AJP - Regu Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R752-R759, 2001;
0363-6119/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, E. H.
Vol. 280, Issue 3, R752-R759, March 2001

Microinjection of glutamate into the pedunculopontine tegmentum induces REM sleep and wakefulness in the rat

Subimal Datta, Eric E. Spoley, and Elissa H. Patterson

Sleep Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the cells in the brain stem pedunculopontine tegmentum (PPT) are critically involved in the normal regulation of wakefulness and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. To test this hypothesis, one of four different doses of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate (15, 30, 60, and 90 ng) or saline (control vehicle) was microinjected unilaterally into the PPT while the effects on wakefulness and sleep were quantified in freely moving chronically instrumented rats. All microinjections were made during wakefulness and were followed by 6 h of polygraphic recording. Microinjection of 15- ng (0.08 nmol) and 30-ng (0.16 nmol) doses of L-glutamate into the PPT increased the total amount of REM sleep. Both doses of L-glutamate increased REM sleep at the expense of slow-wave sleep (SWS) but not wakefulness. Interestingly, the 60-ng (0.32 nmol) dose of L-glutamate increased both REM sleep and wakefulness. The total increase in REM sleep after the 60-ng dose of L-glutamate was significantly less than the increase from the 30-ng dose. The 90-ng (0.48 nmol) dose of L-glutamate kept animals awake for 2-3 h by eliminating both SWS and REM sleep. These results show that the L-glutamate microinjection into the PPT can increase wakefulness and/or REM sleep depending on the dosage. These findings support the hypothesis that excitation of the PPT cells is causal to the generation of wakefulness and REM sleep in the rat. In addition, the results of this study led to the identification of the PPT dosage of L-glutamate that optimally induces wakefulness and REM sleep. The knowledge of this optimal dose will be useful in future studies investigating the second messenger systems involved in the regulation of wakefulness and REM sleep.

brain stem; rapid eye-movement sleep


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE PEDUNCULOPONTINE TEGMENTUM (PPT), situated in the dorsolateral mesopontine tegmentum, contains a prominent group of cholinergic neurons, which project widely throughout the brain stem and forebrain (1, 16, 20, 21, 26, 29, 36-38, 41, 42, 45, 47, 51, 56-58). All of these PPT cholinergic cells are capable of synthesizing nitric oxide (NO) as well (5-7, 23, 52-53). Single cell recordings from the PPT of behaving cats have identified several different classes of cells whose firing rates correlate with both wakefulness and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (8, 9, 12, 17, 43, 50). Some of these PPT neurons, called REM-on cells, progressively increase their firing rates as the animal moves from wakefulness to slow-wave sleep (SWS) and then to REM sleep. Others, constituting the majority of these cells in the PPT, called wake-REM-on cells, are tonically active during both wakefulness and REM sleep (8). Brain stem lesion studies in cats have demonstrated that lesions of the PPT neurons reduced and/or eliminated physiological signs of REM sleep, (10, 44, 49). Microinjection studies in cats have demonstrated that chemical excitation of PPT cells increased both wakefulness and REM sleep by eliminating SWS (15). Although there is strong evidence in the cat suggesting that PPT cells regulate the behavioral states of wakefulness and REM sleep, there is no single study that directly shows that the excitation of PPT cells is causal to the generation of wakefulness or REM sleep in the rat. To understand, at the level of PPT cells, the detailed biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved in the normal regulation of wakefulness and sleep in the rat, the changes in wakefulness and REM sleep resulting from the excitation of PPT cells must be investigated and documented.

In the present study we examined the hypothesis that PPT cell activation is causal to the generation of wakefulness and REM sleep in the rat. This hypothesis was tested by microinjection of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate into the PPT while simultaneously quantifying wake-sleep signs.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals. Experiments were performed on 23 male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) weighing between 250 and 350 g. The rats were housed individually at 24°C with food and water provided ad libitum with lights on from 0700 to 1900 (light cycle) and off from 1900 to 0700 (dark cycle). Principles for the care and the use of laboratory animals in research, as outlined by the National Institute of Health (1985), were strictly followed.

Surgical procedures and implantation of electrodes. Treatment of the animals and surgical procedures were in accordance with an approved institutional animal welfare protocol. Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg ip), placed in the stereotaxic apparatus, and secured using blunt rodent ear bars. With the use of sterile procedures, cortical electroencephalogram (EEG), dorsal neck muscle electromyogram, electrooculogram, hippocampal EEG (to record theta wave), and pontine EEG (to record pontine wave) recording electrodes were chronically implanted as described elsewhere (14). In addition, bilateral stainless steel guide tubes (26 gauge) with a fitted stylet of equal length inside were stereotaxically implanted 2 mm above the PPT (anterior, 0.70-1.30; lateral, 1.5-2.0; height, 2.4-3.2) (40) as described previously (11). The tips of the guide tubes were left 2 mm above the targets to minimize cellular damage at the injection sites. Rats were postsurgically treated with butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg im) to control any possible pain on recovery from anesthesia.

Habituation and polygraphic recordings. During recovery, habituation, and free-moving recording periods all rats were housed under a 12:12-h light-dark cycle with free access to food and water. After a postsurgical recovery period of 3-7 days, rats were habituated to a sound-attenuated recording cage (2.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 ft) and free-moving polygraphic recording conditions for 10 days. All adaptation recording sessions were performed between 1000 and 1600, when rats are normally sleeping.

Intracerebral microinjections and experimental design. After the adaptation-recording sessions, microinjection sessions began. Six-hour (between 1000 and 1600) microinjection recording sessions were begun after a single, unilateral microinjection of 100 nl control saline or one of the four different doses of L-glutamate (15, 30, 60, or 90 ng in 100 nl sterile saline) into the PPT. In individual rats, each microinjection was separated by at least 2 days. Each PPT site received no more than two microinjections in two different recording sessions at least 96 h apart. In these two recording sessions microinjections of control saline or the dose of L-glutamate were never repeated in a single site. The sequence of these microinjections was random.

The microinjection system consisted of a 32-gauge stainless steel injector cannula with a 26-gauge collar that extended 2.0 mm beyond the implanted guide tube. The collar was connected to a 1.0-µl motor-driven Hamilton microsyringe with polyethylene-20 tubing. The L-glutamate (RBI, Natick, MA) solutions in control saline were prepared fresh under sterile conditions before each use, and they were filtered through a sterile microfilter. After the injection system was filled, a small air bubble was introduced into the polyethylene tubing to monitor the movement of the fluid during the injection. While the animal was connected to the recording system, the stylet was removed, and a control saline- or L-glutamate solution-filled injector was introduced through the guide tube. One minute after the insertion of the injector cannula, the microinjection was performed over a 60-s period while polygraphic recordings continued. The cannula was withdrawn gently 2 min after the injection, and the stylet was reintroduced inside the guide tube. At the end of all experimental sessions and 30 min before perfusion, with the use of the same injector used for glutamate microinjection, 100 nl of black ink were microinjected 1 mm dorsal to each injection site for localizing glutamate injection sites.

Determination of behavioral states and data analysis. For the purpose of determining possible effects on sleep and wakefulness, three behavioral states were distinguished based on the visual scoring of polygraphic records as described earlier (14). The behavioral states of wakefulness (W), SWS, and REM sleep were scored in successive 10-s epochs. The polygraphic measures provided the following dependent variables that are quantified for each trial: 1) percentage of recording time spent in W, SWS, and REM sleep, 2) latencies to the onset of the first episode of REM sleep after the onset of injection, 3) total number of REM sleep episodes in 6-h recording session, and 4) mean duration of REM sleep episodes in 6-h recording session. Statistical analyses were performed with the use of StatView statistical software (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Analysis of variance (2-way ANOVA) and post hoc t-tests (one-factor ANOVA, Scheffé's F test) were used to examine the effects of microinjection of L-glutamate vs. control saline on behavioral states of W, SWS, and REM sleep.

Histological localization of injection site. At the conclusion of the microinjection experiments, rats were deeply reanesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (60 mg/kg ip) and perfused transcardially with heparinized cold phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The brains were removed and processed for the NADPH-diaphorase staining and histological localization of injection sites as described earlier (13, 15).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A total of 66 microinjections was made in 46 PPT injection sites (Fig. 1). Histological identification showed that 20 of the 46 sites were placed within NADPH-diaphorase-positive cell compartments (Fig. 1) and thus were considered to be within the PPT. Histological methods for the identification of PPT for this study are in agreement with previous reports (13, 15, 30, 52, 53). Another nine sites were 0.5-1.0 mm away from the PPT (Fig. 1). The effects of microinjections of glutamate into these nine negative sites were compared with control vehicle and glutamate microinjections into the anatomically positive sites. The results of these negative sites enabled us to determine the site specificity of glutamate-induced changes in sleep and wakefulness. The remaining 17 injection sites were more than 1 mm away from the PPT (Fig. 1). Because these 17 injection sites were substantially outside of the target area they are not included in this analysis. The analysis below quantifies the effects on W, SWS, and REM sleep resulting from the differ concentrations of glutamate injected into the PPT.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Anatomic location of glutamate injection sites. Schematic coronal sections through the brain stem are illustrated at levels anterior (A): 2.20, A: 1.70, A: 1.20, A: 1.00, A: 0.70, and A: 0.28 (labeled at right top). , n = 20: sites of injections that produced changes in wakefulness and sleep after glutamate microinjection. black-triangle, n = 9 and triangle , n = 17: sites of injection that did not induce any change in wakefulness and sleep after glutamate microinjection. black-triangle are to indicate that the results from those sites are used to test the anatomic specificity of the pedunculopontine tegmentum (PPT) glutamate microinjection responses. Abbreviations of anatomic terms: 3, oculomotor nucleus; 4, trochlear nucleus; Aq, aqueduct; ATg, anterior tegmental nucleus; BIC, nucleus brachium inferior colliculus; CG, central gray; CL, caudal linear nucleus raphe; CnF, cuneiform nucleus; cp, cerebral peduncle, basal; ctg, central tegmental tract; DLL, dorsal nucleus lateral lemniscus; DpMe, deep mesencephalic nucleus; DR, dorsal raphe nucleus; dtg, dorsal tegmental bundle; IC, inferior colliculus; InCo, intercollicular nucleus; KF, Kolliker-Fuse nucleus; LDT, laterodorsal tegmental nucleus; LL, lateral lemniscus; Me5, mesencephalic trigeminal tract/nucleus; MiTg, microcellular tegmental nucleus; Mlf, medial longitudinal fasciculus; Pa4, paratrochlear nucleus; PB, parabrachial nucleus; PL, paralemniscus nucleus; PMR, paramedian raphe; PnO, pontine reticular nucleus, oral; PPT, pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus; RR, retrorubral nucleus; RRF, retrorubral field; rs, tectospinal tract; Sag, sagulum nucleus; scp, superior cerebellar peduncle; SPTg, subpeduncular tegmental nucleus; Su3, supraoculomotor central gray; SubC, subcoeruleus nucleus; ts, tectospinal tract; VTA, ventral tegmental area; VTg, ventral tegmental nucleus; xscp, decussation superior cerebellar peduncle. Scale bar in bottom right corner = 600 µm

Effects of glutamate on sleep-wake architecture. Figure 2 illustrates representative sleep-wake architectures for the 6-h recording session (10 AM to 4 PM) starting immediately after microinjections of control saline or different doses of glutamate. The figure shows that the latency between microinjection and the first episode of REM sleep is much shorter after microinjections of 15 (0.08 nmol)-, 30 (0.16 nmol)-, and 60-ng (0.32 nmol) doses of glutamate than control saline into the PPT. The REM sleep episodes are more frequent after microinjection of 15-, 30-, and 60-ng doses of glutamate than after microinjection of control saline. In contrast, the 90-ng (0.48 nmol) dose of glutamate microinjection into the PPT eliminated REM sleep for about 3-4 h.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Examples to show the changes in sleep-wake architecture after microinjections of different doses of glutamate into the PPT. These 6 hypnograms from 6 different rats plotted as step histograms plot the occurrence and duration of polygraphically and behaviorally defined wakefulness (W), slow-wave sleep (S), and rapid eye movement (R) sleep after control vehicle, four different dosages of glutamate into the PPT, and 30-ng dosage of glutamate into a control site. All microinjections were made at time = 1000 and followed by 6 h of continuous recording. Note that microinjections of 15-, 30-, and 60-ng doses of glutamate microinjections into the PPT increased the number of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep episodes. Also note that 60- and 90-ng doses of glutamate microinjections into the PPT increased duration of wakefulness for about 2-3 h. In contrast, sleep-wake architecture after microinjection of 30 ng of glutamate in a control site is similar to the sleep-wake architecture following microinjection of control vehicle into the PPT.

All four doses of glutamate (15, 30, 60, and 90 ng) microinjection delayed the first episode of SWS compared with control saline microinjection into the PPT. The duration of individual SWS episodes decreased after microinjections of 60- and 90-ng doses of glutamate. In contrast, the duration of individual episodes of W increased after microinjections of glutamate compared with after control saline microinjections. These long W episodes were present only during the first hour after microinjections of 15- and 30-ng doses of glutamate. However, after 60- and 90-ng doses of glutamate, individual long W episodes were also present in the 3rd h of recording. The sleep-wake architectures after the 30-ng dose of glutamate microinjection into the control sites are comparable to the sleep-wake architectures after microinjections of control saline into the PPT.

Effects of glutamate on the total amount of W, SWS, and REM sleep states. To determine the optimum dose of glutamate in the PPT, 15 (n = 6), 30 (n = 10), 60 (n = 8), and 90 ng (n = 7) microinjection-induced changes in W, SWS, and REM sleep were compared with control saline microinjection-induced changes (n = 9). In 6-h postinjection recording sessions, the total percentage of W was significantly higher after 60-ng [F(1,15) = 8.722; P < 0.001] and 90-ng [F(1,14) = 25.33; P < 0.001] doses of glutamate compared with the control saline (Fig. 3). Microinjections of 15- and 30-ng doses of glutamate into the PPT did not significantly change the percentage of time in W compared with control microinjection of saline (Fig. 3).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of PPT nuclei microinjection of control vehicle and four different doses of L-glutamate on percentages of wakefulness, slow-wave sleep (SWS), and REM sleep. These graphs shows the percentage (means ± SE) of total recording time (6 h) spent in wakefulness (top), SWS (middle), and REM sleep (bottom) without any microinjection (Hab) and following microinjections of control vehicle (G-0), 15 ng of glutamate into the PPT (G-15), 30 ng of glutamate into the PPT (G-30), 60 ng of glutamate into the PPT (G-60), 90 ng of glutamate into the PPT (G-90), and 30 ng of glutamate into the control sites (G-CS). Note that 60- and 90-ng dose of glutamate increased wakefulness. After microinjections of glutamate into the PPT SWS decreased dose dependently. Also note increase of REM sleep after microinjection of 15-, 30-, and 60-ng doses of L-glutamate and decrease of REM sleep after microinjection of 90-ng dose of L-glutamate into the PPT. The 30-ng dose in the PPT optimally induced REM sleep compared with the other doses. These histograms also show that the optimal dose of 30 ng of glutamate does not change wakefulness, SWS, and REM sleep when it is microinjected into control sites. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. These P values represent the comparison with the control vehicle (G-0).

All four doses of glutamate microinjection into the PPT reduced SWS compared with the control microinjections of saline (Fig. 3). The reduction in SWS was dose dependent. Microinjection of 15 ng of glutamate into the PPT reduced 4.9% of SWS, but these changes did not reach the level of statistical significance compared with the control saline microinjection. Compared with the control microinjection, the glutamate-induced reductions in SWS were highly significant after 30 [F(1,17) = 4.01; P < 0.01]-, 60 [F(1,15) = 10.194; P < 0.001]-, and 90-ng [F(1,14) = 20.057; P < 0.001] doses.

Microinjections of 15-, 30-, and 60-ng doses of glutamate into the PPT increased REM sleep compared with control saline microinjection (Fig. 3). Of those three doses of glutamate, the 30-ng dose showed the highest increase in the amount of REM sleep compared with control [209% increase; F(1,17) = 33.988; P < 0.001]. This increase in REM sleep indicates that the 30-ng dose of glutamate was the most effective at REM sleep induction. Although the increase in REM sleep after the 60-ng dose of glutamate was 27% higher than the control saline, these changes did not reach the level of statistical significance compared with the control saline microinjection. Microinjection of the 90-ng dose of glutamate reduced REM sleep significantly [69% reduction; F(1,14) = 3.226; P < 0.05] compared with control saline injection. The reduction of REM sleep after the 90-ng dose of glutamate was due to the increase in W.

To determine the anatomic site specificity for the effect of glutamate microinjections, the total percentages of REM sleep after the 30-ng dose of glutamate microinjections into the control sites (n = 9) were compared with the percentages of REM sleep after the 30-ng dose of glutamate microinjections into the PPT (n = 10). Microinjections of glutamate into the PPT induced a significantly higher amount of REM sleep compared with glutamate microinjections into those control sites [204% higher; F(1,17) = 33.463, P < 0.001]. The total percentages of W, SWS, and REM sleep after glutamate microinjections into the control sites (n = 9) were also compared with the percentages of W, SWS, and REM sleep after control saline injections into the PPT (n = 9). Post hoc t-tests showed no significant differences in W (42.7 ± 7.1 vs. 44.0 ± 6.0), SWS (49.9 ± 8.0 vs. 47.9 ± 7.6), and REM sleep (7.4 ± 2.1 vs. 7.5 ± 2.4) between control saline microinjections into the PPT (n = 9) and 30-ng glutamate microinjections into the control sites. These results indicated that the changes in wakefulness and sleep stages induced after microinjections of glutamate into the PPT could not be obtained by microinjecting glutamate in those control sites.

Having documented the 30-ng dose of glutamate in the PPT as optimal for the induction of REM sleep, we next quantified time course, latency, number of episodes, and duration of REM sleep after microinjection of the optimal dose of glutamate. Figure 4 illustrates effects on time course, latency, number of episodes, and duration of REM sleep after microinjection of the optimal dose of glutamate. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant [F(1,5) = 11.014; P < 0.001] interaction between treatment (optimal dose of glutamate and saline) and postinjection time, indicating that the percentage of REM sleep difference between postmicroinjection of saline and optimal dose of glutamate was greater 1 h after injection than 6 h after injection (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, it should be noted that individual comparisons (post hoc Scheffé's F test) showed that the percentage of REM sleep after the optimal dose of glutamate was significantly greater than after control saline at all six postinjection times. In a limited set of rats we did observe that differences were eliminated by 8 h postinjection. The optimal dose of glutamate facilitated a quicker onset of REM sleep [latency 11.57 ± 7.76 (SD) min], compared with an REM sleep latency of 83.8 ± 22.76 min in saline controls [F(1,17) = 89.682; P < 0.001]. In addition to reduced REM sleep latency, the optimal dose of glutamate significantly increased the total number [F(1,17) = 242.512; P < 0.001] and mean duration [F(1,17) = 7.536; P < 0.05] of the REM sleep episodes compared with the levels after control saline injection.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects on the hourly percentage of REM sleep, the latency, the number, and the duration of REM sleep episodes observed after microinjection of the optimal 30-ng dose of glutamate into the PPT. Top: percentage (means ± SD) of REM sleep every hour for 6-h period of time after microinjection of control saline (open circle ) and 30 ng glutamate () into the PPT. Note that the percentage of REM sleep is significantly higher following microinjection of glutamate compared with the control saline (vehicle). Bottom left: REM sleep latency (means ± SD); bottom middle: number of REM sleep episodes per 6 h (means ± SD); and the bottom right: duration of REM sleep episodes (means ± SD) after microinjection of control saline (open bars) and 30 ng glutamate (closed bars). Note that the REM sleep latency is lower and the number of REM sleep episodes and the duration of REM sleep episodes are higher following glutamate microinjection compared with the control microinjection. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The principal findings of this study are that 1) microinjections of 15-, 30-, and 60-ng doses of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate into the PPT increase the total amount of REM sleep, 2) of those three doses of glutamate the 30-ng dose showed the highest increase in the amount of REM sleep, and 3) microinjections of 60- and 90-ng doses of L-glutamate increase the total amount of wakefulness when injected into the same site. As a consequence of this glutamate-induced increase in wakefulness and REM sleep, SWS is suppressed and/or eliminated. The results show for the first time that the glutamatergic excitation of the PPT cells in rats causes wakefulness and/or REM sleep. The results presented here strengthen and extend the hypothesis that the activity of PPT cells is important for the generation of REM sleep as well as wakefulness (8, 15).

Methodological considerations. In the present study all of our pharmacologically effective injection sites were in the middle of the NADPH-diaphorase-positive cell compartment of the PPT. With use of the specific monoclonal antibodies to choline acetyltransferase, the PPT has been shown to be one of the major aggregations of cholinergic neurons in the mammalian brain stem (1, 26, 29, 36-38, 42, 45, 47, 51, 56). All of these choline acetyltransferase-positive cells also displayed intense NADPH-diaphorase activity (52, 53). Thus mesopontine NADPH-diaphorase-positive cells are unequivocally considered to be cholinergic cells (13, 50, 52, 53, 55). These NADPH-diaphorase-positive PPT cells contain NO synthase (NOS) enzyme mRNA (5-7). The presence of NADPH-diaphorase together with NOS enzyme indicates that the PPT cells are capable of synthesizing NO (6, 7, 23). Thus our effective injections were made in the middle of the PPT region where cells synthesize acetylcholine (ACh) and NO (13, 15).

In this study we used local microinjections of L-glutamate to increase the activity of cells located within the NADPH-diaphorase-positive cell compartments of the PPT. To study the structure-function relationship at the system level, cerebral microinjection of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate has certain advantages over traditional lesion and electrical stimulation techniques, especially in the study of the wake-sleep cycle. Local application of L-glutamate excites mostly cell bodies of that particular diffusion site (35), whereas electrolytic lesion and electrical stimulation include not only a larger area, they also include processes of the cell body and passing fibers through that particular region (44, 49, 54). The level of excitation of a population of neurons (multiunit activity) could be changed in a dose-dependent manner by changing the concentration of injected L-glutamate (35). Thus L-glutamate application to excite particular cell groups that affect wake-sleep patterns could be accurately evaluated for causality.

A major limitation of the L-glutamate microinjection method relates to the diversity in the neurochemical nature of the neuronal population affected by its application (15, 35). L-Glutamate is a nonspecific excitatory amino acid that excites all types of neuronal cells with different neurochemical signatures. In this study, we have injected glutamate into the part of the PPT where most cells are NADPH-diaphorase-positive cholinergic type. We acknowledge that if there are noncholinergic cells within those cholinergic cell groups, they also may be excited by the application of glutamate.

Role of the PPT in REM sleep generation. The results of the present study demonstrate that the microinjection of L-glutamate into the cholinergic/nitric-oxergic (Ch/NO) cell compartments of the PPT increases REM sleep in a dose-dependent manner. These results are consistent with the results obtained after L-glutamate microinjection into the Ch/NO cell compartments of the PPT in the cat (15). However, there are three important species differences between the cat and the rat in glutamate-induced REM sleep increase. First, the optimum dose of L-glutamate for inducing the maximum amount of REM sleep is much higher in the cat (1,000 ng) compared with the rat (30 ng). Second, the mean latency for the induction of REM sleep after microinjection of the optimum dose of L-glutamate is much shorter in the rat (11.57 min) compared with the cat (38.0 min). Third, glutamate-induced increase in the total amount of REM sleep in the cat is mainly due to the increase in the duration of individual REM sleep episodes. But in the rat, the total amount of REM sleep increase was contributed by increase in both duration and total number of REM sleep episodes. Despite these important species differences, these results demonstrate that increased extracellular concentration of glutamate in the Ch/NO cell compartment of the PPT successfully induced REM sleep in the rat.

To explain the observation, we suggest that the glutamatergic excitation of Ch/NO cells of the PPT-induced REM sleep possibly by two different mechanisms. First, excitation of Ch/NO cells caused release of ACh in the anterodorsal pontine reticular formation (32), and this increased level of ACh in the anterodorsal pons induced REM sleep. In support of this possible explanation, neuroanatomic studies in which retrograde tracers were used have shown that the axons of the PPT Ch/NO cells project to the cholinoceptive REM sleep generating structures in the anterodorsal pons of the rat (41, 42, 46, 57). These anatomic connectivity studies indicate that the PPT Ch/NO cells could release ACh to the cholinoceptive REM sleep generating structures in the anterodorsal pons. Several neuropharmacological studies have shown that the microinjection of cholinergic agonist (carbachol) into the anterodorsal pons induces REM sleep in the rat (4, 19, 24, 33, 34, 39, 48). Together, these pharmacological and anatomic studies support that the PPT Ch/NO cells could induce REM sleep by releasing ACh to the anterodorsal pons. Another line of evidence supporting this suggestion that the excitation of PPT Ch/NO neurons is involved in the generation of REM sleep comes from extracellular single-cell recording studies. Although no studies have attempted to correlate single-cell activity patterns of the PPT cells and the normal sleep-wake cycle in the rat, several studies in the cat have shown that a group of PPT Ch/NO cells increases their firing rates during REM sleep (8, 17, 43). Second, possibly glutamatergic excitation of Ch/NO cells increased REM sleep by releasing NO within the extracellular space of the PPT. Indeed, increased concentration of NO within the Ch/NO cell compartment of the PPT increased REM sleep in the cat (13). This cat study also demonstrated that the NO-induced increase in REM sleep was mainly due to the increase in number of REM sleep episodes. In the present study, increase in the number of REM sleep episodes was a main contributor for the glutamate-induced increase in REM sleep. Thus it is possible that the glutamate-induced REM sleep in the present study was also due to the local release of NO in the Ch/NO cell compartment of the PPT. This interpretation also supports the hypothesis that diffusible NO acts as a paracrine agent in the PPT for the regulation of sleep-wake behavior (27, 28).

Role of the PPT in wakefulness. The results of the present study demonstrate that microinjection of higher doses (60 and 90 ng) of L-glutamate into the Ch/NO cell compartments of the PPT induces wakefulness. At present there is no evidence in the rat implicating involvement of the PPT cells in wakefulness. However, in the cat there are two lines of evidence implicating involvement of the PPT cells in wakefulness. The first comes from extracellular single-cell recording studies. One group of PPT cells is active both during wakefulness and REM sleep (8, 12, 17, 43, 50). These cells have a much higher firing rate during active waking than during REM sleep. The second line of evidence comes from local microinjection studies in the cat. Microinjection of a higher dose of L-glutamate (3,000 ng) into the Ch/NO cell compartments of the PPT induced wakefulness (15).

We suggest that the high dose of L-glutamate maximally activates PPT Ch/NO cells. Maximal excitation of cholinergic cells released ACh to the locus ceruleus and other structures involved in wakefulness. It is already known that the locus ceruleus receives afferent inputs from the PPT cholinergic cells (31, 57). It is also known that the cholinergic agonist directly excites locus ceruleus cells (3). Excitation of the locus ceruleus noradrenergic cells ultimately causes wakefulness (2, 18, 22, 25).

Limitations and future studies. The present data cannot address the involvement of specific glutamate receptor subtypes by which PPT cholinergic cells were stimulated to produce their effects on sleep and wakefulness. The excitatory amino acid glutamate is a mixed agonist for the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), non-NMDA, and metabotropic receptors (35). The present results point to the need for future studies to specify the receptor subtypes involved for the glutamatergic excitation of the PPT cholinergic cell.

Another limitation, which can be confirmed and quantified by future studies, is the amount of ACh release in the locus ceruleus and REM sleep sign generating structures of the brain stem after glutamate microinjection into the PPT cholinergic cell compartments. The present results also encourage the measurement of norepinephrine levels in the REM sleep sign generating structures of the brain stem following microinjection of a high dose of L-glutamate into the cholinergic cell compartments of the PPT.

Despite the above limitations, our results suggest for the first time in the rat that the increased activity of the PPT cells may be causal for the generation of REM sleep as well as for wakefulness. By determining optimal doses of L-glutamate in the Ch/NO cell compartment of the PPT for the induction of REM sleep and wakefulness, the present study provides an important pharmacological tool to study the cellular and neurochemical mechanisms of these two behavioral states.

Perspectives

The current findings together with previous correlative observations that PPT cells are active during wakefulness and REM sleep (reviewed in Ref. 8) suggest that glutamate may regulate wakefulness and REM sleep by regulating the levels of activation in the PPT cell compartment. Although the half-life of glutamate is very short, it produced a long-lasting REM sleep effect when microinjected into the PPT. This long-lasting REM sleep effect suggests that the glutamate microinjection into the PPT possibly activated a second messenger system(s) to sustain REM sleep effect.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Sanford H. Auerbach, J. Allan Hobson, and Bernat Kocsis for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health Research Grants MH-59839 and NS-34004.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Datta, Sleep Research Laboratory, Dept. of Psychiatry, Boston Univ. School of Medicine, M-913, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118 (E-mail: subimal{at}bu.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 11 July 2000; accepted in final form 27 October 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Armstrong, DA, Saper CB, Levey AI, Wainer BH, and Terry RD. Distribution of cholinergic neurons in the rat brain demonstrated by the immunohistochemical localization of choline-acetyltransferase. J Comp Neurol 200: 53-63, 1983.

2.   Aston-Jones, G, and Bloom FE. Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J Neurosci 1: 876-886, 1981[Abstract].

3.   Berridge, CW, and Foote SL. Effects of locus coeruleus activation on electro-encephalographic activity in neocortex and hippocampus. J Neurosci 11: 3135-3145, 1991[Abstract].

4.   Bourgin, P, Escourrou P, Gaultier C, and Adrien J. Induction of rapid eye movement sleep by carbachol infusion into the pontine reticular formation in the rat. Neuroreport 6: 532-536, 1995[ISI][Medline].

5.   Bredt, DS, Glatt CE, Hwang PM, Fotuhi M, Dawson TM, and Snyder SH. Nitric oxide synthase protein and mRNA are discretely localized in neuronal populations of the mammalian CNS together with NADPH diaphorase. Neuron 7: 615-624, 1991[ISI][Medline].

6.   Bredt, DS, Hwang PM, and Snyder SH. Localization of nitric oxide synthase indicating a neuronal role for nitric oxide. Nature 347: 768-770, 1990[Medline].

7.   Bredt, DS, and Snyder SH. Nitric oxide, a novel neuronal messenger. Neuron 8: 3-11, 1992[ISI][Medline].

8.   Datta, S. Neuronal activity in the peribrachial area: relationship to behavioral state control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 19: 67-84, 1995[ISI][Medline].

9.   Datta, S. Cellular basis of pontine ponto-geniculo-occipital wave generation and modulation. Cell Mol Neurobiol 17: 341-365, 1997[ISI][Medline].

10.   Datta, S, and Hobson JA. Suppression of ponto-geniculo-occipital waves by neuro-toxic lesions of pontine caudo-lateral peribrachial cells. Neuroscience 67: 703-712, 1995[ISI][Medline].

11.   Datta, S, Kumar VM, Chinna GS, and Singh B. Interrelationship between the thermal and sleep-wakefulness changes elicited from the medial preoptic area in rats. Exp Neurol 100: 40-50, 1988[ISI][Medline].

12.   Datta, S, Pare D, Oakson G, and Steriade M. Thalamic-projecting neurons in brainstem cholinergic nuclei increases their firing rates one min in advance of EEG desynchronization associated with REM sleep. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15: 452, 1989.

13.   Datta, S, Patterson EH, and Siwek DF. Endogenous and exogenous nitric oxide in the pedunculopontine tegmentum induces sleep. Synapse 27: 69-78, 1997[ISI][Medline].

14.   Datta, S, Patterson EH, Vincitore M, Tonkiss J, Morgane PJ, and Galler JR. Prenatal protein malnourished rats show changes in sleep/wake behavior as adults. J Sleep Res 9: 71-79, 2000[ISI][Medline].

15.   Datta, S, and Siwek DF. Excitation of the brainstem pedunculopontine tegmentum cholinergic cells induces wakefulness and REM sleep. J Neurophysiol 77: 2975-2988, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   DeLima, AD, and Singer W. The brainstem projection to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat: identification of cholinergic and monoaminergic elements. J Comp Neurol 259: 92-121, 1987[ISI][Medline].

17.   El-Mansari, M, Sakai K, and Jouvet M. Unitary characteristics of presumptive cholinergic tegmental neurons during the sleep-waking cycle in freely moving cats. Exp Brain Res 76: 519-529, 1989[ISI][Medline].

18.   Foote, SL, Bloom FE, and Aston-Jones G. Nucleus locus ceruleus: new evidence of anatomical and physiological specificity. Physiol Rev 63: 844-914, 1983[Free Full Text].

19.   Gnadt, JW, and Pegram GV. Cholinergic brainstem mechanism of REM sleep in the rat. Brain Res 384: 29-41, 1986[ISI][Medline].

20.   Hallanger, AE, Levey AI, Lee HJ, Rye DB, and Wainer BH. The origins of cholinergic and other subcortical afferents to the thalamus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 262: 105-124, 1987[ISI][Medline].

21.   Hallanger, AE, and Wainer BH. Ascending projections from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the adjacent mesopontine tegmentum in the rat. J Comp Neurol 274: 483-515, 1988[ISI][Medline].

22.   Hobson, JA, McCarley RW, and Wyzinski PW. Sleep cycle oscillations: reciprocal discharge by two brainstem neuronal groups. Science 189: 55-58, 1975.

23.   Hope, BT, Michael GJ, Knigge KM, and Vincent SR. Neuronal NADPH diaphorase is a nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 2811-2814, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Imeri, L, Bianchi S, Angeli P, and Mancia M. Selective blockade of different brain stem muscarinic receptor subtypes: effects on the sleep-wake cycle. Brain Res 636: 68-72, 1994[ISI][Medline].

25.   Jacobs, BL. Single unit activity of locus coeruleus neurons in behaving animals. Prog Neurobiol 27: 183-194, 1986[ISI][Medline].

26.   Jones, BE, and Beaudet A. Distribution of acetylcholine and catechol-amine neurons in the cat brain stem studied by choline acetyl-transferase and tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry. J Comp Neurol 261: 15-32, 1987[ISI][Medline].

27.   Kapas, L, Fang J, and Krueger JM. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis inhibits rat sleep. Brain Res 664: 189-196, 1994[ISI][Medline].

28.   Kapas, L, and Krueger JM. Nitric oxide donors SNAP and SIN-1 promote nonrapid-eye-movement sleep in rats. Brain Res Bull 41: 293-298, 1996[ISI][Medline].

29.   Kimura, H, McGeer PL, Peng JH, and McGeer EG. The central cholinergic system studied by choline acetyltransferase immuno-histochemistry in the cat. J Comp Neurol 200: 151-201, 1981[ISI][Medline].

30.   Lanca, AJ, Adamson KL, Coen KM, Chow BLC, and Corrigall WA. The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the role of cholinergic neurons in nicotine self-administration in the rat: a correlative neuroanatomical and behavioral study. Neuroscience 96: 735-742, 2000[ISI][Medline].

31.   Luppi, PH, Aston-Jones G, Akaoka H, Chouvet G, and Jouvet M. Afferent projections to the rat locus coeruleus demonstrated by retrograde and anterograde tracing with cholera-toxin B subunit and phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Neuroscience 65: 119-160, 1995[ISI][Medline].

32.   Lydic, R, and Baghdoyan HA. Pedunculopontine stimulation alters respiration and increases ACh release in the pontine reticular formation. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 264: R544-R554, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Marks, GA, and Birabil CG. Enhancement of rapid eye movement sleep in the rat by cholinergic and adenosinergic agonists infused into the pontine reticular formation. Neuroscience 86: 29-37, 1998[ISI][Medline].

34.   Marks, GA, and Birabil CG. Infusion of adenylyl cyclase inhibitor SQ22,536 into the medial pontine reticular formation of rats enhances rapid eye movement sleep. Neuroscience 98: 311-315, 2000[ISI][Medline].

35.   Mayer, ML, and Westbrook GL. The physiology of excitatory amino acids in the vertebrate central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 28: 197-276, 1987[ISI][Medline].

36.   Mesulam, M-M, Geula C, Bothwell MA, and Hersh LB. Human reticular formation: cholinergic neurons of the pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei and some cytochemical comparisons to forebrain cholinergic neurons. J Comp Neurol 281: 611-633, 1989.

37.   Mesulam, M-M, Mufson EJ, Levey AI, and Wainer BH. Atlas of cholinergic neurons in the forebrain and upper brainstem of the macaque based on monoclonal choline acetyltransferase immuno-histochemistry and acetyl-cholinesterase histochemistry. Neuroscience 12: 669-686, 1984[ISI][Medline].

38.   Mesulam, M-M, Mufson EJ, Wainer BH, and Levey AI. Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: an overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1-Ch6). Neuroscience 10: 1185-1201, 1983[ISI][Medline].

39.   Okabe, S, Sanford LD, Veasey SC, and Kubin L. Pontine injections of nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME consolidate episodes of REM sleep in the rat. Sleep Res Online 1: 41-48, 1998[Medline].

40.   Paxinos, G, and Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego, CA: Academic, 1986.

41.   Rye, DB, Lee HJ, Saper CB, and Wainer BH. Medullary and spinal efferents of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and adjacent mosopontine tegmentum in the rat. J Comp Neurol 269: 315-341, 1988[ISI][Medline].

42.   Rye, DB, Saper CB, Lee HJ, and Wainer BH. Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus of the rat: cytoarchitecture, cytochemistry, and some extrapyramidal connections of the mesopontine tegmentum. J Comp Neurol 259: 483-528, 1987[ISI][Medline].

43.   Saito, H, Sakai K, and Jouvet M. Discharge patterns of the nucleus parabrachialis lateralis neurons of the cat during sleep and waking. Brain Res 134: 59-72, 1977[ISI][Medline].

44.   Sakai, K, Petitjean F, and Jouvet M. Effects of pontomesencephalic lesions and electrical stimulation upon PGO waves and EMPs in unanesthetized cats. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 4: 49-63, 1976.

45.   Satoh, K, and Fibiger HC. Distribution of central cholinergic neurons in the baboon (papio papio). II. A topographic atlas correlated with catecholamine neurons. J Comp Neurol 236: 215-233, 1985[ISI][Medline].

46.   Semba, K. Aminergic and cholinergic afferents to REM sleep induction regions of the pontine reticular formation in the rat. J Comp Neurol 330: 543-556, 1993[ISI][Medline].

47.   Shiromani, PJ, Armstrong DM, Berkowitz A, Jeste DV, and Gillin JC. Distribution of acetyltransferase immunoreactive somata in the feline brainstem: implications for REM sleep generation. Sleep 11: 1-16, 1988[ISI][Medline].

48.   Shiromani, PJ, and Fishbein W. Continous pontine cholinergic microinfusion via mini-pump induces sustained alterations in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25: 1253-1261, 1986[ISI][Medline].

49.   Shouse, N, and Siegel JM. Pontine regulation of REM sleep components in cats: PPT is important for phasic events but unneccessary for atonia during REM sleep. Brain Res 571: 50-63, 1992[ISI][Medline].

50.   Steriade, M, Datta S, Pare D, Oakson G, and Currodossi R. Neuronal activities in brain-stem cholinergic nuclei related to tonic activation processes in thalamocortical systems. J Neurosci 10: 2541-2559, 1990[Abstract].

51.   Vincent, SR, and Reiner PB. The immunohistochemical localization of choline acetyltransferase in the cat brain. Brain Res Bull 18: 371-415, 1987[ISI][Medline].

52.   Vincent, SR, Satoh K, Armstrong DM, and Fibiger HC. NADPH-diaphorase: a selective histochemical marker for the cholinergic neurons of the pontine reticular formation. Neurosci Lett 43: 31-36, 1983[ISI][Medline].

53.   Vincent, SR, Satoh K, Armstrong DM, Panula P, Vale W, and Fibiger HC. Neuropeptides and NADPH-diaphorase activity in the ascending cholinergic reticular system of the rat. Neuroscience 17: 167-182, 1986[ISI][Medline].

54.   Webster, HH, and Jones BE. Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsolateral pontomesencephalic tegmentum cholinergic cell area in the cat. II. Effects upon sleep-waking states. Brain Res 458: 285-302, 1988[ISI][Medline].

55.   Williams, JA, Comisarow J, Day J, Fibiger HC, and Reiner PB. State-dependent release of acetylcholine in rat thalamus measured by in vivo microdialysis. J Neurosci 14: 5236-5242, 1994[Abstract].

56.   Woolf, NJ, and Butcher LL. Cholinergic systems in the rat brain: III. Projections from the pontomesencephalic tegmentum to the thalamus, tectum, basal ganglia and basal forebrain. Brain Res Bull 16: 603-637, 1986[ISI][Medline].

57.   Woolf, NJ, and Butcher LL. Cholinergic systems in the rat brain: IV. Descending projections of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum. Brain Res Bull 23: 519-540, 1989[ISI][Medline].

58.   Woolf, NJ, Harrison JB, and Buchwald JS. Cholinergic neurons of the feline pontomesencephalon. II. Ascending anatomical projections. Brain Res 520: 55-72, 1990[ISI][Medline].


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280(3):R752-R759
0363-6119/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Datta and S. L. Prutzman
Novel Role of Brain Stem Pedunculopontine Tegmental Adenylyl Cyclase in the Regulation of Spontaneous REM Sleep in the Freely Moving Rat
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1928 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Huitron-Resendiz, M. P. Kristensen, M. Sanchez-Alavez, S. D. Clark, S. L. Grupke, C. Tyler, C. Suzuki, H.-P. Nothacker, O. Civelli, J. R. Criado, et al.
Urotensin II Modulates Rapid Eye Movement Sleep through Activation of Brainstem Cholinergic Neurons
J. Neurosci., June 8, 2005; 25(23): 5465 - 5474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Kohlmeier, T. Inoue, and C. S. Leonard
Hypocretin/Orexin Peptide Signaling in the Ascending Arousal System: Elevation of Intracellular Calcium in the Mouse Dorsal Raphe and Laterodorsal Tegmentum
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 221 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Ulloor, V. Mavanji, S. Saha, D. F. Siwek, and S. Datta
Spontaneous REM Sleep Is Modulated By the Activation of the Pedunculopontine Tegmental GABAB Receptors in the Freely Moving Rat
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1822 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Kobayashi, C. Good, K. Mamiya, R. D. Skinner, and E. Garcia-Rill
Development of REM sleep drive and clinical implications
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 735 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Datta
Evidence That REM Sleep Is Controlled by the Activation of Brain Stem Pedunculopontine Tegmental Kainate Receptor
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1790 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, E. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online