|
|
||||||||
Center for Research on Energy Metabolism and Department of Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study aimed to dissociate the peripheral effects of adrenalectomy (ADX) on triglyceride (TG) metabolism from those it exerts centrally on energy intake and to determine the impact of diet composition therein. Rats were fed either rodent chow or a diet high in sucrose and fat (HSF) and were adrenalectomized or left intact and pair fed to the ADX animals. Liver TG content, an index of hepatic TG production, was not affected by ADX, but was increased twofold by the HSF diet. ADX decreased the rate of hepatic TG secretion by 41% in chow-fed but not in HSF-fed animals. Triglyceridemia and postheparin plasma lipase activities remained largely unchanged by treatments. ADX decreased insulinemia fivefold in chow-fed rats, but less so in HSF-fed animals. Likewise, subcutaneous and visceral adipose depots were 40-60% smaller in ADX than in intact pair-fed rats given chow, but the effect of ADX was dampened by consumption of the HSF diet. Although smaller, adipose tissues of ADX rats maintained a higher activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) than those of intact pair-fed rats, whereas muscle LPL was decreased. The study confirms that in the presence of reduced energy intake, corticosterone contributes to the maintenance of adipose stores and that the consequences of its absence tend to be attenuated when a high-energy diet is fed. The study further shows that, contrary to ad libitum feeding conditions, most determinants of TG metabolism, such as hepatic TG stores, triglyceridemia, postheparin plasma LPL, and adipose tissue LPL, are minimally affected by glucocorticoids when consumption of a high-energy diet is restricted, suggesting that glucocorticoids affect TG metabolism mostly indirectly through their central action on ingestive behavior.
triglyceride secretion; lipoprotein lipase; insulin; adipose tissue
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ADRENAL GLUCOCORTICOIDS (GC) are important modulators of energy balance. Removal of GC by adrenalectomy (ADX) attenuates or prevents the development of obesity in the majority of genetic and experimental rodent models of obesity (35), an effect that is reversed by administration of corticosterone (18). GCs act on energy metabolism both at the central level, where they affect neuronal pathways involved in the regulation of food intake and energy expenditure, and at the periphery, where they modulate metabolic pathways that accommodate changes in energy balance (7, 8, 38). The metabolism of lipid substrates undergoes alterations that adjust its various components to the lipid flux imposed by energy intake and expenditure, and several of these components are directly modulated by GC. Indeed, the steroids positively modulate hepatic lipid synthesis and secretion (2, 6, 41) and potentiate the positive modulation by insulin of adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (1, 19, 31), the enzyme responsible for the tissue uptake of fatty acids derived from circulating triglycerides (TG). GCs also tend to stimulate insulin secretion through several mechanisms (5, 39), and insulin shares with corticosterone most of its actions on lipid production and storage.
The respective contribution of central and peripheral actions of GC on overall lipid metabolism remains to be fully determined. The centrally mediated anorectic and thermogenic effects of GC removal, for instance through ADX, obviously result in decreased TG synthesis in the liver, secretion and transport into the circulation, and deposition into lipid stores. Changes in determinants of TG metabolism brought by manipulation of the GC status have indeed been found to correlate with the concomitant alterations in energy intake (9, 25). However, this relationship is partial, and direct peripheral actions of GC may be involved in the establishment of some of the adaptations of TG metabolism to centrally mediated alterations in energy intake.
The present study, therefore, aimed to verify the hypothesis that ADX exerts actions on TG metabolism that are independent of those on energy intake. This was verified by comparing rats having undergone ADX to intact animals whose energy consumption was matched to that of their ADX counterparts. The consequences of altering the GC status on energy and TG metabolism are strongly dependent on diet composition (22, 25, 35, 36). We have indeed shown that the impact of GC on TG metabolism is minimal when diet composition maintains a low lipid flux but becomes highly significant when diet increases lipid flux (25). Therefore, a diet that maintains a low lipid flux (rodent chow) was compared with a diet high in sucrose and fat (HSF), which maintains a high lipid flux and produces alterations in glucose and lipid metabolism (25) that are reminiscent of those observed in the human dyslipidemic insulin resistance syndrome (11). This comparison allowed testing of the secondary hypothesis that the energy intake-independent, peripheral actions of GC on TG metabolism are modulated by diet composition.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Treatments
Two cohorts of 32 male Sprague-Dawley rats each (Charles River, St. Constant, Québec, Canada) initially weighing 225-250 g were housed individually in stainless steel cages in a room maintained at 24 ± 1°C, with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 2000). The animals were cared for and handled in compliance with the Canadian Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the experimental procedures were approved by our institutional animal care committee. In each of the two cohorts, the animals were randomly assigned to four groups according to a 2 × 2 factorial design. The factors were the adrenal status with two levels (intact and ADX) and diet with two levels (chow and HSF).Bilateral removal of the adrenals was performed in two groups of each cohort, whereas the remaining two groups underwent a sham operation. The bilateral removal of the adrenals was achieved through two small lateral skin incisions performed under isoflurane anesthesia. The adrenals were pulled out through the incision by holding the periadrenal fat and were severed with scissors. After each excision surgery, incisions were appropriately sutured. Sham-operated animals were handled in the same way as ADX animals except that the adrenals were not excised.
All rats were given 0.15 M NaCl in lieu of water to drink throughout the experiment and were fed either a commercial, high-carbohydrate nonpurified diet (Charles River rodent chow #5075), with an energy density of 14.4 kJ/g, or the HSF diet that contained 41% of energy as carbohydrate (sucrose), 39% as lipid (1:1, corn oil to lard), and 20% as protein (casein), supplemented with vitamins, minerals, and fiber, with a gross energy content of 19.44 kJ/g. Food intake and body weight were recorded daily during the experimental period. Throughout the experiment, food intake of the intact animals was adjusted to that of their ADX counterparts in each of the two dietary cohorts. This was achieved by providing to the intact animals the average amount of food that was eaten the previous day by the ADX animals. Two-thirds of the food was provided to the pair-fed rats at the beginning of the dark period (0800) and the remaining third in the evening (1800), 2 h before the beginning of the lighted period. Rats were treated for a total of 12 days.
Six days after the initial surgery for ADX, the animals were fitted with a permanent polyethylene cannula in the right jugular vein under isoflurane anesthesia. At the end of the 12-day treatment period, the first cohort of animals was used to determine in vivo the rate of hepatic very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-TG secretion. Postheparin plasma LPL (PHLPL) and hepatic lipase (HL) and tissue LPL activities as well as serum variables were determined in the second cohort. The postheparin plasma lipase procedure was performed 3 days after cannulation and, therefore, 3 days before death and serum/tissue harvesting. The animals were fasted for 12 h before the procedures described below were performed so as to avoid the strong effects on lipid metabolism of the acute nutritional status, which would have differed between intact and ADX animals. An additional group of five intact animals was fed the chow diet ad libitum throughout the experiment and was used for comparison of food intake and body and tissue weights with the pair-fed and ADX groups fed chow.
Variables of TG Metabolism
VLDL-TG secretion rate. An initial blood sample (0.15 ml) was withdrawn through the venous catheter, and rats were injected through the catheter with 300 mg/kg body wt of Triton WR-1339 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), a detergent that prevents intravascular TG catabolism (32). Blood samples (0.15 ml) were then taken 20, 40, and 60 min after the Triton injection. The rate of VLDL-TG secretion into the circulation was determined from regression analysis of TG accumulation in plasma versus time. Secretion rate was calculated by multiplying the slope of the regression line by plasma volume estimated from body weight and was expressed as micromoles per minute.Postheparin plasma lipases. Approximately 0.5 ml of blood were
drawn from the jugular catheter 10 min before and 10 min after the
rapid intrajugular administration of 200 IU/kg body wt of sodium
heparin (porcine intestinal mucosa, 1,000 USP/ml, Sigma) (23). Blood
was centrifuged at 1,500 g, 4°C for 15 min, and plasma was
stored at
70°C for later biochemical measurements.
Blood and tissue harvesting. Rats were killed by decapitation.
Blood collected from the neck wound was centrifuged at 1,500 g,
4°C for 15 min. Serum was stored at
70°C for later
biochemical measurements. Retroperitoneal and inguinal white adipose
tissues (WAT) as well as the vastus lateralis muscle (VLM) were excised and weighed. Approximately 50 mg were taken from WAT and the red portion of the VLM, and tissue samples were homogenized using all-glass
tissue grinders (Kontes, Vineland, NJ). WAT were homogenized in 1 ml of
a solution containing 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, and 12 mM deoxycholate, pH 7.4. The VLM was homogenized in 1 ml of a solution
containing 1 M ethylene glycol, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 3 mM deoxycholate, 10 IU/ml heparin, and 5% (vol/vol) aprotinin (Trasylol, Miles
Pharmaceuticals, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada), pH 7.4. These homogenizing
media were found to yield optimal LPL activities in the individual
tissues. Homogenates of the VLM were quickly frozen and stored at
70°C until measurement of LPL activity. WAT homogenates were
centrifuged at 12,000 g, 4°C for 20 min. The fraction
between the upper fat layer and the bottom sediment was removed after
tube slicing, diluted with four volumes of the homogenization solution
without deoxycholate, and stored at
70°C until later
measurement of LPL activity.
Serum variables. Insulin was quantitated by radioimmunoassay using a reagent kit from Linco Research (St. Charles, MO) with rat insulin as standard. Serum corticosterone was determined by a competitive protein-binding assay (sensitivity: 0.058 nmol/l; interassay coefficient of variation: 9.0%) using plasma from a dexamethasone-treated female Rhesus monkey as a source of transcortin (27). Serum glucose was determined by the glucose oxidase method using the Beckman glucose analyzer (Beckman, Palo Alto, CA). TG concentrations were assayed by an enzymatic method using a reagent kit from Boehringer Mannheim (Montréal, Québec, Canada), which allows correction for free glycerol. Plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) were determined with a reagent kit from Wako Chemicals (Richmond, VA).
Postheparin plasma lipases and tissue LPL activities. LPL activity was measured in postheparin plasma and tissue homogenates as described earlier (33). Samples of 100 µl of postheparin plasma diluted 1:50 with saline and of WAT and VLM homogenates were incubated for 1 h at 28°C under gentle agitation with 100 µl of a substrate mixture consisting of a 0.2 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.6, which contained 10 MBq/l carboxyl-[14C]triolein and 2.52 mM cold triolein emulsified in 5% gum arabic, as well as 2% fatty-acid free bovine serum albumin, 10% human serum as a source of apolipoprotein C-II, and either 0.1 or 2 M NaCl. Free oleate released by LPL was then separated from intact triolein using a liquid partition system (3) and mixed with Universol (New England Nuclear, Montréal, Canada), and sample radioactivity was determined. LPL activity was calculated by subtracting non-LPL lipolytic activity determined in a final NaCl concentration of 1 M from total lipolytic activity determined in a final NaCl concentration of 0.05 M. Postheparin plasma hepatic TG lipase (PHHL) activity was directly evaluated in plasma samples to which 25 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate was added before incubation with the TG emulsion to inhibit LPL activity (42). Tissue LPL activity was expressed as microunits (1 µU = 1 µmol NEFA released per hour of incubation at 28°C), and PHLPL and PHHL activity was expressed as microunits per milliliter of plasma. The interassay coefficient of variation was 4.8% and was determined using bovine skim milk as a standard source of LPL. Protein content of the tissue extracts was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (24). Tissue LPL activity was expressed per total tissue (total activity) and per unit tissue protein (specific activity).
Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE. Main
treatment effects and treatment interactions were analyzed using factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparison between intact ad
libitum, intact pair fed, and ADX groups fed chow (Table
1) was performed by one-factor ANOVA. When
significant, individual means were then compared pairwise using
Fisher's protected least squares difference (PLSD) post hoc test. All
other comparisons were performed by two-factor ANOVA. The factors were
the adrenal status with two levels (intact, ADX) and diet with two
levels (chow, HSF diet). When justified by a significant treatment
interaction, comparisons between individual group means were performed
using Fisher's PLSD test. Data were log transformed before analysis when group variances were not homogeneous (O'Brien's test), but untransformed values are presented below. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
|
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of ADX on food intake and of pair feeding and ADX on body and tissue weights of chow-fed rats are shown in Table 1. ADX induced a 25% reduction in ad libitum food intake, which was reflected in body weight that was 11% smaller than that of intact rats fed ad libitum. Final body weight of intact, pair-fed rats was identical to that of ADX animals. The mass of the three adipose depots that were considered was decreased almost by one-half in ADX compared with intact animals. In contrast, pair feeding intact animals did not result in any significant change in adipose tissue weight compared with their ad libitum-fed counterparts. Vastus lateralis weight remained unaltered by either pair feeding or ADX.
As expected, surgery to remove the adrenals resulted in a slight loss
of body weight (Fig. 1, days
0-2), which was followed by resumption of weight gain.
Therefore, the present experimental conditions resulted in an initial
weight loss that was followed by a phase of weight recovery and stunted
growth compared with intact animals fed chow ad libitum (Fig. 1,
inset). The ADX animals appeared to be more sensitive in terms
of weight gain to subsequent surgery and 12-h fasting
[cannulation (day 6) and fasting (day 8) before
postheparin plasma lipase procedure] than their intact pair-fed
counterparts. However, neither the adrenal status nor the type of diet
significantly affected final body weights (see below) after 12 days of
treatment.
|
The impact of the adrenal status and diet on energy intake, final body
weight, and plasma variables is depicted in Table
2. ADX rats fed the HSF diet ingested
slightly (+6%), but significantly, more energy than those fed chow,
which did not translate into a significant difference in final body
weight. Final body weights were similar in intact pair-fed and ADX
groups regardless of diet. Fasting plasma corticosterone levels were
similar in intact rats of both dietary cohorts and undetectable in ADX
animals. The adrenal status and diet affected neither fasting plasma
levels of TG and NEFA nor the activity of PHLPL, whereas ADX exerted an
overall lowering action on PHHL.
|
As depicted in Fig. 2A, liver TG
content, an index of long-term hepatic TG production, was more than
twofold higher in HSF- than in chow-fed rats, whereas it remained
unaffected by the presence or absence of corticosterone. In contrast,
ADX reduced hepatic VLDL-TG secretion rate by 41% in chow-fed rats, an
effect that was abolished in HSF-fed animals (adrenal status × diet interaction; Fig. 2B). Diet did not affect VLDL-TG
secretion rate in intact pair-fed rats.
|
Despite equal energy intakes, ADX rats displayed lower insulinemia than
intact pair-fed animals (Fig. 3A).
The difference related to the adrenal status was attenuated in HSF-fed
rats, as ADX reduced fasting insulinemia less in the latter than in their chow-fed counterparts (adrenal status × diet interaction). Plasma insulin was identical in intact pair-fed rats regardless of
diet. Fasting serum glucose was reduced in ADX compared with intact
pair-fed rats but remained unchanged by diet (Fig. 3B).
|
The effects of the adrenal status and diet on retroperitoneal WAT are
depicted in Fig. 4. ADX resulted in lower
retroperitoneal WAT weight than pair feeding in both dietary cohorts,
whereas depot weight was higher in HSF- than in chow-fed rats (Fig.
4A). Although the ADX effect was relatively smaller in HSF-
than in chow-fed animals (
33% vs.
58%), treatments did
not interact significantly with each other. Total protein content
closely reflected depot mass, and both were highly correlated
(r = 0.89, P < 0.0001), indicating that the extra
depot weight loss induced by ADX included both lipid and protein mass
(Fig. 4B). Despite treatment effects on depot weight, total LPL
activity was comparable in all groups (Fig. 4C). However, when
expressed relative to total protein, LPL activity was higher in ADX
than in intact pair-fed animals, whereas it remained unaffected by diet
(Fig. 4D). Globally, similar observations were made in the
subcutaneous inguinal depot (Fig. 5).
Despite the absence of a significant treatment interaction, examination
of Fig. 5 indicates that the reducing effect of ADX on WAT weight was
clearly stronger in chow- than in HSF-fed rats. Here again, protein
content of the depot was reduced in ADX rats compared with the intact
pair-fed animals (Fig. 5B). Total tissue LPL activity was
comparable in all groups (Fig. 5C), but LPL was higher in ADX
than in pair-fed rats when expressed as specific activity (Fig.
5D). In both WAT depots, insulinemia was positively correlated
with weight (r = 0.67, P < 0.0001) but not with total or specific activity of LPL.
|
|
The slight reduction in VLM weight (Fig.
6A) and protein content (Fig.
6B) in ADX compared with intact pair-fed animals did not reach
statistical significance, and these variables were not affected by the
type of diet. Lipoprotein lipase activity was significantly reduced in
ADX compared with intact pair-fed animals when expressed per total
muscle (Fig. 6C), but not when expressed per unit protein (Fig.
6D). Diet did not affect muscle LPL in any substantial manner.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study confirms that in the presence of reduced energy intake, corticosterone contributes to the maintenance of adipose stores and that the consequences of its absence tend to be attenuated when a high-energy diet is fed. The study further shows that contrary to ad libitum feeding conditions, most determinants of TG metabolism, such as hepatic TG stores, triglyceridemia, PHLPL, and adipose tissue LPL are minimally affected by GCs when consumption of a high-energy diet is restricted, suggesting that GCs affect TG metabolism mostly indirectly through their central action on ingestive behavior.
It is well established that pair feeding brings about changes in energy balance that are not identical to those produced by ADX. Food restriction reduces sympathetically activated thermogenesis (13). In contrast, ADX lowers energy intake, but thermogenesis is maintained at higher levels than in pair-fed animals, because corticosterone no longer inhibits sympathetically mediated thermogenesis (13). An additional unknown metabolic component, independent of GC action and sympathetically mediated thermogenesis, also contributes to the conservation of energy stores during restricted feeding (14, 15). In the present study, such energy-conserving adaptations explain the larger adipose depots of pair-fed animals, which were only slightly below those of ad libitum-fed rats, compared with ADX rats despite identical energy intake. The findings also confirm the contribution of GC to these adaptations. On the other hand, diet composition, particularly a high fat content, has also been shown to promote the conservation of lipid stores during recovery from undernutrition in normal rats (12) and to attenuate the effects of ADX on fat stores of obese ob/ob mice (20, 22, 36). These effects are partly related to the lower cost of storing dietary fat compared with carbohydrate or protein (12). The sucrose component of the HSF diet was also likely involved, because dietary carbohydrates have been shown to influence the effects of ADX on energy balance (22, 35). The findings of the present study on the effects of the adrenal status and diet composition on adipose tissue mass are, therefore, congruent with these diet-GC interactions on energy balance.
Liver TG content, which reflects long-term endogenous TG production, was much higher in the HSF- than in chow-fed rats and was not affected by the presence or absence of corticosterone. This indicates that in situations of reduced energy intake, hepatic lipid production remains very sensitive to the amount of lipogenic substrates provided by the diet, as is the case in ad libitum feeding conditions (4, 25). Sucrose, particularly its fructose moiety, is highly lipogenic in rats (4, 10), which explains the higher hepatic TG content of rats fed the HSF diet compared with those fed chow. A larger uptake of dietary fatty acids, either nonesterified or within lipoprotein remnants, may also have contributed to a greater lipid input to the liver. In addition, the findings indicate that, although GCs clearly favor de novo lipid production by the liver (4) in animals fed ad libitum, their contribution becomes insignificant, regardless of diet composition, when energy intake is low. This is in sharp contrast to what we have observed in ad libitum-fed rats, in which marked effects of the adrenal status were noted on hepatic lipids, particularly in animals fed the HSF diet (25). It can therefore be concluded that corticosterone alters liver lipid production mainly through its central modulation of nutrient intake rather than through a direct action on hepatic TG synthesis.
Fasting rates of hepatic VLDL-TG secretion in chow-fed, ADX animals were approximately one-half of those of their intact pair-fed counterparts, confirming the positive modulation of hepatic VLDL secretion by GC (4). In vitro studies have shown that GCs affect the intracellular fate of apolipoprotein B (41), which underlies their modulation of VLDL-TG secretion. Therefore, in the presence of a reduced supply of dietary energy, corticosterone contributes directly to approximately one-half of the hepatic output of TG into the circulation in the fasted state. However, this contribution of corticosterone to VLDL-TG secretion was no longer evident when the HSF diet was fed, as the HSF diet and the presence of corticosterone did not exert an additive effect on VLDL-TG secretion. It may be that corticosterone contributes to VLDL-TG secretion when hepatic TG stores are low, such as in rats pair fed the chow diet, but that this contribution is masked when hepatic TG stores are larger, as was the case in HSF-fed animals. In the chow-fed rats, adrenal status-related changes in hepatic TG secretion rates did not impact fasting triglyceridemia. This is likely because endothelium-bound LPL, which remained unchanged by treatments, was in sufficient amount to metabolize the larger mass of TG secreted in the intact rats, thereby maintaining their triglyceridemia to levels similar to those of ADX animals.
Adipose tissue LPL is generally modulated in concomitance with the flux of fat deposition. Indeed, LPL tends to be increased when energy metabolism favors fat accretion and is decreased with fat mass loss (16, 17, 29, 34). In the present conditions, however, adipose tissue LPL specific activity was higher and total tissue LPL similar in ADX than in intact pair-fed rats despite the smaller size of their fat depots. Moreover, higher adipose LPL in ADX rats compared with intact pair-fed animals was not congruent with the hormonal milieu created by ADX. In rats fed ad libitum, adipose LPL was greatly reduced by ADX in rats fed the HSF diet in concomitance with the effects of the adrenal status and diet on insulinemia (25). In the ADX rats of the present study, lower insulinemia and the absence of corticosterone, two positive modulators of the enzyme, as well as the possible activation of the sympathoadrenal system (13) should all have tended to decrease adipose tissue LPL activity relative to intact animals. Pairing the latter for food intake of ADX animals revealed that in conditions of reduced energy intake, adipose LPL appears to escape the endocrine modulation characteristic of ad libitum feeding conditions. This phenomenon perhaps manifests itself below a certain threshold of fat mass and would be akin to what is observed in well-trained athletes whose low fat reserves are associated with paradoxically high adipose LPL activity (26, 28). Such an adaptation, established by as yet unknown mechanisms, may serve to render a depleted adipose tissue ready for an eventual replenishment of fat stores. Finally, the fact that higher LPL activity was present in adipose tissues of ADX compared with pair-fed animals demonstrates that modulation of LPL is not part of the metabolic adaptations that favor the sparing of fat reserves elicited by GC.
In contrast to adipose LPL, muscle LPL was reduced by ADX, independently of the type of diet. Whether corticosterone directly influences muscle LPL activity has not yet been systematically investigated, and a lack of effect of ADX has been previously observed in ad libitum-fed male and female rats (25 and Y. Deshaies, A. Dagnault, and D. Richard, unpublished observations). The present results suggest however, that in conditions of reduced energy intake, the hormone may contribute to the maintenance of muscle LPL, which would constitute a useful adaptation to ensure an adequate supply of lipid substrates to the muscle. Inasmuch as LPL activity measured in tissue homogenates is proportional to the fraction of the enzyme pool available at the endothelial surface (30), it is worthy of noting that the divergent changes in LPL of adipose and muscle tissues tended to cancel each other, because total endothelium-bound LPL measured in postheparin plasma remained unchanged by treatments.
Despite identical food intake, fasting insulinemia diverged widely between intact and ADX animals, and the difference was greatly attenuated by consumption of the HSF diet. The present findings show that for a given level of energy intake, fasting insulin levels are maintained at a higher level in the presence than in the absence of corticosterone. This is in agreement with the notion that GCs tend to stimulate insulin secretion through several mechanisms (5, 39), including GC-induced peripheral insulin resistance (39) that is compensated by hypersecretion of insulin. The dampening of the hypoinsulinemic effect of ADX by consumption of the HSF diet is also congruent with the presence of insulin resistance associated with dietary sucrose and fat (37, 43). The present findings indicate that the development of insulin resistance induced by such diets is at least partly independent of GC. The effects of the adrenal status and diet on insulinemia, which correlated with those on fat mass, suggest an involvement of the hormone in treatment effects on body fat. This corroborates the well-known lipogenic actions of insulin, but the degree of involvement of insulin in treatment effects remains to be determined directly, as high-fat diets have been shown to dampen the effects of ADX on energy balance without concomitant changes in insulinemia (22). As to determinants of TG metabolism, our findings do not suggest an involvement of insulin in treatment effects. Indeed, given the known actions of insulin on TG metabolism (21, 40), changes in fasting insulinemia could not explain treatment differences in hepatic lipid content, hepatic TG secretion rates, or tissue LPL activity. This again contrasts with the ad libitum-feeding condition, in which insulinemia was strongly associated with most determinants of TG metabolism (25).
Perspectives
The present study confirmed that corticosterone participates in the maintenance of fat reserves in situations of decreased energy intake and that a high-energy diet complements this action. However, with the exception of hepatic TG secretion in chow-fed rats, corticosterone appeared to have little direct impact on determinants of TG metabolism, including hepatic TG stores, triglyceridemia, postheparin plasma lipases, and adipose tissue LPL. Although diet composition did influence some determinants of TG metabolism, it did not modulate the impact of corticosterone thereupon. Whether such a lack of impact of the adrenal status extends to the postprandial period remains to be determined. We have previously shown in rats fed ad libitum that the impact of corticosterone on TG metabolism is minimal in rats fed a diet (rodent chow) that maintains a low lipid flux but that it greatly affects TG metabolism in animals fed a diet (HSF) that increases lipid flux. The present study extends these findings by showing that corticosterone influences TG metabolism only minimally when consumption of the high-energy diet is restricted. On the other hand, the mechanisms by which GCs exert their fat-sparing action remain unclear. The present results indicate that modulation of the availability of LPL in adipose tissue is not part of the adaptations that allow for the fat-sparing action of GCs. Together with our previous findings of a strong, diet-dependent impact of the presence of corticosterone on determinants of TG metabolism in ad libitum feeding conditions, the present studies demonstrate that determinants of TG metabolism, as assessed after an overnight fast, are affected in the long term to a much greater extent through the central modulation of energy intake by GC than by their direct peripheral actions on TG metabolism.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors acknowledge the excellent professional assistance of Josée Lalonde.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. Deshaies, Dept. of Physiology, School of Medicine, Laval Univ., Québec, Qc, Canada G1K 7P4 (E-mail: yves.deshaies{at}phs.ulaval.ca).
Received 13 July 1999; accepted in final form 10 December 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ashby, P,
and
Robinson DS.
Effects of insulin, glucocorticoids and adrenaline on the activity of rat adipose-tissue lipoprotein lipase.
Biochem J
188:
185-192,
1980[Web of Science][Medline].
2.
Bartlett, SM,
and
Gibbons GF.
Short- and longer-term regulation of very-low-density lipoprotein secretion by insulin, dexamethasone, and lipogenic substrates in cultured hepatocytes. A biphasic effect of insulin.
Biochem J
249:
37-43,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Belfrage, P,
and
Vaughan M.
Simple liquid-liquid partition system for isolation of labeled oleic acid from mixtures with glycerides.
J Lipid Res
10:
341-344,
1969[Abstract].
4.
Berdanier, CD.
Role of glucocorticoids in the regulation of lipogenesis.
FASEB J
3:
2179-2183,
1989[Abstract].
5.
Blair, SC,
Caterson ID,
and
Cooney GJ.
Glucose tolerance and insulin secretion after adrenalectomy in mice made obese with gold thioglucose.
J Endocrinol
148:
391-398,
1996
6.
Brindley, DN.
Phosphatidate phosphohydrolase activity in the liver.
In: Phosphatidate Phosphohydrolase, edited by Brindley DN.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1988, p. 21-77.
7.
Brindley, DN.
Role of glucocorticoids and fatty acids in the impairment of lipid metabolism observed in the metabolic syndrome.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
19, Suppl. 1:
S69-S75,
1995.
8.
Brindley, DN,
McCann BS,
Niaura R,
Stoney CM,
and
Suarez EC.
Stress and lipoprotein metabolism: modulators and mechanisms.
Metabolism
42, Suppl. 1:
3-15,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Deshaies, Y,
Dagnault A,
Lalonde J,
and
Richard D.
Interaction of corticosterone and gonadal steroids on lipid deposition in the female rat.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
273:
E355-E362,
1997
10.
Deshaies, Y,
Martineau M-J,
and
Lalonde J.
Chronic alpha 1-adrenergic blockade, serum triacylglycerols, and tissue lipoprotein lipase activity in rats fed diets high in starch or sucrose.
Nutrition
7:
109-115,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Després, J-P.
Dyslipidaemia and obesity.
Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab
8:
629-660,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Dulloo, AG,
and
Girardier L.
Influence of dietary composition on energy expenditure during recovery of body weight in the rat: implications for catch-up growth and obesity relapse.
Metabolism
41:
1336-1342,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Dulloo, AG,
and
Miller DS.
Obesity: a disorder of the sympathetic nervous system.
Wld Rev Nutr Diet
50:
1-56,
1987.
14.
Dulloo, AG,
Seydoux J,
and
Girardier L.
Dissociation of enhanced efficiency of fat deposition during weight recovery from sympathetic control of thermogenesis.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
269:
R365-R369,
1995
15.
Dulloo, AG,
Seydoux J,
and
Girardier L.
Role of corticosterone in adaptive changes in energy expenditure during refeeding after low calorie intake.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
259:
E658-E664,
1990
16.
Eckel, RH.
Lipoprotein lipase. A multifunctional enzyme relevant to common metabolic diseases.
N Engl J Med
320:
1060-1068,
1989[Abstract].
17.
Eckel, RH,
Yost TJ,
and
Jensen DR.
Alterations in lipoprotein lipase in insulin resistance.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
19, Suppl. 1:
S16-S21,
1995.
18.
Freedman, MR,
Horwitz BA,
and
Stern JS.
Effect of adrenalectomy and glucocorticoid replacement on development of obesity.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
250:
R595-R607,
1986.
19.
Fried, SK,
Russell CD,
Grauso NL,
and
Brolin RE.
Lipoprotein lipase regulation by insulin and glucocorticoid in subcutaneous and omental adipose tissues of obese women and men.
J Clin Invest
92:
2191-2198,
1993.
20.
Grogan, CK,
Kim H-K,
and
Romsos DR.
Effects of adrenalectomy on energy balance in obese (ob/ob) mice fed high carbohydrate or high fat diets.
J Nutr
117:
1115-1120,
1987.
21.
Howard, BV,
and
Howard WJ.
Dyslipidemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Endocr Rev
15:
263-274,
1994
22.
Kang, JS,
Pilkington JD,
Ferguson D,
Kim HK,
and
Romsos DR.
Dietary glucose and fat attenuate effects of adrenalectomy on energy balance in ob/ob mice.
J Nutr
122:
895-905,
1992.
23.
Krauss, RM,
Windmueller HG,
Levy RI,
and
Fredrickson DS.
Selective measurement of two different triglyceride lipase activities in rat postheparin plasma.
J Lipid Res
14:
286-295,
1973[Abstract].
24.
Lowry, OH,
Rosebrough NJ,
Farr AL,
and
Randall RJ.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J Biol Chem
193:
265-275,
1951
25.
Mantha, L,
Palacios E,
and
Deshaies Y.
Modulation of triglyceride metabolism by glucocorticoids in diet-induced obesity.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R455-R464,
1999
26.
Marniemi, J,
Peltonen P,
Vuori I,
and
Hietanen E.
Lipoprotein lipase of human postheparin plasma and adipose tissue in relation to physical training.
Acta Physiol Scand
110:
131-135,
1980[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Murphy, BE.
Some studies of the protein-binding of steroids and their application to the routine micro and ultramicro measurement of various steroids in body fluids by competitive protein-binding radioassay.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
27:
973-990,
1967
28.
Nikkilä, EA,
Taskinen M-R,
Rehunen S,
and
Härkönen M.
Lipoprotein lipase activity in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of runners: relation to serum lipoproteins.
Metabolism
27:
1661-1671,
1978[Web of Science][Medline].
29.
Nilsson-Ehle, P.
Impaired regulation of adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase in obesity.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
5:
695-699,
1981.
30.
Nilsson-Ehle, P.
Measurements of lipoprotein lipase activity.
In: Lipoprotein Lipase, edited by Borensztajn J.. Chicago: Evener, 1987, p. 59-77.
31.
Ottosson, M,
Vikman-Adolfsson K,
Enerbäck S,
Olivecrona G,
and
Björntorp P.
The effects of cortisol on the regulation of lipoprotein lipase activity in human adipose tissue.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
79:
820-825,
1994[Abstract].
32.
Otway, S,
and
Robinson DS.
The use of a non-ionic detergent (Triton WR 1339) to determine rates of triglyceride entry into the circulation of the rat under different physiological conditions.
J Physiol (Lond)
190:
321-332,
1967
33.
Paulin, A,
Lalonde J,
and
Deshaies Y.
-Adrenergic blockade and lipoprotein lipase activity in rat tissues after acute exercise.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
261:
R891-R897,
1991
34.
Picard, F,
Richard D,
Huang Q,
and
Deshaies Y.
Effects of leptin on adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase in the obese ob/ob mouse.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
22:
1088-1095,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Romsos, DR.
Energy balance: role of adrenal gland secretions.
In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Nutrition, edited by Young KW,
Cha LY,
Yull LK,
Soon JJ,
and He KS.. Seoul, South Korea: International Congress of Nutrition, 1991, p. 129-132.
36.
Smith, CK,
and
Romsos DR.
Effects of adrenalectomy on energy balance of obese mice are diet dependent.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
249:
R13-R22,
1985.
37.
Storlien, LH,
James DE,
Burleigh KM,
Chisholm DJ,
and
Kraegen EW.
Fat feeding causes widespread in vivo insulin resistance, decreased energy expenditure, and obesity in rats.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
251:
E576-E583,
1986
38.
Strack, AM,
Sebastian RJ,
Schwartz MW,
and
Dallman MF.
Glucocorticoids and insulin: reciprocal signals for energy balance.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
268:
R142-R149,
1995
39.
Tappy, L,
Randin D,
Vollenweider P,
Vollenweider L,
Paquot N,
Scherrer U,
Schneiter P,
Nicod P,
and
Jéquier E.
Mechanisms of dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance in healthy humans.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
79:
1063-1069,
1994[Abstract].
40.
Tomkin, GH,
and
Owens D.
Insulin and lipoprotein metabolism with special reference to the diabetic state.
Diabetes Metab Rev
10:
225-252,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Wang, CN,
McLeod RS,
Yao Z,
and
Brindley DN.
Effects of dexamethasone on the synthesis, degradation, and secretion of apolipoprotein B in cultured rat hepatocytes.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
15:
1481-1491,
1995
42.
Watson, TDG,
Tan CE,
McConnell M,
Clegg SK,
Squires LF,
and
Packard CJ.
Measurement and physiological significance of lipoprotein and hepatic lipase activities in preheparin plasma.
Clin Chem
41:
405-412,
1995
43.
Wright, DW,
Hansen RI,
Mondon CE,
and
Reaven G.
Sucrose-induced insulin resistance in the rat: modulation by exercise and diet.
Am J Clin Nutr
38:
879-883,
1983
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Michailidou, R. N. Carter, E. Marshall, H. G. Sutherland, D. G. Brownstein, E. Owen, K. Cockett, V. Kelly, L. Ramage, E. A. S. Al-Dujaili, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor haploinsufficiency causes hypertension and attenuates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and blood pressure adaptions to high-fat diet FASEB J, November 1, 2008; 22(11): 3896 - 3907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barazzoni, A. Bosutti, M. Stebel, M. R. Cattin, E. Roder, L. Visintin, L. Cattin, G. Biolo, M. Zanetti, and G. Guarnieri Ghrelin regulates mitochondrial-lipid metabolism gene expression and tissue fat distribution in liver and skeletal muscle Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2005; 288(1): E228 - E235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Haluzik, K. R. Dietz, J. K. Kim, B. Marcus-Samuels, G. I. Shulman, O. Gavrilova, and M. L. Reitman Adrenalectomy Improves Diabetes in A-ZIP/F-1 Lipoatrophic Mice by Increasing Both Liver and Muscle Insulin Sensitivity Diabetes, July 1, 2002; 51(7): 2113 - 2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |