AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R894-R901, 2001;
0363-6119/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Saumet, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Saumet, J. L.
Vol. 281, Issue 3, R894-R901, September 2001

The influence of topical capsaicin on the local thermal control of skin blood flow in humans

Dan P. Stephens1, Nisha Charkoudian1, Jessica M. Benevento2, John M. Johnson1, and Jean Louis Saumet3

1 The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Physiology, San Antonio 78229; 2 Texas Lutheran University, Seguin, Texas 78155; and 3 Laboratoire de Physiologie et d'Explorations Vasculaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, 49045 Angers Cedex 01, France


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To test whether heat-sensitive receptors participate in the cutaneous vascular responses to direct heating, we monitored skin blood flow (SkBF; laser Doppler flowmetry) where the sensation of heat was induced either by local warming (TLoc; Peltier cooling/heating unit) or by both direct warming and chemical stimulation of heat-sensitive nociceptors (capsaicin). In part I, topical capsaicin (0.075 or 0.025%) was applied to 12 cm2 of skin 1 h before stepwise local warming of untreated and capsaicin-treated forearm skin. Pretreatment with 0.075% capsaicin cream shifted the SkBF/TLoc relationship to lower temperatures by an average of 6 ± 0.8°C (P < 0.05). In part II, we used a combination of topical capsaicin (0.025%) and local warming to evoke thermal sensation at one site and only local warming to evoke thermal sensation at a separate site. Cutaneous vasomotor responses were compared when the temperatures at these two sites were perceived to be the same. SkBF differed significantly between capsaicin and control sites when compared on the basis of actual temperatures, but that difference became insignificant when compared on the basis of the perceived temperatures. These data suggest heat-sensitive nociceptors are important in the cutaneous vasodilator response to local skin warming.

nociceptors; warmth perception; laser Doppler; local warming


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE CONTROL OF THE HUMAN CUTANEOUS circulation includes both neural and local elements. In nonglabrous skin, neural elements are comprised of sympathetic noradrenergic vasoconstrictor nerves and active vasodilator nerves (17). These neural systems are responsible for the efferent portion of the reflex control of skin blood flow, and both are known to participate in a variety of homeostatic reflexes.

Local factors also affect control of the cutaneous circulation. For example, the local temperature of the skin is one of the determinants of skin blood flow (16, 35). Local cooling can reduce skin blood flow essentially to zero, and local warming can maximally vasodilate the region being warmed (1, 16, 35, 36). Hence, the full range of skin blood flow can be achieved by local temperature changes. How local cooling or warming causes vasoconstriction or vasodilation, respectively, is not fully understood. Local effects of temperature are known to affect the responsiveness of vascular smooth muscle to sympathetic stimulation during both local warming and local cooling (38). There is strong evidence favoring an alteration in postsynaptic alpha -adrenergic receptor function with local cooling (10, 38). It also appears that either an axon reflex from cold receptors or more direct effects of local cooling on sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerves causes the release of neurotransmitter from noradrenergic nerve terminals, resulting in vasoconstriction (9, 23, 30, 31).

The mechanisms of the vasodilator response to direct local warming of the skin are not as well understood. During local warming, it is likely that heat-sensitive sensory nerves are involved in an axon reflex such that warming of the skin initiates the vasomotor response through activation of afferent nerves (2, 7, 22). The vasodilation induced by direct local warming is nitric oxide dependent but is not dependent on vasoconstrictor or active vasodilator nerves (20, 21, 31). Also, the effects of direct local warming have been demonstrated to spread beyond the area heated (7, 26). Rather than this vasodilation being due to any direct effects of local heating on the vascular smooth muscle per se, a significant body of evidence supports the hypothesis that local warming stimulates heat-sensitive afferent nerves, which then cause vasodilation through an axon reflex (26).

The sensation of heat in human forearm skin is detected by two populations of afferent nerves: warm receptors and mechano-heat-sensitive nociceptors (3, 11, 12, 26). Hallin et al. (12) and Green and Cruz (11) found that warm receptors are sparse in the human forearm and that areas as large as 4.8 cm2 were without warm receptor innervation. Thus the dominant sensory modality for heat in the human forearm is likely the heat-sensitive nociceptor. Heat-sensitive nociceptors transduce sensation by the vanilloid receptor (VR-1) (4), which can be activated by capsaicin. Thus capsaicin can serve as a means of stimulating heat-sensitive nociceptors without direct heating.

We questioned whether heat-sensitive nociceptors might play a role in the cutaneous vasodilator response to local skin heating. This question arose from the temporal association between warmth perception and vasodilation during local warming. This possibility was further supported by preliminary observations we made with applications of topical capsaicin. Capsaicin stimulates heat-sensitive nociceptor afferent neurons (3, 13, 14) but has no effects on warm receptor activity (3). In preliminary studies, we noted similarities in the cutaneous vascular responses to topical capsaicin and direct local warming in that both caused the sensation of heat, albeit via separate modes of stimulation. Also, capsaicin treatment and local warming of the skin were both associated with cutaneous vasodilation at the site of treatment. Lastly, neither the responses to local heating nor to capsaicin appear to involve the sympathetic active vasodilator system (5, 20, 31). These similarities and observations led us to test the hypothesis that activation of heat-sensitive nociceptors was involved in the cutaneous vascular responses to local warming of the skin. We took advantage of the ability to stimulate heat-sensitive nociceptors chemically, with topical capsaicin cream, or thermally, with direct local heating.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. The study was conducted in three parts. In part I, we examined how topical capsaicin affected the relationship between local skin temperature and skin blood flow. In part II, we tested whether the degree of vasodilation accompanying chemical stimulation of warmth perception differed from that accompanying thermal stimulation at the same perceived temperature. In part III, we tested whether blood flow was significantly different at untreated sites perceived to be the same temperature. A total of 15 subjects was involved, aged 21-51 yr, all of normal height, weight, and health. All were nonsmokers. After being interviewed and briefed about the protocol, each subject provided voluntary written consent to participate.

Part I. This portion included five healthy subjects (3 females, 2 males). One hour before the study, capsaicin cream (0.075%; CapzasinHP, Thompson Medical) was applied to a 12-cm2 area of forearm skin. At the time of the study, the subject lay supine on an examination table with the arm supported at the wrist and elbow. A combination Peltier cooling/heating device with a recessed area for a laser Doppler blood flow probe was applied to the capsaicin-treated area (29, 30). A second, identical device was applied to a control site ~10 cm from the capsaicin-treated site. These combination probe holder/temperature controllers cover exactly the area of capsaicin treatment except for a 0.16-cm2 center area through which skin blood flow was monitored.

Skin blood flow was measured continuously by laser- Doppler flowmetry (Laser Flo, Vasamedics, St. Paul, MN) and expressed as laser Doppler blood flow (LDF) (15, 29, 34). Blood pressure was measured by the Penaz method via a finger cuff (Finapres, Ohmeda, CO). Mean arterial pressure, obtained by electrical integration of the continuous blood pressure signal, was used with LDF to calculate cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC).

The protocol for part I, illustrated by Fig. 1, began with 15-20 min at a local temperature of 30°C at the two sites. The sites were then cooled in 2°C steps to 19-20°C over 15-20 min. For 5 min, both sites were maintained at that minimum temperature. Thereafter, the sites were simultaneously warmed in 2°C steps until achieving a local temperature of 42°C. Local temperature was held at each temperature for 5 min. In preliminary studies, skin blood flow reached a steady state in ~3 min to small changes in local temperatures below 42°C. Maximal CVC was taken as the level of blood flow achieved at 42°C local temperature (16, 36).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Protocol and data from one subject in part I. A: pattern of local temperature. B: responses in skin blood flow are shown for untreated (thin line) and capsaicin-treated (bold line) sites. CVC, cutaneous vascular conductance.

Part I included a second series of experiments in which capsaicin of two concentrations was applied to different areas of forearm skin [0.075 (as above) and 0.025%; Zostrix, Genderm]. The protocol and measurements were the same as those described above, except that the control site was replaced by a site at which 0.025% capsaicin was applied on one forearm site at the time the 0.075% capsaicin cream was applied to the other forearm site.

Data analysis for part I involved comparison of the relationship of LDF to local temperature between untreated and capsaicin-pretreated sites. This comparison was by paired analysis of the local temperatures at which LDF achieved 50% of its maximal response to local heating. Effects of the concentration of capsaicin were similarly analyzed.

Part II. We noted in part I that local cooling suppressed both vasodilation and the sensation of warmth at capsaicin-treated sites. Furthermore, on rewarming, it was uniformly seen that the onset of marked vasodilation occurred simultaneously with the first perception of local warmth, suggesting an association between warmth sensation and the vascular effects of warming.

To test this question further, capsaicin (0.025%) was applied to a 12-cm2 area of forearm skin 1 h before the study in each of seven healthy subjects (4 females, 3 males). At the time of the study, subjects were instrumented, as in part I, with laser Doppler probe holders/heater-cooler units applied to the capsaicin-treated site and to a corresponding untreated site on the other forearm. It is important to note that as in Part I, the area of local temperature control corresponded to the area of capsaicin application. Blood pressure, skin blood flow, and local temperatures were monitored as in part I.

The protocol for part II, illustrated by Fig. 2, involved matching the perception of temperature, our index of heat-sensitive nociceptor activity, between capsaicin-treated and untreated sites. To do this, both sites were cooled initially to 19-21°C, which removed any perception of warmth at both sites. After 5-10 min, both sites were warmed to 29°C, which was just below the threshold for perception of warmth at either the control or the capsaicin-treated site. The capsaicin-treated site was then slowly warmed until the subject noted the sensation of warmth. That temperature was held while the control site was slowly warmed until the subject considered the two sites to have the same temperature. CVC at each of the two sites was noted at that time. The capsaicin-treated site was then warmed by an additional 2°C, and the control site was then warmed until, again, the subject perceived the two sites as having the same temperature. This procedure was repeated for a total of three to four local temperatures per experiment. At no time did any of the subjects report that the direct heat stimulus was painful. First, analysis consisted of normalization of blood flow at each site to the maximum blood flow at that site achieved by local warming to 42°C (16, 36). We then compared blood flow between capsaicin-treated and untreated sites at equal actual temperatures and at equal perceived temperatures. Statistical analysis of these comparisons was made by repeated-measures ANOVA with planned contrasts.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Protocol and data from one subject in part II. A: levels of CVC for the capsaicin-treated (bold line) and untreated (thin line) sites. B: local temperatures for those sites. Vertical lines indicate the times at which the subject indicated the temperatures at the sites to be equal. Note that the capsaicin-treated sites uniformly had lower local temperatures when the two sites were perceived to be at the same local temperature. The levels of CVC were similar at the times the subject indicated the temperatures to be equal.

Part III. Five male subjects were instrumented as described above for control of whole body and local skin temperature. Skin blood flow and blood pressure were measured as described above. This protocol was identical to that in part II, except that neither site of blood flow measurement was treated with capsaicin. Thus part III was designed to find whether CVC from untreated sites on different arms was similar at temperatures that were perceived to be the same. CVC values from this study were analyzed by ANOVA.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Part I. Figure 1 shows the results from part I for one subject. Initially, the blood flow at capsaicin-treated sites was higher than at control sites. With local cooling, blood flow at both sites fell and was not distinguishable statistically at the lowest local temperature (P > 0.05). As the sites were rewarmed, blood flow at both sites increased slowly at first, then a temperature was reached at which blood flow began to increase sharply, which always occurred at the capsaicin-treated site at a lower temperature than that at the control site. As shown in Fig. 3, the relationship of LDF to local temperature was shifted to the left and lower temperatures by capsaicin pretreatment. The local temperature at which LDF achieved 50% of maximal averaged 6.0 ± 0.8°C lower at capsaicin-treated sites than at control sites (P < 0.05).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Relationship of skin blood flow to local temperature averaged across all subjects for part I. The relationship is shown for untreated (control) and capsaicin-treated sites. The relationship is shifted to the left by capsaicin treatment. LDF, laser Doppler blood flow.

The effect of capsaicin on the relationship of LDF to local temperature was related to the concentration of the capsaicin in the cream. The local temperature required for vasodilation to 50% of maximal averaged 3.1 ± 0.7°C lower at the site with the higher (0.075%) than at the site with the lower (0.025%) capsaicin concentration (P < 0.05).

Invariably, LDF and CVC at capsaicin-treated sites followed a different relationship to local temperature during the initial cooling than during the subsequent rewarming. This hysteresis in the relationship is shown in Fig. 4. It was uniformly the case that the initial cooling from normothermia was associated with higher levels of CVC at a given level of local temperature than during the subsequent rewarming (P < 0.05) and that such a hysteresis was not seen at control sites (P > 0.05). At a local temperature of 29°C, CVC at the capsaicin-treated site was 44.3 ± 8.4% maximum during cooling and 8.4 ± 2.0% maximum during the subsequent rewarming. A significant difference in CVC values at the capsaicin-treated sites was detected at local temperatures of 27 and 25°C with CVC values being 27.9 ± 5.3 and 17.0 ± 2.9% during cooling and 5.5 ± 2.0 and 4.5 ± 1.6 during rewarming, respectively. A significant difference in CVC values was not detected between local cooling and subsequent rewarming at local temperatures of 23 and 21°C (P < 0.05). CVC values were also significantly different between capsaicin-treated and control sites during the initial cooling phase (P < 0.05). For example, at local temperatures of 29°C, CVC values averaged 8.6 ± 1.8% maximum at control sites with capsaicin-treated sites averaging 44.3 ± 8.4% (P < 0.05 between sites). During rewarming at 29°C, CVC values at control and capsaicin-treated sites were 5.8 ± 1.8 and 8.4 ± 2.0% maximum, respectively (P < 0.05 between sites).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Average cutaneous vasomotor response during the initial local cooling and rewarming in part I. These relationships are shown for both untreated (control) and capsaicin-treated sites. Note that the relationship of CVC to local temperature at the capsaicin-treated site differs between the initial cooling phase and the subsequent rewarming phase. CVC values at capsaicin-treated sites were significantly different between the descending and ascending changes in local temperature (*P < 0.05). The CVC at the capsaicin-treated sites during decreasing local temperatures was also significantly different from that at control sites (#P < 0.05). CVC at control sites was not significantly different between cooling and rewarming. The order is indicated by the arrows, such that the level of skin blood flow was higher during the initial cooling for a given level of local temperature.

We also noted in part I that the local temperature at which warmth was first perceived (as reported by the subject) was also the local temperature at which CVC began to rise sharply. This was true both for the capsaicin-treated and control sites and led to part II.

Part II. Results for part II are illustrated in Fig. 5. The data in Fig. 5 were taken from times when temperature at the two sites was perceived by the subject to be equal (see Fig. 2). Because they were at the same perceived local temperatures, they were necessarily at different actual temperatures, with the untreated sites being at temperatures averaging 2.2 ± 0.4°C greater than at capsaicin-treated sites (P < 0.01). This difference is shown by the CVC-local temperature relationships indicated by lines A and C in Fig. 5. When the data from the capsaicin-pretreated sites are plotted as a function of their perceived temperature, i.e., the simultaneous temperature at the untreated sites (Fig. 5, line B), the difference between the CVC-local temperature relationships for the untreated and capsaicin-treated sites diminishes (lines B and C). At none of the times when the perceived temperatures were the same did the values for CVC, expressed as a percent of the maximum, differ statistically between untreated and capsaicin-treated sites (P > 0.1).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Results from part II of all subjects. Line A shows the relationship of CVC to local temperature for sites pretreated with capsaicin. Line B is the same CVC values, now plotted against the local temperature as perceived by the subject at those sites. Line C is data from untreated sites plotted against their actual local temperatures. Note that the separation between capsaicin-treated and untreated relationships as functions of actual local temperature diminishes when represented as functions of perceived local temperatures.

Part III. Figure 6 illustrates the response in CVC from sites perceived to be the same local temperature. ANOVA did not detect a significant difference in CVC at untreated sites when they were perceived to be the same temperature (P > 0.05). Regression of the local temperature data when the sites were perceived to be the same found a slope of 1.002 (±0.005) and R2 = 0.95 (see Fig. 6).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   A: average CVC values collected when the subjects perceived the two sites to be the same temperature: approx 38 (n = 3), approx 39 (n = 3), and approx 40°C (n = 5). These data indicate that CVC is not significantly different between sites when the two sites are perceived to be the same. B: individual CVC values when the subject perceived the control sites to be the same temperature. Linear regression of these data points produced a line significantly different from 0 (slope = 1.1, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.74). The line of identity is shown. C: local temperature values when the local temperatures at the site of blood flow measurement were considered to be the same. Regression of these data points found the linear regression line to be essentially the line of identity (slope = 1.002, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.95). The line of identity is shown.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The major new finding from this study is that cutaneous vasodilation accompanying direct local skin warming correlates better with the sensation of heat than it does with actual skin temperature. The suggestion from this study is that local warming-induced vasodilation is mediated by heat-sensitive nociceptors. In part I, we observed that pretreatment with capsaicin shifted the relationship of vasodilation to local warming and that this effect is dose dependent. Furthermore, in part I, we noted that a correlation existed between the first sensation of nonnoxious heat and the onset of cutaneous vasodilation. In part II, we observed the same degree of vasodilation (similar blood flow) at sites with different actual temperatures but similar heat sensation. Cutaneous blood flow increases induced by combined chemical and thermal stimulation were not significantly different from those induced through only thermal stimulation, when the sensation of heat was the same. In part III, we found no significant difference in CVC values or local temperatures from untreated sites on different arms warmed to the same perceived temperature. These findings led us to the conclusion that an important part of the mechanism for the vasodilator response to local warming includes activation of heat-sensitive nociceptors.

In general, neural and local mechanisms are considered as independent means of control in the circulation. That the local environment of the nerve-vascular smooth muscle junction can influence efferent neural function is now well accepted in a variety of tissues and organ systems (6, 33, 37). More recently, it has been found that responses to local stimuli by the human cutaneous circulation are dependent on neural elements. That is, the relationship between local and neural control mechanisms is more than simply modulatory. For example, the cutaneous vasoconstrictor response to local cooling is dependent on intact sympathetic nerves (30, 31) and on the availability of alpha -2 adrenoceptors (9, 24). Currently, available findings indicate that local cooling of the skin both stimulates transmitter release from vasoconstrictor nerve terminals (30, 31) and increases postsynaptic alpha -2 receptor affinity for norepinephrine (10, 27, 38). Both of these elements of the remote sympathetic control of the cutaneous circulation appear to be required for the response to local skin cooling.

The response of the cutaneous circulation to local warming does not appear to require elements of sympathetic vasoconstrictor or vasodilator nerves. Local heating of the skin can cause a marked increase in blood flow with the potential for complete relaxation of cutaneous resistance vessels and a maximal vasodilation (1, 16, 36). This degree of vasodilation is not achievable by modulation of vasoconstrictor nerve function. Neither sympathectomy (32), nerve block (8), stellate ganglion block (39), nor inhibition of neurotransmitter release from adrenergic nerve terminals (19), all of which raise skin blood flow by inhibiting or eliminating vasoconstrictor nerve function, will cause this degree of cutaneous vasodilation. Furthermore, presynaptic blockade of the cutaneous neurogenic active vasodilator system does not eliminate or obviously affect the vasodilator response to local heating (21). These observations effectively eliminate any major role for sympathetic efferent nerves in the cutaneous vasodilator response to local heating. Similarly, the dilator effects of topical capsaicin do not appear to involve sympathetic nerves (5).

Several have noted that the vasodilator response to direct skin heating extends beyond the heated area, suggesting a neurogenic component (6, 25). Brief heat stimuli were found to cause vasodilation at an 8-mm distance from the heated site, but only at temperatures considered to be nociceptive, whereas nociceptive sensations and vasodilation were not as closely correlated if the warm stimulus was more sustained (26). In either case, the data clearly support the role of an axon reflex from heat-sensitive nociceptors in mediating increases in blood flow up to 8 mm from the site of heating. However, information is lacking regarding the mechanisms of vasodilation at the site of heating during nonnociceptive stimulation. Lynn et al. (25) demonstrated that thermally induced vasodilation of porcine skin is mediated by a distinctive type of nociceptor that is sensitive both to heat and to capsaicin, but not to pressure. In part I, the sites of blood flow measurement, measured on the same arm, were separated by at least 10 cm. The distance of separation in our experiment is larger than the distance of axon reflex vasodilation conduction observed by Magerl and Treede (26) at noxious local temperatures. Furthermore, the local temperatures during parts I, II, and III were lower than the local temperature used by Magerl and Treede (26) to induce vasodilation 8 cm distant from the site of local warming. Crockford et al. (7) showed that local warming-induced vasodilation of forearm blood flow was conducted at 10 cm. However, Crockford et al. sprayed warm water over a large area of the forearm and upper arm. The results reported in this study were collected from sites where the changes in local temperature were confined to a smaller area (12 cm2), presumably stimulating a more discrete axon reflex. Thus, given the reports in the literature and the distance of separation, an axon reflex at the capsaicin-treated site is unlikely to have importantly influenced the cutaneous vascular response to local warming observed at the control site on the same arm.

A possible limitation in part I is that 5 min may not be long enough for the cutaneous vasomotor response to reach steady state at the higher local temperatures. During local temperature changes at relatively low temperatures (e.g., <40°C), vasomotor responses reach a steady state typically in 3 min. However, at higher temperatures, the time constant to reach a steady-state blood flow response in response to local temperature changes can be longer. This limitation does not change our conclusion that capsaicin pretreatment significantly lowers the threshold for local warming-induced vasodilation in a dose-dependent manner.

The origin of the hysteresis in the LDF-local temperature relationship as shown in Fig. 4 is not clear. However, it was seen only at the capsaicin-treated sites and is most likely associated with the continual stimulation by capsaicin during the 1 h before the study began. During that period, the area was simply exposed to the ambient environment, but the capsaicin may have induced significant heat-sensitive nociceptor activity. It is likely that the continued activity of those receptors over the hour caused continual secretion of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or another axon reflex transmitter, causing an increased interstitial concentration. It follows that when the pretreated area was cooled such that the heat-sensitive nociceptor activity was abolished, the secretion of sensory transmitters was halted and the interstitial levels dissipated. In this scenario, the interstitial level of transmitter would be greater for a given local temperature during the initial cooling than during the subsequent rewarming. Another possibility is that a modulatory interaction exists between sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerves activated by local cooling and the capsaicin-induced release of vasodilatory neurotransmitters. This hypothesis arises from the observation that blood flow at capsaicin-treated sites is similar to that at untreated sites only after being cooled to a moderately cold temperature and that local skin cooling stimulates vasoconstriction through adrenergic activity (6, 10, 31).

The perception of heat sensation in the human forearm is mediated by both warm receptors and heat-sensitive C fiber nociceptors. Interestingly, Green and Cruz (11) described warmth-insensitive fields in the human forearm of up to 4.8 cm2, supporting the concept that heat sensation is sensitive to and coded by spatially summated sensory information. In our study, the area of application of both capsaicin and heat of ~12 cm2 exceeded the largest warmth-insensitivity fields described by Green and Cruz. However, although warm receptors may be stimulated in our direct heating method, the relative paucity of warm receptors in the human forearm (11, 12) and the insensitivity of warm receptors to capsaicin (3) make their having a prominent role in the vasomotor response to direct heating unlikely. Interestingly, one subject in part III did not perceive warmth at a site that was heated to 42°C. Those data were not included in the analysis, but they suggest that warmth-insensitive fields described by Green and Cruz may occasionally be larger than even the 4.8 cm2 measured.

In our studies, we took advantage of the perception of increased temperature by capsaicin pretreatment as a means of separating heat-sensitive afferent activity from the actual local temperature. With this tool, we explored the vasodilator responses in directly heated areas where effects of local warming appear to differ from the effects found by Magerl and Treede (26) at nearby unheated sites. They found no vasodilation 8 mm from the site of local warming during heating from 30 to 35°C, a range of temperatures chosen for nonnociceptive stimulation of warm receptors. This was true for either brief, pulsatile heating or sustained heating. On the contrary, in the present study, we found significant vasodilation between local temperatures of 30 and 35°C at the heated sites (see Fig. 2). This is in keeping with earlier reports (1, 16, 36). Taken together, these observations suggest that heat-sensitive afferents, likely C fibers, mediate vasomotor responses to direct heating and that these responses are active at temperatures below those perceived to be painful.

Is the vasodilation with local heating a direct function of the temperature of the resistance vessels, or does that response require a neural element? Part II of this study supports the latter possibility. The vasodilator response to direct heating corresponded better to the perception of temperature than to the temperature itself (see Fig. 5). Our assumption was that a given level of heat-sensitive nociceptor stimulation, be it by physical heating or by chemical stimulation, would be perceived as a particular temperature. Blood flow did not differ significantly between untreated and capsaicin-treated sites when perceived as being at equal temperatures although actually being several degrees different. This suggests the major local stimulus for vasodilation to involve activity of heat-sensitive nociceptors and to be less dependent on the physical temperature of the resistance vessels. Furthermore, the VR is capable of mediating cationic currents that are induced by heat. Capsaicin sensitizes the VR to heat and thus amplifies the response to the heat stimulus. Caterina et al. (4) noted that VRs were only active at noxious temperatures (48°C). However, methodological differences with the present study are significant in that we tested intact human sensory function that likely includes endogenous physiological signaling mechanisms absent in transfected cell preparations.

To complete our investigation of the role of heat-sensitive nociceptors and cutaneous vasodilation, we tested whether subjects could accurately match heat sensation at untreated sites and whether blood flow differed significantly at untreated sites perceived to be the same temperature. We found that blood flow was not significantly different at untreated sites perceived to be the same (Fig. 6A) and that subjects could accurately match the local temperatures by heat sensation on their arms (Fig. 6B). The local temperatures in part III were similar to the local temperatures from the untreated sites in part II.

In summary, we have shown that chemical stimulation of heat-sensitive nociceptors shifts the vasodilator response to local warming to lower temperatures. Furthermore, these data indicate that similar levels of heat-sensitive nociceptor stimulation, whether by thermal or chemical means, cause similar levels of skin blood flow. Taken together, the findings strongly suggest that the cutaneous vasodilator response to local warming of the skin is dependent on the activation of sensory nerves (heat-sensitive nociceptors) in the area being warmed.

Perspectives

We propose a model for direct local heating-induced vasodilation whereby application of heat activates an axon reflex from heat-sensitive nociceptors, which then secrete a neurotransmitter that increases skin blood flow. In our model, local warming stimulates the heat-sensitive VR-1 receptor as described by Caterina et al. (4). Capsaicin sensitizes a population of heat-sensitive nociceptors such that the response to a given level of thermal stimulation is amplified. The stimulated heat-sensitive nociceptor then releases a vasodilatory neurotransmitter, likely CGRP (40). Minson et al. (28) and Kellogg et al. (20) found that local warming-induced vasodilation is mediated largely by nitric oxide. Furthermore, Kellogg et al. (21) found that the local warming-induced vasodilation is not mediated by the same population of nerves that mediate active vasodilation in response to whole body warming. In our model, the vasodilating neurotransmitter would stimulate nitric oxide secretion causing vasodilation. Thus at sites pretreated with capsaicin, the response to heat is amplified at the level of the afferent receptor such that more sensory neurotransmitter is released for a given thermal stimulus leading to a shifted relationship between blood flow and local temperature. Our contribution to this model is in demonstrating the physiological connection between heat sensation and vasodilation, thereby linking the in vitro studies of Caterina et al. (4) and Zygmunt et al. (40), which demonstrate the effects of capsaicin on afferent nerves, with the functional studies of Kellogg et al. (20, 21) and Magerl and Treede (26).

The results from these studies further illuminate the mechanisms involved in the cutaneous vascular response to local heating. We have demonstrated that capsaicin pretreatment sensitizes the cutaneous vasomotor response to local heating. Furthermore, results from part II demonstrate that the response in CVC to local heating is closely associated with the perceived temperature. These studies add to the model of the cutaneous vasomotor response to local heating, linking published in vitro and in vivo studies. Remaining questions include: 1) Are both CGRP and substance P involved in the vasodilatory response to local heating? 2) What is the stimulus intensity dependence for release of the vasodilatory transmitters?


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge W. A. Kosiba for expert technical assistance. We also thank the subjects for cooperation in this experiment.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-59166.

Present address of Dr. Charkoudian: Anesthesia Research, Mayo, Clinic, Rochester, MN 55095.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. M. Johnson, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900 (E-mail: Johnson{at}UTHSCSA.Edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 9 November 2000; accepted in final form 4 May 2001.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Barcroft, H, and Edholm OG. The effect of temperature on blood flow and deep temperature in the human forearm. J Physiol 102: 5-20, 1943.

2.   Baron, R, Wasner G, Borgstedt R, Hastedt E, Schulte A, Binder A, Kopper F, Rowbotham M, Levine JD, and Fields HL. Effect of sympathetic activity on capsaicin-evoked pain, hyperalgesia, and vasodilatation. Neurology 52: 923-932, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Baumann, TK, Simone DA, Shain CN, and LaMotte RH. Neurogenic hyperalgesia: the search for the primary cutaneous afferent fibers that contribute to capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia. J Neurosci 66: 212-227, 1991.

4.   Caterina, MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, and Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389: 816-824, 1997[Medline].

5.   Charkoudian, N, Fromy B, and Saumet JL. Reflex control of the cutaneous circulation after acute and chronic capsaicin. J Appl Physiol 90: 1860-1864, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Cooke, JP, Shepherd JT, and Vanhoutte PM. The effect of warming on adrenergic neurotransmission in canine cutaneous vein. Circ Res 54: 547-553, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Crockford, GW, Hellon RF, and Parkhouse J. Thermal vasomotor responses in human skin mediated by local mechanisms. J Physiol 161: 10-20, 1962.

8.   Edholm, OG, Fox RH, and MacPherson RK. Vasomotor control of the cutaneous blood vessels in the human forearm. J Physiol 139: 455-465, 1957.

9.   Ekenvall, L, Lindblad LE, Norbeck O, and Etzell BM. alpha -Adrenoceptors and cold-induced vasoconstriction in human finger skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 255: H1000-H1003, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Flavahan, NA. The role of vascular alpha 2-adrenoceptors as cutaneous thermosensors. News Physiol Sci 6: 251-255, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Green, BG, and Cruz A. "Warmth insensitive fields": evidence of sparse and irregular innervation of human skin by the warmth sense. Somatosens Mot Res 15: 269-275, 1998[ISI][Medline].

12.   Hallin, RG, Torebjörk HE, and Wiesenfeld Z. Nociceptors and warm receptors innervated by C fibers in human skin. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45: 313-319, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Holzer, P. Capsaicin: cellular targets, mechanisms of action, and selectivity for thin sensory neurons. Pharmacol Rev 43: 143-201, 1991[ISI][Medline].

14.   Holzer, P. Peptidergic sensory neurons in the control of vascular functions: mechanisms and significance in the cutaneous and splanchnic vascular beds. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 121: 49-146, 1992[ISI][Medline].

15.   Johnson, JM. The cutaneous circulation. In: Laser Doppler Blood Flowmetry, edited by Shepherd AP, and Öberg PÅ.. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1990, p. 121-140.

16.   Johnson, JM, O'Leary DS, Taylor WF, and Kosiba W. Effect of local warming on forearm reactive hyperaemia. Clin Physiol 6: 337-346, 1986[ISI][Medline].

17.   Johnson, JM, and Proppe DW. Cardiovascular adjustments to heat stress. In: Handbook of Physiology. Environmental Physiology. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1996, sect. 4, vol. I, chapt. 11, p. 215-244.

18.   Kellogg, DL, Jr, Crandall CG, Liu Y, Charkoudian N, and Johnson JM. Nitric oxide and cutaneous active vasodilation during heat stress in humans. J Appl Physiol 85: 824-829, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Kellogg, DL, Jr, Johnson JM, and Kosiba WA. Selective abolition of adrenergic vasoconstrictor responses in skin by local iontophoresis of bretylium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 257: H1599-H1606, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Kellogg, DL, Jr, Liu Y, Kosiba IF, and O'Donnell D. Role of nitric oxide in the vascular effects of local warming of the skin in humans. J Appl Physiol 86: 1185-1190, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Kellogg, DL, Jr, Pérgola PE, Piest KL, Kosiba WA, Crandall CG, Grossmann M, and Johnson JM. Cutaneous active vasodilation in humans is mediated by cholinergic nerve cotransmission. Circ Res 77: 1222-1228, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Kilo, S, Harding-Rose C, Hargreaves KM, and Flores CM. Peripheral CGRP release as a marker for neurogenic inflammation: a model system for the study of neuropeptide secretion in rat paw skin. Pain 73: 201-207, 1997[ISI][Medline].

23.   Lindblad, LE, and Ekenvall L. alpha -Adrenoceptors in the vessels of human finger skin. Acta Physiol Scand 128: 219-222, 1986[ISI][Medline].

24.   Lindblad, LE, Ekenvall L, and Klingstedt C. Neural regulation of vascular tone and cold induced vasoconstriction in human finger skin. J Auton Nerv Syst 30: 169-173, 1990[ISI][Medline].

25.   Lynn, B, Schutterle S, and Pierau FK. The vasodilator component of neurogenic inflammation is caused by a special subclass of heat-sensitive nociceptors in the skin of the pig. J Physiol (Lond) 494: 587-593, 1996[ISI][Medline].

26.   Magerl, W, and Treede RD. Heat-evoked vasodilatation in human hairy skin: axon reflexes due to low-level activity of nociceptive afferents. J Physiol (Lond) 497: 837-848, 1996[ISI][Medline].

27.   Miller, VM, and Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial alpha 2-adrenoceptors in canine pulmonary and systemic blood vessels. Eur J Pharmacol 188: 123-133, 1985.

28.   Minson, CT, Green DJ, and Joyner MJ. Role of nitric oxide and the cutaneous nerves in the initial response to local heating of the skin in humans (Abstract). FASEB J 14: A319, 2000.

29.   Öberg, PÅ. Laser Doppler flowmetry. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18: 125-163, 1990[ISI][Medline].

30.   Pérgola, PE, Johnson JM, Kellogg DL, Jr, and Kosiba WA. Control of skin blood flow by whole body and local skin cooling in exercising humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 270: H208-H215, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Pérgola, PE, Kellogg DL, Jr, Johnson JM, Kosiba WA, and Solomon DE. Role of sympathetic nerves in the vascular effects of local temperature in human forearm skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 265: H785-H792, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Roddie, IC, Shepherd JT, and Whelan RF. The vasomotor nerve supply to the skin and muscle of the human forearm. Clin Sci (Colch) 16: 67-74, 1957.

33.   Rowell, LB, Brengelmann GL, Detry JM, and Wyss C. Venomotor responses to local and remote thermal stimuli to skin in exercising man. J Appl Physiol 30: 72-77, 1971[Free Full Text].

34.   Saumet, JL, Kellogg DL, Jr, Taylor WF, and Johnson JM. Cutaneous laser-Doppler flowmetry: influence of underlying muscle blood flow. J Appl Physiol 65: 478-481, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35.   Savage, MV, and Brengelmann GL. Reproducibility of the vascular response to heating in human skin. J Appl Physiol 76: 1759-1763, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Taylor, WF, Johnson JM, O'Leary DS, and Kosiba WA. Effect of high local temperature on reflex cutaneous vasodilation. J Appl Physiol 57: 191-196, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Thomas, GD, and Victor RG. Nitric oxide mediates contraction-induced attenuation of sympathetic vasoconstriction in rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 506: 817-826, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

38.   Vanhoutte, PM. Physical factors of regulation. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Vascular Smooth Muscle. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1980, sect. 2, vol. II, chapt. 16, p. 443-474.

39.   Wenger, CB, Stephenson LA, and Durkin MA. Effect of nerve block on response of forearm blood flow to local temperature. J Appl Physiol 61: 227-232, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

40.   Zygmunt, PM, Petersson J, Andersson DA, Chuang H, Sorgard M, Di Marzo V, Julius D, and Hogestatt ED. Vanilloid receptors on sensory nerves mediate the vasodilator action of anandamide. Nature 400: 452-457, 1999[Medline].


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281(3):R894-R901
0363-6119/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Kellogg Jr., J. L. Zhao, and Y. Wu
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase control mechanisms in the cutaneous vasculature of humans in vivo
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H123 - H129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. Roosterman, T. Goerge, S. W. Schneider, N. W. Bunnett, and M. Steinhoff
Neuronal control of skin function: the skin as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1309 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Kellogg Jr
In vivo mechanisms of cutaneous vasodilation and vasoconstriction in humans during thermoregulatory challenges
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1709 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Johnson, T. C. Yen, K. Zhao, and W. A. Kosiba
Sympathetic, sensory, and nonneuronal contributions to the cutaneous vasoconstrictor response to local cooling
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1573 - H1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. O. Warner, M. J. Joyner, and N. Charkoudian
Nicotine increases initial blood flow responses to local heating of human non-glabrous skin
J. Physiol., September 15, 2004; 559(3): 975 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. A. Munce and W. L. Kenney
Age-specific modification of local cutaneous vasodilation by capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2003; 95(3): 1016 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
T. A. Munce and W. L. Kenney
Age-Specific Skin Blood Flow Responses to Acute Capsaicin
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2003; 58(4): B304 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
V. Moiseenkova, B. Bell, M. Motamedi, E. Wozniak, and B. Christensen
Wide-band spectral tuning of heat receptors in the pit organ of the copperhead snake (Crotalinae)
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2003; 284(2): R598 - R606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Saumet, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Saumet, J. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online