|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2 Anatomy and Neuroscience, and 3 Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555 - 1062
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have
demonstrated that nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the uterine host
defense against bacterial infection. In nonpregnant rats, NO
production in the uterus was shown to be lower, and inducible NO
synthase (NOS) expression was undetectable. However, studies in
pregnant rats show abundant expression of inducible NOS with
significant elevation in NO production in the uterus. We have recently
reported that intrauterine Escherichia coli infection caused
a localized increase in uterine NO production and inducible NOS
expression in the nonpregnant rat. In our present study, we examined
whether the uterine NO production, NOS expression, and uterine tumor
necrosis factor-
protein are increased in pregnant rats with
intrauterine pathogenic Escherichia coli infection. Unlike
the nonpregnant state, the NO production in the infected uterine horn
of pregnant rats was not significantly elevated after bacterial
inoculation compared with the contralateral uterine horn. The
expression of uterine NOS (types II and III) also did not show
significant upregulation in the infected horn. This is in contrast to
that in nonpregnant animals, in which type II NOS was induced in the
uterus on infection. Moreover, intrauterine infection induced an
elevated expression of tumor necrosis factor-
protein in the
infected horn both of nonpregnant and of pregnant rats. These data
suggest that the sequential stimulation of NOS expression, especially
the inducible isoform, and generation of uterine NO are lacking during
pregnancy despite an elevated tumor necrosis factor-
after
infection. In summary, NO synthesis response may be maximal at
pregnancy, and infection may not further induce the NO system. Present
studies, together with our previous report that intrauterine
infection-induced lethality in pregnancy rats was amplified with the
inhibition of NO, suggest that pregnancy is a state predisposed for
increased complications associated with intrauterine infection and that
the constitutively elevated uterine NO during pregnancy may help
contain or even reduce the risk of infection-related complications.
cytokines; Escherichia coli; gestation; Dr fimbriae; nitric oxide
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
INTRAUTERINE INFECTION
DURING pregnancy is a serious problem with significant neonatal
morbidity and mortality, including low birth weight, high-risk
pregnancy, fetal growth retardation, and septicemia (1, 11, 14,
20, 33). The underlying predisposition to intrauterine infection
during pregnancy is poorly understood. Suggested mechanisms include a
decrease in the immune response during pregnancy and pregnancy-induced
hormonal changes (19). Recently, much emphasis has been
placed on the role of inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1
(IL-1
)
and tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), prostaglandins, and nitric
oxide (NO) in the pathophysiology of intrauterine infection and
infection associated with uterine immune response (1, 14, 15, 22,
26, 31, 33).
NO, a simple gas molecule, is generated from L-arginine by NO synthase (NOS) and was found to be involved in a variety of physiological functions, including neurotransmission, vasodilation, and infection (9, 10, 24). Three different isoforms of NOS (I, II, and III) have been identified in mammalian cells (9, 24, 41). Types I and III NOS are constitutive isoforms originally isolated from neurons and endothelial cells, respectively. NOS II is an inducible form originally found in mouse macrophages that has been shown to participate in the immune response to infection (9, 24). Several reports indicate that NOS III, but not II, is expressed in nonpregnant rat uterus, whereas both NOS II and III are expressed in pregnant rat uterus (4, 41, 42). Uterine NO production is substantially elevated during pregnancy (41-43). Furthermore, the inhibition of NO synthesis with nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; an inhibitor of NOS) increased the bacterial invasion and the infection-induced lethality in pregnant rats (26, 28). NOS II is upregulated in the nonpregnant rat uterus on intrauterine bacterial inoculation, and the NOS II expression is restricted to uterine macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells (7).
Several lines of evidence indicate that NO may be involved in the host
defense mechanisms against infection (6, 29). Inhibition
of NOS activity significantly decreased the survival time of mice
infected with Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli (6). Furthermore, the mortality rate was
increased in endotoxemic rats from 33% to 74% when NO synthesis was
inhibited (38). In addition, NO was considered to be a
crucial effector in the host defense in Leishmania-infected
mice (5, 36). The microbicidal and microbiostatic activity
of NO has been demonstrated against a number of protozoa, viruses, and
bacteria (6, 12, 29). Furthermore, an increased NO
production induced by infection and endotoxin via cytokines such as
TNF-
and IL-6 could also play a role in these host defense
mechanisms (33).
Maternal intrauterine infections have been related to several adverse outcomes of pregnancy in human and experimental animals including intrauterine fetal death, premature labor, premature rupture of membranes, and abortion (3, 13, 32). Compared with nonpregnant, pregnant women are more susceptible to the infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa; once women are infected, these diseases tend to become severe. The pathophysiology of the gestation-associated infections is thought to correlate with pregnancy-altered systemic and local host responses. Maternal host defense against these pathogens is primarily cell mediated, and so it is believed that maternal cell-mediated immunity is downregulated to avoid immunological rejection of the fetus. The amount of immunosuppression increases with the duration of the gestation (39).
It is well accepted that the pregnant state is associated with a
reduced host response to infection, which may be different from the
nonpregnant state. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to
evaluate the responsiveness of uterine NOS expression and NO production
in pregnant rats with intrauterine pathogenic E. coli infection compared with those from the nonpregnant rat uterus. The
levels of uterine TNF-
, a well-known proinflammatory cytokine that
can stimulate the upregulation of inducible NOS and high output of NO
(21, 24), were also measured in the infected pregnant and
nonpregnant animals to assess whether differential uterine NO
generation is a consequence of altered proinflammatory cytokine response.
| |
MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Treatment
Infected pregnant rat model.
Adult timed-pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Harlan
Sprague Dawley (Houston, TX). All experiments were approved by the
Animal Care and Use Committee at The University of Texas Medical Branch
and performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Two days
before experimental infection, each animal received one dose of
streptomycin (7.0 mg/g body wt) to eliminate possible infections in the
urogenital tract that may have occurred naturally. An inoculum of
pathogenic E. coli 075:K5:H
that express the
virulence factor Dr fimbriae (strain IH11128) in a volume of 200 µl
of PBS (5 × 109 bacterial cells/ml) was placed
through the cervical os into the cavity of the left uterine horn of
pregnant rats on day 18 of gestation using a blunted
16-gauge stainless steel animal feeding needle. For control
experiments, the same amount of PBS was placed in the right uterine
horn. During this procedure, animals were placed under ketamine (45 mg/kg body wt; Parker-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ)/xylazine (5 mg/kg body
wt; Phoenix Scientific, St. Joseph, MO) anesthesia. Infected animals
were randomly killed in groups of five using a CO2-
inhalation chamber at 12 and 24 h after bacterial infection, and
tissues were collected for further study. We used an E. coli
strain (IH11128) that expresses Dr fimbriae, a virulent factor that
mediates adherence to the mucosal surface, in our experiments because
of its association with gestational infections and its capacity to
colonize epithelial cells (27) through the attachment to
its tissue receptors.
Infected nonpregnant rat model. Adult female nonpregnant Sprague-Dawley rats, without regard to the stage of estrus cycle, were bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX) while they were under anesthesia and treated as described above. Similar to pregnant animal protocol, 2 days before experimental infection, each animal received one dose of streptomycin (7.0 mg/g of weight). Because it was impossible to pass the blunt needle through the cervix in nonpregnant rats, we used laparotomy to inoculate bacteria into the uterine lumen of these animals. Under anesthesia, a laparotomy exposing both uterine horns was performed and an inoculum of Dr+ E. coli in a volume of 200 µl of PBS (5 × 109 bacterial cells/ml) was injected into the lumen of the exposed left uterine horn through an 18-gauge needle. The cervical end of the horn was ligated to prevent loss of inoculum through the injection site. The right uterine horn, which was injected with the same amount of PBS followed by ligation of the cervical end, served as the control within each animal. The laparotomy incision was closed, and the animals were randomly killed in groups of five using a CO2 inhalation chamber at specific times after infection.
Tissue collection.
The uterine tissues from all animals were removed for assessment of
nitrite production or were either immediately snap frozen in liquid
nitrogen or placed in Tissue-Tek OCT embedding compound and frozen in
liquid nitrogen. Frozen specimens were stored at
70°C until they
were sectioned for immunofluorescence-staining studies and
immunoblotting analysis.
Evaluation of nitrite production by rat uterine tissue with HPLC. Uterine tissues were cut into 2-mm strips (~100 mg), placed in minimum essential medium (GIBCO, Gaithersburg, MD) containing 1% penicillin and 1% streptomycin, and placed in a CO2 incubator with humidified chamber at 37°C for an initial 1-h equilibration period to eliminate the effect of cutting. Media was replaced with fresh media, and incubation continued for 24 h. Because NO spontaneously autooxidizes to form the stable metabolites nitrite and nitrate, measurement of these products provides an indirect assay for NO production. Nitrates were converted to nitrites, and these were measured as the final product of NO metabolism. We used a novel and highly sensitive HPLC method for the measurement of nitrites released into media from infected and noninfected rat uterus (7).
Nitrite concentrations in the media were measured in triplicate by the HPLC method as described earlier (7). Briefly, an aliquot of media was injected into a spectrophotometric nitrite (NO2) and nitrate (NO3) analyzer, which consists of HPLC pumps, a cadmium-reducing column, a postcolumn reactor, and an ultraviolet detector (Beckman System Bold 126, Beckman, Fullerton, CA). The samples were carried through the analyzer in a 0.3% aqueous ammonium chloride buffer containing 0.07% EDTA (pH 8.0). Nitrates were reduced to nitrites on the cadmium-reducing column. The ultraviolet-absorbing derivative was formed by postcolumn reaction with a solution containing 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride and 1% HCl. The areas of the absorbance peak at 546 nm were determined with an integrator.Western immunoblotting analysis for NOS
II and III in rat uterine tissue.
Western blot was performed as previously described (7).
Full-thickness uterine tissues containing both endometrium and myometrium were homogenized in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mmol EGTA, 0.14 µl
-mercaptoethanol, 100 nmol
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.2 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor. The
homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 15 min at 4°C,
and the supernatant was used for immunoblotting. The concentration of
proteins in the supernatant fraction was measured with the
bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). As
positive controls for NOS isoforms, proteins obtained from cytosolic
fractions of cytokine-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (NOS II) and membrane
fraction of human endothelial cells (NOS III) were used. Equal amounts
of protein (40 µg) were size fractionated on 7.5% (wt/vol) SDS-PAGE
and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The blots were
allowed to dry in air and placed in blocking buffer [1% BSA (wt/vol)
in 10 mM Tris buffer with 100 mmol NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (vol/vol)] at pH 7.5, for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were incubated with
specific monoclonal antibodies of NOS III and II (Transduction Laboratories Lexington, KY) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were washed three times for 30 min each with buffer [10 mM Tris, 100 mmol NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (vol/vol), pH 7.5] incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse antibody (Transduction Laboratories). The membranes were washed, and proteins were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights,
IL). The intensity of specific immunoreactive bands on autoradiographic
film was quantified using a densitometric image-scanning system (PDI,
Huntinton Station, NY).
Immunofluorescent staining for the distribution of NOS II in pregnant rat uterus. The immunofluorescent staining method was performed by a modified immunofluorescence protocol (7, 41). Cryosections of 5 µm from rat uterus were cut and fixed in 70% acetone. Five percent normal goat serum and Avidin-Biotin blocking buffer were applied to slides to reduce nonspecific binding. Because polyclonal antibodies against NOS II (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) and III (Transduction Laboratories) appeared to work better for immunofluroscent studies (7, 41); these antibodies in PBS buffer were added to the sections and incubated for 90 min. After slides were washed in PBS, they were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Lab, Burlingame, CA) for 45 min at 25°C. After washes in PBS, the detection step was performed with fluorescein avidin-D (Vector Lab) for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were then washed four times in PBS, counterstained with propidium iodide to visualize nuclei, and mounted with Vectashield mounting media (Vector Lab), then they were viewed under a Nikon fluorescent microscope (Nikon, Mellville, NY). For negative control sections, rabbit IgG was used in place of primary antibodies.
Western immunoblotting analysis for TNF-
in
pregnant and nonpregnant OVX rat uterus.
Full-thickness uterine tissues from OVX rats were homogenized as
described above. Because TNF-
has a molecular weight of 18, the
homogenates of uterine tissue were size fractionated on 10%-20%
(wt/vol) gradient SDS-PAGE gels. The polyclonal antibody of TNF-
raised against purified recombinant rat TNF-
was used at a dilution
of 1:10,000. Both the antibody and the rat TNF-
for positive control
were from Biosource International (Carmarillo, CA) and
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody was
from Santa Cruz Biotech (Santa Cruz, CA). The procedures for blotting were similar to that described above.
Statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA or Student's t-test was used to evaluate differences between various treatments. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitrite production by uterine tissue from rats with intrauterine
infection.
Analysis of HPLC absorbence peaks of nitrite generated by the uterine
tissue from nonpregnant and pregnant rats, a quantitative indicator of
NO production, is presented in Fig. 1. In
nonpregnant rats, increases in nitrite production by the infected
uterine horn 12 or 24 h after bacterial inoculation were observed
(P > 0.05) compared with those from the noninfected
uterine horn. These results are similar to our previous report
(7). Interestingly, NO production in the noninfected
uterine horns of pregnant rats was significantly higher (3.5-fold)
compared with that of nonpregnant OVX rats (Fig. 1). However, in the
infected horn of pregnant rat uterus, a significant induction after
intrauterine infection was not demonstrable (Fig. 1). Moreover, the
baseline uterine NO levels in pregnant rats are similar to the
infection-stimulated uterine NO levels in nonpregnant rats. This
indicates that the uterine NO production may be at near maximum in
pregnant rats and that there is a lack of uterine NO production
increase on intrauterine infection in pregnant rats.
|
Western immunoblotting analysis for NOS
II of experimental rats.
NOS II protein was undetectable in nonpregnant OVX animals, whereas it
is expressed abundantly during pregnancy (Fig.
2A). Protein from murine
macrophages was used as a control for NOS II. Densitometric analysis
(Fig. 2B) indicated that intrauterine infection of
nonpregnant rats caused a significant elevation in the expression of
NOS II protein in infected uterine horn but not in the noninfected horn
when examined at 12 and 24 h after inoculation (P < 0.05). In pregnant animals, however, no significant changes were found
in NOS II contents between the infected and noninfected horns.
|
Western immunoblotting analysis for NOS
III in rat uterine tissue.
A specific band corresponding to the size of NOS III protein was
present in the homogenate of all uterine horns from every tested group
whether or not they received the bacterial inoculum. Densitometric
analysis demonstrates that no significant differences are apparent in
the homogenates of infected and noninfected uterine horns, either in
pregnant or nonpregnant rats (Fig.
3B). Protein from human
endothelial cells was used as a control for NOS III.
|
Immunofluorescent staining for the distribution of
NOS II in pregnant rat uterus.
Abundant staining for NOS II was detected in the uterine stromal layer
and in the connective tissue area between myometrial bundles (Fig.
4a) in the infected uterine
horn. No detectable staining was visualized in epithelial and smooth
muscle cells (Fig. 4a). A similar pattern of
immunoreactivity for NOS II was found in sections from the noninfected
horn of pregnant rats (Fig. 4c). In the nonpregnant rat
uterus, abundant staining for NOS II was detected in the uterine
stromal layer in the infected horn, and no detectable staining was
visualized in any cells in the noninfected horn (see Ref.
7 for details).
|
Western immunoblotting analysis for TNF-
in rat
uterine tissues.
With the use of a similar immunoblotting method, the expression of
TNF-
protein was demonstrable in the uterine tissues of nonpregnant
OVX and pregnant rats, irrespective of infection (Fig. 5A). However, the intensity of
TNF-
expression was greater in the infected uterine horn compared
with noninfected horn at 12 and 24 h after infection, either in
nonpregnant or pregnant rats. In addition, the levels of expression of
uterine TNF-
in response to infection were greater in pregnant rats
compared with those from nonpregnant OVX rats (Fig. 5, P < 0.05).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have suggested that the uterus is capable of NO generation and that NO may have a role in maintaining uterine quiescence during pregnancy (8, 17, 25, 34, 40-42). Inducible NOS (NOS II) expression is detectable in the pregnant rat uterus by Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy (41) as well as the presence of mRNA for NOS II (4). Constitutive NOS (NOS III) expression is present both in the nonpregnant (2, 41) and in pregnant rat uterus (41). Furthermore, uterine NO and NOS expression may be important host-response factors to intrauterine infection both in pregnant human and in experimental animals (7, 16, 26).
The major finding of this study is that the pattern of the responsiveness of NOS II to intrauterine bacterial infection in pregnant rats is different from nonpregnant animals. Unlike the nonpregnant rats challenged with bacteria, there was no significant elevation in uterine NO production or NOS II protein expression in pregnant rats (Fig. 1A, Fig. 2). Lack of changes in uterine NOS II protein expression due to infection observed in pregnant rats was also confirmed by immunofluorescence methods, i.e., no apparent changes in the pattern of distribution of NOS II-expressing cells (Fig. 4). This may be suggestive of a lack of response of the NO system (both NO production and inducible NOS II expression) to intrauterine bacterial infection in the pregnant state. This lack of response could be due to saturation of NOS II expression and NO generation during pregnancy to function as an endogenous smooth muscle relaxation factor. Thus infection cannot induce further NOS II or NO production in the pregnant rat uterus. However, pregnancy appeared to be a state predisposed for increased complications associated with intrauterine infection (1, 11, 14, 20, 33). An elevated uterine NO production (constitutively) during pregnancy may help contain or even reduce the infection-related complications. Therefore, if NO production is reduced during pregnancy, the infection-related complications may become more pronounced. This is further supported by our previous report in which inhibition of NO with L-NAME increased the lethality of pregnant rats on intrauterine infection (26).
In this study, immunoblotting for NOS III demonstrated that intrauterine infection did not change the amount of this constitutive NOS isoform (Fig. 3). This phenomenon was also observed in the uterus of infected nonpregnant OVX rats. This result further confirms that NOS III is a constitutive isoform in rat uterine tissue. In the absence of infection, both uterine NO production and NOS II protein expression were significantly higher in the pregnant rat uterus compared with those from nonpregnant rats (Figs. 1 and 2). These observations are similar to our previous reports (4, 41, 42).
In our previous study, the uterine macrophage and NK cells in nonpregnant uterine tissues were shown to be the NOS II-expressing cells after infection (7). The distribution of NOS II-expressing cells in the current study is similar to our previously published data in pregnant rats (41). No apparent differences were detectable in the distribution of NOS II-expressing cells between infected and noninfected horns in pregnant rats. Together, immunolocalization (Fig. 4) and immunoblotting data (Fig. 2) in pregnant rats indicate that infection did not induce NOS II expression when compared with the noninfected horn.
We found a significant increase in the expression of uterine TNF-
protein after bacterial infection both in nonpregnant OVX rats and in
pregnant rats. TNF-
is a cytokine associated with inflammation and
infection. The presence of bioactive TNF-
in human amniotic fluid
and placental culture supernatants indicates its possible involvement
in normal pregnancy (19). Intrauterine infection-induced
increases in TNF-
both in pregnant and in nonpregnant rats observed
in the current study are similar to the changes in uterine TNF-
both
in humans and in experimental animals with intrauterine infection
(11). Several studies have shown that lipopolysaccharide
(LPS) stimulates TNF-
protein in uterine macrophage and NK cells
(18), cultured human fetal membranes, and decidual explants (1). Furthermore, high levels of TNF-
during gestation are associated with intrauterine infection and preterm
labor (23, 33).
TNF-
has been shown to induce NOS II expression and subsequently
increase NO production during infection. In nonpregnant rats, infection
caused elevations in the levels of both TNF-
and NOS II proteins and
NO production in the uterus (Figs. 1 and 2). In pregnant rats, however,
infection stimulated the expression of TNF-
(Fig. 5) without changes
in NOS II protein and NO production (Figs. 1 and 2). This may indicate
that the NOS II expression in pregnant rat uterus is no longer
inducible by the increased TNF-
after infection, because the levels
of this enzyme are already maximally induced (Fig. 5). When
pregnancy-associated elevations in uterine NO are reduced by an
inhibitor of NO, L-NAME, the severity of infection is
increased resulting in higher lethality to infection (26).
Moreover, NO presumably derived from tissue-associated macrophages and
NK cells in the uterus may be an important antimicrobial compound, and
high local concentrations of NO may independently have bacteriostatic
or bactericidal effects during pregnancy. Thus perhaps the elevated NOS
II expression may compensate for other potential immunological defects
during pregnancy.
Hirsch's laboratory (14) observed that the increased
uterine TNF-
levels in a mouse model with intrauterine E. coli infection were concomitant with the upregulation of inducible
cyclooxengenase enzyme. As a major gram-negative bacterial product, LPS
activates transcription of TNF-
gene and stimulates massive
production of bactericidal molecules such as NO by macrophages and NK
cells. Previous experiments from Hunt's lab (18) suggest
that LPS may be capable of stimulating TNF-
production by
nonlymphocytes as well as by lymphocytes. For example, the human Jar
cell (choriocarcinoma cell) was reported to produce TNF-
after the
stimulation with LPS (44). In addition, the release of
uterine TNF-
and NO in uterine tissue was observed in the
LPS-injected rat model. The results from our current study also suggest
that uropathogenic E. coli is a strong stimulator for
induction of TNF-
and NOS II expression in nonpregnant rat uterine
tissue. Previous studies on uropathogenic E. coli with P or
type 1 fimbriae also indicate that the fimbrial protein could activate
the cytokine network (TNF-
and IL-1
) of local mucosal epithelial
cells and immune cells, either with LPS or alone (37). The
E. coli strain, IH11128, that we used in this study
expresses LPS and two types of fimbriae (type 1 and Dr); together,
these factors may serve to induce TNF-
and the NO system.
In summary, we used uropathogenic Dr+ E. coli to initiate an
intrauterine bacterial infection in nonpregnant and pregnant rats and
observed the responsiveness of the NO system and TNF-
. We found that
both NO production and NOS II expression in the uterus were increased
in nonpregnant but not in pregnant rats. These studies suggest that the
uterine NO system may be maximally activated during pregnancy to
function as an endogenous relaxation factor as well as a local
antimicrobial agent to protect against uterine infection. This
upregulated NO system in the uterus cannot be stimulated further.
Perspectives
Intrauterine infection during pregnancy can result in increased neonatal morbidity and mortality, fetal growth retardation, and septicemia. It is suggested that immunological responses are dampened during pregnancy to accommodate the fetus. This reduced immunological host-response state could provide ample opportunity for amplification of the severity of potential infection. NO, a gas molecule, has been implicated as an important modulator of infection and immunity through its antimicrobial activity. Our current study provides evidence that local NO synthesis and expression of inducible NOS (NOS II) are increased on intrauterine infection in the nonpregnant rat. However, in pregnant rats, there is a lack of further increase in the NO system indicating that this system is functioning at maximum during pregnancy to protect against infection and also to provide smooth muscle relaxation. When pregnancy-associated elevations in uterine NO are reduced by an inhibitor (L-NAME), the severity of uterine infection is increased, resulting in higher lethality (26). The elevated local concentrations of NO in the uterus may have a bactericidal function, and thus perhaps the increased NOS II expression during pregnancy may be compensatory for other potential immunological deficiencies. Therefore, the uterine NO system during pregnancy may play an important role in maintaining host defense against infection, and disturbance of this system could result in infection-related complications.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
For editorial and graphic assistance, we thank Obstetrics/Gynecology Publications director and staff: R. G. McConnell, Kristi Barrett, John Helms, and Traci Smith.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
We gratefully acknowledge support received through grants from the National Institutes of Health: HD-30273 and HL-58144 to C. Yallampalli and DK-42029 to B. J. Nowicki.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Yallampalli, Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 301 Univ. Blvd., Medical Research Bldg., Rm. 11.138, Galveston, TX 77555-1062 (E-mail: chyallam{at}utmb.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 21 March 2000; accepted in final form 8 January 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Casey, ML,
Cox SM,
Beutler B,
Milewich L,
and
MacDonald PC.
Cachectin/tumor necrosis factor-alpha formation in human decidua. Potential role of cytokines in infection-induced preterm labor.
J Clin Invest
83:
430-436,
1989.
2.
Chatterjee, S,
Gangula PR,
Dong YL,
and
Yallampalli C.
Immunocytochemical localization of nitric oxide synthase-III in reproductive organs of female rats during the oestrous cycle.
Histochem J
28:
715-723,
1996[ISI][Medline].
3.
Dammann, O,
and
Leviton A.
Maternal intrauterine infection, cytokines, and brain damage in the preterm newborn.
Pediatr Res
42:
1-8,
1997[ISI][Medline].
4.
Dong, YL,
Fang L,
Gangula PR,
and
Yallampalli C.
Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase messenger ribonucleic acid expression in pregnant rat uterus.
Biol Reprod
59:
933-940,
1998
5.
Evans, TG,
Thai L,
Granger DL,
and
Hibbs JB, Jr.
Effect of in vivo inhibition of nitric oxide production in murine leishmaniasis.
J Immunol
151:
907-915,
1993[Abstract].
6.
Fang, FC.
Perspectives series: host/pathogen interactions. Mechanisms of nitric oxide-related antimicrobial activity.
J Clin Invest
99:
2818-2825,
1997[ISI][Medline].
7.
Fang, L,
Nowicki BJ,
Dong YL,
and
Yallampalli C.
Localized increase in nitric oxide production and the expression of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in rat uterus with experimental intrauterine infection.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
181:
601-609,
1999[ISI][Medline].
8.
Figueroa, JP,
and
Massmann GA.
Estrogen increases nitric oxide synthase activity in the uterus of nonpregnant sheep.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
173:
1539-1545,
1995[ISI][Medline].
9.
Forstermann, U,
and
Kleinert H.
Nitric oxide synthase: expression and expressional control of the three isoforms.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
352:
351-364,
1995[ISI][Medline].
10.
Fukatsu, K,
Saito H,
Fukushima R,
Inoue T,
Lin MT,
Inaba T,
and
Muto T.
Detrimental effects of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (N-omega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester) in a murine sepsis model.
Arch Surgery
130:
410-414,
1995[Abstract].
11.
Gomez, R,
Ghezzi F,
Romero R,
Munoz H,
Tolosa JE,
and
Rojas I.
Premature labor and intra-amniotic infection. Clinical aspects and role of the cytokines in diagnosis and pathophysiology.
Clin Perinatol
22:
281-342,
1995[ISI][Medline].
12.
Granger, DL.
Macrophage production of nitrogen oxides in host defense against microorganisms.
Res Immunol
142:
570-572,
1991[ISI][Medline].
13.
Hill, LV,
Luther ER,
Young D,
Pereira L,
and
Embil JA.
Prevalence of lower genital tract infections in pregnancy.
Sex Transm Dis
15:
5-10,
1988[ISI][Medline].
14.
Hirsch, E,
Saotome I,
and
Hirsh D.
A model of intrauterine infection and preterm delivery in mice.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
172:
1598-1603,
1995[ISI][Medline].
15.
Hsu, CD,
Aversa K,
Meaddough E,
Lee IS,
and
Copel JA.
Elevated amniotic fluid nitric oxide metabolites and cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate in pregnant women with intraamniotic infection.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
177:
793-796,
1997[ISI][Medline].
16.
Hsu, CD,
Meaddough E,
Lu LC,
Chelouche A,
Liang RI,
Copel JA,
and
Parkash V.
Immunohistochemical localization of inducible nitric oxide synthase on human fetal amnion in intra-amniotic infection.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
179:
1271-1274,
1998[ISI][Medline].
17.
Huang, PL,
Huang Z,
Mashimo H,
Bloch KD,
Moskowitz MA,
Bevan JA,
and
Fishman MC.
Hypertension in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
Nature
377:
239-242,
1995[Medline].
18.
Hunt, JS,
Chen HL,
and
Miller L.
Tumor necrosis factors: pivotal components of pregnancy.
Biol Reprod
54:
554-562,
1996[Abstract].
19.
Jaattela, M,
Kuusela P,
and
Saksela E.
Demonstration of tumor necrosis factor in human amniotic fluids and supernatants of placental and decidual tissues.
Lab Invest
58:
48-52,
1988[ISI][Medline].
20.
Krohn, MA,
Hillier SL,
Nugent RP,
Cotch MF,
Carey JC,
Gibbs RS,
and
Eschenbach DA.
The genital flora of women with intraamniotic infection. Vaginal Infection and Prematurity Study Group.
J Infect Dis
171:
1475-1480,
1995[ISI][Medline].
21.
Lowenstein, CJ,
Alley EW,
Raval P,
Snowman AM,
Snyder SH,
Russell SW,
and
Murphy WJ.
Macrophage nitric oxide synthase gene: two upstream regions mediate induction by interferon gamma and lipopolysaccharide.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:
9730-9734,
1993
22.
Mitchell, MD,
Edwin S,
and
Romero RJ.
Prostaglandin biosynthesis by human decidual cells: effects of inflammatory mediators.
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids
41:
35-38,
1990[ISI][Medline].
23.
Mussalli, GM,
Blanchard R,
Brunnert SR,
and
Hirsch E.
Inflammatory cytokines in a murine model of infection-induced preterm labor: cause or effect?
J Soc Gynecol Invest
6:
188-195,
1999[ISI][Medline].
24.
Nathan, C,
and
Xie QW.
Nitric oxide synthases: roles, tolls, and controls.
Cell
78:
915-918,
1994[ISI][Medline].
25.
Natuzzi, ES,
Ursell PC,
Harrison M,
Buscher C,
and
Riemer RK.
Nitric oxide synthase activity in the pregnant uterus decreases at parturition.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
194:
1-8,
1993[ISI][Medline].
26.
Nowicki, B,
Fang L,
Singhal J,
Nowicki S,
and
Yallampalli C.
Lethal outcome of uterine infection in pregnant but not in nonpregnant rats and increased death rate with inhibition of nitric oxide.
Am J Reprod Immunol
38:
309-312,
1997.
27.
Nowicki, B,
Martens M,
Hart A,
and
Nowicki S.
Gestational age-dependent distribution of Escherichia coli fimbriae in pregnant patients with pyelonephritis.
Ann NY Acad Sci
730:
290-291,
1994[ISI][Medline].
28.
Nowicki, B,
Singhal J,
Fang L,
Nowicki S,
and
Yallampalli C.
Inverse relationship between severity of experimental pyelonephritis and nitric oxide production in C3H/HeJ mice.
Infect Immun
67:
2421-2427,
1999
29.
Payen, D,
Bernard C,
and
Beloucif S.
Nitric oxide in sepsis.
Clin Chest Med
17:
333-350,
1996[ISI][Medline].
30.
Polan, ML,
Loukides J,
Nelson P,
Carding S,
Diamond M,
Walsh A,
and
Bottomly K.
Progesterone and estradiol modulate interleukin-1 beta messenger ribonucleic acid levels in cultured human peripheral monocytes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
69:
1200-1206,
1989[Abstract].
31.
Rivera, DL,
Olister SM,
Liu X,
Thompson JH,
Zhang XJ,
Pennline K,
Azuero R,
Clark DA,
and
Miller MJ.
Interleukin-10 attenuates experimental fetal growth restriction and demise.
FASEB J
12:
189-197,
1998
32.
Robb, JA,
Benirschke K,
and
Barmeyer R.
Intrauterine latent herpes simplex virus infection. I. Spontaneous abortion.
Hum Pathol
17:
1196-1209,
1986[ISI][Medline].
33.
Romero, R,
Sirtori M,
Oyarzun E,
Avila C,
Mazor M,
Callahan R,
Sabo V,
Athanassiadis AP,
and
Hobbins JC.
Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
161:
817-824,
1989[ISI][Medline].
34.
Sladek, SM,
Regenstein AC,
Lykins D,
and
Roberts JM.
Nitric oxide synthase activity in pregnant rabbit uterus decreases on the last day of pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
169:
1285-1291,
1993[ISI][Medline].
35.
Spitzer, JA.
Gender differences in nitric oxide production by alveolar macrophages in ethanol plus lipopolysaccharide-treated rats.
Nitric Oxide
1:
31-38,
1997[ISI][Medline].
36.
Stenger, S,
Donhauser N,
Thuring H,
Rollinghoff M,
and
Bogdan C.
Reactivation of latent leishmaniasis by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase.
J Exp Med
183:
1501-1514,
1996
37.
Svanborg, C,
Godaly G,
and
Hedlund M.
Cytokine responses during mucosal infections: role in disease pathogenesis and host defence.
Curr Opin Microbiol
2:
99-105,
1999[ISI][Medline].
38.
Tiao, G,
Rafferty J,
Ogle C,
Fischer JE,
and
Hasselgren PO.
Detrimental effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibition during endotoxemia may be caused by high levels of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6.
Surgery
116:
332-337,
1994[ISI][Medline].
39.
Weinberg, ED.
Pregnancy-associated immune suppression: risks and mechanisms.
Microb Pathog
3:
393-397,
1987[ISI][Medline].
40.
Yallampalli, C,
Byam-Smith M,
Nelson SO,
and
Garfield RE.
Steroid hormones modulate the production of nitric oxide and cGMP in the rat uterus.
Endocrinology
134:
1971-1974,
1994[Abstract].
41.
Yallampalli, C,
Dong YL,
Gangula PR,
and
Fang L.
Role and regulation of nitric oxide in the uterus during pregnancy and parturition.
J Soc Gynecol Invest
5:
58-67,
1998[ISI][Medline].
42.
Yallampalli, C,
Garfield RE,
and
Byam-Smith M.
Nitric oxide inhibits uterine contractility during pregnancy but not during delivery.
Endocrinology
133:
1899-1902,
1993[Abstract].
43.
Yallampalli, C,
Izumi H,
Byam-Smith M,
and
Garfield RE.
An L-arginine: nitric oxide-cGMP system exists in the uterus and inhibits contractility during pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
170:
175-85,
1994[ISI][Medline].
44.
Yang, Y,
Yelavarthi KK,
Chen HL,
Pace JL,
Terranova PF,
and
Hunt JS.
Molecular, biochemical, and functional characteristics of tumor necrosis factor-alpha produced by human placental cytotrophoblastic cells.
J Immunol
150:
5614-5624,
1993[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Wroblewska-Seniuk, R. Selvarangan, A. Hart, R. Pladzyk, P. Goluszko, A. Jafari, L. du Merle, S. Nowicki, C. Yallampalli, C. Le Bouguenec, et al. Dra/AfaE Adhesin of Uropathogenic Dr/Afa+ Escherichia coli Mediates Mortality in Pregnant Rats Infect. Immun., November 1, 2005; 73(11): 7597 - 7601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Servin Pathogenesis of Afa/Dr Diffusely Adhering Escherichia coli Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2005; 18(2): 264 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Granger Maternal and fetal adaptations during pregnancy: lessons in regulatory and integrative physiology Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): R1289 - R1292. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |