Vol. 281, Issue 3, R902-R908, September 2001
Gastrin-releasing peptides from Xenopus
laevis: purification, characterization, and myotropic
activity
Joseph B.
Kim1,
Ågot
Johansson2,
Susanne
Holmgren2, and
J. Michael
Conlon1
1 Regulatory Peptide Center, Department of Biomedical
Sciences, Creighton University Medical School, Omaha, Nebraska
68178; and 2 Zoological Institute, Department of
Zoophysiology, Göteborg University, SE 40530 Göteborg,
Sweden
 |
ABSTRACT |
Two
molecular forms of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) were isolated from
an extract of the intestine of the tetraploid frog Xenopus
laevis. The primary structure of GRP-1
(APTSQQHTEQ10LSRSNINTRG20 SHWAVGHLM.NH2)
differs from that of GRP-2 by a single amino acid substitution
(Asn15
Thr15). GRP-(20-29)
peptide (neuromedin C) was also isolated from the extract. Synthetic
GRP-1 produced concentration-dependent contractions of longitudinal
smooth muscle strips from Xenopus cardiac stomach (pD2 = 8.93 ± 0.32; n = 6). The
responses were unaffected by tetrodotoxin, atropine, and methysergide,
indicating a direct action of the peptide on smooth muscle cells. GRP-1
elicited concentration-dependent relaxations of precontracted (5 µM
carbachol) circular smooth muscle strips from the same region
(pD2 = 8.96 ± 0.21; n = 8). The
responses were significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated
(71 ± 24% decrease in maximum response; n = 6)
by indomethacin, indicating mediation, at least in part, by
prostanoids. Despite the fact that Xenopus GRP-1 differs
from pig GRP at 15 amino acid sites, both peptides are equipotent and
equally effective for both contractile and relaxant responses,
demonstrating that selective evolutionary pressure has acted to
conserve the functional COOH-terminal domain in the peptide. The data
suggest a physiologically important role for GRP in the regulation of
gastric motility in X. laevis.
neuromedin C; amphibian; stomach; prostanoid
 |
INTRODUCTION |
GASTRIN-RELEASING
PEPTIDE (GRP), first isolated from an extract of porcine
nonantral gastric tissue (16), belongs to a family of
structurally related peptides whose members include bombesin from the
skin of the frog Bombina bombina (1), alytensin
from the skin of Alytes obstetricans (1), and
neuromedin B (19) and neuromedin C (NMC) (20)
from porcine spinal cord. NMC represents the COOH-terminal decapeptide
of GRP, and structure-activity studies have shown that this peptide
possesses the full biological potency and efficacy of GRP (14,
24). These peptides share the common sequence
Trp-Ala-Xaa-Gly-His-Leu-Met.NH2 at their COOH termini. GRP
was originally regarded as the mammalian ortholog of bombesin, but
subsequent work demonstrated that the stomach and brain of Bombina express a gene encoding a peptide structurally
similar to GRP as well as the gene encoding bombesin (21).
Similarly, both GRP and NMC were isolated from an extract of the brain
of the frog Rana ridibunda, whereas bombesin was absent
(4).
In mammals, GRP is localized exclusively to nerves distributed
throughout the gastrointestinal tract, but immunohistochemical studies
have demonstrated that in gastric tissues of the frogs, Rana
pipiens, Rana catesbeiana, and Xenopus
laevis, GRP is also produced in endocrine-like cells in the antral
and fundic mucosa (12). Roles for GRP in the regulation of
a wide range of mammalian physiological processes have been proposed.
These include gastric motility, antral cell proliferation, feeding
behavior, neuroendocrine secretion, pancreatic exocrine secretion, and
thermoregulation (reviewed in Ref. 2). However, the
biological actions of an amphibian GRP in an amphibian have not been
investigated. This study involves the purification of two molecular
forms of GRP and NMC from an extract of the intestine of the African
clawed frog Xenopus laevis (Anura: Pipidae) and an
investigation of the effects of Xenopus GRP on the motility
of longitudinal and circular smooth muscle from the cardiac stomach of
the animal.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Radioimmunoassay.
GRP-like immunoreactivity (GRP-LI) was measured by
radioimmunoassay using antiserum R354, raised against porcine GRP, as
previously described (26). The antiserum shows full molar
cross-reactivity with bombesin and NMC.
Tissue extraction.
All experimental procedures were approved by University of
Göteborg Ethical Committee. Adult specimens of X. laevis
of both sexes (n = 60; body wt 60-110 g) were
supplied by Horst Kähler, Bedarf für Forschung und Lehre,
Hamburg, Germany. Animals were anesthetized by immersion in 0.1%
3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester in water buffered with
NaHCO3 to pH 7.4. The intestine and stomach were removed by
dissection immediately after death and stored at
55°C until time of
extraction. Tissue (92 g) was homogenized with ethanol-0.7 M HCl (3:1
by vol; 10 ml/g) using a Waring blender and stirred for 2 h at
0°C. After centrifugation (1,600 g, 30 min, 4°C),
ethanol was removed from the supernatant under reduced pressure. After
a further centrifugation (1,600 g, 30 min, 4°C), the
extract was pumped at a flow rate of 2 ml/min through six Sep-Pak
C18 cartridges (Waters Associates, Milford, MA) connected in series. Bound material was eluted with
acetonitrile-water-trifluoroacetic acid (70.0:29.9:0.1 by vol) and
freeze-dried.
Purification of Xenopus GRP.
The intestinal extract, after partial purification on Sep-Pak
cartridges, was redissolved in 1 M acetic acid (5 ml) and
chromatographed on a 100 × 2.5-cm column of Sephadex G-25
(Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated with 1 M acetic acid at a
flow rate of 48 ml/h. Absorbance was measured at 280 nm, and fractions
(8 ml) were collected. GRP-LI in the fractions was measured at a
dilution of 1:30. The fractions containing GRP-LI from gel permeation
chromatography (denoted by the bar designated GRP in Fig.
1) were pooled and pumped at a flow rate
of 2 ml/min onto a 25 × 1-cm Vydac 218TP510 (C18)
reverse-phase HPLC column (Separations Group, Hesperia, CA)
equilibrated with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid-water. The concentration of acetonitrile in the eluting solvent was increased to 21% over 10 min, followed by an increase to 49% over 60 min using linear gradients. Absorbance was measured at 214 and 280 nm, and fractions (1 min) were collected. The fraction containing GRP-LI (denoted by the bar
in Fig. 2A) was
rechromatographed on a 25 × 0.46-cm Vydac 214TP54
(C4) column equilibrated with
acetonitrile-water-trifluoroacetic acid (21.0:78.9:0.1 by vol) at a
flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The concentration of acetonitrile in the
eluting solvent was raised to 35% over 40 min using a linear gradient.
Xenopus GRP-1 and GRP-2 were separately purified to apparent
homogeneity by successive chromatographies at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min
on 25 × 0.46-cm Vydac 219TP54 phenyl and 25 × 0.46-cm Vydac
218TP54 (C18) columns using the same elution conditions for
the C4 column.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Gel permeation chromatography on a Sephadex G-25 column
of an extract of Xenopus intestine after partial
purification on Sep-Pak cartridges. The fractions denoted by
gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) contain GRP-1 and GRP-2 and the
fractions denoted by NMC contain neuromedin C. ABS280,
absorbance at 280 nm.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Reverse-phase HPLC on a semi-preparative Vydac 218TP510
(C18) column of fractions from gel permeation
chromatography containing GRP (A) and fractions from gel
permeation chromatography containing NMC (B). The fractions
(1 min) containing GRP-like immunoreactivity, denoted by the bars, were
pooled for further purification. The dashed line shows the
concentration of acetonitrile in the eluting solvent.
|
|
Purification of Xenopus NMC.
The later-eluting fractions containing GRP-LI from gel permeation
chromatography (denoted by the bar designated NMC in Fig. 1) were
pooled and pumped at a flow rate of 2 ml/min onto a 25 × 1-cm
Vydac 218TP510 (C18) HPLC column equilibrated with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid-water. The concentration of acetonitrile in the
eluting solvent was increased to 35% over 60 min using linear
gradients. Absorbance was measured at 214 and 280 nm, and fractions (1 min) were collected. The fraction containing GRP-LI (denoted by the bar
in Fig. 2B) was rechromatographed on Vydac C4, Vydac phenyl, and Vydac C18 columns under
the same conditions used for purification of Xenopus GRP.
Structural characterization.
The primary structures of the peptides were determined by
automated Edman degradation using a Perkin Elmer model 491A sequenator. Electrospray mass spectrometry was carried out using a Perkin Elmer
Sciex API 150EX single quadrupole instrument. The accuracy of mass
determinations was ±0.05%.
Peptide synthesis.
Xenopus GRP-1 (APTSQQHTEQ10 LSRSNINTRG20
SHWA VGHLM.NH2) was synthesized on a
4-(2',4'-dimethoxy-phenyl-Fmoc-aminomethyl) phenoxyacetamidoethyl resin
(Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) (0.025- mmol scale) using an Applied
Biosystems peptide synthesizer (model 432A). Fmoc amino acid
derivatives were activated with
O-benzotriazol-1-yl-N,N,N',N'-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (0.075 mmol), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole
hydrate (0.075 mmol), and diisopropylethylamine (0.150 mmol) as
previously described (22). The peptide was cleaved from
the resin with trifluoroacetic acid-water-thioanisole-1,2-ethanedithiol
(99.0:0.50:0.25:0.25 by vol) at 25°C for 3 h.
The crude product was partially purified by gel permeation
chromatography on a 2.5 × 100-cm Sephadex G-25 column
equilibrated with 1 M acetic acid at a flow rate of 48 ml/h. Fractions
containing the synthetic GRP were identified by mass spectrometry, and
the peptide was further purified by reverse-phase HPLC on a 25 × 1-cm Vydac 218TP510 (C18) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. The
concentration of acetonitrile in the eluting solvent was raised from 14 to 35% over 40 min. The identity of the synthetic peptide was
confirmed by mass spectrometry (observed molecular mass 3,243.5 Da,
calculated molecular mass 3,243.6) and automated Edman degradation. The
purity of the synthetic peptide was >95%.
Myotropic activity.
Male and female specimens (55-110 g) of X. laevis
were killed as previously described. The stomach was surgically removed and opened by cutting along the lesser curvature from the opening at
the pylorus to the cardiac stomach. The cardiac stomach was dissected
into strips (2.5 × 7 mm) oriented in the direction of either the
longitudinal or circular smooth muscle. Each strip was mounted between
the fittings of a Somedic Sales AB (Farsta, Sweden) differential
pressure transducer by cotton strings tied at each end. The mounted
strips were kept in glass organ baths containing 5 ml of modified
McKenzie's toad Ringer solution (composition in g/l: 6.22 NaCl, 1.68 NaHCO3, 1.30 HEPES, 0.24 KCl, 0.35 MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.19 CaCl2,
3.0 glucose). The McKenzie's solution was maintained at 20°C and
aerated with 0.03% CO2 in air to give a pH between 7.8 and
8.0. A Grass Model 7 Polygraph (Quincy, MA) was used to measure force.
The strips were placed under an initial force of 10 mN, washed every 30 min with McKenzie's solution, and allowed to equilibrate at least
1 h.
The effects of Xenopus GRP-1 or porcine GRP (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) on the force generated in the longitudinal muscle strips were obtained by cumulative addition of the peptides in the
concentration range 10
11-10
7 M. At the end
of the experiment, the contractile responses to KCl (60 mM) were
determined. This concentration of KCl produced a maximal (or near
maximal) response in the preparation. Circular smooth muscle strips
were precontracted with carbachol (5 µM) to constant tension, and the
effects of either Xenopus GRP-1
(10
11-10
7) or porcine GRP on the force
generated were measured by cumulative addition. In a further series of
experiments, the effects of a 30-min preincubation with 1)
tetrodotoxin (1 µM), 2) atropine (10 µM), and
3) methysergide (10 µM) on the Xenopus
GRP-induced contractions of the longitudinal muscle strips were
determined. The effect on the Xenopus GRP-induced
relaxations of the circular muscle strips (precontracted with 5 µM
carbachol) pretreated with indomethacin (10 µM) for 30 min was also investigated.
Statistical analysis.
The data were analyzed by measuring the change in average force
generated over a 3-min period at each concentration of GRP for each
individual tissue preparation. Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-rank
test was used to analyze the effects of drugs on the responses to
Xenopus GRP-1 and differences between the responses to
porcine GRP and Xenopus GRP-1. P values <0.05
were considered to indicate a significant difference.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of Xenopus GRP.
The GRP-LI in the extract of Xenopus intestine, after
partial purification on Sep-Pak C18 cartridges, was eluted
from a Sephadex G-25 gel permeation column in two zones that were
subsequently shown to contain GRP and NMC (Fig. 1). The fractions
denoted by the GRP bar in Fig. 1 were pooled and chromatographed on a
semipreparative Vydac C18 column (Fig. 2A).
GRP-LI was eluted in the single fraction denoted by the bar.
Rechromatography of this material on an analytic Vydac C4
column resulted in the separation of the GRP-LI into two discrete
fractions associated with the well-defined peaks designated
1 and 2 (Fig.
3A). Peak 1 (containing GRP-1) and peak 2 (containing GRP-2) were each
separately rechromatographed on an analytic Vydac phenyl column (Fig.
3, B and C). Both peptides were purified to near
homogeneity, as assessed by a symmetrical peak shape and mass
spectrometry, by a final chromatography on an analytic Vydac
C18 column. The final yields of the pure peptides were
GRP-1 500 pmol and GRP-2 150 pmol.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Purification by reverse-phase HPLC of Xenopus
GRP on an analytic Vydac 214TP54 (C4) column
(A) and analytic Vydac 219TP54 (phenyl) column (B
and C). Individual peaks were collected by hand, and the
arrows indicate where peak collection began and ended. Peak
1 contains GRP-1 and peak 2 contains GRP-2.
|
|
Purification of Xenopus NMC.
The later-eluting fractions from the Sephadex G-25 column containing
GRP-LI (Fig. 1) were pooled and chromatographed on a semipreparative
Vydac C18 column (Fig. 2B). GRP-LI was eluted in
the fractions denoted by the bar that were subsequently shown to
contain NMC. The peptide was purified to near homogeneity by successive
chromatographies on analytic Vydac C4 and phenyl columns (chromatograms not shown), and the final yield of pure peptide was
~400 pmol.
Peptide characterization.
The primary structures of Xenopus GRP-1 and GRP-2 were
established by automated Edman degradation, and their amino acid
sequences are shown in Fig. 4. The
peptides are identical except for a single amino acid substitution at
position 15 (Asn
Thr). The primary structure of Xenopus
NMC was established as Gly-Ser-His-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-Met, which corresponds to the amino acid sequence of the common
COOH-terminal decapeptide of GRP-1 and GRP-2. The presence of a COOH
terminally
-amidated residue in the peptides was demonstrated by
mass spectrometry [GRP-1 observed relative molecular mass
(Mr) = 3,243.8 Da, calculated Mr = 3,243.6 Da; GRP-2 observed
Mr = 3,230.5 Da, calculated
Mr 3,230.6 Da; and NMC observed
Mr = 1,092.8 Da, calculated
Mr = 1,092.8 Da]. The calculated masses
refer to the COOH terminally
-amidated forms of the peptides.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A comparison of the amino acid sequences of Xenopus
GRP-1 and GRP-2 with the corresponding sequences of GRP-related
peptides from species of other vertebrate taxa. , Residue identity.
Residue deletions denoted by * are inserted into some sequences to
maximize structural similarity, but the positions of these deletions
are arbitrary.
|
|
Myotropic activity.
Both Xenopus GRP-1 and porcine GRP produced a dose-dependent
increase in the tension of longitudinal smooth muscle strips from the
cardiac stomach of X. laevis (Fig.
5). The peptides produced an increase in
the frequency and intensity of spontaneous rhythmic contractions in the
strips so that the data points in Fig. 5 refer to the average force
generated over a 3-min recording period. The potencies of both peptides
were not significantly different (pD2 = 8.93 ± 0.32 for Xenopus GRP-1 and pD2 = 8.23 ± 0.32 for porcine GRP; n = 6). Similarly, the maximum
increases in average tension induced by porcine GRP and
Xenopus GRP-1 were not significantly different (29.2 ± 7.7 and 20.9 ± 6.8% of the response to 60 mM KCl, respectively;
n = 6).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of increasing concentrations of synthetic
Xenopus GRP-1 (xGRP) and porcine GRP (pGRP) on the
contraction of isolated longitudinal smooth muscle strips from
Xenopus cardiac stomach. Data are expressed as % of the
maximum response produced by 60 mM KCl in the same strip (means ± SE; n = 6).
|
|
Both Xenopus GRP-1 and porcine GRP produced a dose-dependent
decrease in the average force generated in circular smooth muscle strips from the cardiac stomach that had been precontracted with 5 µM
carbachol (Fig. 6). There were no
significant differences between the two peptides in potency
(Xenopus GRP-1, pD2 = 8.96 ± 0.21;
porcine GRP, pD2 = 8.92 ± 0.43;
n = 8) and efficacy (maximum decrease in force:
Xenopus GRP-1, 123 ± 35%; porcine GRP, 90 ± 12%; n = 8).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of increasing concentrations of synthetic xGRP
and pGRP on the relaxation of precontracted isolated circular smooth
muscle strips from Xenopus cardiac stomach. Data points show
means ± SE; n = 8. The 100% value represents
baseline force before addition of carbachol (5 µM).
|
|
The ability of Xenopus GRP-1 to contract longitudinal smooth
muscle strips was not significantly affected by preincubation with
tetrodotoxin [pD2 = 8.94 ± 0.47 (control) vs.
8.42 ± 0.92 (treated); n = 5], atropine (pD = 8.68 ± 0.23 vs. 8.88 ± 0.20; n = 5), and
methysergide (pD2 = 9.29 ± 0.43 vs. 9.44 ± 0.25; n = 5). Preincubation of the circular muscle
strips with indomethacin (10 µM) produced a significant (71 ± 24%; n = 6) decrease in the maximum relaxant response
produced by Xenopus GRP-1 (Fig.
7).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of indomethacin (10 µM) on the ability of
Xenopus GRP-1 to contract isolated longitudinal smooth
muscle strips from Xenopus cardiac stomach. Data are
expressed as % of the maximum response produced by the peptide
(means ± SE; n = 6).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The African clawed frog Xenopus laevis is believed to
have arisen following a tetraploidization event occurring in an
ancestral species ~30 million years ago (8) and, as a
result, expresses two nonallelic copies of many genes that encode
neuroendocrine peptides. Examples of genes in X. laevis that
have been identified in two copies include insulin, growth hormone,
corticotropin-releasing hormone, proenkephalin A, cholecystokinin,
proopiomelanocortin, and pancreatic polypeptide (reviewed in Ref.
11). Although gene duplication may lead to the evolution
of a new gene having a new function, an alternative outcome
following polyploidization is that one copy of the gene will
eventually accumulate sufficient deleterious mutations that it is no
longer expressed, i.e., becomes a pseudogene (29). The
isolation of two forms of GRP from the intestine of X. laevis that differ only by a single amino acid substitution
(Asn15
Thr) demonstrates that both genes are expressed
and encode functional peptides. The extent of the difference in
sequence between the two isoforms of Xenopus regulatory
peptides encoded by the duplicated genes is quite variable. For
example, the two isoforms of corticotropin-releasing hormone are
identical, neuropeptide Y and pancreatic polypeptide, similar to GRP,
differ by one residue, whereas one of the isoforms of peptide
tyrosine-tyrosine appears to have undergone an accelerated rate of
mutation with the result that the two isoforms differ by six residues
(11). There have been few studies comparing the biological
activities of the two isoforms of the Xenopus peptides, but
it has been reported that Xenopus prolactin-II is more
potent than prolactin-I in suppressing the thyroid hormone-induced
resorption of the larval tail, suggesting that the isoforms may be
evolving toward specialized functions (31).
In Fig. 4, the amino acid sequences of Xenopus GRP-1 and
GRP-2 are compared with the corresponding sequences of GRP from pig (16), human (27), chicken (15),
the alligator Alligator mississipiensis (30),
the amphibian Bombina orientalis (21), the
rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Teleostei)
(10), and the spotted dogfish Scyliorhinus
canicula (Elasmobranchii) (3). The data show that
evolutionary pressure to conserve the structure of GRP has been very
selective. The amino acid sequence at the NH2-terminal
region of the peptide has not been conserved at all during the
evolution of vertebrates, whereas the COOH-terminal domain has been
fully conserved except for the single conservative substitution
(Ser
Asn) at the site corresponding to position 2 in NMC. The single
arginine residue that constitutes the site of proteolytic cleavage in
the generation of NMC has also been fully conserved. Our findings that
myotropic activities of Xenopus GRP-1 and porcine GRP are
indistinguishable demonstrate that evolutionary pressure has acted to
conserve only the functionally important domain in GRP.
Xenopus GRP-2 differs from Xenopus GRP-1 by a
single amino acid substitution in a region of the peptide that is
outside this domain, and so it is highly probable that
Xenopus GRP-2 is equipotent with GRP-1. Consistent with
previous work with R. ridibunda brain
(4), bombesin was not identified in the extract of
Xenopus gut, providing further support for the assertion
that the bombesin gene is expressed only in tissue of frogs of the
genus Bombina as a result of a localized gene duplication
event within that lineage (21).
The inability of tetrodotoxin (a sodium channel blocker), atropine (a
muscarinic receptor antagonist), and methysergide (an antagonist of
5-hydroxytryptamine) to modify the response to Xenopus longitudinal gastric smooth muscle to Xenopus GRP-1 suggests
that the peptide interacts directly with receptors on the smooth muscle to produce contraction. In contrast, the significant attenuation of the
response of the circular smooth muscle by indomethacin, an inhibitor of
cyclooxygenase, indicates that the ability of GRP to relax this
preparation is mediated, at least in part, by synthesis of prostanoids.
The dual contractile and relaxant effects of Xenopus GRP-1
on Xenopus gastric smooth muscle are appreciably different
from the effects of porcine GRP (and/or bombesin) on gastrointestinal smooth muscle preparations from different species of mammal. Porcine GRP produced concentration-dependent contractions of both circular and
longitudinal muscle strips isolated from different regions of human
stomach and longitudinally cut strips from human duodenum (23). Circularly cut human duodenal strips showed no
response to GRP (23). Longitudinal muscle strips from the
human ileocecal region showed an increase in rhythmic activity in
response to GRP, whereas circular muscle strips were unresponsive or
showed a small decrease in tone (28). GRP and bombesin
stimulated the spontaneously occurring contractions of both
longitudinal and circular muscle from the antrum and corpus of the
canine stomach (13, 14). The bombesin-stimulated
contractions of longitudinal muscle involve the mediation of neuronally
released acetylcholine, whereas the effects on contractions of circular
muscle are myogenic. Circular smooth muscle strips from cat esophagus,
fundus, and duodenum and longitudinal strips from the duodenum
responded to NMC with tetrodotoxin- and atropine-resistant contractions
(18). Direct contractile effects of GRP and bombesin have
been demonstrated using freshly dispersed muscle cells from the guinea
pig stomach (25) and from the longitudinal and circular
muscle layers of human jejunum (17). In the latter case,
cells from the circular and longitudinal muscle layers showed identical
contractile responses.
Perspectives
Evidence that GRP plays a physiologically important role in the
regulation of gastric motility in mammals is strong (reviewed in Ref.
2). In the rat stomach, for example, the oxyntic and antral mucosa and the circular muscle layer are richly innervated by
GRP-containing fibers that are also present in the myenteric plexus,
submuscosal plexus, and longitudinal muscle layer (5). Studies in vivo have shown that exogenous GRP and related peptides inhibit the rate of gastric emptying of liquid test meals in rats (32). Our findings that endogenous GRP potently stimulates
the contraction of longitudinal smooth muscle and relaxes circular smooth muscle in Xenopus stomach suggest that the peptide is
important in the regulation of gastric motility in this amphibian. Our
data are thus consistent with an earlier immunohistochemical study showing the myenteric plexus and circular muscle layer of the stomach
of the mudpuppy Necturus maculosus (Amphibia: Caudata) are
richly innervated by GRP-containing fibers (7). In this species, however, the effects of bombesin on isolated gastric longitudinal smooth muscle preparations were variable, although the
peptide had a clear inhibitory effect on the spontaneous rhythmic activity of circular muscle strips.
The demonstration that Xenopus GRP shows potent effects on
Xenopus gastric motility in vitro warrants further studies
in vivo to demonstrate unequivocally that the peptide has a
physiologically important role in the regulation of gastric function in
this species. In particular, it is proposed to study the effects of
intra-arterial infusions of synthetic Xenopus GRP on gastric
motility and gastrointestinal blood flow in anesthetized
Xenopus specimens using the same methodology used to measure
these parameters in fish (9). Similarly, further insight
in the physiological role of GRP in an amphibian will be gained by
studying the effects of Xenopus GRP on the release of
gastrin and the secretion of gastric acid in the in situ isolated perfused Xenopus stomach (6).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank E. Lovas, Creighton University Medical School, for mass
spectrometry measurements.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (EPS-9720643
and INT-9732434) and the Swedish Natural Science Research Council.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. M. Conlon, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Creighton Univ. Medical School, Omaha, NE 68178-0405 (E-mail:
jmconlon{at}creighton.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 12 January 2001; accepted in final form 10 May 2001.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Anastasi, A,
Erspamer V,
and
Bucci M.
Isolation and structure of bombesin and alytensin, two analogous active peptides from the skin of the European amphibians, Bombina and Alytes.
Experientia
27:
166-167,
1971[ISI][Medline].
2.
Bunnett, N.
Gastrin-releasing peptide.
In: Gut Peptides: Biochemistry and Physiology, , edited by Walsh JH,
and Dockray GJ.. New York: Raven, 1994, p. 423-445.
3.
Conlon, JM,
Henderson IW,
and
Thim L.
Gastrin-releasing peptide from the intestine of the elasmobranch fish, Scyliorhinus canicula (common dogfish).
Gen Comp Endocrinol
68:
415-420,
1987[ISI][Medline].
4.
Conlon, JM,
O'Harte F,
and
Vaudry H.
Primary structures of the bombesin-like neuropeptides in frog brain show that bombesin is not the amphibian gastrin-releasing peptide.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
178:
526-530,
1991[ISI][Medline].
5.
Dockray, GJ,
Vaillant C,
and
Walsh JH.
The neuronal original of bombesin-like immunoreactivity in the rat gastrointestinal tract.
Neuroscience
4:
1561-1568,
1979[ISI][Medline].
6.
Guo, Y-S,
Mok L,
Cooper CW,
Greeley GH,
Thompson JC,
and
Singh P.
Effect of gastrin-releasing peptide analogues on gastrin and somatostatin release from isolated rat stomach.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
253:
G206-G210,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Holmgren, S,
Jensen J,
Jönsson AC,
Lundin K,
and
Nilsson S.
Neuropeptides in the gastrointestinal canal of Necturus maculosus.
Cell Tissue Res
241:
565-580,
1985[ISI][Medline].
8.
Hughes, MK,
and
Hughes AL.
Evolution of duplicate genes in a tetraploid animal, Xenopus laevis.
Mol Biol Evol
10:
1360-1369,
1993[Abstract].
9.
Jensen, J,
Axelsson M,
and
Holmgren S.
Effects of substance P and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide on gastrointestinal blood flow in the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua.
J Exp Biol
156:
361-373,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Jensen, J,
and
Conlon JM.
Isolation and primary structure of gastrin-releasing peptide from a teleost fish, the trout (Oncorhynchus mykissi).
Peptides
13:
995-999,
1992[ISI][Medline].
11.
Kim, JB,
Johansson Å,
and
Conlon JM.
Anomalous rates of evolution of pancreatic polypeptide and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY) in a tetraploid frog, Xenopus laevis (Anura:Pipidae).
Peptides
22:
317-323,
2001[ISI][Medline].
12.
Lechago, J,
Holmquist AL,
Rosenquist GL,
and
Walsh JH.
Localization of bombesin-like peptides in frog gastric mucosa.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
36:
553-558,
1978[ISI][Medline].
13.
Mayer, EA,
Elashoff J,
and
Walsh JH.
Characterization of bombesin effects on canine gastric muscle.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
243:
G141-G147,
1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Mayer, EA,
Reeve JR, Jr,
Khawaja S,
Chew P,
Elashoff J,
Clark B,
and
Walsh JH.
Potency of natural and synthetic canine gastrin-releasing decapeptide on canine antral muscle.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
250:
G581-G587,
1986.
15.
McDonald, TJ,
Jornvall H,
Ghatei M,
Bloom SR,
and
Mutt V.
Characterization of an avian gastric (proventricular) peptide having sequence homology with the porcine gastrin-releasing peptide and the amphibian peptides bombesin and alytensin.
FEBS Lett
122:
45-48,
1980[ISI][Medline].
16.
McDonald, TJ,
Jornvall H,
Nilsson G,
Vagne M,
Ghatei M,
Bloom SR,
and
Mutt V.
Characterization of gastrin-releasing peptide from porcine non-antral gastric tissue.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
90:
227-233,
1979[ISI][Medline].
17.
Micheletti, R,
Grider JR,
and
Makhlouf GM.
Identification of bombesin receptors on isolated muscle cells from human intestine.
Regul Pept
21:
219-226,
1988[ISI][Medline].
18.
Milusheva, EA,
Kortezova NI,
Mizhorkova ZN,
Papasova M,
Coy DH,
Balint A,
Vizi ES,
and
Varga G.
Role of different bombesin receptor subtypes mediating contractile activity in cat upper gastrointestinal tract.
Peptides
19:
549-556,
1998[ISI][Medline].
19.
Minamino, N,
Kangawa K,
and
Matsuo H.
Neuromedin B: a novel bombesin-like peptide identified in porcine spinal cord.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
114:
541-548,
1983[ISI][Medline].
20.
Minamino, N,
Kangawa K,
and
Matsuo H.
Neuromedin C: a bombesin-like peptide identified in porcine spinal cord.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
119:
14-20,
1984[ISI][Medline].
21.
Nagalla, SR,
Gibson BW,
Tang D,
Reeve JR,
and
Spindel ER.
Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) is not mammalian bombesin.
J Biol Chem
267:
6916-6922,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Platzack, B,
Schaffert C,
Hazon N,
and
Conlon JM.
Cardiovascular actions of dogfish urotensin I in the dogfish Scyliorhinus canicula.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
109:
269-275,
1998[ISI][Medline].
23.
Pogrzeba, B,
Mandrek K,
Lüdtke FE,
Lepsien G,
and
Golenhofen K.
Contractile action of gastrin-releasing peptide on isolated preparations of human gastroduodenal muscle.
Dig Dis
9:
354-359,
1991[ISI][Medline].
24.
Rouissi, N,
Rhaleb NE,
Nantel F,
Dion S,
Drapeau G,
and
Regoli D.
Characterization of bombesin receptors in peripheral contractile organs.
Br J Pharmacol
103:
1141-1147,
1991[ISI][Medline].
25.
Severi, C,
Jensen RT,
and
Erspamer V.
Different receptors mediate the action of bombesin-related peptides on gastric smooth muscle cells.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
260:
G683-G690,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Shaw, C,
Thim L,
and
Conlon JM.
Primary structure and tissue distribution of guinea pig gastrin-releasing peptide.
J Neurochem
49:
1348-1354,
1987[ISI][Medline].
27.
Spindel, ER,
Chin WW,
Price J,
Rees LH,
Besser GM,
and
Habener JF.
Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding human gastrin-releasing peptide.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
81:
5699-5703,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Vadokas, B,
Lüdtke F-E,
Lepsien G,
Golenhofen K,
and
Mandrek K.
Effects of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) on the mechanical activity of the human ileocaecal region in vitro.
Neurogastroenterol Motil
9:
265-270,
1997[ISI][Medline].
29.
Wagner, A.
The fate of duplicated genes: loss or new function.
Bioessays
20:
785-788,
1998[ISI][Medline].
30.
Wang, Y,
and
Conlon JM.
Neuroendocrine peptides (NPY, GRP, VIP, somatostatin) from the brain and stomach of the alligator.
Peptides
14:
573-579,
1993[ISI][Medline].
31.
Yamashita, K,
Matsuda K,
Hayashi H,
Hanaoka Y,
Tanaka S,
Yamamoto K,
and
Kikuyama S.
Isolation and characterization of two forms of Xenopus prolactin.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
91:
307-317,
1993[ISI][Medline].
32.
Yegen, BC,
Gurbuz V,
Coskun T,
Bozkurt A,
Kurtel H,
Alican I,
and
Dockray GJ.
Inhibitory effects of gastrin-releasing peptide on gastric emptying in rats.
Regul Pept
61:
175-180,
1996[ISI][Medline].
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281(3):R902-R908
0363-6119/01 $5.00
Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society