|
|
||||||||
Arizona State University, Exercise Science Research Institute, Tempe, Arizona 85287-0404
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High-fat and high-sucrose diets
increase the contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose appearance (glc
Ra) under basal conditions. They also reduce insulin
suppression of glc Ra and insulin-stimulated muscle
glycogen synthesis under euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic conditions. The
purpose of the present study was to determine whether these impairments
influence liver and muscle glycogen synthesis under hyperglycemic,
hyperinsulinemic conditions. Male rats were fed a high-sucrose,
high-fat, or low-fat, starch control diet for either 1 (n = 5-7/group) or 5 wk (n = 5-6/group). Studies involved two 90-min periods. During the first,
a basal period (BP), [6-3H]glucose was infused. In the
second, a hyperglycemic period (HP), [6-3H]glucose,
[6-14C]glucose, and unlabeled glucose were infused.
Plasma glucose (BP: 111.2 ± 1.5 mg/dl; HP: 172.3 ± 1.5 mg/dl), insulin (BP: 2.5 ± 0.2 ng/ml; HP: 4.9 ± 0.3 ng/ml),
and glucagon (BP: 81.8 ± 1.6 ng/l; HP: 74.0 ± 1.3 ng/l)
concentrations were not significantly different among diet groups or
with respect to time on diet. There were no significant differences
among groups in the glucose infusion rate
(mg · kg
1 · min
1) necessary
to maintain arterial glucose concentrations at ~170 mg/dl (pooled
average: 6.4 ± 0.8 at 1 wk; 6.4 ± 0.7 at 5 wk), percent
suppression of glc Ra (44.4 ± 7.8% at 1 wk;
63.2 ± 4.3% at 5 wk), tracer-estimated net liver glycogen
synthesis (7.8 ± 1.3 µg · g
liver
1 · min
1 at 1 wk; 10.5 ± 2.2 µg · g liver
1 · min
1
at 5 wk), indirect pathway glycogen synthesis (3.7 ± 0.9 µg · g liver
1 · min
1 at 1 wk; 3.4 ± 0.9 µg · g
liver
1 · min
1 at 5 wk), or
tracer-estimated net muscle glycogenesis (1.0 ± 0.3 µg · g muscle
1 · min
1 at
1 wk; 1.6 ± 0.3 µg · g
muscle
1 · min
1 at 5 wk). These data
suggest that hyperglycemia compensates for diet-induced insulin
resistance in both liver and skeletal muscle.
indirect pathway glycogenesis; hepatic insulin resistance
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LIVER GLUCOSE METABOLISM is impaired in type 2 diabetes mellitus. This impairment involves both the fasted state, where gluconeogenesis appears to be increased (3, 15), and the fed state, where insulin suppression of glucose production is reduced (5). Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the development of these impairments. Diet composition represents one environmental factor that can influence both gluconeogenesis and insulin action on glucose production (22-27). For example, both high-fat (HFD) (27) and high-sucrose (HSD) (unpublished observations) diets increase the contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose production under fasted, basal conditions. In addition, these diets reduce insulin suppression of glucose production under hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic conditions (24, 25, 39). Thus changes in diet composition can produce a liver that is more gluconeogenic and resistant to insulin suppression.
In the postprandial state, the liver removes ~30% of an oral glucose
load (6, 7, 13) with a significant proportion being
directed to glycogen (16), both by the direct (glucose
glycogen) and indirect (glucose
3-carbon intermediates
glucose-6-phosphate
glycogen) pathways (17, 30, 34,
35). It is reasonable to predict that a liver characterized by
insulin resistance and increased reliance on gluconeogenesis would, in
the postprandial state, undergo lower rates of glycogen synthesis
and/or synthesize a greater proportion of its glycogen via indirect
pathway glycogenesis. Indeed, a high-protein diet produced elevated
rates of basal glucose production largely due to an increased rate of
gluconeogenesis and an increase in the contribution of the indirect
pathway to glycogen synthesis (32). The present study was
designed to test the hypothesis that, under conditions of liver glucose
uptake (i.e., hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia), net glycogen
synthesis would be reduced and the contribution of indirect pathway
glycogen synthesis would be greater in HSD and HFD rats compared with
low-fat, high-starch diet (STD)-fed rats.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats bred at the Arizona State University Animal Care Facility were used for this study. Rats weighed 170-210 g on entering the study. Rats were individually caged under controlled conditions (12:12-h light-dark cycle; 50-60% relative humidity, 25°C) with free access to water. All procedures for animal use were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Arizona State University.Diet Protocol
Rats were provided ad libitum access to a semipurified starch diet (STD; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ; Table 1) for 2 wk (baseline period). The baseline period was followed by an experimental diet period where rats either remained on the STD or were switched to either HFD (Table 1) or HSD (Table 1). To ensure equivalent energy intake, body weight gain, and body composition, rats were provided 95% of the calories consumed during the second week of ad libitum baseline feeding throughout the experimental diet period. Rats were studied after 1 or 5 wk of experimental diet feeding. We chose to study rats at different lengths of time on diet for several reasons: 1) gluconeogenesis is increased after only 1 wk of HFD or HSD feeding, 2) HSD and HFD produce hepatic insulin resistance after 1 wk of feeding (24), and 3) these diets produce skeletal muscle insulin resistance after 2-5 wk (19, 24, 39). Throughout the protocol, food intake was measured daily, and body weight was recorded once per week.
|
Animal Preparation
After either 1 or 5 wk of experimental diet feeding and several days before an animal's day of study, catheters were implanted into the jugular vein (tracer infusions) and carotid artery (blood sampling) while the rats were under general anesthesia as previously described (28). Rats were allowed to recover for at least 4 days before being studied. Rats ate their respective diets during recovery. The body weight of rats used in the studies was
94% of presurgery weight.
Basal and Hyperglycemic Clamps
At 0900 the morning before the day of study, body weight and the previous day's food intake were measured, and all food was removed. Studies commenced between 0900 and 1200 the following morning so that all animals were fasted 24-27 h at the start of the study. On the morning of the study day, extensions were placed onto exteriorized catheters to allow easy access. Before initiating infusions, an arterial blood sample was drawn to determine 24-h fasted (basal) glucose concentrations. Rats (n = 5-7/diet group per time) were studied only if basal glucose concentrations were below 130 mg/dl. To estimate basal glucose kinetics, a primed (3.0 µCi) continuous infusion (0.1 µCi/min) of [6-3H]glucose was initiated (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) into the venous catheter. Arterial blood samples were collected at 70, 80, and 90 min of tracer infusion to determine 3H glucose-specific activity (glc SA). Plasma insulin and glucagon concentrations were determined from the 90-min blood sample only. At t = 90, rats were momentarily disconnected from the infusion pump, and a bolus of tracer containing [6-14C] and [6-3H]glucose (3.2 and 4.3 µCi, respectively) in 100 µl of saline was injected through the venous extension. Rats were then reconnected to the infusion pump, and a constant infusion of [6-14C] and [6-3H]glucose was begun (0.13 and 0.16 µCi/min, respectively). At the same time, a variable infusion of unlabeled glucose (20%) was started via the venous catheter to achieve an arterial glucose concentration of ~170 mg/dl (hyperglycemic period). This concentration of glucose was maintained for a period of 90 min (90-180 min). Arterial samples were taken at 5- to 10-min intervals, and the infusion of unlabeled glucose was adjusted accordingly. 3H and 14C glc SAs were determined from blood samples taken at t = 105, 120, 135, 160, 170, and 180 min. Plasma insulin and glucagon were determined from blood samples taken at t = 135 and 180 min only. After the last blood sample (180 min), pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg iv) was administered, and a blood sample from the portal vein was taken while infusions were maintained. A small portion of the liver was then removed and immediately placed into liquid N2. The remainder of the liver and the gastrocnemius muscle were taken, weighed, and placed into liquid N2. The epididymal, retroperitoneal, and mesenteric fat pads were then weighed and discarded. Urine was removed from the bladder, total urine volume was recorded, and urinary glucose and [3H] and [14C]glucose concentrations were measured. The harvesting of blood and tissues after death took less than 2 min.Basal and Euglycemic Clamp Studies
On a separate group of rats (n = 4/diet group per time), studies were performed exactly as described above with the exception of the second 90-min period (90-180 min). At t = 90, a primed continuous infusion of insulin (3.1 mU · kg
1 · min
1) was begun,
and the [3-3H]glucose infusion rate (GIR) was increased
to 0.15 µCi/min to minimize changes in plasma glc SA from the basal
to the hyperinsulinemic period. At the same time, an exogenous infusion
of 10% dextrose was administered venously at variable rates to
maintain euglycemia. Arterial blood samples (~30 µl) were taken
throughout the subsequent 90 min at 5- to 10-min intervals to determine
the exogenous GIR necessary to maintain euglycemia. Three arterial
samples (~200 µl) were taken at 10-min intervals during the final
30-min steady-state period for determination of glucose concentration,
insulin (final sample only), and glucose radioactivity. Animals were
killed, and tissues and blood samples were taken as described above.
Basal Studies
A separate group of rats (n = 3-4/diet per time on diet) was anesthetized following the 90-min basal period. Blood and tissue sampling were done exactly as described above. Basal studies were not statistically compared because of the small group sizes. These studies were performed primarily to assure there were no marked differences in certain metabolic processes of interest (basal glc Ra, hepatic glycogenesis) among groups before the experimental manipulation of hyperglycemia.Analytic Methods
Plasma and tissue radioactivity. Plasma tracer samples were deproteinized (37) with equal volumes of barium hydroxide and zinc sulfate (0.03 N) and stored overnight at 4°C. To determine glucose radioactivity, a portion of the supernatant was dried and reconstituted in distilled deionized water. In studies involving hyperglycemia, on a second portion of the supernatant (samples taken between 90 and 180 min only), 14C-labeled metabolites other than glucose were removed by ion-exchange chromatography (26). 3H and 14C disintegrations/min were determined using liquid scintillation counting (LS6500, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). 3H and 14C counts associated with liver and skeletal muscle glycogen were determined on aliquots from the extracts used to determine tissue glycogen concentration as described by Chan and Exton (2).
Metabolites, hormones, and tissue glycogen concentrations. Plasma glucose was determined using a Beckman glucose analyzer (glucose oxidase method; Glucose Analyzer II, Fullerton, CA). Insulin (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO) and glucagon (Linco) were determined by radioimmunoassay. Liver and skeletal muscle glycogen were determined using the method described by Chan and Exton (2).
Liver enzyme activities. All liver enzyme activities were determined at room temperature on extracts from tissue frozen immediately after animal death. The method described by Hutson et al. (12) was used to determine phosphorylase a activity. Glycogen synthase a activity was determined using the filter paper method of Thomas et al. (40). Glucokinase (GK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) activity were determined from the same liver homogenate. After centrifugation, the supernatant was used to determine GK activity at glucose concentrations of 0.5, 7, and 18 mM using methods previously described (4). G6Pase activity was determined on the reconstituted pellet at glucose-6-phosphate concentrations of 0.5, 2.5, and 10 mM as described by Nordlie and Arion (18).
Data Analysis and Calculations
Glucose kinetics. Rate of appearance (Ra) of glucose under basal, euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic, and hyperglycemic-hyperinsulinemic conditions was determined by isotope dilution (38). Under basal conditions, basal Ra was calculated from the rolling average of glc SA at t = 70, 80, and 90 min. During the euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps, the endogenous rate of glucose appearance (endo Ra) was calculated from the rolling average of 3H glc SA at t = 160, 170, and 180 min. Negative values for glucose Ra were not observed in this study (8, 29). The exogenous GIR during both euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps was calculated as the time-weighted average over the last 45 min. Percent suppression of glucose Ra under euglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions was calculated as the ratio of endogenous to basal glucose Ra.
Tracer-estimated glycogenesis under basal and hyperglycemic conditions. Aliquots of the extracts resulting from the determinations of liver and skeletal muscle glycogen content were used to estimate retention of 3H and [14C]glucose in glycogen. In basal studies, retention of 3H in glycogen was calculated from the ratio of [3H]glycogen and 3H glc SA in the portal vein. Under basal conditions, 3H retention into glycogen reflects the extent of tracer incorporation into liver glycogen, in the absence of net glycogenesis. In RESULTS, this is referred to as tracer-estimated glycogenesis. Glycogenesis during the hyperglycemic period was calculated from the ratio of [14C]glycogen and the weighted mean for 14C glc SA in arterial plasma over the 90-min hyperglycemic period. In RESULTS, this is referred to as tracer-estimated net glycogenesis, because under this condition, the liver is characterized by net glucose uptake (20). The ratio of [3H]glucose/[14C]glucose in liver glycogen (corrected for [3H]glycogen at the end of the basal period) relative to that in arterial plasma (time weighted over the entire 90 min of hyperglycemia) was used to estimate the relative contributions of the direct and indirect pathways to tracer-estimated net hepatic glycogenesis. A ratio of 1.0 would indicate that all of the glycogen retained during the experiment was formed via the direct pathway; the lower the ratio, the greater the contribution of the indirect pathway to net glycogenesis. This method underestimates the contribution of the indirect pathway in proportion to the dilution of 14C traversing the oxaloacetate pool (14). It also assumes that this dilution is not different across diet groups (11). With these caveats, the tracer-estimated rate of net glycogen synthesis from the indirect pathway was calculated as the product of the tracer-estimated rate of net glycogenesis and the fraction arising from the indirect pathway.
Data Analyses
Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of any diet-by-time interactions, with contrasts used to detect any significant differences among groups. When one-way ANOVA in combination with necessary multiple-comparison tests (41) were used to detect differences across groups, interpretations were the same as those made using linear contrasts. Because the results from the one-way ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons offer more information to the reader, data are reported using these statistics. For glucose, insulin, and glucagon, repeated-measures ANOVA was used to detect any differences with respect to time. Significance was set at P
0.05 for all comparisons. All data are reported as means
±SE. Statistical comparisons were not made in basal studies.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Basal Studies
Energy intake, fat pad weight, body weight gain, and body weight. Energy intake (cumulative pooled intake) averaged 103.7 ± 1.7 kcal at 1 wk and 519.9 ± 10.8 kcal at 5 wk. Fat pad weight (sum of epididymal, retroperitoneal, and mesenteric) was 15.9 ± 1.0 g in 1 wk and 31.2 ± 2.8 g in 5 wk. Body weight gain (cumulative weight gain) averaged 37.2 ± 2.9 g over 1 wk and 175.4 ± 8.3 g over 5 wk. Body weight on the day of study was 346 ± 7 g in 1 wk and 447 ± 11 g in 5 wk.
Plasma glucose, tissue glycogen, tracer-estimated glycogenesis, and
hepatic enzyme activities.
Fasting glucose concentrations, tissue glycogen content, and
tracer-estimated glycogenesis are reported in Table
2. Activities for glycogen synthase a,
glycogen phosphorylase a, GK, and G6Pase are reported in Table
3.
|
|
Basal and Euglycemic Clamp Studies
Energy intake, fat pad weight, body weight gain, and body weight. There were no significant differences among 1- or 5-wk rats throughout the experimental diet-feeding period in energy intake (cumulative pooled intake: 102.9 ± 3.6 kcal at 1 wk; 514.9 ± 12.5 kcal at 5 wk), fat pad weight (sum of epididymal, retroperitoneal, and mesenteric: 17.7 ± 2.3 g at 1 wk; 36.2 ± 3.1 g at 5 wk), body weight gain (cumulative weight gain: 34.9 ± 3.7 g at 1 wk; 174.9 ± 8.4 g at 5 wk), or body weight on the day of study (343 ± 8 g at 1 wk; 470 ± 13 g at 5 wk).
Basal and clamp glucose and insulin concentrations. Basal glucose (mg/dl) and insulin (ng/ml) concentrations were not significantly different among diet groups and averaged: basal glucose, HFD1, 122 ± 7; HSD1, 121 ± 3; STD1, 125 ± 4; HFD5, 124 ± 6; HSD5, 123 ± 3; STD5, 127 ± 4; basal insulin, HFD1, 2.3 ± 0.5; HSD1, 2.2 ± 0.5; STD1, 1.8 ± 0.4; HFD5, 2.6 ± 0.5; HSD5, 2.5 ± 0.5; STD5, 2.1 ± 0.5. Likewise, glucose and insulin concentrations during the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps were not significantly different among groups and averaged: clamp glucose (mg/dl), HFD1, 121 ± 5; HSD1, 123 ± 3; STD1, 121 ± 5; HFD5, 126 ± 6; HSD5, 126 ± 5; STD5, 124 ± 4; clamp insulin (ng/ml), HFD1, 4.7 ± 0.5; HSD1, 4.6 ± 0.5; STD1, 4.4 ± 0.6; HFD5, 4.3 ± 0.4; HSD5, 4.7 ± 0.4; STD5, 4.8 ± 0.5.
Glucose kinetics.
Basal glucose Ra was not significantly different
among 1- and 5-wk rats (Table 2). Under
euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic conditions, endo Ra was
higher in HFD and HSD vs. STD at 1 and 5 wk (Table 4). At 1 wk, rate of glucose
disappearance during clamp (clamp Rd) was not significantly
different among groups, thus the reduction in the GIR observed in HFD
and HSD was entirely accounted for by the higher rates of glucose
Ra (Table 4). At 5 wk, clamp Rd was
significantly reduced in HFD and HSD vs. STD, thus the reduction in the
GIR observed in HFD and HSD resulted from both higher rates of glucose
appearance and lower rates of glucose disappearance.
|
Basal and Hyperglycemic Clamp Studies
Energy intake, fat pad weight, body weight gain, and body weight. There were no significant differences among 1- or 5-wk rats throughout the experimental diet-feeding period in energy intake (cumulative pooled intake: 101.9 ± 1.3 kcal at 1 wk; 513.8 ± 7.2 kcal at 5 wk), fat pad weight (sum of epididymal, retroperitoneal, and mesenteric pads: 16.9 ± 1.1 g at 1 wk; 33.6 ± 2.3 g at 5 wk), body weight gain (cumulative weight gain: 36.9 ± 1.8 g at 1 wk; 174.5 ± 4.7 g at 5 wk), or body weight on the day of study (361 ± 6 g at 1 wk; 474 ± 6 g at 5 wk).
Basal plasma substrate and hormone concentrations.
Arterial plasma glucose concentrations before initiating infusions
averaged 111 ± 2 mg/dl for 1-wk rats and 115 ± 2 mg/dl for
5-wk rats with no significant effect of diet (Fig.
1A). Plasma glucose
concentrations averaged 109 ± 3 and 114 ± 3 mg/dl over the
final 20 min of the basal period in 1- and 5-wk rats, respectively (Fig. 1A). Plasma insulin at the end of the 90-min basal
period was 2.7 ± 0.4 ng/ml (pooled average) for 1-wk rats and
2.2 ± 0.3 ng/ml for 5-wk rats, with no significant effect of diet
(Fig. 1B). Likewise, there were no differences among diet
groups in plasma glucagon at the end of the basal period (pooled
average: 81.8 ± 2.3 ng/l at 1 wk; 81.8 ± 2.4 ng/l at 5 wk;
Fig. 1C).
|
Glucose kinetics under basal conditions.
Steady state was achieved over the last 20 min of the basal period for
3H glc SA (Fig.
2A). Basal Ras
(mg · kg
1 · min
1) were not
significantly different among 1- and 5-wk rats (pooled average:
15.7 ± 1.4 at 1 wk; 18.5 ± 2.6 at 5 wk; Fig.
3).
|
|
Plasma substrate and hormone concentrations and glucose kinetics
with hyperglycemia.
Glucose concentrations throughout the 90-min period of hyperglycemia
were not significantly different among diet groups at any time point
(Fig. 1A) and averaged 172 ± 2 mg/dl over the last 45 min of hyperglycemia for both 1- and 5-wk rats. The coefficient of variation for glucose concentrations averaged 5.1 ± 0.3%.
3H and 14C glc SAs are shown in Fig. 2,
A and B, respectively. GIR over the last 45 min
of the hyperglycemic period was not significantly different among diet
groups (pooled average: 6.4 ± 0.8 mg · kg
1 · min
1 at 1 wk;
6.2 ± 0.7 mg · kg
1 · min
1 at 5 wk;
Fig. 3). Over the last 20 min of hyperglycemia, endo Ras
averaged 8.3 ± 1.3 mg · kg
1 · min
1 for 1-wk
rats and 6.3 ± 0.8 mg · kg
1 · min
1
for 5-wk rats with no significant effect of diet (Fig. 3). Suppression of glucose Ra with hyperglycemia averaged 44.4 ± 7.8% for 1-wk rats and 63.2 ± 4.3% for 5-wk rats and was not
significantly different among diet groups (Fig. 3). There were no
significant differences in plasma insulin or glucagon concentrations
among diet groups at either t = 135 or 180 during the
hyperglycemic period (Fig. 1, B and C).
Liver glycogen, tracer-estimated net hepatic glycogenesis, and
enzyme activities.
There were no significant differences among diet groups for liver
glycogen content (pooled average: 4.5 ± 0.4 mg/g at 1 wk; 6.0 ± 0.7 mg/g at 5 wk), tracer-estimated net hepatic
glycogenesis (7.8 ± 1.3 µg · g
liver
1 · min
1 at 1 wk; 10.5 ± 2.2 µg · g liver
1 · min
1
at 5 wk), percentage of indirect pathway glycogenesis (52.8 ± 6.7% at 1 wk; 53.2 ± 8.0% at 5 wk), and net indirect pathway
glycogenesis (3.7 ± 0.9 µg · g
liver
1 · min
1 at 1 wk; 3.4 ± 0.9 µg · g liver
1 · min
1
at 5 wk; Fig. 4). Maximal activities of
glycogen synthase a, glycogen phosphorylase a, GK (at 18 mM glucose),
and G6Pase (at 10 mM glucose-6-phosphate) were not significantly
different among diet groups (Fig. 5).
|
|
Gastrocnemius glycogen and tracer-estimated net glycogenesis.
There were no significant differences among diet groups in
gastrocnemias glycogen concentration (pooled average: 3.4 ± 0.5 mg/g at 1 wk; 3.3 ± 0.4 mg/g at 5 wk) or tracer-estimated net glycogenesis (pooled average: 1.0 ± 0.3 µg · g
muscle
1 · min
1 at 1 wk; 1.6 ± 0.3 µg · g muscle
1 · min
1
at 5 wk; Fig. 6).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similar to previous studies (22, 24, 25), 1 wk of HFD and HSD feeding resulted in reduced insulin suppression of glucose Ra, or hepatic insulin resistance, under euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic conditions. Five weeks of HFD and HSD feeding produced both hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance. However, under hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic conditions, suppression of glucose Ra and stimulation of glucose disappearance were not reduced in HFD and HSD. In the present study, the effects of HFD and HSD feeding on liver glycogen synthesis were also investigated, because this process is both regulated by insulin and involves the gluconeogenic pathway (i.e., the indirect pathway) (16, 20, 30, 34). The results suggest that under hyperglycemic and hyperinsulinemic conditions, neither net hepatic glycogenesis nor the contribution of the indirect pathway to glycogen synthesis was significantly influenced by HFD or HSD.
These findings suggest that hyperglycemia compensated for HFD and HSD diet-induced insulin resistance. Under euglycemic and hyperinsulinemic conditions, HFD and HSD reduced 1) the GIR required to maintain glycemia, 2) suppression of endogenous glucose production, and 3) stimulation of glucose disappearance (5 wk only). In contrast, when hyperglycemia was induced in the presence of a similar level of hyperinsulinemia, GIRs, suppression of endogenous glucose production, and stimulation of glucose disappearance were not significantly different among HFD, HSD, and STD controls. In addition, the apparent contribution of the indirect pathway to hepatic glycogen synthesis was not significantly different among groups. Thus HFD and HSD diet-induced changes in gluconeogenic capacity (23, 27) do not appear to influence the contribution of gluconeogenic flux to liver glycogen formation under hyperglycemic conditions.
The ability of hyperglycemia to compensate for insulin resistance has been observed in humans. Insulin-resistant, normoglycemic first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are characterized by increased glucose-mediated glucose disposal into extrahepatic tissues and increased glucose-mediated suppression of endogenous glucose production (10). Thus maintenance of fasting normoglycemia in the prediabetic state in humans is achieved, in part, through enhanced glucose effectiveness. It is likely that enhanced glucose effectiveness results from adaptations in glucose transport and metabolism. For example, recent studies have demonstrated that phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression can be suppressed by glucose metabolism (33). Hyperglycemia per se can also increase hepatic glycogen synthesis and increase the contribution of the direct pathway to total glycogen synthesis in rats (36).
In the present study, fasting hyperinsulinemia was not observed in either HFD or HSD groups after 1 or 5 wk. However, both groups of rats were clearly insulin resistant based on the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Thus, unlike the human, fasting hyperinsulinemia does not appear to be a consistent marker for insulin resistance in the rat. It is possible that maintenance of normoglycemia following exposure to HSD and HFD is achieved, in part, via changes in glucose effectiveness.
We have recently reported that in isolated hepatocytes, G6Pase activity is significantly increased in both HSD and HFD compared with STD (1). Although not evaluated statistically, basal G6Pase activities presented in Table 3 support these findings. However, in liver samples taken following the hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic period, these differences were no longer apparent. Normalization of hepatic G6Pase activity in HSD and HFD following the hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic period is consistent with the hypothesis that glucose effectiveness was increased in these two diet groups. The lack of differences among diet groups following the hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic period for all of the enzymes measured is also consistent with the tracer-estimated rates of endogenous glucose production and glycogen synthesis in the liver. It is important to note that any potential differences in enzyme responses may have been obscured by the 90-min glucose infusion period. For example, stimulation of glycogen synthase a has been observed after 15 min of exposure to hyperglycemia, whereas longer exposure resulted in activities that were not significantly different from baseline values (21).
The experimental protocol used to promote liver glucose uptake included a 90-min period of constant hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and the delivery of glucose via a peripheral vein. In contrast, the postprandial setting is characterized by a dynamic rise and fall in glucose and insulin concentrations and the presence of a portal signal (elevation in the portal vein glucose concentration relative to the arterial glucose concentration) (9, 20). Because all groups were studied under similar conditions, these differences should not impact on the conclusions of this study. However, it would be predicted that the ability of hyperglycemia to compensate for insulin resistance is enhanced in the presence of constant and prolonged hyperglycemia.
The rates of endogenous glucose production we report during the hyperglycemic period may be underestimated. The hyperglycemic period, where both [6-3H] and [6-14C]glucose were infused, was preceded by a 90-min basal period during which [6-3H]glucose was also infused. During the basal period, 3H was retained in the liver glycogen pool. Thus, during the hyperglycemic period, hepatic glycogenolysis would result in the release of labeled glucose. We do not believe that this resulted in a large underestimate of glucose appearance because the specific activity of glycogen at the end of the basal period was only ~3% of the plasma glc SA. In addition, the amount of label in liver glycogen at the end of the basal period was not significantly different among groups.
Suppression of endogenous glucose production, whole body glucose disposal, and liver and skeletal muscle glycogenesis were not impaired under hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic conditions in rats following 1 or 5 wk on HFD or HSD. These diets impair insulin suppression of glucose production and insulin stimulation of glucose disposal and muscle glycogen synthesis under euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic conditions. Therefore, these data suggest that hyperglycemia compensates for diet-induced impairments in insulin action on glucose metabolism. In addition, although these diets increase the contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose production under basal conditions, they do not appear to increase the contribution of the indirect pathway to liver glycogen synthesis under hyperglycemic conditions. Studies are underway to determine the mechanisms that contribute to changes in glucose effectiveness and increased G6Pase activity following exposure to HFD and HSD.
Perspectives
The liver has a central role in the disposal of dietary nutrients. This is due both to its anatomic location and its ability to remove a large variety of nutrients. In this context, the liver can be considered a dietary energy buffer. It would appear that when the macronutrient composition of the diet is changed, there are compensatory short- and long-term adjustments made by the liver. In the short term, the contribution of the liver to the removal of dietary nutrients may be increased. This is certainly the case for dietary sucrose, where the presence of fructose stimulates glucose uptake by the liver. These short-term adjustments lead to long-term adaptations that include changes in gluconeogenic capacity and insulin action. The ability of hyperglycemia to compensate for some of these long-term adaptations provides a mechanism to reduce the magnitude of postprandial hyperglycemia. The signals that ultimately lead to these short- and long-term adjustments in liver glucose metabolism are an important area for future study and will certainly provide important clues in the quest to understand hepatic impairments in both prediabetic and diabetic states.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-55386 (to M. J. Pagliassotti).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Renee Commerford, Dept. of Medicine/Division of Endocrinology, Univ. of Pittsburgh Medical Center, E1112 Biomedical Science Tower, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (E-mail: CommerfordR{at}msx.dept-med.pitt.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 8 February 2001; accepted in final form 25 June 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bizeau, ME,
Thresher JS,
and
Pagliassotti MJ.
A high sucrose diet increases gluconeogenic capacity in isolated periportal and perivenous hepatocytes.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
280:
E695-E702,
2001
2.
Chan, TM,
and
Exton JH.
A rapid method for the determination of glycogen content and radioactivity in small quantities of tissue or isolated hepatocytes.
Anal Biochem
71:
96-105,
1976[ISI][Medline].
3.
Consoli, A,
Nurjhan N,
Capani F,
and
Gerich J.
Predominant role of gluconeogenesis in increased hepatic glucose production in NIDDM.
Diabetes
38:
550-556,
1989[Abstract].
4.
Davidson, AL,
and
Arion WJ.
Factors underlying significant underestimations of glucokinase activity in crude liver extracts: physiological implications of higher cellular activity.
Arch Biochem Biophys
253:
156-167,
1987[ISI][Medline].
5.
DeFronzo, RA,
Bonadonna RC,
and
Ferrannini E.
Pathogenesis of NIDDM: a balanced overview.
Diabetes Care
15:
317-367,
1992.
6.
DeFronzo, RA,
and
Ferrannini E.
Regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in humans.
Diabetes Metab Rev
3:
415-459,
1987[Medline].
7.
Ferrannini, E,
Bjorkman O,
Reichard G,
Pilo A,
Olsson M,
Wahren J,
and
DeFronzo RA.
The disposal of an oral glucose load in healthy subjects: a quantitative study.
Diabetes
34:
580-588,
1985[Abstract].
8.
Finegood, DT,
Bergman RN,
and
Vranic M.
Estimation of endogenous glucose production during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps: comparison of unlabeled and labeled exogenous glucose infusates.
Diabetes
35:
914-924,
1987.
9.
Galassetti, P,
Shiota M,
Zinker BA,
Wasserman DH,
and
Cherrington AD.
A negative arterial-portal venous glucose gradient decreases skeletal muscle glucose uptake.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
275:
E101-E111,
1998
10.
Henriksen, JE,
Levin K,
Thye-Ronn P,
Alford F,
Hother-Nielson O,
Holst JJ,
and
Beck-Nielsen H.
Glucose-mediated glucose disposal in insulin-resistant normoglycemic relatives of type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes
49:
1209-1218,
2000[Abstract].
11.
Hetenyi, G.
Calculation of the rate of gluconeogenesis from the incorporation of 14C atoms from labelled bicarbonate or acetate.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
60:
1603-1609,
1982[ISI][Medline].
12.
Hutson, NJ,
Brumley FT,
Assimacopoulos FD,
Harper SC,
and
Exton JH.
Studies on the
-adrenergic activation of hepatic glucose output.
J Biol Chem
251:
5200-5208,
1976
13.
Kelley, DE,
Mitrakou A,
Marsh H,
Schwenk F,
Benn J,
Sonnenberg G,
Arcangeli M,
Aoki T,
Sorensen J,
Berger M,
Sonksen P,
and
Gerich J.
Skeletal muscle glycolysis, oxidation, and storage of an oral glucose load.
J Clin Invest
81:
1563-1571,
1988.
14.
Landau, BR,
and
Wahren J.
Quantification of the pathways followed in hepatic glycogen formation from glucose.
FASEB J
2:
2368-2375,
1988[Abstract].
15.
Magnusson, I,
Rothman DL,
Katz LD,
Shulman RG,
and
Shulman GI.
Increased rate of gluconeogenesis in type II diabetes mellitus. A 13C nuclear magnetic resonance study.
J Clin Invest
90:
1323-1327,
1992.
16.
Moore, MC,
Cherrington AD,
Cline G,
Pagliassotti MJ,
Jones EM,
Neal DW,
Badet C,
and
Shulman GI.
Sources of carbon for hepatic glycogen synthesis in the conscious dog.
J Clin Invest
88:
578-587,
1991.
17.
Newgard, CB,
Hirsch LJ,
Foster DW,
and
McGarry JD.
Studies on the mechanism by which exogenous glucose is converted into liver glycogen in the rat: a direct or an indirect pathway.
J Biol Chem
258:
8046-8052,
1983
18.
Nordlie, RC,
and
Arion WJ.
Glucose-6-phosphatase.
Methods Enzymol
9:
619-625,
1966.
19.
Oakes, ND,
Cooney GJ,
Camilleri S,
Chisholm D,
and
Kraegen EW.
Mechanisms of liver and muscle insulin resistance induced by chronic high-fat feeding.
Diabetes
46:
1768-1774,
1997[Abstract].
20.
Pagliassotti, MJ,
and
Cherrington AD.
Regulation of net hepatic glucose uptake.
Annu Rev Physiol
54:
847-860,
1992[ISI][Medline].
21.
Pagliassotti, MJ,
Holste LC,
Moore MC,
Neal DW,
and
Cherrington AD.
Comparison of the time courses of insulin and portal activation on hepatic glucose and glycogen metabolism in the conscious dog.
J Clin Invest
97:
81-91,
1996[ISI][Medline].
22.
Pagliassotti, MJ,
and
Prach P.
Quantity of sucrose in the diet alters the tissue pattern and time course of insulin resistance in young rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
269:
R641-R646,
1995
23.
Pagliassotti, MJ,
and
Prach P.
Increased net hepatic glucose output from gluconeogenic precursors following high-sucrose diet feeding in male rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
272:
R526-R531,
1997
24.
Pagliassotti, MJ,
Prach P,
Koppenhafer T,
and
Pan DA.
Changes in insulin action, triglycerides and lipid composition during sucrose feeding in rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
271:
R1319-R1326,
1996
25.
Pagliassotti, MJ,
Shahrokhi KA,
and
Moscarello M.
Involvement of liver and skeletal muscle in sucrose-induced insulin resistance: dose-response studies.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
266:
R1637-R1644,
1994
26.
Podolin, DA,
Gayles EC,
Wei Y,
Thresher JS,
and
Pagliassotti MJ.
Menhaden oil prevents but does not reverse sucrose-induced insulin resistance.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
274:
R840-R848,
1998
27.
Podolin, DA,
Wei Y,
and
Pagliassotti MJ.
Effects of a high-fat diet and voluntary wheel running on gluconeogenesis and lipolysis in rats.
J Appl Physiol
86:
1374-1380,
1999
28.
Popovic, V,
and
Popovic P.
Permanent cannulation of aorta and vena cava in rats and ground squirrels.
J Appl Physiol
15:
727-728,
1960
29.
Powrie, JK,
Smith GD,
Hennessy TR,
Shojaee-Moradie F,
Kelly JM,
Sonksen PH,
and
Jones RH.
Incomplete suppression of hepatic glucose production in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus measured with [6,6-2H2]glucose enriched glucose infusion during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps.
Eur J Clin Invest
22:
244-253,
1992[ISI][Medline].
30.
Radziuk, J.
Hepatic glycogen in humans. I. Direct formation after oral and intravenous glucose or after a 24-h fast.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
257:
E145-E157,
1989
31.
Reeves, PG,
Nielsen FH,
and
Fahey J.
AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Committee on the Reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet.
J Nutr
123:
1939-1951,
1993.
32.
Rossetti, L,
Rothman DL,
DeFronzo RA,
and
Shulman GI.
Effect of dietary protein on in vivo insulin action and liver glycogen repletion.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
257:
E212-E219,
1989
33.
Scott, DK,
O'Doherty RM,
Stafford JM,
Newgard CB,
and
Granner DK.
The repression of hormone-activated PEPCK gene expression by glucose is insulin-independent but requires glucose metabolism.
J Biol Chem
273:
24145-24151,
1998
34.
Shalwitz, RA,
Reo NV,
Becker NN,
Hill AC,
Ewy CS,
and
Ackerman JJ.
Hepatic glycogen synthesis from duodenal glucose and alanine. An in situ 13C NMR study.
J Biol Chem
264:
3930-3934,
1989
35.
Shulman, GI,
Cline G,
Schumann WC,
Chandramouli V,
Kumaran K,
and
Landau BR.
Quantitative comparison of pathways of hepatic glycogen repletion in fed and fasted humans.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
259:
E335-E341,
1990
36.
Shulman, GI,
DeFronzo RA,
and
Rossetti L.
Differential effect of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on pathways of hepatic glycogen repletion.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
260:
E731-E735,
1991
37.
Somogyi, M.
Determination of blood sugar.
J Biol Chem
160:
69-73,
1945
38.
Steele, R.
Influences of glucose loading and of injected insulin on hepatic glucose output.
Ann NY Acad Sci
82:
420-430,
1959.
39.
Storlien, LH,
James DE,
Burleigh KM,
Chisholm D,
and
Kraegen EW.
Fat feeding causes widespread in vivo insulin resistance, decreased energy expenditure, and obesity in rats.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
251:
E576-E583,
1986
40.
Thomas, JA,
Schlender KK,
and
Larner J.
A rapid filter paper assay for UDPglucose-glycogen glucosyltransferase, including an improved biosynthesis of UDP-14C-glucose.
Anal Biochem
25:
486-499,
1968[ISI][Medline].
41.
Tukey, JW.
A quick compact two-sample test to Duckworth's specifications.
Technometrics
1:
31-48,
1959.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Buettner, I. Ottinger, J. Scholmerich, and L. C. Bollheimer Preserved direct hepatic insulin action in rats with diet-induced hepatic steatosis Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2004; 286(5): E828 - E833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |