|
|
||||||||
Departments of 1 Psychology, Pharmacology, Exercise Science and 2 Anatomy and Cell Biology and the Cardiovascular Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The subfornical organ (SFO) is sensitive to both ANG II and ACh, and local application of these agents produces dipsogenic responses and vasopressin release. The present study examined the effects of cholinergic drugs, ANG II, and increased extracellular osmolarity on dissociated, cultured cells of the SFO that were retrogradely labeled from the supraoptic nucleus. The effects were measured as changes in cytosolic calcium in fura 2-loaded cells by using a calcium imaging system. Both ACh and carbachol increased intracellular ionic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i). However, in contrast to the effects of muscarinic receptor agonists on SFO neurons, manipulation of the extracellular osmolality produced no effects, and application of ANG II produced only moderate effects on [Ca2+]i in a few retrogradely labeled cells. The cholinergic effects on [Ca2+]i could be blocked with the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine and with the more selective muscarinic receptor antagonists pirenzepine and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperdine methiodide (4-DAMP). In addition, the calcium in the extracellular fluid was required for the cholinergic-induced increase in [Ca2+]i. These findings indicate that ACh acts to induce a functional cellular response in SFO neurons through action on a muscarinic receptor, probably of the M1 subtype and that the increase of [Ca2+]i, at least initially, requires the entry of extracellular Ca2+. Also, consistent with a functional role of M1 receptors in the SFO are the results of immunohistochemical preparations demonstrating M1 muscarinic receptor-like protein present within this forebrain circumventricular organ.
cholinergic; muscarinic angiotensin II; osmosensitive magnocellular neurons; vasopressin; oxytocin
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE SUBFORNICAL ORGAN (SFO) is a forebrain structure that lacks a blood-brain barrier and is generally recognized for its important role in monitoring indexes of body fluid homeostasis (15, 25). The SFO and other structures lying along the lamina terminalis, specifically the median preoptic nucleus and the organum vasculosum, constitute a local neural network that is essential for normal body fluid and cardiovascular regulation (14, 16). Efferent connections from the SFO project to a number of forebrain structures such as the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), the supraoptic nucleus (SON), the amygdala, and perifornical hypothalamus, which are sites of integration and control of effector mechanisms (behavioral, hormonal, and autonomic) that collectively contribute to body fluid and cardiovascular regulation (14, 16).
The SFO is sensitive to osmotic stimuli (37), ANG II (26, 39), and ACh (7, 38, 40). Such extracellular humoral factors rely on pathways between the SFO and the SON for the control of vasopressin and oxytocin release. Magnocellular neurons of the PVN and SON (24, 29, 30) are key components of this forebrain network because they synthesize and control the secretion of vasopressin and oxytocin (10, 20, 32, 35), which affect total body sodium and water balance and distribution.
Relatively little is known of the individual cell types of the SFO that are affected by osmotic stimuli, ANG II, and ACh or of the mechanisms by which their efferent signals to humoral stimuli are generated and how coded neural information projects to forebrain nuclei receiving and integrating information related to body fluid and cardiovascular homeostasis, such as the magnocellular neurons. However, evidence indicates that the SFO is not composed of a homogeneous cell type. In addition to the expected variety of glia, there appears to be a variety of neuronal perikarya based on morphology (7). Electrophysiological studies have also suggested heterogeneity in the structure of the SFO composed of superficial and deep neurons (4, 5).
Our previous work has shown that SFO neurons can be retrogradely labeled by injection of tracer into the SON/perinuclear SON region (17), which contains terminal fields from the SFO (33). Retrograde tracer can be reliably injected into this terminal field of SFO projections without inadvertent diffusion of tracer from the delivery site into the ventricular system. The retrograde label can be visualized both in fixed coronal sections of the SFO, where it appears in an annular pattern, and in acutely dissociated cultured neurons of the SFO (17).
Previous studies (see Refs. 12, 17) have demonstrated the utility of [Ca2+]i imaging in examining the response of dissociated and cultured cells of circumventricular organs. The present study used retrograde label to identify dissociated neurons of the SFO that had in vitro efferent connections with the SON. [Ca2+]i imaging was then used to measure the response of identified neurons to ANG II, increased extracellular osmolarity (sodium concentration), and cholinergic agonists and antagonists.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All rats, both adults and mothers with preweanling pups, were Sprague-Dawley-derived animals (Harlan; Indianapolis, IN). Rats were housed either individually (adults) or in groups, in the case of mothers and pups in a light-controlled room (12:12-h light-dark cycle) with food and water provided ad libitum for 4-7 days before they were used.
Eleven-day-old rats received pressure injections (under methoxyflurane
inhalation anesthesia) of
1,1',dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethlindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI;
50 mg/ml ethanol; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) aimed bilaterally at
the SON. The injector was angled 20° lateral from the perpendicular
to avoid the lateral ventricles and advanced so that its tip was
stereotaxically placed at a target 1.3 mm behind bregma, 4.5 mm either
side of midline, and 8.3 mm below the skull. Three days were allowed
for retrograde transport, and then the SFO was removed for
dissociation. The retrograde pattern of labeling was verified in
coronal sections (Fig. 1). As previously
reported (17), the pattern observed in coronal sections of
the SFO was a concentration of retrogradely labeled cells in an annulus
at the perimeter of the organ with a paucity of cells in the core of
the structure. In patch-clamp electrophysiological studies conducted in
our laboratory (17), individual labeled dissociated cells
were easily visualized using rhodamine-labeled microspheres and
microscopic epifluorescence. However, in the calcium imaging system
used in the present studies, a narrow bandwidth of light was used, and
DiI provided more intense fluorescence than rhodamine-labeled
microspheres.
|
Following previously published protocols (18, 19), dissociated cells of the SFO were obtained and cultured for studies over 1-4 days postdissociation. Briefly, for the dissociation, five or six rat pups (14 days old) were decapitated, and each head was placed in ice-cold 70% ethanol. The brain was removed rapidly, placed in ice-cold Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS; +20 mM HEPES buffer), and a thick coronal slice was made to include tissue from the rostral level of the optic chiasm caudal to the collicular level. Dissection studies we previously carried out in animals that had been systemically injected with Evans blue (1% solution), which labels brain areas outside the blood-brain barrier (i.e., circumventricular organs, such as the SFO), have shown that the SFO can be isolated and removed from these coronal slices with minimal non-SFO tissue attached (non-SFO tissue is mainly from the hippocampal commissure). Isolated SFOs from five or six pups were transferred to ice-cold Earle's salt solution (ESS; +20 mM HEPES buffer) for 1 h and then treated with dispase I (3 U/3 ml; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) for 1 h at 35°C. After three washes in culture medium, a cell suspension was prepared by trituration of the fragments through a fire-polished Pasteur pipette (15-20×) until the tissue fragments were visibly dissociated, and then, several drops of the medium containing the cells were plated onto previously precoated (0.1 mg poly-L-lysine/ml) round 25-mm coverslips and incubated in a humidified atmosphere (plus 5% CO2) at 37°C. The culture medium was Dulbecco's modified Eagle's nutrient mixture F-12 HAM (1:1) with 10% fetal bovine serum (heat inactivated at 56°C for 1 h) and 1% L-glutamine-penicillin-streptomycin solution added (except where noted, all solutions are from Fisher). After 1-2 h postplating to allow the cells to adhere to the coverslips, 1-2 ml of additional medium was added to the culture wells; thereafter the medium was changed every 1-2 days. Within hours of dissociation, the cells began to differentiate: the neurons remain simply spherical and may develop one or two processes, but the glia develop either multiple astrocyte-like processes or become flat large cells with prominent nuclei but no processes.
Changes in cytosolic [Ca2+]i were measured with fura 2 ratio fluorescence as previously described (12, 36). Cells were loaded with fura 2 by incubating cells grown on 25-mm coverslips (see above) in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA and 2 mM fura 2-AM (Molecular Probes) for 60 min at 37°C. During the incubation, fura 2-AM is absorbed by the cell and hydrolyzed only within living cells to impermeant fura 2. The coverslip was washed once with DMEM-BSA and once with HEPES-buffered ESS containing 10 mM sodium bicarbonate and 0.1% BSA. Calcium measurements were made using the latter as bath solution. To examine the effects of stimulation in a calcium-free bath, the extracellular medium was custom made without Ca2+, and the Ca2+ chelator, 1 mM EGTA, was added.
For [Ca2+]i measurements and pharmacological manipulations, the coverslip was mounted in a brass bath chamber that was attached to the microscope stage. A circulating water jacket maintained a 37°C bath temperature, and all test solutions added were of the same temperature. The bath solutions could be siphoned off and the coverslip washed to permit subsequent testing. [Ca2+]i was measured using a video microscopic digital image analysis system (Photon Technology International, South Brunswick, NJ). Excitation wavelengths of 340 and 380 nm were obtained with a 75-W xenon arc lamp, two separate monochromators, and a chopper. The excitation light was delivered from the monochromators to a Nikon Diaphot microscope via fiber optics. A 405-nm dichroic mirror separated the excitation and emitted light. Fluorescence was observed via the microscope-computer system after passing through a 510-nm broad band filter. Excitation image pairs (340/380 nm) were acquired every 10 s with a silicon intensified target camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ) and a 512 × 480 frame grabber. The data were recorded on hard disk after several video frames were averaged to reduce the level of noise. An increase in [Ca2+]i produces a shift in fluorescence intensity from 380 to 340 nm and thus an increase in the 340/380 ratio. A positive change in intracellular [Ca2+] was judged visually as a detectable change in color of the cell as the computer scanned the field every 10 s. Only after the experiment was completed were the accumulated data sets from positive responders analyzed and the [Ca2+] converted to numerical concentrations. A response to stimulation was easily discerned as a sudden and sharp change in the color of the cell.
The system had been calibrated in a previous study on neurons
(36). Briefly, pseudocolor maps of absolute
[Ca2+]i were constructed on a pixel by pixel
basis, and the values over the entire cell were averaged to obtain
whole cell calcium concentration. Calcium concentration was calculated
using the equation [Ca2+]i = Kd(Sf/Sb)(R
Rmin)/(Rmax
R), where
Kd is the dissociation constant of fura 2 (224 nM), R is the 340/380 ratio, Rmax and Rmin are
the ratios obtained with saturated and zero levels of calcium,
respectively, Sf and Sb are the 380-nm excitation fluorescence in the
presence of EGTA and at saturation level, respectively. The values of
Rmin (0.45), Rmax (8.5), and Sf/Sb (8.1) were
determined by exposing cells to 5 µM ionomycin, 10 µM nigericin,
and 2 µM gramicidin in a 100 mM K+ solution containing
either 0 or 10 mM calcium.
The coverslip (200 µl bath solution) was systematically scanned with the computer to identify a microscopic field that contained one or more DiI-labeled cells. Three measures at 10-s intervals were taken as baseline, then the test solution (200 µl) was added via bolus injection and 12 subsequent measures were taken. Because in most cases unlabeled cells were present in the field, responses from these cells were also recorded as a matter of course.
Immunocytochemistry testing for the presence of M1 muscarinic receptor protein in the SFO was performed in seven male rats (300-350 g). Rats were anesthetized (pentobarbital sodium, 50-75 mg/rat) and perfused with 0.01 M PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS. The brains were removed and placed in 20% sucrose dissolved in 0.01 M PBS overnight and then coronally sectioned on a freezing microtome (40 µm). Tissue sections from five rats were incubated with M1 muscarinic antiserum (1:5,000; Research and Diagnostic Antibodies, Berkeley, CA) for 48 h at 4°C without agitation (sections from 2 rats served as controls, i.e., no primary antibody was added). All sections were washed twice with PBS, incubated in goat anti-rabbit serum for 1 h at room temperature with gentle agitation (1:200; Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA), and processed using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Labs, "Elite" ABC reagent). The sections were treated in 1 mg/ml nickel-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma) dissolved in 0.01 M PBS with 0.02% hydrogen peroxide. The intensity of staining was microscopically monitored to the desired ratio of signal to background. The sections were mounted on gelatinized slides, dried overnight, dehydrated in alcohol, and placed under a coverslip with DePeX (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Ft. Washington, PA).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of a long-standing interest in the coupling of the classic
(renal) renin-angiotensin system with the brain-renin angiotensin systems through the SFO (22-24; see Refs. 14,
16 for review), we initially investigated the effects of
increased extracellular ANG II on SFO neurons. In only 1 of 23 retrogradely labeled neurons and 3 of 44 unlabeled cells was there an
increase in [Ca2+]i in response to the
addition of 200 µl ANG II solution to the 200 µl bath solution
(acetate salt, Sigma; final concentration 1 µM). To examine the
possibility that the paucity of responding cells was due to
inactivation of the ANG II receptors by nonspecific factors in the
culture medium, several coverslips were subjected to a "starvation
protocol" in which the cells were incubated in BSA-free media for
~18 h. In this case, 0 of 9 retrogradely labeled neurons and 2 of 15 unlabeled cells responded to the ANG II stimulation. In addition to
these initial studies, we again tested the
[Ca2+]i response of cells to ANG II (10 µM
final concentration) after all the cholinergic manipulations were
completed (see below). Of the 195 cells tested, 12% of 42 retrogradely
labeled neurons and 26% of 153 unlabeled cells increased
[Ca2+]i. See Fig.
2 for the pattern of averaged
[Ca2+]i response of ANG II stimulation.
|
In other studies, a total of 103 cells (35 labeled) that had been grown in media of 298 mosM for at least 18 h were held at a basal 276 mosM for 1 h and then osmolality was increased by ~10% (final concentration 304-308 mosM; osmolality was increased via addition of basal solution rendered hyperosmotic via addition of NaCl). No cell showed any alteration in [Ca2+]i .
We then turned our attention toward studying the effects of cholinergic
receptor agonists on SFO neurons. In initial cholinergic studies, when
the cells were examined for responsiveness to carbachol (carbamylcholine chloride, Sigma; 100 µM), 32% of 22 retrogradely labeled neurons and 45% of 33 unlabeled cells showed an increase in
[Ca2+]i. In addition, 10 of 10 cells
recovered their basal level of [Ca2+]i after
three washes of bath solution, and 3 of 3 cells tested responded again
to carbachol stimulation, albeit at a reduced level (see Fig.
3, inset). Figure 3 also shows
the combined averaged pattern of the [Ca2+]i
response to carbachol stimulation (3 labeled cells and 16 unlabeled cells). Several cells were tested for the efficacy of atropine (sulfate
salt, Sigma, 1 µM) to block the carbachol-induced increase in
[Ca2+]i. In cells that had responded to
carbachol addition, when 200 µl of the subsequent bath solution was
replaced with atropine solution, the increased level of
[Ca2+]i was reduced in 1 of 2 retrogradely
labeled cells and in 12 of 14 unlabeled cells.
|
Similarly, cells that responded to ACh (1 mM) by increasing
[Ca2+]i could be returned to basal levels by
application of atropine (1-10 µM) in 1 of 2 retrogradely labeled
neurons and in 9 of 10 unlabeled cells. Overall, retrogradely labeled
cells showed a tendency, although not significant, for a smaller
increase in [Ca2+]i than the unlabeled cells
in response to ACh stimulation (Fig. 4).
Further experiments were conducted to examine the nature of the
muscarinic receptor that mediated the increase in
[Ca2+]i. In 13 cells (2 with retrograde
label) that had responded to application of ACh (1 mM) with increased
[Ca2+]i, when the ACh was removed via three
washes of bath solution and a combination of ACh and pirenzepine
dihydrochloride (RBI, Natick, MA) was added (1 mM each), no increase in
[Ca2+]i occurred. However, after three more
washes and application of ACh alone, a recovered, albeit reduced,
increase in [Ca2+]i occurred (Fig.
5A).
|
|
In 12 cells (2 with retrograde label) that showed increased levels of [Ca2+]i to application of ACh, the increased level was gradually reversed (Fig. 5B) after the application of 4-DAMP (RBI; 100 µM).
Finally, we examined whether the presence of Ca2+ was
necessary in the extracellular fluid for the increase in
[Ca2+]i after ACh (1 mM) application. In 13 cells examined (1 with retrograde label), there was only minimal, if
any, effect when the 1.8 mM CaCl2 was excluded from the
usual bath solution and 1 mM EGTA was added. However, a robust increase
in [Ca2+]i was observed in the presence of
extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 6).
|
Immunocytochemical treatment of tissue with primary M1
muscarinic receptor antibody revealed there was a high density of
staining in the five sets of sections (Fig.
7). However, there was no indication of
immunoreactivity in the SFOs of the two control sets of sections that
were incubated under identical conditions but where the M1 antibody was omitted.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present findings indicate that neurons of the SFO are retrogradely labeled when DiI is injected into the SON and its perinuclear region. The pattern of retrograde labeling in the SFO is annular. Backlabeled neurons from the SFO can be cultured and studied with [Ca2+]i imaging techniques. Both cultured retrogradely labeled neurons (i.e., efferents of the SFO to the SON) and unlabeled cells failed to show changes in [Ca2+]i to increases in extracellular osmolality (~10%). Also, only a few of the dissociated cells of the SFO, labeled or unlabeled, responded to ANG II. However, a failure to detect changes in [Ca2+]i is not necessarily indicative of complete lack of cellular response to the manipulations; e.g., the manipulations may influence K+ channels producing only a weak depolarization and possibly no change in [Ca2+]i if, for example, the change is dependent on action potentials.
A relatively high number of cells, both labeled and unlabeled, increased [Ca2+]i to the cholinergic agonist, carbachol. Basal levels of [Ca2+]i could be restored after carbachol was washed off the cells, and the carbachol response could be repeated, although at a diminished level. In addition, the carbachol-induced increase in [Ca2+]i could be blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine. The normal endogenous cholinergic receptor agonist ACh also increased [Ca2+]i in labeled and unlabeled cells. Again, atropine was effective in blocking the response and basal levels could be restored after washes. However, the repeated response to the agonist was also diminished compared with the original response. When more specific muscarinic subtype receptor antagonists were used, both pirenzepine and 4-DAMP were effective antagonists of the ACh-induced increase in [Ca2+]i, indicating that ACh is acting on M1-muscarinic receptors. The ACh-induced increase in [Ca2+]i was largely dependent on the presence of extracellular Ca2+, indicating that Ca2+ entry is a critical event in the signaling process. Finally, immunocytochemical evidence indicates the presence of M1-muscarinic receptors in the SFO.
The pattern of retrograde label in the SFO with DiI is similar to previous studies using injections in the perinuclear SON area (17); i.e., it is annular or concentrated around the periphery of the organ with a relative paucity of label in the middle (41). However, the annular pattern is much less distinct when DiI is used as the retrograde label compared with rhodamine-labeled microspheres (17). This may due to the fact that DiI, both under fluorescent microscopy and photography, tends to "bleed" and produce a relatively diffuse image. The annular pattern of DiI label of the SFO is notable relative to the fact that immunolabeled cells in the SFO with M1 receptors tended to be homogeneous across the SFO. The latter may explain why, in addition to labeled neurons, a large number of unlabeled cells responded to cholinergic manipulation.
Previous research has shown that M1 receptors are present in the forebrain of primate and rat (8, 11). The present study found M1 receptors in the hypothalamus and septum consistent with the findings of the previous reports. The present study found M1 receptor immunoreactivity also is present in the SFO where cholinergic effects have been localized by pharmacological and physiological studies (27, 38, 40).
The annular pattern of retrograde label (see Fig. 1) may explain the failure of ANG II to produce an increase in [Ca2+]i in retrogradely labeled cells. Numerous studies indicate that the SFO is sensitive to ANG II (26, 28, 39). However, the localization of ANG II receptors in the SFO appears mainly in the core of the structure (21; i.e., an area that may overlap with the area of paucity of retrograde label). Such an argument would not explain, however, why the unlabeled cells were also relatively nonresponsive. Perhaps SFO neurons maintained in tissue culture downregulate or internalize their ANG receptors. Another possibility is that membrane-bound receptors are lost during the dissociation process, thus rendering the cells unresponsive to specific neurochemicals. Ferguson and Bains (9) found that electrophysiological recordings obtained from slices do not differ in their basic properties from those obtained from dissociated cells. Nevertheless, the dissociation process may affect the cells' reactivity to specific drugs.
Studies have found mechano-/osmosensitive cells in areas of the nervous system that are involved in body fluid regulation and cardiovascular homeostasis (2). There is both functional (13, 23) and electrophysiological (37) evidence to suggest that SFO neurons are osmo- and/or Na+ sensitive. However, the present study failed to detect any response in SFO cells to a 10% increase in osmolality of extracellular fluid. It is possible that SFO osmosensitive cells lose their sensitivity to increased extracellular osmolarity in the course of culture or that input is transduced through mechanisms not involving increased [Ca2+]i. It should be noted that in studies of the supraoptic nucleus in which electrophysiological effects are detected given osmotic changes of 10% or less, these increases are referenced from physiological osmotic pressure (1, 3, 31). In the present study, the 10% percent increase from a hypoosmotic reference would only have been 3-4% hyperosmotic compared with a physiological reference, but studies have detected neuronal responses with lower osmotic changes (34).
The present study found a robust response of [Ca2+]i to cholinergic stimulation of the dissociated SFO cells consistent with in vivo studies of the SFO's sensitivity to cholinergic stimulation (27, 38, 40). The receptors mediating the cholinergic response are clearly muscarinic in nature, given the efficacy of atropine blockade. Furthermore, the receptors appear to be of the M1 subtype, and as deduced from the efficacy of pirenzepine, an M1-receptor antagonist, and 4-DAMP, an M1/M3-receptor antagonist, (6) they block the effects of cholinergic receptor agonist. Finally, the immunochemical evidence of the presence of the M1 receptor in the SFO argues for an important role for SFO M1 receptors.
Although the present study clearly indicates that extracellular Ca2+ is critical for a significant ACh-induced increase in [Ca2+]i, it is not clear from the present data whether the substantive amount of Ca2+ producing the increase is due to a large membrane flux of external Ca2+ inward or a relatively small flux of Ca2+ inward that then mediates a large release of internal stores of Ca2+.
Perspectives
The SFO is one of three sensory circumventricular organs (15) that senses blood-borne extracellular humoral factors (e.g., osmotically activate solute, ANG II, atrial natriuretic peptide; Ref. 15). Such blood-borne factors and their actions through sensory circumventricular organs are key mechanisms in body-brain communication that are necessary for the control of effector mechanisms that collectively maintain body fluid and cardiovascular homeostasis. The findings of the present study indicate that cells located at the periphery of the SFO projecting to the SON are sensitive to cholinergic receptor agonists, but insensitive to increased extracellular osmolarity and ANG II. The results suggest that the cells in the perimeter of the SFO may receive input from the central core of the SFO and thereby act as integrative interneurons. The SFO is a highly complex structure with many different cell types, and its morphology is consistent with the idea that substantial neural processing takes place in the SFO. An understanding of the cellular organization of the SFO and the flow of information through the SFO will be important to gain a full understanding of the processing of body fluid/cardiovascular-related sensory input into the central nervous system.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL-14388, HL-57472, and DK-54759), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG5-6171), and the Office of Naval Research (N00014-97-1-0145).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address of Z. Xu: Perinatal Research Laboratories, Department of OB/GYN, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90503.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. K. Johnson, Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Iowa, 11 Seashore Hall E, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 3 May 2000; accepted in final form 29 December 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bourque, CW.
Ionic basis for the intrinsic activation of rat supraoptic neurones by hyperosmotic stimuli.
J Physiol (Lond)
417:
263-277,
1989
2.
Bourque, CW,
Oliet SH,
and
Richard D.
Osmoreceptors, osmoreception and osmoregulation.
Front Neuroendocrinol
15:
231-274,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Bourque, CW,
and
Renaud LP.
Activity patterns and osmosensitivity of rat supraoptic neurones in perfused hypothalamic explants.
J Physiol (Lond)
349:
631-642,
1984
4.
Buranarugsa, P,
and
Hubbard JI.
Intracellular recording from neurones of the rat subfornical organ in vitro.
J Physiol (Lond)
294:
23-32,
1979
5.
Buranarugsa, P,
and
Hubbard JI.
The neuronal organization of the rat subfornical organ in vitro and a test of the osmo- and morphine-receptor hypothesis.
J Physiol (Lond)
291:
101-116,
1979
6.
Cooper, JR,
Bloom FE,
and
Roth RH.
The Biochemical Basis of Neuropharmacology (7th ed.). New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1996.
7.
Dellmann, HD.
Fine structural organization of the subfornical organ. A concise review.
Brain Res Bull
15:
71-78,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Ehlert, FJ,
and
Tran LP.
Regional distribution of M1, M2 and non-M1, non-M2 subtypes of muscarinic binding sites in rat brain.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
255:
1148-1157,
1990
9.
Ferguson, AV,
and
Bains JS.
Electrophysiology of the circumventricular organs.
Front Neuroendocrinol
17:
440-475,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
Ferguson, AV,
and
Kasting NW.
Electrical stimulation in subfornical organ increases plasma vasopressin concentrations in the conscious rat.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
251:
R425-R428,
1986.
11.
Flynn, DD,
and
Mash DC.
Distinct kinetic binding properties of N-[3H]-methylscopolamine afford differential labeling and localization of M1, M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes in primate brain.
Synapse
14:
283-296,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Hay, M,
Edwards GL,
Lindsley K,
Murphy S,
Sharma RV,
Bhalla RC,
and
Johnson AK.
Increases in cytosolic Ca2+ in rat area postrema/mNTS neurons produced by angiotensin II and arginine-vasopressin.
Neurosci Lett
151:
121-125,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Hosutt, JA,
Rowland N,
and
Stricker EM.
Impaired drinking responses of rats with lesions on the subfornical organ.
J Comp Physiol Psychol
95:
104-113,
1981[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Johnson, AK,
Cunningham JT,
and
Thunhorst RL.
Integrative role of the lamina terminalis in the regulation of cardiovascular and body fluid homeostasis.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
23:
183-191,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Johnson, AK,
and
Gross PM.
Sensory circumventricular organs and brain homeostatic pathways.
FASEB J
7:
678-686,
1993[Abstract].
16.
Johnson, AK,
and
Thunhorst RL.
The neuroendocrinology of thirst and salt appetite: visceral sensory signals and mechanisms of central integration.
Front Neuroendocrinol
18:
292-353,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Johnson, RF,
Beltz TG,
Jurzak M,
Wachtel RE,
and
Johnson AK.
Characterization of ionic currents of cells of the subfornical organ that project to the supraoptic nuclei.
Brain Res
817:
226-231,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Jurzak, M,
Muller AR,
and
Gerstberger R.
Characterization of vasopressin receptors in cultured cell derived from the region of rat brain circumventricular organs.
Neuroscience
65:
1145-1159,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Jurzak, M,
Muller AR,
Schmid HA,
and
Gerstberger R.
Primary culture of circumventricular organs from the rat brain lamina terminalis.
Brain Res
662:
198-208,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Knepel, W,
Nutto D,
and
Meyer DK.
Effect of transection of subfornical organ efferent projections on vasopressin release induced by angiotensin or isoprenaline in the rat.
Brain Res
248:
180-184,
1982[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Lenkei, Z,
Corvol P,
and
Llorens-Cortes C.
The angiotensin receptor subtype AT1A predominates in rat forebrain areas involved in blood pressure, body fluid homeostasis and neuroendocrine control.
Mol Brain Res
30:
53-60,
1995[Medline].
22.
Lind, RW,
and
Johnson AK.
Central and peripheral mechanisms mediating angiotensin-induced thirst.
In: The Renin Angiotensin System in the Brain, edited by Ganten D,
Printz M,
Phillips MI,
and Scholkens BA.. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982, p. 353-364.
23.
Lind, RW,
Thunhorst RL,
and
Johnson AK.
The subfornical organ and the integration of multiple factors in thirst.
Physiol Behav
32:
69-74,
1984[Medline].
24.
Lind, RW,
Van Hoesen GW,
and
Johnson AK.
An HRP study of the connections of the subfornical organ of the rat.
J Comp Neurol
210:
265-277,
1982[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Mangiapane, ML.
Cardiovascular regulation.
In: Circumventricular Organs and Body Fluids, edited by Gross PM.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1987, vol. 1, p. 96-108.
26.
Mangiapane, ML,
and
Simpson JB.
Subfornical organ: forebrain site of pressor and dipsogenic action of angiotensin II.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
239:
R382-R389,
1980.
27.
Mangiapane, ML,
and
Simpson JB.
Drinking and pressor responses after acetylcholine injections into subfornical organ.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
244:
R508-R513,
1983.
28.
Mangiapane, ML,
Thrasher TN,
Keil LC,
Simpson JB,
and
Ganong WF.
Role for the subfornical organ in vasopressin release.
Brain Res Bull
13:
43-47,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
29.
Miselis, RR.
The efferent projections of the subfornical organ of the rat: a circumventricular organ within a neural network subserving water balance.
Brain Res
230:
1-23,
1981[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Miselis, RR,
Shapiro RE,
and
Hand PJ.
Subfornical organ efferents to neural systems for control of body water.
Science
205:
1022-1025,
1979
31.
Oliet, SH,
and
Bourque CW.
Steady-state osmotic modulation of cationic conductance in neurons of rat supraoptic nucleus.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
265:
R1475-R1479,
1993
32.
Renaud, LP,
Ferguson AV,
Day TA,
Bourque CW,
and
Sgro S.
Electrophysiology of the subfornical organ and its hypothalamic connections
an in-vivo study in the rat.
Brain Res Bull
15:
83-86,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
33.
Renaud, LP,
Rogers J,
and
Sgro S.
Terminal degeneration of supraoptic nucleus following subfornical lesions: ultrastructural observations in the rat.
Brain Res
275:
365-368,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Richard, D,
and
Bourque CW.
Synaptic activation of rat supraoptic neurons by osmotic stimulation of the organum vasculosum lamina terminalis.
Neuroendocrinology
55:
609-611,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Sgro, S,
Ferguson AV,
and
Renaud LP.
Subfornical organ-supraoptic nucleus connections: an electrophysiological study in the rat.
Brain Res
303:
7-13,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
36.
Sharma, RV,
Chapleau MW,
Hajduczok G,
Wachtel RE,
Waite LJ,
Bhalla RC,
and
Abboud FM.
Mechanical stimulation increases intracellular calcium concentration in nodose sensory neurons.
Neuroscience
66:
433-441,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
37.
Sibbald, JR,
Hubbard JI,
and
Sirett NE.
Responses from osmosensitive neurons of the rat subfornical organ in vitro.
Brain Res
461:
205-214,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
Simpson, JB,
and
Routtenberg A.
The subfornical organ and carbachol-induced drinking.
Brain Res
45:
135-152,
1972[Web of Science][Medline].
39.
Simpson, JB,
and
Routtenberg A.
Subfornical organ: site of drinking elicitation by angiotensin II.
Science
181:
1772-1775,
1973.
40.
Simpson, JB,
and
Routtenberg A.
Subfornical organ: acetylcholine application elicits drinking.
Brain Res
79:
157-164,
1974[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Wilkens, LD,
Mitchell LD,
Ganten D,
and
Johnson AK.
The supraoptic nucleus: afferents from areas involved in control of body fluid homeostasis.
Neuroscience
28:
573-584,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Zimmerman, R. V. Sharma, and R. L. Davisson Superoxide Mediates Angiotensin II-Induced Influx of Extracellular Calcium in Neural Cells Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 717 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |