|
|
||||||||
1 Center for Ulcer Research and Education: Digestive Diseases Research Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases and Brain Research Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles 90073; 3 Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037; and 2 Cardenal Herrera University, Department of Basic Biomedical Sciences, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intraperitoneal urocortin inhibits gastric emptying and food intake in mice. We investigated corticotropin-releasing factor receptor (CRF-R) subtypes involved in intraperitoneal urocortin actions using selective CRF-R antagonists. Gastric emptying was measured 2 h after a chow meal, and food intake was measured hourly after an 18-h fast in mice. Urocortin (3 µg/kg ip) inhibited gastric emptying by 88%. The CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonist astressin B (30 µg/kg ip) and the selective CRF-R2 antagonist antisauvagine-30 (100 µg/kg ip) completely antagonized urocortin action, whereas the selective CRF-R1 antagonist CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg ip) had no effect. Urocortin (1-10 µg/kg ip) dose dependently decreased the 2-h cumulative food intake by 30-62%. Urocortin (3 µg/kg)-induced hypophagia was completely antagonized by astressin B (30 µg/kg ip) and partially (35 and 31%) by antisauvagine-30 (100 or 200 µg/kg ip). The CRF-R1 antagonists CP-154,526 or DMP904 (10 mg/kg ip) had no effect. Capsaicin did not alter urocortin-inhibitory actions while blocking the satiety effect of intraperitoneal CCK. These data indicate that intraperitoneal urocortin-induced decrease in feeding is only partly mediated by CRF-R2, whereas urocortin action to delay gastric emptying of a meal involves primarily CRF-R2.
antisauvagine-30; astressin B; capsaicin; cholecystokinin; CP-154,526; DMP904; corticotropin-releasing factor
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
UROCORTIN IS A NEW
MEMBER of the mammalian corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)
family that was characterized in 1995 from the rat brain and named
after its 63% sequence homology to the fish urotensin-I ("uro")
and to the mammalian CRF (45%, "cort") (55). Besides
its specific distribution in the central nervous system
(6), urocortin gene is expressed in peripheral tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract (18, 37). Currently, the actions of CRF and CRF-related peptides in mammals are mediated by
two distinct seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled CRF receptors, the subtypes 1 and 2 (CRF-R1 and CRF-R2), which have heterogenous pharmacological profiles and tissue distribution (11, 13). Rat/human CRF binds with high affinity to CRF-R1 and with lower affinity to CRF-R2, whereas urocortin and the
CRF-related peptides characterized from lower vertebrates, namely
sauvagine and urotensin-I, display high affinity to both CRF-R1 and
CRF-R2, including the splice variants CRF-R2
and CRF-R2
(14, 40, 41, 55).
Mapping studies in rats showed that CRF-R2
is found mainly in the
brain, whereas CRF-R2
predominates in nonneuronal brain cells and
peripheral tissues (2, 25, 40, 55). Consistent with the
presence of CRF-R2
in the heart, immune cells, and gastrointestinal tract (25), peripherally administered urocortin exerts
diverse cellular and biological effects on cardiovascular, immune, and gastrointestinal systems (9, 36, 52). In particular, we previously reported that urocortin injected intravenously exhibited greater potency than CRF to delay gastric emptying of a nonnutrient solution in rats (36). This action was blocked by the
CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonist astressin, whereas the selective CRF-R1
antagonists NBI-27914 and antalarmin (31) had no effect
(36). In addition, a recent study indicates that
intraperitoneal urocortin-induced delayed gastric emptying in lean and
ob/ob mice may contribute to the decrease in food intake
(3). In the marsupial Sminthopsis crassicaudata, urocortin injected intraperitoneally was reported to be 50-fold more potent than CRF in decreasing food intake, and its
action was not altered by antalarmin (21). These few observations provide indirect pharmacological evidence that peripheral administration of urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying and
reduction in food intake may be mediated by CRF-R2. However, less is
known about the mechanisms involved in the inhibition of food intake
induced by urocortin given peripherally (24) compared with
centrally (8, 38, 53, 54).
Up to now, the lack of a selective CRF-R2 antagonist has restricted the
direct assessment of CRF-R2-mediated actions of urocortin. Recently,
the selective CRF-R2 antagonist antisauvagine-30 has been developed
(50). In membrane-binding assays prepared from HEK293
cells stably expressing the CRF-Rs, antisauvagine-30 exhibits ~110-fold higher binding affinity for the murine CRF-R2
than the
rat CRF-R1 (50) and binds exclusively to human CRF-2
but not to human CRF-R1 (20).
The objectives of the present study were twofold. First, it was to investigate the functional significance of CRF-R2 in the inhibition of gastric emptying and food intake induced by peripheral administration of urocortin in lean mice. We used the recently developed long-acting CRF-R antagonist astressin B, an isoform of astressin with high affinity to both CRF-R1 and CRF-R2 (49), the specific CRF-R2 antagonist antisauvagine-30 (20, 50), and the specific CRF-R1 antagonists CP-154,526 (51) and DMP904 (15). Second, we examined whether capsaicin-sensitive afferents may be part of the pathways underlying the inhibitory effects of peripheral urocortin on both gastric emptying and food intake. This is based on our previous report that intravenous injection of CRF and, more potently, urocortin induced Fos expression in specific autonomic nuclei in the rat brain (57) and that peripheral injection of CCK, which also induced Fos in these nuclei (7, 56), inhibits gastric emptying and food intake through capsaicin-sensitive afferents projecting to the nucleus of the solitary tract (5, 30, 46).
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Male C57BL/6 mice (20-25 g, 8- to 12-wk old; Harlan, San Diego, CA) were used. They were housed in group cages with free access to food (Purina Chow) and tap water and maintained under controlled conditions of illumination (light-dark cycle of 6:30 AM-6:30 PM), temperature (21-23°C), and humidity (30-35%). All experiments were performed in mice fasted for 18-20 h with free access to water. Experiments were performed between 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM and conducted under the Veterans Administration Animal Component of Research protocol number 99-070-04.Drugs and Treatments
Rat urocortin, rat/human CRF, astressin B, and antisauvagine-30 were synthesized as previously described (49). Peptides were maintained in powder form at
80°C and dissolved in
pyrogen-free distilled water immediately before use. CP-154,526
(Pfizer, Groton, CT) was dissolved in 5% DMSO, 5% Cremaphor EL, and
90% saline (0.9% NaCl), and DMP904 (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) was
dissolved in 10% DMSO, 5% Tween 80, and 85% water immediately before
use. The pH of CP-154,526 solution was adjusted to the same as
its vehicle. Capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide;
Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in 10% Tween 80, 10%
ethanol, and 80% saline. CCK (sulfated CCK-8; Peninsula Labs, Belmont,
CA) was stored at
80°C in 1-µg/µl aliquots and further diluted
in saline to the appropriate concentration immediately before use. All
injections were performed intraperitoneally in a volume of 0.1 ml/mouse.
Measurement of Gastric Emptying
Gastric emptying of the nutrient solid meal was measured as described previously (5). Fasted mice were fed for a 1-h period, then food and water were removed. At different time intervals, mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation, the abdominal cavity was opened, and the stomach was removed and weighed. Then, the stomach was opened, its content was washed out with tap water, and the gastric wall was weighed. The amount (in g) of food contained in the stomach was quantified as the difference between the weight of the stomach with and without its content. The amount of food ingested by the mice during the 1-h refeeding period was determined by the difference between the total weight of the Purina chow before feeding and the weight of the pellets and spills at the end of the 1-h food exposure. The percentage of gastric emptying during the experimental periods was calculated according to the following equation: gastric emptying (%) = [1
(wet weight of food recovered from the stomach/weight of
food intake)] × 100.
Experimental Protocols
Effects of intraperitoneal CRF antagonists alone or with intraperitoneal urocortin on gastric emptying of a solid nutrient meal. Fasted mice were given preweighed Purina chow for 1 h, then urocortin (3 µg/kg), CRF (10 µg/kg), or water was injected intraperitoneally. Gastric emptying of the solid nutrient meal ingested during the 1-h refeeding period was determined at 2, 4, and 7 h after intraperitoneal injection of vehicle or urocortin and 2 h after CRF. Due to the absence of CRF action at 2 h, later time points were not investigated. In other experiments, astressin B (30 µg/kg), antisauvagine-30 (30, 100, or 200 µg/kg), or water was injected intraperitoneally, 10 min before that of urocortin (3 µg/kg) or water. The CRF-R1 antagonist CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg) or vehicle (5% DMSO, 5% Cremaphor EL, and 90% saline) was injected intraperitoneally 30 min before that of urocortin (3 µg/kg) or water. Urocortin was administered at the end of the 1-h refeeding period, and gastric emptying of ingested food was determined 2 h later. The regimen of CRF-R antagonists, CRF, and urocortin administration was based on previous dose-response studies in rats (27, 36).
Effects of intraperitoneal CRF-R antagonists alone or with urocortin on food intake. Mice, fasted for 18-20 h, received a single intraperitoneal injection of urocortin (1, 3, or 10 µg/kg), CRF (10 µg/kg), or water and were given free access to preweighed Purina chow. Food intake was measured at 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 h thereafter. Similar studies were performed in fasted mice injected intraperitoneally with astressin B (3, 10, 30, or 100 µg/kg) or antisauvagine-30 (30, 100, or 200 µg/kg), CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg), DMP904 (10 mg/kg), CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg) plus antisauvagine-30 (100 µg/kg), or the respective antagonist vehicles. Astressin B and antisauvagine-30 were injected 10 min before and CP-154,526 and DMP904 were injected 30 min before urocortin (3 µg/kg ip). Immediately after urocortin administration, preweighed Purina chow was given, and food intake was measured at 30 min, 1, 2, and 4 h later. Food intake was determined by measuring the difference between the preweighed standard chow and the weight of chow and spilt at the end of each time point, as previously described in mice (5).
Effect of capsaicin pretreatment on urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying and food intake. Two groups of mice were injected subcutaneously with capsaicin (50 mg/kg; two injections of 25 mg/kg at 12-h interval) or vehicle (two injections of 0.1 ml/mouse). Ten to 15 days later, capsaicin- and vehicle-pretreated mice fasted for 18-20 h and then had free access to preweighed Purina chow for 1 h. Thereafter, food was withdrawn, and mice received an intraperitoneal injection of either urocortin (3 µg/kg) or vehicle. Gastric emptying was determined 2 h after the intraperitoneal injection. In other groups, capsaicin- and vehicle-pretreated fasted mice were injected intraperitoneally with urocortin (3 µg/kg), CCK (10 µg/kg), or their respective vehicles (water and saline). Food intake was monitored for the following 4 h as described above.
The efficiency of capsaicin pretreatment was assessed immediately before euthanasia by the corneal chemosensory test that consisted of monitoring the wiping reflex to ocular instillation of a drop of 0.1% NH4OH solution in one eye. None of the capsaicin-pretreated mice showed a wiping response, indicating the effective ablation of primary sensory afferents, as previously reported under the same conditions (5). Wiping reflex was present in vehicle-pretreated mice.Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means ± SE and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a multiple-comparison test (Tukey's test) of all pairs. Values of P < 0.05 are considered statistically significant.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of CRF-R Antagonists Alone or With Urocortin on Gastric Emptying of a Solid Nutrient Meal
In mice fasted for 18-20 h that had access to standard Purina chow for 1 h, 56.6 ± 5.5, 80.5 ± 2.6, and 90.2 ± 1.5% of the ingested meal were emptied from the stomach at 2, 4, and 7 h, respectively, in the control groups injected intraperitoneally with vehicle (Fig. 1). When urocortin (3 µg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally at the end of the 1-h food exposure, only 6.6 ± 3.9% of the meal was emptied from the stomach after 2 h (Fig. 1). At 4 h, values increased to 62.1 ± 5.9%, although they remained significantly lower than those of intraperitoneal vehicle group. At 7 h, the inhibitory effect of intraperitoneal urocortin on gastric emptying was no longer observed (Fig. 1). CRF (10 µg/kg) injected intraperitoneally did not modify gastric emptying of the Purina chow meal at 2 h after the peptide administration (64.4 ± 6.1 vs. 56.6 ± 5.5% vehicle; P > 0.05, n = 5 for each group; Fig. 1). On the basis of this time course study, gastric emptying was assessed at 2 h after urocortin injection in all other experiments.
|
Astressin B (30 µg/kg ip) completely prevented urocortin (3 µg/kg
ip)-induced inhibition of gastric emptying of the solid meal (49.4 ± 6.5 vs. 55.4 ± 8.6% in vehicle-pretreated mice;
P > 0.05; Fig.
2A). Likewise,
antisauvagine-30 injected intraperitoneally at 30 or 100 µg/kg dose
dependently antagonized urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric
emptying by 54 and 100%, respectively. Gastric emptying values were
40.9 ± 11.4 and 71.2 ± 6.9%, respectively, compared with
60.3 ± 9.5% in vehicle plus vehicle and 20.8 ± 5.1% in
vehicle plus urocortin groups (Fig. 2B). By contrast,
CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg ip) did not modify urocortin action (Fig.
2C). None of the individual CRF-R antagonists, including
astressin B, antisauvagine-30, and CP-154,526, significantly modified
basal gastric emptying of the solid meal (Fig. 2). Antisauvagine-30, at
100 µg/kg ip, showed a tendency to increase gastric emptying
(78.3 ± 5.0%), although it did not reach statistical
significance (Fig. 2B).
|
Effects of Intraperitoneal Urocortin and CRF on Food Intake in Fasted Mice
Urocortin (1, 3, or 10 µg/kg) injected intraperitoneally in fasted mice induced a time- and dose-related inhibition of food intake (Fig. 3). Cumulative chow intake was significantly reduced for 2, 4, and 7 h after intraperitoneal injection of urocortin at 1, 3, or 10 µg/kg, respectively, compared with intraperitoneal vehicle [F(4,35) = 13.34, P < 0.001; Fig. 3A]. Urocortin significantly reduced food intake within 30 min at all doses (Fig. 3A). The inhibition reached its maximum during the 1- to 2-h period postinjection that was maintained for the following hour only after urocortin at 10 µg/kg; thereafter, values were no longer significantly different from the vehicle group (Fig. 3B). The 2-h cumulative food intake was reduced in a dose-related manner from 0.66 ± 0.05 g (n = 8) in vehicle-injected mice to 0.46 ± 0.03 g (n = 9, P < 0.05), 0.33 ± 0.04 g (n = 9, P < 0.05), and 0.25 ± 0.07 g (n = 9, P < 0.05) by intraperitoneal urocortin at 1, 3, or 10 µg/kg, respectively (Fig. 3A); this corresponds to a 30 ± 5, 50 ± 6, and 62 ± 12% inhibition of the 2-h cumulative food intake, respectively. By contrast, CRF injected intraperitoneally at 10 µg/kg (n = 8) inhibited food intake by 35% only during the first 30 min postadministration (0.18 ± 0.03 g, P < 0.05 vs. vehicle, 0.28 ± 0.06 g; Fig. 3A); thereafter, either hourly or cumulative intake was similar to that of vehicle-treated mice (2-h cumulative food intake was 0.76 ± 0.06 g, P > 0.05 vs. vehicle, 0.66 ± 0.05 g). Urocortin (10 µg/kg ip) was significantly more potent than CRF (10 µg/kg ip) to reduce cumulative food intake for the 7-h experimental period (Fig. 3A).
|
On the basis of the robust food intake-reducing effect of urocortin at 3 µg/kg ip, this dose was selected in subsequent experiments. In addition, 2 h postadministration was chosen to represent food intake data (accumulated food intake, g/2 h).
Effects of CRF-R Antagonists on Intraperitoneal Urocortin-Induced Inhibition of Food Intake in Mice
Urocortin decreased the 2-h cumulative food intake to 0.21 ± 0.03 g (n = 6) in vehicle-pretreated mice compared with vehicle plus vehicle (0.53 ± 0.06 g; n = 6, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4A). Mice treated with urocortin did not show signs of illness. Astressin B (3, 10, 30, or 100 µg/kg ip) inhibited dose dependently urocortin-induced reduction of 2-h cumulative food intake by 34 ± 19, 25 ± 11, 73 ± 8, and 100 ± 29%, respectively (Fig. 4A). The 2-h cumulative food intake values were 0.32 ± 0.06 g (n = 6, P > 0.05), 0.29 ± 0.04 g (n = 9, P > 0.05), 0.45 ± 0.03 g (n = 6, P < 0.05), and 0.55 ± 0.09 g (n = 7, P < 0.05), respectively, compared with vehicle plus urocortin (0.21 ± 0.03 g; n = 6). Astressin B (30 or 100 µg/kg) injected intraperitoneally alone did not significantly influence the 2-h cumulative food consumption (Fig. 4A).
|
Antisauvagine-30 (100 or 200 µg/kg ip) resulted in a partial reversal of intraperitoneal urocortin-induced decrease in the 2-h cumulative food intake (35 ± 12 and 31 ± 24%, respectively), whereas 30 µg/kg had no effect. The 2-h cumulative food intake values were 0.36 ± 0.05 g (n = 9, P > 0.05), 0.34 ± 0.09 g (n = 7, P > 0.05), and 0.26 ± 0.03 g (n = 5, P < 0.05), respectively, compared with vehicle plus vehicle (0.61 ± 0.06 g; n = 12) (Fig. 4B). Antisauvagine-30 by itself (30, 100, or 200 µg/kg ip) did not influence food intake (0.54 ± 0.06 g, n = 5; 0.53 ± 0.05 g, n = 7; and 0.57 ± 0.08 g, n = 6, respectively; P > 0.05 vs. vehicle plus vehicle) (Fig. 4B).
CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg ip), as well as DMP904 (10 mg/kg), did not
significantly alter the urocortin-inhibitory action on food intake when
assessed after 2 h (Fig. 5,
A and B) or at every 30 min for the first hour
and hourly thereafter (data not shown). When CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg) and
antisauvagine-30 (100 µg/kg) were administered together, the
inhibitory effect of urocortin on the 2-h cumulative food intake was of
similar magnitude (32 ± 5%) (Fig. 5C) as when
antisauvagine-30 was administered alone (Fig. 4B).
|
Effects of Capsaicin Pretreatment on Urocortin-Induced Inhibition of Food Intake and Gastric Emptying
Pretreatment with capsaicin (10-15 days before) did not modify urocortin (3 µg/kg ip)-induced reduction of food intake in fasted mice (0.30 ± 0.06 g) compared with vehicle pretreatment plus urocortin [0.24 ± 0.06 g; F(3,14) = 10.561, P < 0.001 vs. vehicle plus vehicle group] (Fig. 6A). In vehicle-pretreated groups, CCK (10 µg/kg ip) inhibited the 2-h cumulative food intake to a similar extent (0.23 ± 0.02 g) as urocortin (Fig. 6). However, in contrast to urocortin, the satiety effect of CCK was no longer observed in capsaicin-pretreated mice (0.56 ± 0.04 g; P > 0.05 vs. vehicle 0.75 ± 0.08 g) (Fig. 6B). Capsaicin pretreatment by itself did not affect food intake significantly (Fig. 6).
|
Capsaicin pretreatment did not prevent urocortin (3 µg/kg ip)-induced inhibition of gastric emptying monitored 2 h after a chow meal [vehicle plus urocortin: 12.6 ± 8.4%; capsaicin plus urocortin: 1.5 ± 1.5%; n = 3 for each group, P > 0.05, F(3,8) = 24.963, P < 0.001]. Capsaicin pretreatment by itself had no significant effect on gastric emptying of a solid meal (42.2 ± 5.3%; P > 0.05 vs. 59.5 ± 3.2% in vehicle-pretreated animals, n = 3 for each group).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, urocortin injected intraperitoneally
inhibits gastric emptying of a solid meal in mice, whereas
intraperitoneal CRF tested at a 3.3-fold higher dose than urocortin had
no effect. Previous dose-response studies in mice (3) and
rats (10, 36) showed a rank order of potency with
intraperitoneal or intravenous rat urocortin > rat CRF to inhibit
gastric emptying indicative of a CRF-R2-mediated response (40,
55). The use of selective CRF-R2 antagonists provides additional
pharmacological support for a primary role of CRF-R2 in mediating
intraperitoneal urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying of a
solid meal in mice. Antisauvagine-30 injected intraperitoneally at
antagonist:agonist (wt:wt) ratios of 10:1 and 33:1 induced a
dose-related 54-100% inhibition of intraperitoneal urocortin
action. Antisauvagine-30 is a novel analog of sauvagine, devoid of
intrinsic activity with high binding affinity for the recombinant mouse
CRF-R2
(Kd = 1.4 nM) and human CRF-R2
(Ki = 0.8 nM) compared with the rat CRF-R1
(Kd = 153.6 nM) or human CRF-R1
(Ki = 1.3 µmol) (20, 50). So
far, antisauvagine-30 has been injected only centrally to establish the
role of brain CRF-R2 in CRF-related modulation of behaviors (26,
38, 44). The present data showed that antisauvagine-30 is a
relevant tool to assess the role of peripheral CRF-R2 in the regulation
of visceral function. Likewise, preliminary studies with the recently
developed selective and potent peptide CRF-R2 antagonist
338-086-15 (10 µg/kg ip) completely blocked urocortin (3 µg/kg ip)-inhibited gastric emptying in mice (48). This
further supports the idea that urocortin-inhibitory effect on gastric
emptying is mediated through CRF-R2.
The CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonist astressin B (49) also
abolished urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying at a
3.3-fold lower intraperitoneal antagonist:agonist ratio than that
of antisauvagine-30. Astressin B is one of the most efficacious
CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonists developed so far (49). Its
efficiency (potency, duration of action, and bioavailability)
results from the introduction of two C
MeLeu residues in position
27 and 40 of the astressin molecule {cyclo(30-33)[DPhe12,Nle21,C
MeLeu27,Glu30,Lys33,Nle38,C
MeLeu40]Ac-hCRF(9-41)},
which favors the bioactive conformation while preventing degradation
(47). Previous in vivo studies showed that astressin B
inhibits endogenous CRF-dependent ACTH secretion in adrenalectomized
rats with a duration of action that extends beyond 6 h, whereas
that of astressin lasts 90 min (47, 49). We also showed
that astressin B exhibits a longer duration of action than astressin
when injected intravenously to prevent intravenous CRF-induced decrease
in intraluminal gastric pressure (35). The present
observation provides additional evidence that astressin B is a potent
CRF-R antagonist as established against intraperitoneal
urocortin-induced delayed gastric emptying of a solid meal in mice.
By contrast, the selective CRF-R1 antagonist CP-154,526 injected peripherally did not influence urocortin-inhibitory action on gastric emptying. The regimen of CP-154,526 administration (10 mg/kg ip) was in the bioactive range established previously in rats, where we showed that CP-154,526 (6 mg/kg sc) completely blocked intraperitoneal CRF-induced stimulation of colonic motility (27). Moreover, other selective CRF-R1 antagonists NBI-27914 and antalarmin (16) did not block peripheral CRF- or urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying in rats (36). Taken together, these data provide convergent evidence that urocortin action on gastric motor function is primarily mediated by CRF-R2. None of the CRF antagonists injected intraperitoneally significantly influenced gastric emptying, providing evidence that CRF-Rs are not involved in the basal regulation of gastric emptying of a solid meal in mice in agreement with previous reports in rats (28, 36). However, peripheral administration of astressin, unlike selective CRF-R1 antagonists, blocked postoperative gastric ileus in rats (28, 36), suggesting a possible relevance of CRF-R2 activation in the gastric motor response to viscerosomatic stress.
The mechanisms through which intraperitoneal urocortin induced a
CRF-R2-mediated inhibition of gastric emptying are likely to be
initiated in the periphery. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that CRF and
urocortin are not transported into the brain (23, 29), and
a reasonable inference can be made that the structurally CRF-related
peptides astressin B and antisauvagine-30 may have a limited ability to
cross the blood-brain barrier. Functional studies support this
contention because astressin injected intravenously did not block
intracisternal injection of CRF-induced delayed gastric transit while
antagonizing intravenous CRF-inhibitory action (28). By
contrast, CP-154,526 given peripherally has bioavailability to the
central nervous system to antagonize exogenous or endogenous CRF in the
brain (51). The unaltered urocortin action by
intraperitoneal CP-154,526 supports the view that CRF-R1 in the brain
and periphery is unlikely to be involved. Capsaicin failed to influence
intraperitoneal urocortin-induced slowing of gastric emptying.
Therefore, it is unlikely that intraperitoneal urocortin acts through
capsaicin-sensitive afferents to delay gastric transit as reported for
CCK and secretin (45,46). Although CRF-R2
is expressed
in the rat viscera including the heart and upper gastrointestinal tract
(39), the location at which urocortin interacts with
CRF-R2 to delay gastric emptying remains to be defined. Recent studies
indicate that urocortin hyperpolarized isolated guinea pig stomach
smooth muscle cells (42), suggesting a possible direct
action on gastric muscle layers.
At the intraperitoneal dose at which urocortin inhibited gastric emptying, there was a decrease in feeding. Dose-response studies showed that low doses of urocortin (4-40 pmol/mouse ip) inhibited the 2-h cumulative feeding response to food deprivation by 30-62% in mice. The urocortin-inhibitory effect was observed during the 30-min to 3-h period postinjection, implying that urocortin displays a profile of a short-term satiety signal. These results are in agreement with previous reports showing that urocortin injected intraperitoneally suppressed cumulative food intake within 30 min in the fasted marsupial Sminthopsis crassicaudata (21) as well as in mice, although higher doses (0.03 to 3 nmol/mouse ip) were used (3). The inhibitory effect of intraperitoneal urocortin on food intake occurs via activation of CRF-Rs, because astressin B injected intraperitoneally blocked intraperitoneal urocortin-induced hypophagia by 73 and 100% at antagonist:agonist ratios of 10:1 and 33:1, respectively. By itself, astressin B did not alter the feeding response to fasting concurrent with the absence of changes in feeding pattern in CRF-R2 or CRF-R1 receptor-knockout mice (8, 12). Previous dose-response studies showed that urocortin injected intraperitoneally is more potent than CRF in suppressing food intake in mice (3) as well as in marsupials (21). Likewise, in rats, sauvagine and urotensin-I injected subcutaneously exhibited a higher potency than CRF to suppress fasting-induced feeding (34). This shows a similar rank order of potency across species with urocortin, urotensin-I, and sauvagine > CRF. These observations should be indicative of a CRF-R2-mediated action. However, the selective CRF-R2 antagonist antisauvagine-30 attenuated urocortin-induced reduction of the 2-h cumulative food intake by only 35%. Such partial reversal cannot be related to a subeffective dose, because antisauvagine-30:urocortin at ratios of 33:1 and 66:1 resulted in a similar (35 and 31%, respectively) antagonism of urocortin-inhibitory effect on 2-h cumulative food intake. In addition, antisauvagine-30 at a ratio of 33:1 completely blocked intraperitoneal urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying as monitored 2 h after treatment. The complete prevention of urocortin action on food intake by the CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonist astressin B and the partial blockade by the selective CRF-R2 antagonist may indicate an additional interaction with the CRF-R1 receptor. However, CP-154,526 did not modify urocortin action, and the partial reversal induced by antisauvagine-30 was not improved when both antisauvagine-30 and CP-154,526 were administered together. Likewise, the selective CRF-R1 antagonist DMP904 (19), shown to be more potent than CP-154,526 in a behavioral test (15), was ineffective in blocking urocortin action on food intake. A recent report indicates that the selective CRF-R1 antagonist antalarmin (31) injected intraperitoneally did not affect the anorectic effect of intraperitoneal urocortin or CRF in marsupials, and high doses resulted in a higher decrease in food intake when combined with CRF or urocortin (21). These data indicate that peripheral urocortin-induced decrease in food intake in food-deprived mice is CRF-R mediated, in part, through CRF-R2. Peripheral urocortin may activate a yet to be identified novel CRF-R or CRF-R1 or -2 subtype splice variant that can be blocked by astressin B and less efficiently by the selective CRF-R2 or CRF-R1 antagonist.
The differential antagonist actions of antisauvagine-30 on intraperitoneal urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric emptying and food intake emerged as an interesting finding in light of the previously suspected interrelationship between these two effects (3). Gastric distention acts as a satiety signal to reduce food intake (43), and the presence of food into the stomach could influence the degree of gastric fullness linking the satiating response with delayed gastric emptying (32). However, our results do not support the notion that the slowing of gastric emptying underlies the reduction in food intake induced by intraperitoneal injection of urocortin as suggested in a previous report (3). Indeed, the CRF-R2 antagonist administered at a dose that completely normalized the gastric emptying of a solid meal prevented the reduction of food intake only by 35%. These observations show that alterations of gastric emptying could not solely account for the urocortin hypophagic response. Moreover, the rapid onset of food intake suppression occurring within 30 min after the intraperitoneal injection of urocortin did not support the view that altered gastric emptying plays a major role in the reduction of ingestive behavior.
We obtained evidence that capsaicin pretreatment did not alter the hypophagic action of intraperitoneal urocortin. The biological efficacy of capsaicin was established by the demonstration that CCK injected intraperitoneally no longer inhibits food intake in mice. Likewise, we previously reported that a similar capsaicin treatment abolished the synergistic hypophagic effect of CCK plus leptin injected intraperitoneally in mice (5). Therefore, peripherally administered urocortin did not communicate with the brain to reduce food intake via a neuronal system(s) whose afferent arm is composed of capsaicin-sensitive fibers. These findings are consistent with the demonstration that vagotomy did not alter subcutaneous sauvagine-induced decreased eating response to food deprivation (34), whereas vagotomy abolished satiety cues produced by gastric distention in rats (17). Collectively, these results indicate that intraperitoneal urocortin may act as an early satiety signal through mechanisms largely independent of gastric emptying. In addition, urocortin and CCK administered peripherally, although sharing similar potent actions to inhibit gastric emptying of a solid meal and food intake in fasted mice, act through separate mechanisms.
In summary, urocortin administered peripherally inhibits gastric emptying of a solid meal and reduces the feeding response of fasted mice through activation of CRF-Rs. This was shown by the complete blockade of urocortin-inhibitory actions by intraperitoneal injection of astressin B, a long-acting CRF-R antagonist. The use of selective receptor antagonist to CRF-R1, CP-154,526, and to CRF-R2 antisauvagine-30 indicates that the inhibitory effects of intraperitoneal urocortin on gastric emptying are mediated by the activation of peripherally located CRF-R2 receptor. By contrast, the reduction of food intake following food deprivation is only partially antagonized by antisauvagine-30 and not altered by the CRF-R1 antagonists CP-154,256 and DMP904. Moreover, intraperitoneal urocortin-inhibitory actions on food intake and gastric emptying are not mediated by the activation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent fibers as those of intraperitoneal CCK. These results indicate that CRF-R2 receptor is differentially involved in the inhibitory effect of intraperitoneal urocortin on gastric emptying and food intake, and both actions are not interrelated.
Perspectives
Two unsolved issues arise from these observations. First, which CRF-R subtype(s) blocked by astressin B but not by CP-154,526 and DMP904 and partly by antisauvagine-30 are involved in mediating peripheral urocortin-induced inhibition of feeding response in fasted mice? The recent cloning of a novel CRF-R3 receptor gene in the catfish, in addition to CRF-R1 and CRF-R2 genes (1), raises the possibility that additional mammalian CRF-R gene(s) may also exist. This novel CRF-R subtype may have relevance in conveying the CRF-R-mediated actions of urocortin that are not antagonized by the selective CRF-R1 and CRF-R2 receptor antagonists. Second, what are the pathways outside of capsaicin-sensitive afferent fibers conveying the urocortin signals to the brain that decrease food intake? Although peripheral urocortin does not enter into the brain in mice, increased peripheral levels of leptin facilitate the entry of labeled urocortin into the brain parenchyma within 15 min with higher levels observed in the hypothalamus (23). Leptin and a recently hyperglycemia-assisted transport of urocortin from the periphery into the brain (22, 23) may open new possible mechanisms through which intraperitoneal urocortin signals the brain, resulting in anorexia. Other relevant future directions will be to establish the peripheral site at which activation of CRF-R2 by urocortin triggers alterations of gastric emptying of a solid meal. Also, it will be important to determine whether CRF-R2 activation by urocortin comes into play to induce gastric stasis under conditions of postoperative gastric ileus or immune challenges associated with delayed gastric emptying (4).| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. E. D. Pagani (Central Research Division, Pfizer, Croton, CT) for the generous supply of CP-154,526 and Dr. P. J. Gilligan (DuPont Pharmaceutical, Wilmington, DE) for the generous supply of DMP904. P. Kirsh is acknowledged for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The authors' work was supported by the Medical Research Fund from the Veterans Affairs Merit Review (Y. Taché) and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK-41301 (Animal Core: Y. Taché; Pilot and Feasibility Study: L. Wang) and DK-26741 (J. Rivier).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. Wang, CURE/VA, Bldg. 115, Rm. 203, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 2 November 2000; accepted in final form 14 June 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Arai, M,
Assil IQ,
and
Abou-Samra AB.
Characterization of three corticotropin-releasing factor receptors in catfish: a novel third receptor is predominantly expressed in pituitary and urophysis.
Endocrinology
142:
446-454,
2001
2.
Ardati, A,
Goetschy V,
Gottowick J,
Henriot S,
Valdenaire O,
Deuschle U,
and
Kilpatrick GJ.
Human CRF2
and
splice variants: pharmacological characterization using radioligand binding and a luciferase gene expression assay.
Neuropharmacology
38:
441-448,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Asakawa, A,
Inui A,
Ueno N,
Makino S,
Fujino MA,
and
Kasuga M.
Urocortin reduces food intake and gastric emptying in lean and ob/ob obese mice.
Gastroenterology
116:
1287-1292,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Barquist, E,
Bonaz B,
Martinez V,
Rivier J,
Zinner MJ,
and
Taché Y.
Neuronal pathways involved in abdominal surgery-induced gastric ileus in rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
270:
R888-R894,
1996
5.
Barrachina, MD,
Martinez V,
Wang L,
Wei JY,
and
Taché Y.
Synergistic interaction between leptin and cholecystokinin to reduced short-term food intake in lean mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
10455-10460,
1997
6.
Bittencourt, JC,
Vaughan J,
Arias C,
Rissman RA,
Vale WW,
and
Sawchenko PE.
Urocortin expression in rat brain: evidence against a pervasive relationship of urocortin-containing projections with targets bearing type 2 CRF receptors.
J Comp Neurol
415:
285-312,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Bonaz, B,
De Giorgio R,
and
Taché Y.
Peripheral bombesin induces c-fos-like immunoreactivity in the rat brain.
Brain Res
600:
353-357,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Bradbury, MJ,
McBurnie MI,
Denton DA,
Lee KF,
and
Vale WW.
Modulation of urocortin-induced hypophagia and weight loss by corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 deficiency in mice.
Endocrinology
141:
2715-2724,
2000
9.
Brar, BK,
Jonassen AK,
Stephanou A,
Santilli G,
Railson J,
Knight RA,
Yellon DM,
and
Latchman DS.
Urocortin protects against ischemic and reperfusion injury via a MAPK-dependent pathway.
J Biol Chem
275:
8508-8514,
2000
10.
Broccardo, M,
and
Improta G.
Pituitary-adrenal and vagus modulation of sauvagine- and CRF-induced inhibition of gastric emptying in rats.
Eur J Pharmacol
182:
357-362,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Chang, CP,
Pearse RV, II,
O'Connell S,
and
Resenfeld MG.
Identification of a seven transmembrane helix receptor for corticotropin-releasing factor and sauvagine in mammalian brain.
Neuron
11:
1187-1195,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Coste, SC,
Kesterson RA,
Heldwein KA,
Stevens SL,
Heard AD,
Hollis JH,
Murray SE,
Hill JK,
Pantely GA,
Hohimer AR,
Hatton DC,
Phillips TJ,
Finn DA,
Low MJ,
Rittenberg MB,
Stenzel P,
and
Stenzel-Poore MP.
Abnormal adaptations to stress and impaired cardiovascular function in mice lacking corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor-2.
Nat Genet
24:
403-409,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Dieterich, KD,
Lehnert H,
and
De Souza EB.
Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors: an overview.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes
105:
65-82,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Donaldson, CJ,
Sutton SW,
Perrin MH,
Corrigan AZ,
Lewis KA,
Rivier JE,
Vaughan JM,
and
Vale WW.
Cloning and characterization of human urocortin.
Endocrinology
137:
2167-2170,
1996[Abstract].
15.
Gilligan, PJ,
Baldauf C,
Cocuzza A,
Chidester D,
Zaczek R,
Fitzgerald LW,
McElroy J,
Smith MA,
Shen HS,
Saye JA,
Christ D,
Trainor G,
Robertson DW,
and
Hartig P.
The discovery of 4-(3-pentylamino)-2,7-dimethyl-8-(2-methyl-4-methoxyphenyl)-pyrazolo-[1,5-a]-pyrimidine: a corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF1) antagonist.
Bioorg Med Chem
8:
181-189,
2000[Medline].
16.
Gilligan, PJ,
Robertson DW,
and
Zaczek R.
Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor modulators: progress and opportunities for new therapeutic agents.
J Med Chem
43:
1641-1660,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Gonzalez, MF,
and
Deutsch JA.
Vagotomy abolishes cues of satiety produced by gastric distension.
Science
212:
1283-1284,
1981
18.
Harada, S,
Imaki T,
Naruse M,
Chikada N,
Nakajima K,
and
Demura H.
Urocortin mRNA is expressed in the enteric nervous system of the rat.
Neurosci Lett
267:
125-128,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
He, L,
Gilligan PJ,
Zaczek R,
Fitzgerald LW,
McElroy J,
Shen HS,
Saye JA,
Kalin NH,
Shelton S,
Christ D,
Trainor G,
and
Hartig P.
4-(1,3-Dimethoxyprop-2-ylamino)-2,7-dimethyl-8-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazine: a potent, orally bioavailable CRF(1) receptor antagonist.
J Med Chem
43:
449-456,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Higelin, J,
Py-Lang G,
Paternoster C,
Ellis GJ,
Patel A,
and
Dautzenberg FM.
125I-Antisauvagine-30: a novel and specific high affinity radioligand for the characterization of corticotropin-releasing factor type 2 receptors.
Neuropharmacology
40:
114-122,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Hope, PJ,
Turnbull H,
Farr S,
Morley JE,
Rice KC,
Chrousos GP,
Torpy DJ,
and
Wittert GA.
Peripheral administration of CRF and urocortin: effects on food intake and the HPA axis in the marsupial Sminthopsis crassicaudata.
Peptides
21:
669-677,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Kastin, AJ,
and
Akerstrom V.
Pretreatment with glucose increases entry of urocortin into mouse brain.
Peptides
22:
829-834,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
23.
Kastin, AJ,
Akerstrom V,
and
Pan W.
Activation of urocortin transport into brain by leptin.
Peptides
21:
1811-1817,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Kinneya, JW,
Scruggs B,
and
Avery DD.
Peripheral administration of urocortin suppresses operant responding for food reward.
Peptides
22:
583-587,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Lovenberg, TW,
Chalmers DT,
Liu C,
and
De Souza EB.
CRF2
and CRF2
receptor mRNAs are differentially distributed between the rat central nervous system and peripheral tissues.
Endocrinology
136:
4139-4142,
1995[Abstract].
26.
Lu, L,
Liu D,
Ceng X,
and
Ma L.
Differential roles of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes 1 and 2 in opiate withdrawal and in relapse to opiate dependence.
Eur J Neurosci
12:
4398-4404,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Maillot, C,
Million M,
Wei JY,
Gauthier A,
and
Taché Y.
Peripheral corticotropin-releasing factor and stress-stimulated colonic motor activity involve type 1 receptor in rats.
Gastroenterology
119:
1569-1579,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
28.
Martinez, V,
Rivier J,
and
Taché Y.
Peripheral injection of a new corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist, astressin, blocks peripheral CRF- and abdominal surgery-induced delayed gastric emptying in rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
290:
629-634,
1999
29.
Martins, JM,
Banks WA,
and
Kastin AJ.
Acute modulation of active carrier-mediated brain-to-blood transport of corticotropin-releasing hormone.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
272:
E312-E319,
1997
30.
McCann, MJ,
Verbalis JG,
and
Stricker EM.
Capsaicin pretreatment attenuates multiple responses to cholecystokinin in rats.
J Auton Nerv Syst
23:
265-272,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
McCarthy, JR,
Heinrichs SC,
and
Grigoriadis DE.
Recent advances with the CRF1 receptor: design of small molecule inhibitors, receptor subtypes and clinical indications.
Curr Pharm Des
5:
289-315,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
32.
Moran, TH,
and
McHugh PR.
Cholecystokinin suppresses food intake by inhibiting gastric emptying.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
242:
R491-R497,
1982.
33.
Muramatsu, Y,
Fukushima K,
Iino K,
Totsune K,
Takahashi K,
Suzuki T,
Hirasawa G,
Takeyama J,
Ito M,
Nose M,
Tashiro A,
Hongo M,
Oki Y,
Nagura H,
and
Sasano H.
Urocortin and corticotropin-releasing factor receptor expression in the human colonic mucosa.
Peptides
21:
1799-1809,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Negri, L,
Noviello L,
and
Noviello V.
Effects of sauvagine, urotensin I and CRF on food intake in rats.
Peptides
6, Suppl3:
53-57,
1985.
35.
Nozu, S,
Rivier J,
and
Taché Y.
Effects of newly developed CRF receptor antagonist, astressin B, on peripheral CRF-induced gastric relaxation (Abstract).
Gastroenterology
116:
A1051,
1999.
36.
Nozu, T,
Martinez V,
Rivier J,
and
Taché Y.
Peripheral urocortin delays gastric emptying: role of CRF receptor 2.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
276:
G867-G874,
1999
37.
Oki, Y,
Iwabuchi M,
Masuzawa M,
Watanabe F,
Ozawa M,
Iino K,
Tominaga T,
and
Yoshimi T.
Distribution and concentration of urocortin, and effect of adrenalectomy on its content in rat hypothalamus.
Life Sci
62:
807-812,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
Pelleymounter, MA,
Joppa M,
Carmouche M,
Cullen MJ,
Brown B,
Murphy B,
Grigoriadis DE,
Ling N,
and
Foster AC.
Role of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors in the anorexic syndrome induced by CRF.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
293:
799-806,
2000
39.
Perrin, M,
Donaldson C,
Chen R,
Blount A,
Berggren T,
Bilezikjian L,
Sawchenko P,
and
Vale W.
Identification of a second corticotropin-releasing factor receptor gene and characterization of a cDNA expressed in heart.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
2969-2973,
1995
40.
Perrin, MH,
Sutton SW,
Cervini LA,
Rivier JE,
and
Vale WW.
Comparison of an agonist, urocortin, and an antagonist, astressin, as radioligands for characterization of CRF receptors.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
288:
729-734,
1999
41.
Perrin, MH,
and
Vale WW.
Corticotropin releasing factor receptors and their ligand family.
Ann NY Acad Sci
885:
312-328,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Petkova-Kirova, PS,
Gagov HS,
and
Duridanova DB.
Urocortin hyperpolarizes stomach smooth muscle via activation of Ca2+-sensitive K+ currents.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil
21:
639-645,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
43.
Phillips, RJ,
and
Powley TL.
Gastric volume rather than nutrient content inhibits food intake.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
271:
R766-R779,
1996
44.
Radulovic, J,
Ruhmann A,
Liepold T,
and
Spiess J.
Modulation of learning and anxiety by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and stress: differential roles of CRF receptors 1 and 2.
J Neurosci
19:
5016-5025,
1999
45.
Raybould, HE,
and
Holzer H.
Secretin inhibits gastric emptying in rats via a capsaicin-sensitive vagal afferent pathway.
Eur J Pharmacol
250:
165-167,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
46.
Raybould, HE,
and
Taché Y.
Cholecystokinin inhibits gastric motility and emptying via a capsaicin-sensitive vagal pathway in rats.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
255:
G242-G246,
1988
47.
Rivier, J,
Gulyas J,
Corrigan A,
Martinez V,
Craig AG,
Taché Y,
Vale W,
and
Rivier C.
Astressin analogues (corticotropin-releasing factor antagonists) with extended duration of action in the rat.
J Med Chem
41:
5012-5019,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
48.
Rivier JE, Gulyas J, Kirby D, Kunitake KS, Donaldson CJ, Vaughan J,
Perrin M, Koerber SC, Martinez V, Taché Y, and Vale W. Receptor-selective corticotropin releasing factor analogs. Soc
Neuro Sci. In press.
49.
Rivier, JE,
Kirby DA,
Lahrichi SL,
Corrigan A,
Vale WW,
and
Rivier CL.
Constrained corticotropin releasing factor antagonists (astressin analogues) with long duration of action in the rat.
J Med Chem
42:
3175-3182,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
50.
Ruhmann, A,
Bonk I,
Lin CR,
Rosenfeld MG,
and
Spiess J.
Structural requirements for peptidic antagonists of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor (CRFR): development of CRFR2
-selective antisauvagine-30.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
15264-15269,
1998
51.
Schulz, DW,
Mansbach RS,
Sprouse J,
Braselton JP,
Collins J,
Corman M,
Dunaiskis A,
Faraci S,
Schmidt AW,
Seeger T,
Seymour P,
Tingley FD, III,
Winston EN,
Chen YL,
and
Heym J.
CP-154,526: a potent and selective nonpeptide antagonist of corticotropin releasing factor receptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
10477-10482,
1996
52.
Singh, LK,
Boucher W,
Pang X,
Letourneau R,
Seretakis D,
Green M,
and
Theoharides TC.
Potent mast cell degranulation and vascular permeability triggered by urocortin through activation of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
288:
1349-1356,
1999
53.
Skelton, KH,
Owens MJ,
and
Nemeroff CB.
The neurobiology of urocortin.
Regul Pept
93:
85-92,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
54.
Smagin, GN,
Howell LA,
Ryan DH,
De SE,
and
Harris RB.
The role of CRF2 receptors in corticotropin-releasing factor- and urocortin-induced anorexia.
Neuroreport
9:
1601-1606,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
55.
Vaughan, J,
Donaldson C,
Bittencourt J,
Perrin MH,
Lewis K,
Sutton S,
Chan R,
Turnbull AV,
Lovejoy D,
Rivier C,
Rivier J,
Sawchenko PE,
and
Vale W.
Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-releasing factor.
Nature
378:
287-292,
1996.
56.
Wang, L,
Martinez V,
Barrachina MD,
and
Taché Y.
Fos expression in the brain induced by peripheral injection of CCK or leptin plus CCK in fasted lean mice.
Brain Res
791:
157-166,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
57.
Wang, L,
Martinez V,
Vale W,
and
Taché Y.
Fos induction in selective hypothalamic neuroendocrine and medullary nuclei by intravenous injection of urocortin and corticotropin-releasing factor in rats.
Brain Res
855:
47-57,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Kumar, L. O. Byerley, J. Volaufova, D. J. Drucker, G. A. Churchill, R. Li, B. York, A. Zuberi, and B. K. S. Richards Genetic variation in Glp1r expression influences the rate of gastric emptying in mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R362 - R371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, N. R. Basa, A. Shaikh, A. Luckey, D. Heber, D. H. St-Pierre, and Y. Tache LPS inhibits fasted plasma ghrelin levels in rats: role of IL-1 and PGs and functional implications. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): G611 - G620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Czimmer, M. Million, and Y. Tache Urocortin 2 acts centrally to delay gastric emptying through sympathetic pathways while CRF and urocortin 1 inhibitory actions are vagal dependent in rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): G511 - G518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Seymour, S. L. Dettloff, J. E. Jones, and G. N. Wade Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes mediating nutritional suppression of estrous behavior in Syrian hamsters Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): R418 - R423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Porcher, A. Juhem, A. Peinnequin, V. Sinniger, and B. Bonaz Expression and effects of metabotropic CRF1 and CRF2 receptors in rat small intestine Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): G1091 - G1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Cupples Peptides that regulate food intake Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): R1370 - R1374. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Cupples Regulating food intake Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): R652 - R654. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Martinez, L. Wang, J. E. Rivier, W. Vale, and Y. Tache Differential Actions of Peripheral Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF), Urocortin II, and Urocortin III on Gastric Emptying and Colonic Transit in Mice: Role of CRF Receptor Subtypes 1 and 2 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2002; 301(2): 611 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |