detailed study in the present work with ADN stimulation. Within each such reflex experiment, these two levels were held constant: low voltage (1.5-3 V) and high, supramaximal activation voltages (18-20 V). All shocks were 0.1 ms in pulse duration, long enough to activate C-type axons and short enough to avoid repetitive A-type axon activation within a single pulse (31). The high-voltage level was sufficient to activate all fiber types in the ADN (e.g., Ref. 15), whereas low-voltage stimuli evoked only A fiber volleys. We used a functional test to set the low intensity level in each experiment. In this procedure, intensity was increased until it reached a level at which a test train at 100 Hz elicited marked depressor responses, but trains at 1-2 Hz evoked no measurable changes in blood pressure. This level corresponded to an intensity level in the ENG experiments that evoked no C volley and a maximal A volley and assured a functional normalization of stimulus intensity across experiments. In a limited series of additional experiments, graded stimulation intensities were used to activate portions of the A- and C-type population of axons. In these experiments, intensities <3 V activated variable portions of the A fiber ADN axon population, and 6 and 8 V activated all A-type axons and only small portions of the C-type population based on averages for ADN-ENGs (15).
For determination of the frequency-response relationship, stimulus trains lasting 5 s were tested for selected fixed frequencies between 1 and 200 Hz: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 Hz. Such 5-s trains made these relatively complex stimulus protocols of repeated brief-stimulus trains with and without Ian more pragmatic and thus more feasible. The resulting stimulus-frequency vs. peak-response relationships for these 5-s trains were quite similar to the relationships constructed for responses measured in the last 10 s of a 60-s train in previous studies (15). The order of application of frequencies was random. Stimulus trains were given 3-5 min apart, which was sufficient time to allow full recovery. MAP signals from the pressure processor were displayed on the pen recorder and digitized at 20 Hz for offline analysis.
Patterned stimulation Intermittent and constant modes of stimulation were tested. MAP responses to bursts of stimuli were compared with those evoked by constant stimulation of ADN at equal, 1-s-average frequencies (11, 12, 15, 16). Burst-mode stimulation consisted of fixed 1-s cycles in which a 250-ms period of stimulation (40-120 Hz) was followed by 750 ms of no stimulation. These cycles of stimulation were repeated for 60-s-total periods. To directly compare these intermittent or burst-mode stimulus patterns with constant patterns, stimulation was switched without pause between constant frequency to burst mode with an equal number of shocks delivered in each mode on a 1- to 1-s basis. The instantaneous frequencies used for mode comparisons were constant frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 Hz paired with burst frequencies of 40, 80, and 120 Hz. Thus the burst modes contained a fourfold higher absolute frequency delivered for only one-fourth of the 1-s cycle. Stimuli were switched between burst and constant mode twice for a total of 4 min of stimulation in each test. The order of the mode that presented first was randomized. All patterns were implemented via the programmable stimulator by downloading the protocols from files on the computer and triggered by a control pulse to the stimulator.
Anodal nerve block. To assess the reflex responses to activation of C fiber BRs alone, anodal block of A fiber conduction was used. Test stimuli were delivered to the ADN for 5 s at the fixed frequencies described in Patterned stimulation so that full frequency-response relationship could be constructed in each experiment. Anodal block of A-type nerve conduction was produced by a steady, direct current Ian applied to a portion of the ADN several millimeters central to the section being stimulated for reflex responses. Ian was delivered for 10 s, and its intensity (12-100 µA) was adjusted in each experiment to completely block the reflex response to a near-maximal A fiber stimulus (5-s train of 3-V stimuli at 100 Hz). Twenty percent increases above the minimal level required to effectively block responses to the low-intensity, high-frequency stimuli did not impair responses to low-frequency, high-intensity stimuli. Similar degrees of separation, "safety factors," were reported for anodal block in other species (27, 35).
It was not possible to directly assess A fiber nerve block by recording ADN-ENG waves, stimulating the nerve, and delivering Ian in these slender and fragile nerve trunks. We, as others did (35), based our assessment of anodal-blockade efficacy on indirect means. In our case, we used 1- to 2-V, 100-Hz stimuli for reflex tests that we previously showed to activate only A fiber axons (15). Stimuli for our functional A fiber tests were timed to start 3 s after the beginning of the 10-s blocking-current period and thus occurred in the middle of the anodal-block period. For these blocking-current adjustments, a test stimulus train was delivered before, during, and after the blocking current in successive trials. In all cases, the A fiber reflex response had both to be completely blocked by Ian and to completely recover after the anodal block for an experimental data set to be included in the summary analysis. This assured that the anodal block did not irreversibly damage A fibers. The fact that low-frequency (1-2 Hz) reflex responses before and during block were similar further suggests that Ian did not damage C-type axons either. In each case, once the adequate Ian level had been determined, the high-intensity reflex 5-s tests at the various fixed-stimulation frequencies were tested. In another series of experiments, more prolonged anodal blocking periods were used to determine the effects of intermittent burst-stimulation patterns. In these experiments, the reflex-test volleys lasted 1 min each and included switching from constant to burst mode twice for a total of 4 min of reflex-test stimulation. This required much more prolonged anodal blocks, but, in all cases, to be accepted for analysis, complete reversibility of the block was required as tested with the low-intensity, high-frequency test.
Analysis. To construct reflex
relationships, MAP responses were calculated as changes in MAP (
MAP)
relative to the prestimulation value for each test and expressed as a
percentage of that prestimulation value (
MAP%). The control value
was the average of MAP values sampled (20 Hz analog/digital rate) for
10 s preceding the stimulus. HR values were likewise
determined from the cardiac beat intervals over identical periods and
otherwise processed in a similar manner to the MAP values. Thus HR
responses were calculated as changes relative to the prestimulation
value for each test (
HR%). For patterned trains (MAP only), the
final 10 s of a particular stimulation pattern were averaged for a mean
response and expressed as a change from control MAP. Across
experiments, average reflex-response relationships were plotted as the
mean response against stimulation frequency for low- and high-voltage
stimuli and in the presence of
Ian. Slopes (or
gains) of baroreflex relationships were measured as least-squares
linear regression fits to the submaximal portions of the log-frequency
vs. reflex-response relationships, and a reflex "threshold"
frequency was approximated by where these fits extrapolated an
x-axis crossing. Comparisons were made
using analysis of variance and, in some cases, post hoc, pairwise
comparisons were done using Scheffé's test
(P < 0.05 was considered significant).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Low-intensity electrical stimulation selectively activates a volley of
A-type BR action potentials in the ADN ENG (15) as in all other
peripheral nerves with myelinated axons, including the vagus (16, 36).
Resting, prestimulation MAP averaged 102.0 ± 4.9 mmHg, and HR
averaged 320.4 ± 4.5 beats/min (n = 34). Brief trains (5 s) of these low-intensity, A-type selective
stimuli to the ADN evoked no reflex-MAP responses until the stimulus
frequency exceeded 10 Hz (Fig.
1B). At
intensities sufficient to activate A+C, stimulation frequencies as low
as 1 Hz evoked substantial decreases in MAP (Fig.
1B). Thus, during combined
activation of both A- and C-type axons, low-frequency BR action
potential volleys are sufficient to activate MAP baroreflex responses,
whereas these same low frequencies of activation of A-type BRs alone
are not.
|
To isolate the reflex-MAP responses to C-type BR activation alone, we
repeated our test-stimulus frequency-response series in the presence of
Ian (Fig.
1A). Application of continuous
Ian to the ADN
completely and reversibly blocked MAP reflex responses to
low-intensity, high-frequency test stimulation (see Fig.
1A). Such stimulus intensities
activate A-type BRs only (15, 16). Note that
Ian alone on this
centrally connected but peripherally cut ADN had no effect on MAP (Fig.
1A; preceding ADN
stimulation). In each experiment, we used no more than 20% greater
than the minimum
Ian required to
functionally block the MAP responses to high-frequency, A fiber
activation of ADN (Fig. 1A).
During anodal block, low frequencies of high-intensity stimulation
evoked MAP reflex responses that were not different from preblock
levels at frequencies between 1 and 10 Hz (Fig.
1B). These C-type selective baroreflex MAP responses did not increase further for the highest frequencies (i.e., between 5 and 200 Hz;
n = 6, P > 0.69). Overall, C-selective
maximal MAP responses between 50 and 200 Hz (Fig. 1B) were significantly smaller than
preblock responses (C alone, 24.1 ± 1.1 mmHg; A+C, 35.3 ± 0.7 mmHg, P < 0.00001) but were
equivalent to A-selective stimulation (25.6 ± 1.4 mmHg,
P = 0.24). One-half-maximal activation
of the C fiber BR reflex MAP responses occurred at ~2 Hz, whereas the
A fiber component occurred at somewhat >20 Hz. Such results suggest
that in the A+C responses, the C-type BRs are required for the
low-frequency (<10 Hz) baroreflex MAP responses and that the reflex
contribution of A-type BRs is significant only at high frequencies
(
10 Hz).
Because A- and C-type BRs physiologically conduct such different action potential discharge patterns during pressure stimulation, we tested whether intermittent patterns of activation of BR subtypes might be more effective in evoking reflex-MAP responses. Experiments were designed so that constant numbers of stimulus shocks were delivered each second. For intermittent or burst patterns, this meant that in this protocol all stimuli were delivered in the first 250 ms of a 1-s cycle. Thus only the temporal distribution of the stimulus shocks was changed between burst and constant modes of stimulation and not the total number of shocks in a test or on a second-to-second basis.
Low-intensity, high-frequency (A selective) stimuli evoked brisk reflex
decreases in MAP (Fig.
2A).
Switching without delay from constant stimulation to bursts of
intermittent stimuli reproducibly evoked clear increments in reflex-MAP
responses in all animals tested (Fig.
2A). Thus at a 20-Hz
second-to-second average stimulus frequency, grouping those A-type
activating stimuli into 80-Hz bursts for one-fourth of the time
substantially augmented the reflex-depressor responses. These augmented
reflex-MAP responses quickly disappeared on switching back to
constant-mode stimulation. On average, switching to this 80-Hz burst
mode while presumably stimulating only A-type BRs increased MAP
responses by ~35% (n = 6, P = 0.003; Fig.
2A). During high-intensity A+C-type
activation in these same animals (Fig.
2B), minimal MAP changes were
apparent on switching to burst patterns and average reflex responses
were equivalent when fully activating both A- and C-type axons
(n = 6, P = 0.185). The degree of augmentation
of the A-type BR reflex response on switching from constant- to
burst-patterned stimulation was relatively constant across the linear,
submaximal response range for fixed frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 Hz,
which used 40, 80, and 120 Hz in burst mode, respectively
(n = 6, P < 0.01; Fig. 3). Thus baroreflex responses to A-type BR
inputs are clearly very sensitive to the temporal distribution of
action potentials in their input trains, and efferent mechanisms were
clearly not saturated in these frequency ranges. This augmentation of
A-type BR-reflex MAP responses is obscured, however, when all C-type BR
axons are simultaneously activated.
|
|
To isolate C-type baroreflex responses to patterned stimulation in the
absence of A-type BR activation, anodal blocking
currents were used. Prolonged
periods (4.5 min) of
Ian application
were required for completion of repeated trials of constant- and
burst-mode stimulation. In all cases, we bracketed these anodal
protocols with tests of A-type MAP baroreflexes to assure that the
anodal blocks were reversible and no nerve damage had occurred. Any
experiments in which reflex responses to low-intensity, high-frequency
stimulation were not equivalent to preanodal tests (see Fig.
1A) were discarded. Brief trains of presumed A-type selective stimuli (low intensity, high
frequency) evoked substantial, reproducible depressor responses that
were reversibly eliminated by
Ian (Fig.
4A).
When the same level of
Ian was applied,
high-intensity trains evoked large depressor responses that were not
altered by switching between burst- and constant-mode patterns (Fig.
4B). Reversibility of the anodal block was indicated by the return of the low-intensity, high-frequency baroreflex MAP response (Fig. 4). This lack of augmentation when switching to phasic stimulation was true for a wide range of activation intensities (Fig. 5). Note in these
experiments that test burst-stimulus patterns (Fig. 5) that the burst
frequency was fourfold higher than the constant stimuli and that these
absolute frequencies were on the segment of the maximum slope of the
subtype frequency-response relationship (1-8 Hz for C type and
10-100 Hz for A type). Thus, unlike for A-type sensory inputs,
baroreflex MAP responses to C-type BR inputs appear to be insensitive
to the temporal patterning of action potential input trains.
|
|
Both the low- and high-intensity electrical stimuli evoke synchronous
and nearly maximal activation of axons (A and A+C type, respectively)
as evidenced in the respective volleys recorded in the ADN EDG (15). To
test partial recruitment within BR fiber types, we tested graded
intensities in the selective A-type range (0.5-3 V, Fig.
6) as well as graded higher intensities (6 and 8 V) during anodal block to recruit variable proportions of the C-type population of ADN fibers (Fig. 7).
Five-second stimulus trains were used in this anodal block protocol. At
the lowest intensities (A selective), substantially higher frequencies
(up to 50 Hz at 0.5 V) were required to elicit a significant
reflex-depressor response (
10 Hz, Fig. 6). As the intensity was
increased within the A-selective range, however, there was a roughly
parallel shift in the log frequency-response relationship to lower
frequencies for the MAP baroreflex as a successively greater population
of A-type BRs was recruited. Thus there was no significant change in
the slope of these A-selective baroreflex MAP-response relationships (P > 0.05), only a shift in the
intercept or threshold.
|
|
At
6 V (A+C responses) even 1- to 2-Hz stimulus trains evoked
significant depressor responses that increased with increasing frequency up to ~10-20 Hz (Fig. 7). During anodal block, all
frequency-response relationships for C-selective stimuli were depressed
compared with A+C-preblock relationships
(P < 0.03, n = 5; Fig. 7). At 6 V,
significant depressor responses were evoked by 2-Hz trains. These are
well below the minimum frequencies required for the reflex-MAP
responses evoked by activation of A-type BR axons alone. Unlike for
fully maximal stimuli (Fig. 1), anodal block significantly reduced the
slope of the reflex-MAP responses (P < 0.03, n = 5) for submaximal
intensities, which recruit only part of the total number of C-type
axons but are still maximal for A-type ADN axons (see Figs. 1 and 2 in
Ref. 15). Thus activating all A-type BR axons required substantially
greater input frequencies to evoke a similar magnitude baroreflex
depressor response than small fractions (<20%) of the C-type
population of BRs. Such results make it unlikely that the greater MAP
baroreflex efficacy of C-type BR inputs is simply due to the number of
BR axons activated.
Another prominent A- and C-type difference between the baroreflex
responses to BR activation is evident in the control of HR. For the
60-s, sustained-stimulation protocols (Fig.
8), A-selective trains were remarkably
ineffective in producing bradycardia even at the highest frequencies of
activation (200 Hz). With high intensities (20 V, A+C), however,
increases in stimulus frequency progressively augmented the reflex
bradycardia. Responses to maximal (20 V) C-selective activation of ADN
BRs during anodal block overlaid the high-intensity A+C relationship
from 1 to 10 Hz. Above 10 Hz, maximal C-selective responses evoked a
plateau in HR response extending from 10 to 200 Hz. This maximum
bradycardia (Fig. 8) reached during C-selective stimulation was much
greater than the A-selective responses
(P < 0.001) but only about one-half
the full control (A+C) response level. Such observations are consistent with a supra-additive summation process and may indicate another basic
difference in the organization of pathways for the baroreflex regulation of HR compared with MAP.
|
This notion of pathway-dependent differences in A- and C-type central
BR integration is reinforced by the experiments using graded C-type BR
recruitment protocols with anodal block. With the use of these shorter
train protocols, maximal and submaximal A+C-BR activation evoked
qualitatively similar frequency-response relationships (compare Fig.
9 with Fig. 8). ENG studies of ADN (see
Fig. 2 of Ref. 15) suggest that stimulus intensity can be decreased to
a range that activates a reduced portion of C-type BRs while still
activating all A-type BRs. Such intensities in the present studies
evoked decreased reflex bradycardia at any given stimulus frequency
(Fig. 9). Surprisingly, however, neither of these submaximal
intensities (6 and 8 V) was sufficient to evoke significant reflex
bradycardia when delivered as C-selective stimuli during
anodal blockade. Note that although these C-selective stimulus trains
did not evoke reflex bradycardia, they did produce very substantial
reflex decreases in MAP in these same animals (Fig. 7). Under these
stimulation protocols, the relative increment in C-type activation from
6 to 8 V appears to be amplified by the presence of A-type BR activity
in the frequencies >10 Hz (Fig. 9). Thus the graded HR data are
consistent with an important modulatory interaction between A- and
C-type BRs in mediating enhanced, synergistic reflex responses in the
cardiac pathways during combined A- and C-type BR inputs.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Simultaneous activation of A- and C-type BRs evoked reflex decreases in blood pressure at much lower stimulation frequencies than with activation of A-type BRs alone (15). This finding is very similar to baroreflex responses previously reported for HR, blood pressure, and sympathetic activity to ADN activation in rabbit (1, 12, 27) and in rat (15, 28, 31). Such studies alone, however, cannot resolve the independent roles of A- and C-type BRs in this frequency-dependent behavior of the baroreflex. The present studies were undertaken to allow a direct and independent comparison of A- to C-type BR reflex responses. The use of electrically graded ADN stimulation enabled us to activate graded portions of the population of BR axons within the ADN. We left all other "buffer" nerves intact so that compensatory responses will also impact the absolute magnitude of the measured reflex responses. Combining graded activation with anodal blockade of A fiber conduction allowed us to isolate C-type BR responses from contributions of coactivation of A-type BRs. Such systematic studies have never been done in the rat, and the rat is probably the most widely studied species for broad aspects of autonomic regulation.
Excitation of C-type BRs alone elicited substantial reflex depressor responses even at stimulation frequencies as low as 1 Hz (Fig. 1). The frequency-response relationships for the MAP reflexes to C-selective stimuli diverged from the A+C-MAP relationships only at frequencies similar to those required to elicit a reflex decrease in MAP with A-selective stimuli (>10 Hz). Because of their technical difficulty, previous anodal block studies with ADN have generally been limited to larger species such as the rabbit, which possesses an ADN analogous to that in the rat. In the rabbit, inhibition of renal sympathetic activity by A-type BR activation with low-stimulus intensities occurs only at frequencies >10 Hz and overall frequency-response relationships were similar to our rat-MAP relationships (2).
These fundamental differences in frequency-response baroreflex relationships across BR subtype are consistent with the hypothesis that there are distinct differences in CNS processing of A- and C-type BR inputs. Among these differences, the first appears to be related to the absolute frequency of BR activation. We found that C-type BR inputs are required for low-frequency (1-5 Hz) reflex-MAP responses (Fig. 1), and over this low-frequency range reflex-MAP responses are not significantly altered by addition of conducted A-type BR inputs (i.e., A+C). In addition, stimulation of A-type BR inputs alone in this frequency range was ineffective in evoking reflex decreases in pressure, although such stimuli clearly evoke conducted action potentials in ADN (15) and visceral myelinated fibers are capable of higher frequency axonal transmission (8). Similar results were reported for ADN-evoked inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity in the rabbit (2). From these observations, we conclude that the low-frequency MAP responses require conducted C-type BR inputs. Interestingly, driving C-type BRs to higher frequencies (10-100 Hz) of discharge failed to further increment C-selective MAP reflex responses (Fig. 1). C-type BRs are capable of conducting action potentials along the ADN afferent pathway within this frequency range in which the reflex responses were constant (100 Hz; see Fig. 1 in Ref. 16). Within the CNS, activation of C-type axons to the spinal cord (26) or in the solitary tract (13) reliably evokes synaptic responses in this frequency range in second-order neurons in the dorsal horn or in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), respectively. Thus the C-type baroreflex central pathways beyond the second-order neurons may be operating at their maximum in this 10- to 100-Hz frequency range. In contrast, this same 10- to 100-Hz stimulus range evoked frequency-graded MAP reflex responses from A-type BRs, indicating that A-type pathways require higher frequencies of input (Fig. 1) and thus integrate frequency information over a higher range of action potential frequencies compared with C-type pathways. The mechanisms for such a central processing difference in A- and C-type BR information are not known.
Afferent summation is a second major reflex characteristic that differs across A- and C-type pathways. Reflex-MAP responses to A- and C-type BR inputs had similar average maxima when stimulated separately (Fig. 1). A+C-MAP responses were modestly greater than either subtype, and this summation was clearly occlusive. Together such findings suggest that the plateau of response saturation in the frequency-response relationships at the highest frequencies with selective A- and C-type stimulation does not lie at the effectors in the periphery and may, therefore, represent some limitation within the CNS.
Interestingly, the augmentation of combined stimulation occurred only within the limited frequency range in which A-type BR inputs showed graded MAP responses (i.e., 10-50 Hz; Fig. 1). Thus, overall, absolute action potential frequency is the most distinguishing difference between A- and C-selective baroreflex MAP response relationships. The ranges in which baroreflex responses were graded with frequency were thus quite characteristic of BR subtype: 1-5 Hz for C-type BRs and 10-50 Hz for A-type BRs. Interestingly, these subtype-selective baroreflex frequency windows coincide with the typical discharge ranges found with pressure activation of A- and C-type single BR neurons in the rat (4, 24).
Physiologically, not only are the prevailing rates of discharge substantially different across these BR subtypes, but their distributions in time within each cardiac cycle are characteristically different. Impulses from both A- and C-type BRs fire phasically in the intact animal in response to the pulsatile arterial pressure excursions during each cardiac systole. The dynamic discharge capacities of A- and C-type BRs are well known to differ greatly (e.g., Refs. 4, 16, 24). Anodal block studies of the carotid sinus nerve in dogs suggest that dynamic BR information is carried by A-type BRs (3). However, with the use of maximal-intensity (A+C) stimulation of the ADN or the carotid sinus nerve, we found no differences in baroreflex MAP responses between constant and intermittent patterns of electrical stimulation (16). The comparable efficacy of phasic vs. constant patterns of BR activation has been widely debated over the years with varying experimental results and conclusions. For example, pulsatile pressure inputs to the carotid sinus cause a greater reduction in blood pressure than do steady pressures (6, 14, 23). Burst patterns of carotid sinus nerve stimulation evoked modestly larger sympathoinhibition than did constant patterns in dogs (29, 30). Burst activation of A-type BR axons in rabbits, however, produced no additional response over constant patterns (11). Our intermittent burst tests with the rat ADN augmented baroreflex MAP responses only during selective, A-type BR activation despite an equal number of stimuli on a second-to-second basis (Figs. 2 and 3). Thus the wide dynamic discharge range of A-type BR neurons is associated with a greater reflex sensitivity to phasic patterning and again this correspondence is consistent with a general functional matching of A-type BR discharge characteristics. Thus A-type CNS inputs may have more dynamic reflex modulation than that associated with the more sparse C-type BR discharge. C-type BRs may therefore give rise to CNS baroreflex responses that are slower, perhaps more steady state in character. This functional subtype separation has many similarities to that suggested for types 1 and 2 BR inputs in the dog (35).
In our subtype-selective BR stimulation studies, two important factors should be noted. First, these reflex responses are based on synchronous electrical activation of all axons of a given category and, second, C-type axons outnumber A-type axons in the rat ADN by a nine-to-one ratio (3). Thus the substantially greater numbers of BR neurons activated in C-type stimulation might influence the form of the baroreflex frequency-response relationship. In an attempt to test whether this large numerical discrepancy between A- and C-type BRs was a critical factor, we greatly reduced the C-type BR input by using submaximal stimulation intensities to test recruitment of different numbers of BR axons. In consideration of our earlier ENG studies of ADN (15), we reduced stimulus intensity during anodal block to levels that activate a small fraction of the C fiber population. This was based on integration of compound action potential C-waves from ADN (15). If these time integrals of the ENG represent the fraction of the population activated and we combine this with total axon counts of A- and C-type axon profiles in histological sections of ADN (7), we estimate that 6 V should activate a total number C-type BRs similar to the total number of A-type BRs in the ADN (Fig. 7). Despite this experimental adjustment in the total number of fibers activated, the frequency-dependent differences in the A- and C-selective MAP reflex relationships remained (compare Figs. 6 and 7). These distinctions persisted during graded activation of A- or C-type BRs, suggesting fundamental differences in central summation and integration. For C-type recruitment, the slope of the reflex-MAP relationship increased substantially as more C-type BRs were activated, whereas the threshold index for A-type baroreflex relationships shifted to lower activation frequencies with relatively constant slope as more BRs were recruited.
The HR baroreflex to selective A- and C-type BR activation in our rats
showed surprisingly different patterns of integration than found in the
reflex-MAP relationships. Previous work with ADN in rabbits had
suggested that brief, high-frequency (100-150 Hz) trains of
activation were equipotent for P-R interval modulation with A- and
C-selective stimuli (22) but that C-type BR input was critically
required for maximum bradycardia. In contrast, we found in
the rat that selective A-type stimulation was surprisingly ineffective
at changing HR even at stimulation frequencies of 200 Hz. Just as with
MAP, low frequencies of C-type activation produced substantial
bradycardia and these became maximal at activation rates of
10 Hz.
However, A+C-HR responses were greater than the individual responses in
the frequency range of 20-200 Hz. This supra-additive HR summation
contrasts the occlusive pattern in MAP responses. We conclude from
these results that subtype differences in BR reflex responses extend
not only within but also across reflex output pathways (in this case,
MAP and HR).
Perspectives
Little is known about most of the fundamental mechanisms that might underlie any intrinsic differences in BR subtype-specific processing. BRs first synapse in the CNS at the NTS. Despite all of the intriguing differences between A- and C-type sensory neurons at the peripheral cell bodies (e.g., Refs. 17-19, 25, 33, 34), little is known about key issues that determine synaptic efficacy at NTS, including potential differences in synaptic weight, the degree of presynaptic axon branching, the degree and importance of sensory convergence or divergence on single NTS neurons, or the differential presence of secondary neurotransmitters. Convergence of myelinated and nonmyelinated aortic nerve afferents was found to be relatively rare in NTS neurons of the cat (9), although such afferent trunks are likely mixed modality with BR and chemoreceptors, and this is clearly true of carotid sinus nerves in all species (8, 20). The primary transmitter appears to be glutamate, acting most likely at a non-NMDA receptor at the sensory synapses at NTS (4, 5, 37), but this does not rule out an active and important modulatory role by other transmitters including neuropeptides at this sensory synapse (23). The challenge will be to understand which differences in the properties of myelinated and unmyelinated BR sensory neurons contribute to or mediate these distinct subtype-specific differences in baroreflex performance.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Present addresses: W. Fan, Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences Univ., Portland, OR 97201-3098; J. H. Schild, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Purdue Univ., Indianapolis, IN 46202-5132.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. C. Andresen, Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology L334, Oregon Health Sciences Univ., Portland, OR 97201-3098 (E-mail: andresen{at}ohsu.edu).
Received 15 April 1998; accepted in final form 6 May 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aars, H.
Central interaction between reflex responses to activity in aortic nerve A- and C-fibres.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
110:
315-320,
1980[Medline].
2.
Aars, H.,
L. Myhre,
and
B. Haswell.
The function of baroreceptor C fibres in the rabbit's aortic nerve.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
102:
84-93,
1978[Medline].
3.
Andresen, M. C.,
J. M. Krauhs,
and
A. M. Brown.
Relationship of aortic wall baroreceptor properties during development in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Circ. Res.
43:
728-738,
1978
4.
Andresen, M. C.,
and
D. L. Kunze.
Nucleus tractus solitarius: gateway to neural circulatory control.
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
56:
93-116,
1994[Medline].
5.
Andresen, M. C.,
and
M. Yang.
Non-NMDA receptors mediate sensory afferent synaptic transmission in medial nucleus tractus solitarius.
Am. J. Physiol.
259 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 28):
H1307-H1311,
1990
6.
Angell-James, J. E.,
and
M. D. B. Daly.
Comparison of the reflex vasomotor responses to separate and combined stimulation of the carotid sinus and aortic arch baroreceptors by pulsatile and non-pulsatile pressure in the dog.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
209:
257-293,
1970
7.
Christie, S.,
N. C. Sundgren,
J. H. Schild,
W. Fan,
and
M. C. Andresen.
Neonatal capsaicin treatment permanently eliminates most rat C-type baroreceptors but baroreflex function is preserved (Abstract).
FASEB J.
12:
A687,
1998.
8.
Crill, W. E.,
and
D. J. Reis.
Distribution of carotid sinus and depressor nerves in cat brain stem.
Am. J. Physiol.
214:
269-276,
1968.
9.
Donoghue, S.,
R. E. Fox,
C. Kidd,
and
P. N. McWilliam.
The terminations and secondary projections of myelinated and non-myelinated fibres of the aortic nerve in the cat.
Q. J. Exp. Physiol.
66:
405-422,
1981
10.
Douglas, W. W.,
and
J. M. Ritchie.
Cardiovascular reflexes produced by electrical excitation of non-medullated afferents in the vagus, carotid sinus and aortic nerves.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
134:
167-178,
1956.
11.
Douglas, W. W.,
J. M. Ritchie,
and
W. Schaumann.
A study of the effect of the pattern of electrical stimulation of the aortic nerve on the reflex depressor responses.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
133:
232-242,
1956.
12.
Douglas, W. W.,
J. M. Ritchie,
and
W. Schaumann.
Depressor reflexes from medullated and nonmedullated fibres in the rabbit's aortic nerve.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
132:
187-198,
1956.
13.
Doyle, M. W.,
and
M. C. Andresen.
Capsaicin evokes an inward glutamate receptor mediated current in medial nucleus tractus solitarius (mNTS) neurons (Abstract).
FASEB J.
13:
A120,
1999.
14.
Ead, H. W.,
J. N. Green,
and
E. Neil.
A comparison of the effects of pulsatile and non-pulsatile blood flow through the carotid sinus on the reflexogenic activity of the sinus baroreceptors in the cat.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
118:
509-519,
1952.
15.
Fan, W.,
and
M. C. Andresen.
Differential frequency-dependent reflex integration of myelinated and nonmyelinated rat aortic baroreceptors.
Am. J. Physiol.
275 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 44):
H632-H640,
1998
16.
Fan, W.,
P. J. Reynolds,
and
M. C. Andresen.
Frequency characteristics of baroreflex responses to electrical stimulation of aortic depressor and carotid sinus nerves in rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 40):
H2218-H2227,
1996
17.
Helke, C. J.,
W. Goldman,
and
D. M. Jacobowitz.
Demonstration of substance P in aortic nerve afferent fibers by combined use of fluorescent retrograde neuronal labeling and immunocytochemistry.
Peptides
1:
359-364,
1980[Medline].
18.
Ichikawa, H.,
and
C. J. Helke.
Coexistence of calbindin D-28k and NADPH-diaphorase in vagal and glossopharyngeal sensory neurons of the rat.
Brain Res.
735:
325-329,
1996[Medline].
19.
Ichikawa, H.,
and
C. J. Helke.
Coexistence of calcium-binding proteins in vagal and glossopharyngeal sensory neurons of the rat.
Brain Res.
768:
349-353,
1997[Medline].
20.
Jordan, D.,
and
K. M. Spyer.
Studies on the termination of sinus nerve afferents.
Pflügers Arch.
369:
65-73,
1977[Medline].
21.
Kardon, M. B.,
D. F. Peterson,
and
V. S. Bishop.
Reflex bradycardia due to aortic nerve stimulation in the rabbit.
Am. J. Physiol.
225:
7-11,
1973.
22.
Kardon, M. B.,
D. F. Peterson,
and
V. S. Bishop.
Reflex heart rate control via specific aortic nerve afferents in the rabbit.
Circ. Res.
37:
41-47,
1975
23.
Kumada, M.,
N. Terui,
and
T. Kuwaki.
Arterial baroreceptor reflex: its central and peripheral neural mechanisms.
Prog. Neurobiol.
35:
331-361,
1990[Medline].
24.
Kunze, D. L.,
and
M. C. Andresen.
Arterial baroreceptors: excitation and modulation.
In: Reflex Control of the Circulation, edited by I. H. Zucker,
and J. P. Gilmore. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1991, p. 141-166.
25.
Lawson, S. N.
Morphological and biochemical cell types of sensory neurons.
In: Sensory Neurons: Diversity, Development, and Plasticity, edited by S. A. Scott. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992, p. 27-59.
26.
Liu, X. G.,
and
J. Sandkühler.
Characterization of long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked potentials in spinal dorsal horn of adult rat: essential role of NK1 and NK2 receptors.
J. Neurophysiol.
78:
1973-1982,
1997
27.
Numao, Y.,
M. Saito,
N. Terui,
and
M. Kumada.
Physiological and pharmacological properties of the three subsystems constituting the aortic nerve-renal sympathetic reflex in rabbits.
J. Auton. Nerv. Syst.
9:
361-380,
1983[Medline].
28.
Numao, Y.,
M. Siato,
N. Terui,
and
M. Kumada.
The aortic nerve-sympathetic reflex in the rat.
J. Auton. Nerv. Syst.
13:
65-79,
1985[Medline].
29.
Oberg, B.,
E. Kendrick,
P. N. Thoren,
and
G. Wennergren.
Reflex cardiovascular responses to graded stimulations of low- and high-threshold afferents in the carotid sinus and aortic nerves in the cat.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
113:
129-137,
1981[Medline].
30.
Richter, D. W.,
W. Keck,
and
H. Seller.
The course of inhibition of sympathetic activity during various patterns of carotid sinus nerve stimulation.
Pflügers Arch.
317:
110-123,
1970[Medline].
31.
Sapru, H. N.,
E. Gonzalez,
and
A. J. Krieger.
Aortic nerve stimulation in the rat: Cardiovascular and respiratory responses.
Brain Res. Bull.
6:
393-398,
1981[Medline].
32.
Sapru, H. N.,
and
A. J. Krieger.
Carotid and aortic chemoreceptor function in the rat.
J. Appl. Physiol.
42:
344-348,
1977
33.
Schild, J. H.,
J. W. Clark,
M. Hay,
D. Mendelowitz,
M. C. Andresen,
and
D. L. Kunze.
A- and C-type nodose sensory neurons: model interpretations of dynamic discharge characteristics.
J. Neurophysiol.
71:
2338-2358,
1994
34.
Schild, J. H.,
and
D. L. Kunze.
Experimental and modeling study of Na
current heterogeneity in rat nodose neurons and its impact on neuronal discharge.
J. Neurophysiol.
78:
3198-3209,
1997
35.
Seagard, J. L.,
F. A. Hopp,
H. A. Drummond,
and
D. M. Van Wynsberghe.
Selective contribution of two types of carotid sinus baroreceptors to the control of blood pressure.
Circ. Res.
72:
1011-1022,
1993
36.
Seagard, J. L.,
J. F. M. Van Brederode,
C. Dean,
F. A. Hopp,
L. A. Gallenberg,
and
J. P. Kampine.
Firing characteristics of single-fiber carotid sinus baroreceptors.
Circ. Res.
66:
1499-1509,
1990
37.
Zhang, J.,
and
S. W. Mifflin.
Influences of excitatory amino acid receptor agonists on nucleus of the solitary tract neurons receiving aortic depressor nerve inputs.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
282:
639-647,
1997
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Andresen and J. H. Peters Comparison of baroreceptive to other afferent synaptic transmission to the medial solitary tract nucleus Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): H2032 - H2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-Y. Li, G.-F. Qiao, B. Feng, R.-B. Zhao, Y.-J. Lu, and J. H. Schild Electrophysiological and neuroanatomical evidence of sexual dimorphism in aortic baroreceptor and vagal afferents in rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): R1301 - R1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Bailey, S. M. Appleyard, Y.-H. Jin, and M. C. Andresen Organization and Properties of GABAergic Neurons in Solitary Tract Nucleus (NTS) J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1712 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Tang and B. R. Dworkin Baroreflexes of the rat. V. Tetanus-induced potentiation of ADN A-fiber responses at the NTS Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): R2254 - R2259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Feng, B.-y. Li, E. A. Nauman, and J. H. Schild Theoretical and electrophysiological evidence for axial loading about aortic baroreceptor nerve terminals in rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3659 - H3672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Simms, J. F. R. Paton, and A. E. Pickering Hierarchical recruitment of the sympathetic and parasympathetic limbs of the baroreflex in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats J. Physiol., March 1, 2007; 579(2): 473 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Salgado, A. R. Barale, J. A. Castania, B. H. Machado, M. W. Chapleau, and R. Fazan Jr. Baroreflex responses to electrical stimulation of aortic depressor nerve in conscious SHR Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H593 - H600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Doyle, T. W. Bailey, Y.-H. Jin, and M. C. Andresen Vanilloid Receptors Presynaptically Modulate Cranial Visceral Afferent Synaptic Transmission in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8222 - 8229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Bailey, Y.-H. Jin, M. W. Doyle, and M. C. Andresen Vanilloid-Sensitive Afferents Activate Neurons with Prominent A-Type Potassium Currents in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8230 - 8237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Dworkin, S. Dworkin, and X. Tang Carotid and aortic baroreflexes of the rat: I. Open-loop steady-state properties and blood pressure variability Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): R1910 - R1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Dworkin, X. Tang, A. J. Snyder, and S. Dworkin Carotid and aortic baroreflexes of the rat: II. Open-loop frequency response and the blood pressure spectrum Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): R1922 - R1933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |