AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R143-R148, 2001;
0363-6119/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cases, A.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cases, A.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. C.
Vol. 280, Issue 1, R143-R148, January 2001

Hemodynamic and renal effects of acute and progressive nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in anesthetized dogs

Aleix Cases, John Haas, John C. Burnett, and Juan Carlos Romero

Department of Physiology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study evaluated the effects of progressive nitric oxide (NO) inhibition in the regulation of systemic and regional hemodynamics and renal function in anesthetized dogs. The NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group (n = 9) received progressive doses of 0.1, 1, 10, and 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1. Renal (RBF), mesenteric (MBF), iliac (IBF) blood flows, mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary pressures, cardiac output (CO), and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were measured. During NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester infusion, MAP and systemic vascular resistances increased in a dose-dependent manner. Mean pulmonary pressure and pulmonary vascular resistances increased in both the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and the control group, but the increase was more marked in the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group during the last two infusion periods. CO decreased progressively, before any significant change in blood pressure was noticeable in the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group. IBF decreased significantly from the first NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester dose, whereas RBF and MBF only decreased significantly during the highest NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester dose. Urinary volume and sodium excretion only increased significantly in the time control group during the two last time periods. The pulmonary vasculature was more sensitive than the systemic vasculature, whereas skeletal muscle and renal vasculatures showed a greater sensitivity to the inhibition of NO production than the mesenteric vasculature. NO synthesis inhibition induces a progressive antidiuretic and antinatriuretic effect, which is partially offset by the increase in blood pressure.

NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; regional blood flows; systemic hemodynamics; renal function; urinary sodium excretion


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IT HAS BEEN WIDELY DEMONSTRATED that the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) by endothelial cells plays a critical role in the regulation of the main determinants of blood pressure control: vascular tone (vascular resistance) and tubular sodium reabsorption (volemia). Inhibition of NO synthesis results in an increase in blood pressure due to an increase in peripheral vascular resistance and an antinatriuretic effect (18, 19, 21, 26, 28).

However, changes of renal blood flow (RBF) relative to any other vascular bed and systemic hemodynamics have not been evaluated. Hence, our interest in knowing if the acute inhibition of NO produced in the dog, by progressively increasing doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, is followed by a uniform vasoconstriction in different vascular beds or a more selective influence on some specific vasculature (9, 10). In the identification of selective vascular responses to NO synthesis inhibition, it is important to understand which organ blood flow is dependent on NO synthesis. It was anticipated that this experimental approach would help to define if the renal vascular bed exhibits a highly selective sensitivity to NO inhibition, rendering sodium excretion dependent on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), or if NO affects tubular sodium reabsorption independent of GFR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels (11).

This study was therefore undertaken to determine if the acute and progressive inhibition of NO synthesis, induced by the consecutive administration of four increasing doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 50.0 µg · kg-1 · min-1), produces 1) a uniform or selective increase in vascular resistance to renal, mesenteric, iliac, and pulmonary vascular beds; 2) a change in MAP; and 3) a change in GFR and renal sodium excretion.


    MATERIAL AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Experiments were conducted in 16 anesthetized mongrel dogs (weight 17-21 kg, either sex, on a standard diet) in two groups: 1) vehicle group (n = 7) and 2) NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group (n = 9), which were allowed to drink water ad libitum 16 h before the experiment. Dogs were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg iv), intubated, and mechanically ventilated (Harvard Ventilator, Harvard Apparatus, Millis, MA) with room air at a tidal volume that was determined by the nomogram of Kleinman and Radford (15). To maintain anesthesia during the experiment, pentobarbital sodium (15 mg/ml) was added to the saline infusate. Dogs were placed on a heating pad, and warming lights were adjusted to maintain core temperature between 36 and 38°C.

The right external jugular vein was cannulated with a 7F Swan-Ganz catheter (Criticath, Ohmeda, Oxnard, CA) and advanced into the pulmonary artery for measuring cardiac output (CO) and cardiac filling pressures. The right femoral artery was cannulated to collect peripheral arterial blood samples and for continuous measurement of MAP with the use of a pressure transducer (Pd23 ID, Statham, Hato Rey, PR) connected to a chart recorder (2600, Gould, Cleveland, OH). The femoral vein was cannulated for infusion of vehicle or NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (1 ml/min) and 2% inulin solution at a rate of 1 ml/min with additional anesthetic as necessary.

Transonic flow probes (Transonic #3R, Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) were placed through a left flank incision on the left renal, superior mesenteric, and left iliac arteries in segments proximal to the aorta. The left ureter was cannulated with PE-200 tubing for urine collection.

After completion of the surgical procedure, dogs were allowed to stabilize for 60 min without intervention. At the end of this period, a 15-min baseline clearance period was obtained. After this baseline period, vehicle or increasing doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (0.1, 1, 10, and 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1) were sequentially intravenously administered during 45-min periods. During the last 15 min of each period, a clearance period was obtained. During the clearance periods, serum and urine samples were collected to measure electrolytes, inulin concentration, hemodynamic parameters, and CO.

At the end of the stabilization period and at the end of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester infusion, blood samples were also obtained for measuring plasma endothelin (ET) and plasma renin activity (PRA). Plasma and urinary sodium were measured by flame photometry (IL943, Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA). GFR was calculated by measuring the clearance of inulin. Plasma and urine inulin were measured by a colorimetric method (8). Plasma ET and PRA were measured by radioimmunoassay with the use of commercial RIA kits.

CO was measured by a thermodilution technique with a CO computer (model 9520A, Edwards Laboratories, Santa Ana, CA) and considered as the average of three measurements. Calculated hemodynamic parameters included: systemic vascular resistances (SVR) = MAP - right arterial pressure/CO. Pulmonary vascular resistances are equal to pulmonary artery pressure minus pulmonary capillary wedge pressure divided by CO.

Animals were euthanized at the end of each experiment without emerging from anesthesia by an intravenous injection of 200 meq potassium chloride.

Statistics. Data are expressed as means ± SE. The analysis of the data included a repeated-measures ANOVA and a Scheffé's test to assess differences in the means between periods. To assess differences between control dogs and the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group, ANOVA was performed for each dependent variable, using dog, time, and drug terms as the independent variables. The drug effects were then added to the residuals of this ANOVA model, which created a data set adjusted for dog and time. Two-sample comparisons (t-tests with the Bonferroni correction) were then performed on the adjusted data to determine the significance of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Differences between baseline and the last infusion period in hormonal variables were assessed by means of a paired t-test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

As can be seen in Fig. 1, MAP increased in a dose-dependent manner during the infusion of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester [from 125.4 ± 3.7 to 127.7 ± 4.1, 130.1 ± 4.3, 135.8 ± 4.2*, and 144.9 ± 4.91* (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)]. However, these increments did not achieve statistical significance with respect to the baseline period or the control group until the doses of 10 and 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1 were administered. At this point, the overall increase of MAP was 16% over the basal period. MAP of the control group did not experience any significant change throughout the experiment [from 129.3 ± 1.85 to 132 ± 2.7, 129.4 ± 3.9, 127.4 ± 4.8, and 126.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, P not significant (NS)].


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Response of mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) after progressive doses (0.1, 1.0, 10, 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1) of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and saline in a time control group. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline; and #P < 0.05 vs. control.

CO also decreased in a progressive dose-dependent manner in the experimental group [from 3.13 ± 0.14 to 2.95 ± 0.16, 2.74 ± 0.16*, 2.33 ± 0.14*, and 1.98 ± 0.15* l/min (P < 0.05 vs. baseline)], which became statistically significant during the infusion of 1 µg · kg-1 · min-1, before MAP was significantly increased (Fig. 1). The fall in CO was already significant during the infusion of 1 µg · kg-1 · min-1 compared with the control group, in which the CO remained unaltered until the last period (period 4) when it decreased by ~10% [from 3.24 ± 0.27 to 3.2 ± 0.28, 3.1 ± 0.23, 3.03 ± 0.23, and 2.92 ± 0.23* l/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)]. SVR of the experimental group changed in a parallel fashion with respect to MAP [from 40.43 ± 1.9 to 43.65 ± 1.9, 47.7 ± 1.97, 58.1 ± 2.3*, and 73.93 ± 4.7* dyn · s · cm-5 (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)]. The increments in SVR became significant during the last two periods (10 µg and 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1) with respect to both the baseline period and the control group. SVR in the control group remained unchanged throughout the experiment (from 41.6 ± 3.7 to 42.9 ± 3.4, 42.8 ± 2.28, 43.03 ± 2.17, and 44.2 ± 2.35 dyn · s · cm-5).

In the experimental group, there was a continuous and progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance [from 3.23 ± 0.34 to 3.4 ± 0.34, 3.72 ± 0.33*, 3.98 ± 0.38*, and 4.2 ± 0.37* dyn · s · cm-5 (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)], which was reflected in parallel elevations of pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) [from 14.6 ± 0.41 to 15.4 ± 0.51, 17.9 ± 0.7*, 20.8 ± 0.98*, and 23.2 ± 0.98* mmHg (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] (8.6 mmHg at the end of the study) (Fig. 1). Both of these parameters were significantly increased by the 1-µg · kg-1 · min-1 dose. Pulmonary vascular resistances increased in the last period by 2.45-fold, which is greater than the increase recorded in SVR (1.82-fold). In the control group, pulmonary vascular resistance [from 3.23 ± 0.34 to 3.4 ± 0.34, 3.72 ± 0.33*, 3.98 ± 0.38*, and 4.2 ± 0.37* (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] (30%) and pulmonary artery pressure [from 13.2 ± 0.33 to 13.6 ± 0.4, 14.25 ± 0.35*, 14.9 ± 0.23*, and 15.4 ± 0.28* mmHg (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] also experienced a mild increase from the second infusion (Delta 2.2 mmHg, P < 0.05). The differences in mean pulmonary pressure and pulmonary vascular resistances between the experimental and control groups reached significance during the last two infusion periods.

As it is shown in Fig. 2, in the experimental group, mesenteric blood flow (MBF) [from 203.8 ± 21.1 to 206.1 ± 21.5, 206.8 ± 20.1, 188.1 ± 17.4, and 153.8 ± 16.8* ml/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] and RBF [from 185 ± 24.5 to 184.3 ± 23.9, 178.3 ± 22.2, 161 ± 17.3, and 145 ± 16.4* ml/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] both are decreased by approximately the same proportion, 25 and 22%, respectively. These decrements occur only during the highest dose of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester infusion. This contrasted with the decrease in iliac blood flow (IBF) [from 105.7 ± 8.7 to 98.29 ± 7.8, 94 ± 8.7*, 81.43 ± 9.8*, and 60.3 ± 7.7* ml/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)], which occurred earlier and was more marked. In the control group, MBF (from 225.4 ± 13.5 to 222.3 ± 13.0, 227.4 ± 13.4, 233.7 ± 12.8, and 232.9 ± 15.6 ml/min) and IBF (142.6 ± 10, 141.4 ± 9.7, 142 ± 12.3, 132.9 ± 10.7, and 130.9 ± 9.9 ml/min) did not significantly change, whereas RBF [from 159.4 ± 6.21 to 158.9 ± 8.35, 177.7 ± 13.4, 187.7 ± 13.4*, and 185.1 ± 13.6* ml/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] underwent a progressive elevation of 16%, which became statistically significant from period 3. Furthermore, between the experimental and time control groups, there were significant differences in IBF from the dose of 1 µg · kg-1 · min-1 and in the MBF and RBF from the dose of 10 µg · kg-1 · min-1.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Response of renal, iliac, and mesenteric blood flows after progressive doses (0.1, 1.0, 10, 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1) of L-NAME and saline in a time control group. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline; and #P < 0.05 vs. control.

As shown in Fig. 3, GFR did not change significantly in either group (NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group from 44.45 ± 5.16 to 38.8 ± 5.1 ml/min and control group from 31.14 ± 1.5 to 33.6 ± 2.2 ml/min at the last infusion period, NS). Urine volume (UVol) (from 0.18 ± 0.05 to 0.21 ± 0.05, 0.29 ± 0.07, 0.29 ± 0.07, and 0.25 ± 0.06, NS), urine sodium excretion (UNa) (from 45.93 ± 16.5 to 55.3 ± 14.5, 69.1 ± 16.1, 62.73 ± 14.5, and 39.9 ± 11.6 µeq/min), and fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) (1.11 ± 0.43, 1.3 ± 0.34, 1.62 ± 0.37, 1.67 ± 0.39, and 1.03 ± 0.25%, NS) did not exhibit any significant change in the experimental group. These last three parameters showed a marked tendency toward elevation in the control group, which became significant during the last two periods for UNa [from 38.12 ± 9.1, 37.58 ± 9.22, 48.25 ± 13.42, 60.47 ± 11.35*, and 70.11 ± 12.7* µeq/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] and FeNa [from 1.06 ± 0.23 to 1.07 ± 0.24, 1.19 ± 0.23, 1.57 ± 0.29*, and 1.85 ± 0.32* % (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)] and during the last period for UVol [from 0.17 ± 0.03 to 0.17 ± 0.03, 0.19 ± 0.03, 0.25 ± 0.05, and 0.31 ± 0.06* ml/min (*P < 0.05 vs. baseline)]. The differences between the two groups in these three parameters became significant during the last infusion period.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Response of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary volume, and urinary sodium excretion after progressive doses (0.1, 1.0, 10, 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1) of L-NAME and saline in a time control group. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline; and #P < 0.05 vs. control.

PRA decreased in the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group (from 3.01 ± 0.99 to 1.84 ± 0.77 ng · ml-1 · h-1, P < 0.05), but it did not change in the vehicle group (from 5.05 ± 0.81 to 4.48 ± 0.87 ng · ml-1 · h-1, NS). Plasma ET levels increased after NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester infusion (from 19.35 ± 0.75 to 25.4 ± 1.4 pg/ml, P < 0.05), but not in the control group (from 22.1 ± 2.9 to 23.1 ± 2.9, NS).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Changes in systemic and pulmonary circulation. This study shows that basal release of NO regulates blood pressure and modulates the vasculature of systemic and pulmonary circulation. In systemic circulation, however, the sensitivity of different vascular beds in response to NO synthesis inhibition is not homogenous. Such findings agree to that reported by many other investigators (9, 10, 25, 33, 34, 38). The IBF exhibited dependency on the synthesis of NO, which was greater than that exhibited by other vascular beds. Similar results have been observed by some authors (9, 10), but not by others (33, 38). In fact, the iliac vasculature developed an early vasoconstriction at doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (1 µg · kg-1 · min-1) that was not seen in the renal or mesenteric vascular beds. At maximal doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (50 µg · kg-1 · min-1), the reduction of IBF was almost twofold higher than that produced in RBF and MBF. This effect is important, because the role of NO in the control of skeletal muscle blood flow has been linked to exercise performance (29) and to the amount of glucose uptake that, when decreased, could lead to situations comparable to those observed during insulin resistance (1). It should be pointed out that the mesenteric vasculature was the least dependent on changes in NO synthesis, because it experienced a 25% decrease only at the highest doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Renal vasculature exhibited an intermediate response between the iliac and the mesenteric, considering that RBF increased by 16% in time control animals.

Our results also showed that inhibition of NO synthesis has a major impact on pulmonary circulation, which is an observation previously reported by others (7, 14, 23, 38). In our study, the increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (+146%) and in PAP (+59%) was greater compared with the changes observed in SVR (+83%) and systemic blood pressure (+19.5%), at a dose of 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1. Previous studies reported similar results (7, 38), but this is not a universal finding (23).

Changes in renal hemodynamics and sodium excretion. In previous studies, intrarenal infusion of NO synthesis inhibitors induced potent renal vasoconstriction and antinatriuresis (19). However, Baylis et al. (2) showed that inhibition of NO synthesis causes a dose-dependent increase in arterial blood pressure and sodium excretion in both conscious and anesthetized rats. In the experimental group of animals, RBF did not decrease significantly until the last period. However, these decrements in blood flow became more apparent if one compares it with the steady increments observed in the control group, which became significant from the third period. This renal vasoconstriction was not accompanied by any change in GFR, thus suggesting that the increase in resistance was taking place simultaneously in glomerular afferent and efferent arterioles. This assumption is supported by the finding of other investigators, who have reported similar findings in dogs (5, 23). Schnackenberg et al. (31) and Juncos et al. (13) observed that inhibition of NO renders the afferent preglomerular arteries susceptible to be constricted by doses of ANG II that produce only efferent vasoconstriction under normal circumstances when NO synthesis is not inhibited.

UNa and FeNa in the experimental group showed a tendency to increase in proportion to the increase in MAP, except during the last two periods in which UNa and FeNa declined toward baseline levels. This antinatriuretic effect occurred despite the marked increase in blood pressure. Furthermore, the decrease of sodium excretion is more noticeable when compared with the natriuresis observed in the control group of dogs, which blood pressure did not change, suggesting that NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester induced a dose-dependent antinatriuretic effect that was able to completely blunt pressure natriuresis at the highest dose administered in this study. This phenomenon has been reported by others in rats and dogs (19, 26, 27). The importance of NO in the regulation of sodium excretion is underscored by the demonstration that NO synthesis inhibition blunts both pressure-induced (20) and volume-induced natriuresis (17).

A decrease in PRA was observed at the end of the experiment in the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group, whereas no changes were observed in the control group. Studies on the effects of NO on renin release have yielded disparate results. In early in vitro studies, NO synthesis inhibition increased renin release (3, 39). However, more recent studies indicate a more complex interaction between NO and renin secretion (16, 36). Although several authors reported decreases in plasma renin levels during systemic NO synthesis inhibition (12), other authors observed no changes (5) or even increases (32). Systemic inhibition of NO synthesis is also associated with increases in blood pressure, stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity (35), and increases in other vasoactive factors (4) that can have different directional effects on renin release. Schnackenberg et al. (30) recently demonstrated, in an elegant study, that intrarenal infusion of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester did not alter renal perfusion pressure or GFR and stimulates renin release in the dog and that the macula densa is important in mediating this effect.

An increase in plasma ET was observed in the NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester group but not in the control group, in agreement with previous in vivo and in vitro studies (4, 23). The increase in the plasma levels of this vasoconstrictor peptide may partly account for the hemodynamic, renal, and renin-angiotensin system changes observed during NO synthesis inhibition. Recent studies in rats indicate that ET is partially involved in the hemodynamic changes during NO inhibition, but its role in the renal effects in this situation is controversial (6, 22, 24, 37).

It should be noted that in the control dogs, the administration of 2 ml of saline per minute produced a mild volume expansion reflected in an increase in RBF, UVol, and UNa in the last two experimental periods. However, these changes were not sufficient to alter MAP, CO, IBF, MBF, GFR, PRA, and plasma ET. For these reasons, we believe that the vasodilator actions do not preclude the overall conclusions about the vasoconstrictor effects exerted by NO on different vascular territories.

In summary, this study shows that in anesthetized dogs, the progressive inhibition of NO synthesis with doses of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester that range from 0.1 to 50 µg · kg-1 · min-1 produces a marked elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary blood pressure, which is almost doubled from that observed in SVR. Systemic vascular territories, on the other hand, do not respond in a uniform manner. The iliac vascular bed is by far the most sensitive, whereas the vascular territories supplied by the mesenteric artery do not seem to be significantly affected. Renal vascular territory exhibits an intermediate response. The volume of blood passing through skeletal muscle may be important, because the progressive fall induced by the administration of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester correlated with the CO. Finally, inhibition of NO produces a decrease in RBF with no changes in GFR. Under these conditions, pressure natriuresis is not manifested because of the opposing effects of NO inhibition on sodium excretion.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Rod Bolterman and Denise Heublein for skillful technical assistance and Kristy Zodrow for skillful secretarial assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by contract no. DAMD 17-93-C-3116P3 of the United States Army and by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-16496. Aleix Cases is a research fellow granted by the Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain).

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. C. Romero, Dept. of Physiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 (E-mail: romero.juan{at}mayo.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 21 March 2000; accepted in final form 23 August 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Baron, AD. The coupling of glucose metabolism and perfusion in human skeletal muscle. The potential role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Diabetes 45, Suppl1: S105-S109, 1996.

2.   Baylis, C, Harton P, and Engels K. Endothelial derived relaxing factor controls renal hemodynamics in normal rat kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 875-881, 1990[Abstract].

3.   Beirwaltes, WH, and Carretero OA. Non prostanoid endothelium-derived factors inhibit renin release. Hypertension 9, Suppl2: S68-S73, 1992.

4.   Boulanger, C, and Lüscher TF. Release of endothelin from the porcine aorta, inhibition by endothelium-derived nitric oxide. J Clin Invest 85: 587-590, 1990.

5.   Elsner, D, Müntze A, Kromer EP, and Riegger GAJ Inhibition of synthesis of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in conscious dogs. Hemodynamic, renal and hormonal effects. Am J Hypertens 5: 288-291, 1992[ISI][Medline].

6.   Filep, JG. Endogenous endothelin modulates blood pressure, plasma volume and albumin escape after systemic nitric oxide blockade. Hypertension 30: 22-28, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Fineman, JR, Heymann MA, and Soifer SJ. Nomega -nitro-L-arginine attenuates endothelium-dependent pulmonary vasodilation in lambs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H1299-H1306, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Führ, J, Kaczmarczyk J, and Krüttgen A. Eine einfache colorimetrische methode zur inulinbestimmung für Nierenclearanceuntersuchungen bei Stoffwechselgesunden und Diabetikern. Klin Wochenschr 33: 729-730, 1955[ISI][Medline].

9.   Gardiner, SM, Kemp PA, Bennett T, Palmer RMJ, and Moncada S. Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors cause sustained, but reversible, hypertension and hindquarters vasconstriction in Battleboro rats. Eur J Pharmacol 213: 449-451, 1992[ISI][Medline].

10.   Greenblatt, EP, Loeb AL, and Longnecker DE. Marked regional heterogeneity in the magnitude of EDRF/NO-mediated vascular tone in awake rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 21: 235-240, 1993[ISI][Medline].

11.   Ito, S, Carretero OA, and Abe K. Nitric oxide in the regulation of renal blood flow. New Horiz 3: 615-623, 1995[Medline].

12.   Johnson, RA, and Freeman RH. Pressure natriuresis in rats during blockade of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway. Hypertension 19: 333-338, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Juncos, LA, Ren Y, Arima S, Garvin J, Carretero OA, and Ito S. Angiotensin II action in isolated microperfused rabbit afferent arterioles is modulated by flow. Kidney Int 49: 374-381, 1996[ISI][Medline].

14.   Klabunde, RE, Ritger RC, and Helgren MC. Cardiovascular actions of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (nitric oxide) formation/release in anesthetized dogs. Eur J Pharmacol 199: 51-59, 1991[ISI][Medline].

15.   Kleinman, LT, and Radford EP. Ventilation standards for small mammals. J Appl Physiol 19: 360-362, 1964[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Kramer, BK, Ritthaler T, Ackermann M, Holmer S, Schricker K, Riegger GA, and Kurtz A. Endothelium-mediated regulation of renin secretion. Kidney Int 46: 1577-1579, 1994[ISI][Medline].

17.   Krier, JD, and Romero JC. Systemic inhibition of nitric oxide and prostaglandins in volume-induced natriuresis and hypertension. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 274: R175-R180, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Lahera, V, Navarro-Cid J, Cachofeiro V, Garcia-Estañ J, and Ruilope LM. Nitric oxide, the kidney, and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 10: 129-140, 1997[ISI][Medline].

19.   Lahera, V, Salom MG, Biondi ML, Miranda-Guardiola F, Moncada S, and Romero JC. Effects of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on renal function and blood pressure. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 261: F1033-F1037, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Majid, DSA, Williams A, and Navar LG. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis attenuates pressure-induced natriuretic response in anesthetized dogs. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 264: F79-F87, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Moncada, S, Palmer RMJ, and Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 43: 109-142, 1991[ISI][Medline].

22.   Oyekan, AO, and McGiff JC. Functional response of the rat kidney to inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis: role of cytochrome p450-derived arachidonate metabolites. Br J Pharmacol 125: 1065-1073, 1998[ISI][Medline].

23.   Perella, MA, Hildebrand FL, Margulies KB, and Burnett JC. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor in regulation of basal cardiopulmonary and renal function. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 261: R323-R328, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Qiu, C, Engels K, and Baylis C. Endothelin modulates the pressor actions of acute systemic nitric oxide blockade. J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 1476-1481, 1995[Abstract].

25.   Rees, DD, Palmer RMJ, and Moncada S. Role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of blood pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 3375-3378, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Salazar, FJ, Alberola A, Pinilla JM, Romero JC, and Quesada T. Salt-induced increase in arterial pressure during nitric oxide synthesis inhibition. Hypertension 22: 49-55, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Salazar, FJ, Pinilla JM, Lopez F, Romero JC, and Quesada T. Renal effects of prolonged synthesis inhibition of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Hypertension 20: 113-117, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Salom, MG, Lahera V, Miranda-Guardiola F, and Romero JC. Blockade of pressure natriuresis induced by inhibition of renal synthesis of nitric oxide in dogs. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 262: F718-F722, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Saltin, B, and Rowell LB. Functional adaptations to physical activity and inactivity. Fed Proc 39: 1506-1513, 1980[ISI][Medline].

30.   Schnackenberg, CG, Tabor BL, Strong MH, and Granger JP. Inhibition of intrarenal NO stimulates renin secretion through a macula densa-mediated mechanism. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 272: R879-R886, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Schnackenberg, CG, Wilkins FC, and Granger JP. Role of nitric oxide in modulating the vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II in preglomerular and postglomerular vessels in dogs. Hypertension 26: 1024-1029, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Sigmon, DH, Carretero OA, and Beierwaltes WH. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor regulates renin release in vivo. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 263: F256-F261, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Sigmon, DH, Carretero OA, and Beierwaltes WH. Renal versus femoral hemodynamic response to endothelium-derived relaxing factor synthesis inhibition. J Vasc Res 30: 218-223, 1993[ISI][Medline].

34.   Sonntag, M, Deussen A, and Schrader J. Role of nitric oxide in local blood flow control in the anesthetized dog. Pflügers Arch 420: 194-199, 1992[ISI][Medline].

35.   Sukuma, I, Hiroko M, Yoshiola M, Saito H, Yanagida HM, Tamura M, Kobayashi T, Yashuda S, Gross SS, and Levi R. NG methyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of L-arginine-derived nitric oxide synthesis stimulates renal sympathetic activity in vivo. Circ Res 70: 607-611, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Tharaux, PL, Dussaule JC, Pauti MD, Vassitch Y, Ardaillou R, and Chatziantoniou C. Activation of renin synthesis is dependent on intact nitric oxide production. Kidney Int 51: 1780-1787, 1997[ISI][Medline].

37.   Thompson, AC, Valeri R, and Lieberthal W. Endothelin receptor A blockade alters hemodynamic response to nitric oxide inhibition in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 269: H743-H748, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

38.   Van Gelderen, EM, Den Boer MO, and Saxena PR. NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester: systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, tissue blood flow and arteriovenous shunting in the pig. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 348: 417-423, 1993[ISI][Medline].

39.   Vidal, M, Romero JC, and Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor inhibits renin release. Eur J Pharmacol 149: 401-402, 1988[ISI][Medline].


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280(1):R143-R148
0363-6119/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Nandi, A. Miller, R. Stidwill, T. S. Jacques, A. A.J. Lam, S. Haworth, S. Heales, and P. Vallance
Pulmonary Hypertension in a GTP-Cyclohydrolase 1-Deficient Mouse
Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2086 - 2090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W.-I. Choi, D. A. Quinn, K. M. Park, R. K. Moufarrej, B. Jafari, O. Syrkina, J. V. Bonventre, and C. A. Hales
Systemic Microvascular Leak in an In Vivo Rat Model of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2003; 167(12): 1627 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Persson
Nitric oxide in the kidney
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): R1005 - R1007.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
P. A. Ortiz and J. L. Garvin
Role of nitric oxide in the regulation of nephron transport
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): F777 - F784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. Ehmke
Developmental physiology of the cardiovascular system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): R331 - R333.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cases, A.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cases, A.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online