Vol. 281, Issue 4, R1161-R1168, October 2001
Estradiol impairs hyposmoregulatory capacity in the euryhaline
tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus
Mathilakath M.
Vijayan1,
Akihiro
Takemura2, and
Thomas P.
Mommsen3
1 Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo,
Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1; 2 Sesoko Station, Tropical
Biosphere Research Project, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa,
Japan 905-0227; and 3 Department of Biochemistry and
Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia,
Canada V8W 3P6
 |
ABSTRACT |
Freshwater (FW)-adapted
tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) were treated with
estradiol (E2) for 4 days to stimulate protein synthesis
and sampled at 0, 4, and 24 h after exposure to 50% seawater
(SW). E2 increased circulating vitellogenin (VTG) levels in
large amounts, indicative of unusually high rates of hepatic protein
synthesis. E2 treatment prevented the recovery of plasma osmolality in 50% SW that was evident in the sham group. Plasma sodium
concentration was significantly elevated with E2 in FW, but
the levels did not change in 50% SW. Gill
Na+-K+-ATPase activity was significantly lower
in the E2 group compared with sham-injected tilapia in 50%
SW. No significant differences were noted in plasma cortisol,
thyroxine, triiodothyronine, or glucose concentration with
E2 in 50% SW. E2 significantly lowered several
key liver enzyme activities and also decreased gill lactate dehydrogenase and malate dehydrogenase activities over a 24-h period.
Together, our results suggest that E2 impairs ion
regulation in tilapia, partially mediated by a decreased metabolic
capacity in liver and gill. The decreased tissue metabolic capacity is likely due to E2-induced energy repartitioning processes
that are geared toward VTG synthesis at the expense of other
energy-demanding pathways.
stress; intermediary metabolism; vitellogenin; ion regulation; gill
sodium-potassium-adenosinetriphosphatase
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE MOZAMBIQUE
TILAPIA (Oreochromis mossambicus) tolerates wide
ranges in salinity attributable to efficient ion-regulating mechanisms
(6, 7). Transient changes in gill chloride cell dynamics including Na+-K+-ATPase activity play
a key role in the ion regulation process after seawater (SW) exposure
in this species (5, 9, 11). Changes seen in SW-exposed
gills argue for a temporary increase in the epithelial cell energetics
to maintain ion balance. Indeed, the short-term energetic cost
associated with SW acclimation is as high as 20% of the total body
metabolism in O. mossambicus (27). As protein
synthesis accounts for the majority of the energetic costs
(29), the higher oxygen consumption rate upon SW transfer
may be due to the transient increases in chloride cell biogenesis
and/or including the synthesis of ion pumps and ion channels
(13).
The increased energy demand at the gills is predominantly supported by
oxidation of glucose obtained from the circulation (23, 24,
30). As liver is the main site for glucose production, the
metabolic demand imposed on this tissue in SW would be greater, especially since gluconeogenesis is energetically expensive. Therefore, any alteration in the availability, mobilization, or oxidation of
energy substrates will likely affect the SW acclimation process. To
this end, studies with food-deprived O. mossambicus
confirmed that a decreased energy status did indeed compromise the
ability of this euryhaline species to cope with SW transfer
(34). Food-deprived fish were able to mount metabolic and
hormonal responses crucial for SW acclimation, while being unable to
regulate plasma ion levels in SW compared with fed fish
(34). Together, the results suggest that ion transport
mechanism(s) may be tightly linked to the prior energy status and/or
the energetic demand imposed upon the animal.
In this study, we specifically tested the hypothesis that high rates of
protein synthesis induced by estradiol (E2) will compromise the ability to cope with exposure to 50% SW in a euryhaline teleost. A
similar approach had been taken earlier by Madsen and coworkers (20) who showed that extended exposure to E2
or nonylphenol, a xenoestrogen, negatively affected smoltification in
Atlantic salmon. The rationale for formulating this hypothesis stems
from the fact that SW transfer is energetically expensive, and
therefore increased energy demand (protein synthesis) as part of SW
transfer will impart considerable strain on energy partitioning. We
used exogenous E2 treatment to increase the protein
synthetic requirements prior to 50% SW exposure. Previous studies had
shown that this steroid induces a number of estrogen-responsive genes
in the liver (26), elevates protein synthetic rates
(14, 15) resulting in extraordinarily high circulating
levels of vitellogenin (VTG), and alters metabolic performance of the
liver (16, 37). In addition, E2 treatment also
compromises the ability of male and/or juvenile salmon to acclimate to
SW (18-20). Therefore, our objective was to address
the impact of E2 treatment on short-term changes (4 and
24 h) in hyposmoregulatory abilities after exposure to 50% SW in
O. mossambicus. Specifically, we examined changes in 1) the concentration of plasma hormones (cortisol and
thyroid hormone; 22) and metabolites (glucose; Refs. 28
and 34) that are important in the SW acclimation process, 2)
plasma osmolality and sodium concentration and gill
Na+-K+-ATPase activity as indicators of
osmoregulatory capacity, and 3) the activities of liver and
gill enzymes involved in the intermediary metabolism to determine the
metabolic capacity of these tissues in 50% SW. Plasma VTG
concentration was assessed to confirm E2 stimulation of
protein synthesis in tilapia.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals.
O. mossambicus (~70 g body mass) were collected from
rivers in Okinawa in July 1999 and maintained in running freshwater
(FW) at the Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center,
University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan. The fish were maintained at
ambient temperature (24°C) under a natural photoperiod (12:12-h
light-dark) and fed once daily to satiety with a commercial tilapia
feed (41M; Zen-no, Tokyo, Japan). The fish were acclimated at least for
3 wk.
Experimental protocol.
Groups of 13 male fish each were distributed into four tanks and
maintained in static FW; the FW was replenished every second day. Fish
were acclimated in these tanks and maintained as above for at least a
week prior to the experiment. Fish were lightly anesthetized and
injected intraperitoneally with either peanut oil alone (sham group) or
peanut oil containing E2 at 5 mg/kg fish. Fish were not fed
during the experimental period. Four days after injection, half of the
water in all four tanks was drained, and two tanks each were refilled
with either FW (control) or 100% SW (34
). Salinities in the SW
tanks were 50% SW (17
) within 20 min. Fish were sampled either
4 h or 24 h after SW transfer. Sampling consisted of quickly
netting six fish from each tank into a small bucket with tank water
containing 2-phenoxyethanol (1:10,000; Kanto Pure Chemicals, Tokyo,
Japan). Fish were bled from the caudal vessels using heparinized
syringes, and blood was centrifuged at 13,000 g for 5 min.
The resulting plasma was stored frozen at
70°C for later hormone
and metabolite analyses. Fish were killed and weighed, and the liver
wet weight was obtained to calculate the hepatosomatic index (liver
mass/fish mass × 100). Pieces of liver and gill were quickly
frozen in liquid nitrogen for protein and enzyme measurements
(25, 34). Gill Na+-K+-ATPase
activity was measured according to McCormick (21). Plasma cortisol (Medicorp, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) and triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) concentrations
(Amerlex, Amersham, Montreal, Quebec) were quantified with commercial
radioimmunoassay kits. Plasma glucose (Trinder method; Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) and protein concentrations (bicinchoninic acid method,
bovine serum albumin as standard; Sigma) were determined using
commercially available kits. Plasma VTG concentration was measured with
a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using antibodies raised
against O. mossambicus egg homogenate protein and purified
tilapia VTG as standard (33). Plasma osmolality was
assessed with a vapor-pressure osmometer (model 5500, Wescor).
A polarized Zeeman atomic absorption spectrophotometer (model Z-6100,
Hitachi) was used to quantify plasma sodium concentrations.
Statistical analyses.
Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with treatment (sham and
E2) and time (0, 4, and 24 h in 50% SW) as
independent variables. As the 4- and 24-h time points for sham and
E2 in FW showed no significant differences (unpaired
t-test), these two time points were pooled as FW group (0 h
in 50% SW) for two-way ANOVA. Significant interactions between
treatment and time were compared using the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Significance level was set at 95% (P < 0.05).
Regression analysis (slopes of the regression lines) for gill lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) activities over time
in 50% SW with and without E2 were compared using ANOVA.
Log-transformed data were used wherever necessary to satisfy
homogeneity of variance; however, nontransformed data are shown in
Tables 1-3 and Figs. 1-4.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Effect of estradiol treatment on total body mass, HSI, liver protein
and plasma VTG concentration in tilapia
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2.
Effect of estradiol treatment on plasma cortisol, T4,
T3, and glucose concentration following exposure to
50% SW in tilapia
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of estradiol (E2) treatment (5 mg/kg)
on plasma osmolality following exposure to 50% seawater (SW) in
tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Values are means ± SE (n = 5-12; 12 animals at time 0).
The numerals ("1", "2", and "3") denote significant time
effect, and values with different numbers are statistically significant
(P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA); the letters ("a" and
"b") denote significant time effects within each group, and bars
with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of E2 treatment (5 mg/kg) on
plasma sodium concentration following exposure to 50% SW in
tilapia. Values are means ± SE (n = 5-12; 12 animals at time 0). *Significantly different from the
corresponding sham group (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA);
letters denote significant time effect in the sham group, and bars with
different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of E2 treatment (5 mg/kg) on
gill Na+-K+-ATPase activity following exposure
to 50% SW in tilapia. Values are means ± SE
(n = 5-12; 12 animals at time 0). The
numerals denote significant time effect, and values with different
numerals are significantly different (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA); the letters denote significant time effects within each
group, and bars with different letters are significantly different
(P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). *Significantly different
from the corresponding sham group (P < 0.05, two-way
ANOVA).
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of E2 treatment (5 mg/kg) on gill
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, top) and malate dehydrogenase
activity (MDH, bottom) following exposure to 50% SW in
tilapia. Values are means ± SE (n = 5-12; 12 animals at time 0). *Significantly different from the
corresponding sham group (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).
+Significantly different from time 0 (P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). Regression lines are shown
on the graph, and the insets give the slope and
r2 values for each group. Regression lines for
LDH and MDH were significant (P < 0.005) for the
E2 group, but not the sham group.
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
Body mass, hepatosomatic index, hepatic protein, and plasma VTG.
No differences in body mass, hepatosomatic index or liver protein
concentration were noted between the sham and E2-treated fish (Table 1). Concentrations of plasma
VTG were below the detection limit in the sham group, whereas
E2 treatment resulted in elevated plasma VTG (>2 mg/ml)
(Table 1). Since exposure to 50% SW exerted no obvious effect on the
E2-dependent induction of plasma VTG, data from the
E2 groups were pooled for subsequent comparisons with the
sham group (Table 1).
Plasma hormone and metabolite concentration.
Plasma cortisol, T3, T4, and glucose
concentration showed no significant differences after exposure to 50%
SW either with or without E2 (Table
2). In contrast, E2 treatment
significantly elevated plasma T3, but not cortisol,
T4, or glucose concentration, regardless of the duration of
exposure to half-strength SW (Table 2).
Plasma osmolality and sodium concentration and gill
Na+-K+-ATPase.
Exposure to 50% SW significantly increased plasma osmolality compared
with FW at 4 h, but not at 24 h in the sham fish.
E2 treatment resulted in significantly higher plasma
osmolality at both 4 and 24 h after exposure to 50% SW (Fig.
1). E2 treatment in FW led to
significantly higher plasma sodium concentration compared with the sham
fish (Fig. 2). Exposure to 50% SW
significantly increased plasma sodium concentration at 4 and 24 h
in the sham fish, but not in the E2-treated fish (Fig. 2).
Gill Na+-K+-ATPase activity was markedly
altered by exposure to 50% SW, including significant treatment
(E2 < sham) and temporal effects (0 and 4 < 24 h), as well as a significant interaction between time and treatment (Fig. 3). In the sham group,
gill Na+-K+-ATPase activity was not
significantly different from the FW group at 4 h after 50% SW
exposure. However, at 24 h, the activity was significantly higher
than the FW control. In the E2 group,
Na+-K+-ATPase activity significantly decreased
at 4 h, but recovered at 24 h to that of the FW group (Fig.
3). The Na+-K+-ATPase activity in the
E2 group was significantly lower than the corresponding
sham group at 4 and 24 h after 50% SW exposure (Fig. 3).
Liver and gill enzymes.
Exposure to 50% SW exerted no significant effect on any of the liver
enzymes measured except for glutamine synthetase (GS) (24 > 0, 4 h) (Table 3). Regardless of SW
exposure, E2 treatment significantly decreased the
activities of several key enzymes, including GS, aspartate
aminotransferase (AspAT), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
(PEPCK), MDH, and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (Table 3).
E2 treatment did not affect gill LDH or MDH activities compared with the sham group in FW (Fig.
4). Exposure to 50% SW significantly
decreased gill LDH and MDH activities in the E2 group, but
not in the sham group (time × treatment interaction; two-way
ANOVA) (Fig. 4). Also, regression analysis of LDH and MDH activities
upon exposure to 50% SW showed a significant difference between the
E2 and sham group's regression lines (ANOVA; Fig. 4).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Seawater exposure.
Plasma osmolality increased transiently with exposure to 50% SW, and
this observation is in agreement with other studies showing similar
increases in O. mossambicus (9, 11). The
regulation of plasma osmolality to FW levels occurs within 12-24 h
and coincides with the activation of salt extrusion mechanisms
(7, 9). In 50% SW, sodium levels were significantly
higher (Fig. 2) and concur with previous studies showing elevated
plasma sodium and chloride concentrations for at least a day after
exposure to 70-75% SW in O. mossambicus (27,
28). The plasma sodium levels decline to FW levels at 3 days
after transfer to 75% SW, and the transient activation of
Na+-K+-ATPase in SW is thought to facilitate
this hyposmoregulatory process (27).
Na+-K+-ATPase activity did increase at 24 h after exposure to 50% SW in O. mossambicus (Fig. 3),
which perhaps allows for efficient sodium and chloride regulation in SW
(9, 11). This increase in the sodium pump activity is
crucial for SW acclimation in this species (7, 10).
Hyposmoregulatory hormones, including cortisol and thyroid hormones,
play key roles in the salt extrusion processes in SW-exposed fish,
including activation of Na+-K+-ATPase activity
(22). Our results did not show any changes in plasma
concentration of cortisol, T3, and T4 with
exposure to 50% SW in tilapia. A similar lack of significant changes
in plasma cortisol levels 1-4 days after SW transfer was reported in O. mossambicus (27, 34). Cortisol stimulates
sodium pump activity in fish gills (22), but the absence
of any plasma cortisol changes in O. mossambicus, despite
higher sodium pump activity, suggests either an increased clearance of
the hormone from circulation (31) or the possibility that
cortisol may not be playing a prominent role in the sodium pump
activation in this species. The lack of change in plasma glucose
concentration after SW transfer suggests a lack of cortisol stimulation
in SW in the present study, because cortisol treatment increases plasma
glucose levels in tilapia (27, 34, 35). One possibility
for the lack of cortisol stimulation in SW may be due to the already
elevated cortisol levels in FW. However, plasma levels of cortisol
reported in this study are similar to those reported previously for
resting tilapia (27, 34, 35). Also, plasma glucose levels
that are under cortisol stimulation in these fish were similar to those
seen in a resting fish and much lower than the stressed levels reported
in tilapia (35). Taken together, these results argue
against elevated cortisol in FW fish as a reason for the lack of
cortisol stimulation in 50% SW. However, the cortisol response in SW
becomes apparent in animals with a lower energy status such as in
food-deprived tilapia (34). The higher glucose levels
after SW transfer in O. mossambicus reported by Nakano and
coworkers (28) may also be due to the stress (and as a
result cortisol stimulation) associated with handling during fish
transfer. These results imply that prior stress/energy status of the
animal may be an important determinant in the tissue responses to
cortisol stimulation in SW. It is, therefore, arguable that the higher
sodium pump activity in SW tilapia is mediated by increases and/or
decreases in other hormones, notably growth hormone and prolactin
(22, 27, 28, 34, 39).
We noted no significant changes in the activities of liver or gill
enzymes involved in the intermediary metabolism in SW-exposed fish.
Liver GS activity was higher at 24 h after exposure to 50% SW,
but the reason for the increase is not clear. Our results suggest that
tilapia can efficiently regulate plasma osmolality in SW by activating
the sodium pump. The increased sodium pump activation may be through
several routes, including phosphorylation and/or membrane insertion of
the protein and increased chloride cell biogenesis, as well as
synthesis of new proteins. However, the changes in sodium pump activity
were evident only at 24 h, but not at 4 h, suggesting that
the changes are genomic and may be due to enhanced synthesis of
Na+-K+-ATPase associated with chloride cell
differentiation/turnover in this species upon SW exposure (7,
13). It appears that the energy requirements for this salt
extrusion process do not involve any major shift in the liver and/or
gill metabolic capacity and this is reflected in the lack of
changes in plasma cortisol and glucose concentration in 50% SW in our tilapia.
Effect of E2.
E2 treatment results in activation of energetically
demanding protein synthetic pathways (2, 14, 15). Our
results confirm this enhanced protein synthetic capacity, as the plasma
VTG levels were significantly higher in the E2-treated fish
compared with the sham fish (Table 1). The synthesis of VTG was in
milligram levels within 4 days of E2 treatment, suggesting
a very high protein synthetic rate (14, 15). The lack of
change in liver total protein concentration suggests that synthesized
VTG is not stored in the hepatocytes but was exported immediately into
circulation. A similar lack of change in liver total protein
concentration, despite significant increases in hepatic protein
synthetic activity with E2, was seen in flounder
(Platichthys flesus) (15) and eelpout
(Zoarces viviparus) (14). However, in the
longer term, usually hepatic hyperplasia and hypertrophy are noted,
reflected in increases in the hepatosomatic index (16,
20). That no such changes were seen in the tilapia may be due to
the relatively short exposure to the estrogen. As protein synthesis
accounts for a significant portion of total oxygen consumption and
nearly 80% of hepatocyte oxygen demand (29), a
repartitioning of the energy budget is likely with E2
stimulation in fish. This is reflected in the observation that in
hepatocytes isolated from E2-treated rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss), amino acids are increasingly channeled into oxidation relative to gluconeogenesis, resulting in the
reduction of de novo glucose synthesis from alanine (16, 37). Even in the present study, a marked reduction in enzyme activities was noted with E2 treatment, indicative of a
general decrease in the liver intermediary metabolic capacity. Thus it appears likely that a shift in the energy balance associated with E2 stimulation in fish occurs at the expense of other
energy-demanding pathways critical for allowing animals to cope with
environmental challenges.
E2 treatment has been shown to decrease plasma glucose
concentration and hepatocyte glucose production capacity in rainbow trout (16, 36), but E2 did not modify plasma
glucose concentration in our tilapia (Table 2). We did not measure
glucose turnover rates in these animals and therefore cannot make a
strong case as to the production and utilization of glucose with
E2 treatment in fish. Also, we cannot base our results on
an earlier study with rainbow trout that showed that E2
treatment did not affect the glucose turnover rate (36),
because of species and experimental protocol differences and also
because the rainbow trout were cannulated and confined to individual
boxes, a protocol that is known to stress the fish and increase plasma
cortisol concentration (8). We did, however, observe a
significantly lower liver PEPCK activity, a key enzyme in
gluconeogenesis from amino acids, in the E2-treated tilapia, suggesting a decreased liver gluconeogenic capacity as reported earlier for rainbow trout (16, 37). Also, the
activity of liver AspAT, but not alanine aminotransferase (AlaAT), was significantly lower in the E2-treated tilapia, hinting at a
curtailed carbon (C3 precursor) channeling for glucose
production, at the expense of protein synthesis and oxidation. Similar
decreases in transaminases with E2 have been reported
previously in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)
(38) and flounder (15). The decrease in
transaminases may be representative of the general metabolic status of
the liver with E2, which favors protein synthesis (14, 15). Support for this lies in the observation that
cortisol treatment, which increases liver gluconeogenic capacity,
increases AspAT, but not AlaAT, activity (34). Thus,
arguably, the hepatic capacity for glucose production is compromised
perhaps to channel energy and precursors into protein synthesis. The
mechanism behind this decrease is not clear, although effects of
E2 in mammals are thought to be indirect and mediated by
corticosteroids (12).
Our study did not show any obvious effect of E2 treatment
on plasma cortisol or T4 concentration (Table 2).
E2 treatment did increase the plasma concentration of
T3 in the present study. This increase in T3
may be associated with the increased anabolic activity evident in the
E2-treated fish, as T3 is a known anabolic hormone in fish (2, 32). However, the increase in
T3 with E2 in our tilapia is at odds with
studies on rainbow trout showing that E2 significantly
decreased plasma T3 concentration (4, 17). The difference may be attributed to a species
difference, and also to differences in sampling time, as both trout
studies sampled fish 7-14 days after E2 treatment,
whereas we sampled fish 4 days after E2 treatment. It is
possible that the lower T3 levels with longer-term
E2 treatment may reflect the lowering of the anabolic
potential as the protein synthetic capacity decreases following the
initial increase seen in E2-treated fish (15).
E2 did not significantly affect plasma osmolality or gill
Na+-K+-ATPase activity in FW, but plasma sodium
levels were significantly higher than the sham group (Figs. 1-3).
A previous study using repeated E2 injections over a 15-day
period showed sodium concentrations to be significantly lower in sea
trout (Salmo trutta) (19). The difference
between the two studies may be due to the additional stress factor
involved in the sea trout study, due to the repeated injections of
E2. Stress and cortisol treatment are known to decrease plasma E2 levels and hepatic E2 receptor
binding capacity in trout (3) and to lower plasma sodium
levels in FW (1). The reason for the higher sodium
concentration in the E2-treated fish is not clear.
E2 impact on SW osmoregulation.
E2 treatment prevented the drop in plasma osmolality that
was evident in the sham group after exposure to 50% SW (Fig. 1). The
absence of a drop in osmolality with E2 suggests
osmoregulatory disturbances that may impair SW acclimation in O. mossambicus. Further support for this assumption arises from the
observation that plasma sodium concentration did not change with
exposure to 50% SW in the E2-treated group. This lack of
change in plasma sodium with SW exposure in the E2 fish may
be due to the already significantly higher sodium levels in FW with
levels similar to that seen after SW exposure in the sham group (Fig.
1).
Unlike the stable plasma sodium levels in 50% SW, clear differences
were apparent in gill Na+-K+-ATPase activity
with E2, suggesting disturbances in the salt extrusion
process. The absence of increased Na+-K+-ATPase
activity in 50% SW in the E2-treated fish clearly
implicates the sodium pump as a major site for E2-induced
impairment of ion regulation, as previously shown for naturally
smolting Atlantic salmon, where exposure to estrogen negatively
affected the activity of gill Na+-K+-ATPase
(20). The significant transient decrease in
Na+-K+-ATPase activity 4 h after exposure
to 50% SW in the E2 group is surprising, but perhaps
represents an energy-repartitioning strategy to cope with the other
energy-demanding metabolic processes upon exposure to hyperosmotic
environment. This argument finds support from the significantly lower
gill LDH and MDH activities with E2 in 50% SW (Fig. 4),
suggesting an overall decrease in the gill metabolic potential.
Although the gill sodium pump activity is recovered to the preexposure
levels at 24 h after exposure, the activity is significantly lower
than the sham fish and may account for the lack of a decrease in plasma
osmolality in the E2-treated fish. In sea trout, the gill
sodium pump activity was significantly lower in E2-treated
fish in SW compared with the sham fish and perhaps the reason for the
lack of SW acclimation and elevated mortality in E2-treated
presmolts (19). We tentatively conclude that the lack of
activation of gill Na+-K+-ATPase activity may
be a mechanism for E2 impairment of transient SW
acclimation process in O. mossambicus. Another possible
route may be a direct effect of E2 on chloride cell
turnover, thereby affecting the sodium pump activity, but this remains
to be determined.
Our study did not show any obvious effect of E2 treatment
on plasma cortisol, T3, or T4 concentration in
50% SW (Table 2), suggesting that impaired ion regulation in the
E2-treated fish may be independent of these hormones. The
lack of hyposmoregulatory ability in hyperosmotic environment with
E2 may be mediated by other hormones, including growth
hormone, prolactin, and/or insulin-like growth factor, independent of
cortisol stimulation.
In conclusion, E2 treatment decreases the intermediary
metabolic capacity of the liver in tilapia, pointing to an overall energy repartitioning perhaps to cope with the increased energy demand
associated with synthesis of proteins encoded by estrogen-responsive genes. Concurrent decreases of activities of two housekeeping genes
(LDH and MDH) in gill in the E2 fish in 50% SW imply
curtailed gill metabolic potential. Additional support for decreased
metabolic potential in the gill comes from the lower gill sodium pump
activity in SW. Together our results suggest that the impairment of
hyposmoregulatory ability in 50% SW may be directly related to
E2-induced energy repartitioning processes, affecting both
liver and gill.
Perspectives
In salmonid fish, vitellogenesis impairs hyposmoregulatory ability
of smolts in SW to such a degree that it has been hypothesized that
sexual maturation and smoltification are antagonistic. However, the
processes compromising SW acclimation remain elusive. Based on our
results, we propose that increased energy demands due to E2-induced metabolic reorganization in liver and gill are
key determinants in the SW acclimation process. The partitioning of energy toward synthesis of proteins encoded by estrogen-responsive genes, including that coding for VTG, perhaps occurs at the expense of
other energy-demanding pathways, among them gluconeogenesis, synthesis
of maintenance proteins involved in intermediary metabolism, and
Na+-K+-ATPase activation. This
metabolic hypothesis would also explain the negative effect associated
with xenoestrogens on smoltification and SW survival in salmonids.
Considering that the actions of estrogen and of SW acclimation are by
no means restricted to fish liver and gill, many other sites of common
or antagonistic target can be envisaged and should be analyzed experimentally.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank M. S. Rahman immensely for assistance during the study.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
This research in Okinawa was supported in part by an international
collaboration program fund to A. Takemura from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. M. M. Vijayan and
T. P. Mommsen also acknowledge research grant support from the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. M. Vijayan, Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 (E-mail: mvijayan{at}sciborg.uwaterloo.ca).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 14 December 2000; accepted in final form 14 June 2001.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Barton, BA,
and
Iwama GK.
Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids.
Annu Rev Fish Dis
1:
3-26,
1991.
2.
Bhattacharya, S,
Plisetskaya E,
Dickhoff WW,
and
Gorbman A.
The effects of estradiol and triiodothyronine on protein synthesis by hepatocytes of juvenile Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch).
Gen Comp Endocrinol
57:
103-109,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Campbell, PM,
Pottinger TG,
and
Sumpter JP.
Changes in the affinity of estrogen and androgen receptors accompany changes in receptor abundance in brown and rainbow trout.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
94:
329-340,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Cyr, DG,
MacLatchy DL,
and
Eales JG.
The influence of short-term 17
-estradiol treatment on plasma T3 levels and in vitro hepatic T4 5'-monodeiodinase activity in immature rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
69:
431-438,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Dange, AD.
Branchial Na+-K+-ATPase activity in freshwater or saltwater acclimated tilapia, Oreochromis (Sarotherodon) mossambicus: effects of cortisol and thyroxine.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
62:
341-343,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Evans, DH.
Osmotic and ionic regulation.
In: The Physiology of Fishes, edited by Evans DH.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1993, p. 315-341.
7.
Foskett, JK,
Lodgson CD,
Turner T,
Machen TE,
and
Bern HA.
Differentiation of the chloride extrusion mechanism during seawater adaptation of a teleost fish, the cichlid Sarotherodon mossambicus.
J Exp Biol
93:
209-224,
1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.
Gamperl, AK,
Vijayan MM,
and
Boutilier RG.
Experimental control of stress hormone levels in fishes: techniques and applications.
Rev Fish Biol Fish
4:
215-255,
1994.
9.
Hwang, PP.
Tolerance and ultrastructural responses of chloride cells to salinity changes in the euryhaline teleost Oreochromis mossambicus.
Mar Biol (Berl)
94:
643-649,
1987.
10.
Hwang, PP,
and
Sun CM.
Putative role of adenohypophysis in the osmoregulation of tilapia larvae (Oreochromis mossambicus; Teleostei): an ultrastructure study.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
73:
335-341,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Hwang, PP,
Sun CM,
and
Wu SM.
Changes of plasma osmolality, chloride concentration and gill Na-K-ATPase activity in tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus during seawater acclimation.
Mar Biol (Berl)
100:
295-299,
1996.
12.
Jamieson, PM,
Nyirenda MJ,
Walker BR,
Chapman KE,
and
Seckl JR.
Interactions between oestradiol and glucocorticoid regulatory effects on liver-specific glucocorticoid-inducible genes: possible evidence for a role of hepatic 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1.
J Endocrinol
160:
103-109,
1999[Abstract].
13.
Jürss, K,
and
Bastrop R.
The function of mitochondria-rich cells (chloride cells) in teleost gills.
Rev Fish Biol Fish
5:
235-255,
1995.
14.
Korsgaard, B.
Estrogen treatment and its influence on protein synthesis and amino acid metabolism in Zoarces viviparus (L) males.
Fish Physiol Biochem
8:
121-127,
1990.
15.
Korsgaard, B,
Emmersen J,
and
Petersen I.
Estradiol-induced hepatic protein synthesis and transaminase activity in the male flounder, Platichthys flesus (L.).
Gen Comp Endocrinol
50:
11-17,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Korsgaard, B,
and
Mommsen TP.
Gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes of immature rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): control by estradiol.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
89:
17-27,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Leatherland, JF.
Effects of 17
-estradiol and methyl testosterone on the activity of the thyroid gland in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
60:
343-352,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Madsen, SS,
and
Korsgaard B.
Time-course effects of repetitive oestradiol-17 and thyroxine injections on the natural spring smolting of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.
J Fish Biol
35:
119-128,
1989.
19.
Madsen, SS,
and
Korsgaard B.
Opposite effects of 17
estradiol and combined growth hormone cortisol treatment on hypo-osmoregulatory performance in sea trout presmolts Salmo trutta.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
83:
276-282,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Madsen, SS,
Mathiesen AB,
and
Korsgaard B.
Effects of 17
-estradiol and 4-nonylphenol on smoltification and vitellogenesis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
Fish Physiol Biochem
17:
303-312,
1997.
21.
McCormick, SD.
Methods for nonlethal gill biopsy and measurement of Na+,K+-ATPase.
Can J Fish Aquat Sci
50:
656-658,
1993.
22.
McCormick, SD.
Hormonal control of gill Na+,K+-ATPase and chloride cell function.
In: Cellular and Molecular Approaches to Fish Ionic Regulation, edited by Wood CM,
and Shuttleworth TJ.. San Diego, CA: Academic, 1995, p. 285-315.
23.
Mommsen, TP.
Biochemical characterization of the rainbow trout gill.
J Comp Physiol [B]
154:
191-198,
1984.
24.
Mommsen, TP.
Metabolism of the fish gill.
In: Fish Physiology, edited by Hoar WS,
and Randall DJ.. New York: Academic, 1984, p. 203-238.
25.
Mommsen, TP,
Danulat E,
and
Walsh PJ.
Metabolic actions of glucagon and dexamethasone in liver of the ureogenic teleost Opsanus beta.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
85:
316-326,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
26.
Mommsen, TP,
and
Walsh PJ.
Vitellogenesis and oocyte assembly.
In: Fish Physiology, edited by Hoar WS,
and Randall DJ.. New York: Academic, 1988, p. 347-406.
27.
Morgan, JD,
Sakamoto T,
Grau EG,
and
Iwama GK.
Physiological and respiratory responses of the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) to salinity acclimation.
Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol
117:
391-398,
1997.
28.
Nakano, K,
Tagawa M,
Takemura A,
and
Hirano T.
Temporal changes in liver carbohydrate metabolism associated with seawater transfer in Oreochromis mossambicus.
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol
119:
721-728,
1998.
29.
Pannevis, MC,
and
Houlihan DF.
The energetic cost of protein synthesis in isolated hepatocytes of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
J Comp Physiol [B]
162:
393-400,
1992[Medline].
30.
Perry, SF,
and
Walsh PJ.
Metabolism of isolated fish gill cells: contribution of epithelial chloride cells.
J Exp Biol
144:
507-520,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31.
Redding, JM,
Patiño R,
and
Schreck CB.
Clearance of corticosteroids in yearling Coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, in fresh water and seawater and after stress.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
54:
433-443,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
32.
Reddy, PK,
Vijayan MM,
Leatherland JF,
and
Moon TW.
Does RU486 modify hormonal responses to handling stressor and cortisol treatment in fed and fasted rainbow trout?
J Fish Biol
46:
341-359,
1995.
33.
Takemura, A,
and
Sin DH.
Detection of vitellogenin in the sera of male tilapia inhabiting the Okukubi river, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Biol Magazine Okinawa
37:
1-7,
1999.
34.
Vijayan, MM,
Morgan JD,
Sakamoto T,
Grau EG,
and
Iwama GK.
Food-deprivation affects seawater acclimation in tilapia: hormonal and metabolic changes.
J Exp Biol
199:
2467-2475,
1996[Abstract].
35.
Vijayan, MM,
Pereira C,
Grau EG,
and
Iwama GK.
Metabolic responses associated with confinement stress in tilapia: the role of cortisol.
Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol
116:
89-95,
1997.
36.
Washburn, BS,
Bruss ML,
Avery EH,
and
Freedland RA.
Effects of estrogen on whole animal and tissue glucose use in female and male rainbow trout.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
263:
R1241-R1247,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37.
Washburn, BS,
Krantz JS,
Avery EH,
and
Freedland RA.
Effects of estrogen on gluconeogenesis and related parameters in male rainbow trout.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
264:
R720-R725,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38.
Whiting, SJ,
and
Wiggs AJ.
Effect of sexual maturation and estradiol-17
on liver glycogen and tyrosine aminotransferase activity of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill.
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol
60:
463-465,
1978.
39.
Yada, T,
Hirano T,
and
Grau EG.
Changes in plasma levels of the two prolactins and growth hormone during adaptation to different salinities in the euryhaline tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus.
Gen Comp Endocrinol
93:
214-223,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281(4):R1161-R1168
0363-6119/01 $5.00
Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society