|
|
||||||||
1 Kinesiology Department, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7; 2 Sports Medicine Research Unit, Department of Rheumatology H, Bispebjerg Hospital and Copenhagen Muscle Research Center and 3 Department of Clinical Physiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV; and 4 Department of Medical Physiology, Panum Institute and Copenhagen Muscle Research Center, DK-2220 N Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study
examined the implication of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in
regulation of splanchnic blood flow and glucose production in
exercising humans. Subjects cycled for 40 min at 50% maximal
O2 consumption (
O2 max)
followed by 30 min at 70%
O2 max
either with [angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) blockade] or without
(control) administration of the ACE inhibitor enalapril (10 mg iv).
Splanchnic blood flow was estimated by indocyanine green, and
splanchnic substrate exchange was determined by the arteriohepatic
venous difference. Exercise led to an ~20-fold increase
(P < 0.001) in ANG II levels in the control group
(5.4 ± 1.0 to 102.0 ± 25.1 pg/ml), whereas this response
was blunted during ACE blockade (8.1 ± 1.2 to 13.2 ± 2.4 pg/ml) and in response to an orthostatic challenge performed
postexercise. Apart from lactate and cortisol, which were higher in the
ACE-blockade group vs. the control group, hormones,
metabolites,
O2, and RER followed the
same pattern of changes in ACE-blockade and control groups during
exercise. Splanchnic blood flow (at rest: 1.67 ± 0.12, ACE
blockade; 1.59 ± 0.18 l/min, control) decreased during moderate exercise (0.78 ± 0.07, ACE blockade; 0.74 ± 0.14 l/min,
control), whereas splanchnic glucose production (at rest: 0.50 ± 0.06, ACE blockade; 0.68 ± 0.10 mmol/min, control) increased
during moderate exercise (1.97 ± 0.29, ACE blockade; 1.91 ± 0.41 mmol/min, control). Refuting a major role of the RAS for these
responses, no differences in the pattern of change of splanchnic blood
flow and splanchnic glucose production were observed during ACE
blockade compared with controls. This study demonstrates that the
normal increase in ANG II levels observed during prolonged exercise in
humans does not play a major role in the regulation of splanchnic blood flow and glucose production.
angiotensin-converting enzyme; exercise; arteriohepatic venous difference
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DURING HIGH-INTENSITY physical exercise, splanchnic blood flow decreases by ~70% of the resting value, whereas hepatic glucose production can increase by 5- to 10-fold over resting rates (26, 31). The reduction in splanchnic blood flow is thought to reflect increased local vascular resistance mediated by increased sympathetic nervous activity (25). However, the evidence for this is very limited and based on correlations between a marked reduction in splanchnic blood flow and a rise in plasma norepinephrine and heart rate rather than cause-effect relationships (25). Although an effect of sympathetic nerves in decreasing splanchnic blood flow has been demonstrated at rest by direct stimulation of the sympathetic nerves to the gut (24), during exercise pharmacological blockade of the sympathetic nervous activity to the splanchnic area did not influence the exercise-induced increase in hepatosplanchnic vascular resistance (18). Furthermore, exercise in subjects with sympathetic denervation due to primary autonomic failure is also associated with a full, albeit slower, decrease in splanchnic blood flow compared with control subjects (22). These findings strongly point at other mechanisms involved in the regulation of the hepatosplanchnic blood flow during exercise.
The role of ANG II in splanchnic blood flow regulation has been highlighted with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors during lower body negative pressure (23) and head-up tilt in humans (29). In these conditions the use of ACE inhibitors suppressed the reduction of splanchnic blood flow normally associated with both of these stimuli. Furthermore, just like heart rate and plasma norepinephrine, the angiotensin plasma concentration increases during exercise in an intensity-dependent manner (7). Thus angiotensin is a likely candidate for regulation of splanchnic flow during exercise. In line with this, Symons and Stebbins (30) demonstrated that ANG II had an important role in the reduction of splanchnic blood flow during exercise in miniswine by using ANG II-receptor antagonists. However, there is still no evidence for this regulatory mechanism to be effective in humans during dynamic prolonged exercise.
In addition to this, the rise in hepatic glucose production during exercise cannot be completely accounted for by already described hormonal mechanisms such as the rise and fall of glucagon and insulin concentrations, respectively. Even when counterregulatory hormones are kept constant, epinephrine is absent, and the sympathetic nervous activity to the liver is blocked or the liver is denervated, the rise in hepatic glucose production during exercise still occurs (3, 6, 14, 18, 28, 33). Interestingly, ANG II has been shown to acutely increase gluconeogenesis (5, 34) and liver glycogenolysis (8, 13), but its role in endogenous glucose production during exercise in humans has yet to be determined. On the basis of these findings, it was hypothesized that the renin-angiotensin system is important for the decrease in hepatosplanchnic blood flow and the increase in glucose production during exercise in humans. Accordingly, in the present study, human subjects were exercised either with or without an infusion of an ACE inhibitor (enalapril) both at mild and moderate exercise levels during which simultaneous measurements of hepatosplanchnic blood flow and glucose production, as well as hormonal and metabolic changes across the splanchnic bed, were performed.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects.
Eight young men [mean age, 25 yr (range 23-30 yr); height, 182 (174) cm; weight, 79 (67-95) kg; and maximal
O2 consumption (
O2 max), 50 (46-60)
ml · kg
1 · min
1] gave
informed written consent to participate in this study. The protocol was
approved by the Ethics Committee of Copenhagen. The
O2 max for each individual was
determined 4-8 days before the experimental study using a protocol
of incremental workloads (2 min at each workload) to exhaustion on a
modified electromagnetically braked Krogh cycle ergometer. While the
subjects cycled, the upper part of the body formed an angle of 45°
with the horizontal plane.
O2 max was
the highest O2 consumption (
O2) attained during the latter stages
of the test and was accompanied by a respiratory exchange ratio of more
than 1.1, a heart rate close to the age-predicted maximum (220 beats/min
age), and a leveling-off phenomenon of
O2. None of the subjects was taking medications or had any history of endocrine disease. All subjects refrained from training, smoking, and drinking alcohol the day before
the experiment. Seven subjects were nonsmokers, whereas one subject
smoked in social gatherings. His results did not differ from the others.
Procedures. For this crossover study, subjects arrived at the laboratory at 8:00 A.M. on two separate occasions with an interval of 2-3 wk between randomized control or ACE-blockade experiments. For the purpose of taking blood samples, a cannula was inserted in the radial artery of the nondominant arm of each subject. A venous line was inserted in a forearm vein for infusion and indocyanine green (ICG) dye. Additionally, a separate catheter was inserted into another forearm vein for infusion of radiolabeled [3-3H]glucose to compare the radioisotopic dilution method with the arteriohepatic venous balance technique for determination of endogenous glucose production during exercise as described in our previous paper (2). In all subjects a catheter was introduced into a femoral vein and advanced, under fluoroscopy, into a right-sided hepatic vein approximately 3-4 cm from the wedge position. Its location was verified after exercise by ultrasonography (2). Patency of the catheter was maintained by flushing with heparinized-isotonic saline solution (10 U heparin/ml).
The first baseline blood sampling was taken 1 h after the catheterization and the initiation of the ICG infusion. Immediately after, enalapril (10 mg), an ACE inhibitor, or pure solvent was given intravenously. Thirty minutes later, subjects started exercising. The latter consisted of semisupine cycle exercise on a modified Krogh ergometer (20) for 40 min at an intensity corresponding to 50% of their predetermined
O2 max
(mild exercise) followed by 30 min at 70%
O2 max (moderate exercise). During
exercise the intensity of the effort was quantified by rating the
perceived exhaustion on the scale of Borg (4).
O2 was measured online at rest and
during exercise by using open-circuit indirect calorimetry (Oxycon,
Jaeger). Heart rate was recorded continuously by electrocardiogram
monitoring, and the signal was interfaced to the Oxycon equipment.
Blood pressure was measured intra-arterially and continuously recorded.
Blood was sampled simultaneously from the radial artery and hepatic
vein at 10-min intervals starting 30 min before the onset of exercise
for the determination of plasma glucose, lactate, dye (ICG) and gas
concentrations, and blood hematocrit. Blood for the determination of
hormone and metabolite concentrations other than those mentioned above
was drawn while resting (at
30 and 0 min), at 10 and 40 min for 50%
O2 max, and at 50 and 70 min for 70%
O2 max during exercise. All values in
Tables 1-5 are reported as means of the two measurements for all
three conditions: rest and 50 and 70%
O2 max.
|
|
|
|
|
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid and reduced glutathione. Blood samples were then centrifuged at
4°C, and plasma was stored at
80°C until analysis.
Tilt-table experiment. After completion of the ergocycle exercise protocol, subjects were moved to a tilt table, on which they lay horizontally for 1 h. The subjects were then submitted to an orthostatic challenge by raising the table to a 30% head-up angle for a period of 10 min to test for the effectiveness of the drug on blocking the angiotensin response. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored throughout this time interval (every minute), and blood sampling was performed immediately before and at the end of the orthostatic challenge before the subjects were brought back to a horizontal lying position. Values reported were obtained after 10 min of tilting. To minimize the venous return from the lower limbs during this experiment, subjects were held in position by a bicycle saddle and were told not to contract their leg muscles.
Analytical methods.
The estimated splanchnic blood flow (ESBF) was measured by the ICG dye
excretion method (26) as described in detail previously (2). Briefly, ICG clearance is calculated from infusion
rate and plasma concentrations of ICG. Assuming that ICG is only
eliminated in the liver and that hepatic extraction is complete,
splanchnic blood flow can be calculated from ICG clearance and
hematocrit (2). Hormonal and metabolite exchange data
measured across the splanchnic bed were the product of estimated
splanchnic plasma flow and the arteriohepatic venous difference in
plasma concentration. Plasma glucose and lactate concentrations were
immediately determined with an automatic glucose analyzer (YSI
23AM; Yellow Springs Instruments). Catecholamine concentrations were
determined by a single-isotope radioenzymatic method (1)
evaluated previously (21). The concentrations of insulin,
glucagon, growth hormone, cortisol (10),
adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (9), C peptide
(12), and ANG II (16) were determined by
radioimmunoassay as described previously. Free fatty acids, glycerol,
-hydroxybutyrate, and alanine were measured by enzymatic
fluorimetric methods. Hematocrit was measured by the microhematocrit
method. Blood oxygen saturation and hemoglobin were measured by an
automated gas and acid-base balance microanalyzer (ABL 4, Acid Base
Laboratory, Radiometer, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) and an
OSM3-hemoxymeter immediately after samples had been drawn. Interassay
and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 3 and 4%, respectively,
for oxygen saturation and 2% for hemoglobin.
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA with repeated-measures design. Tukey tests were used for post hoc analysis in the event of significant effect of treatment or time. A 95% level of confidence (2-tailed testing) was accepted for all comparisons. All data are reported as means ± SE.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ANG II concentrations.
ANG II plasma levels at rest were similar in both groups (Fig.
1). However, ACE blockade resulted in
decreased plasma ANG II concentrations 30 min after the infusion of
enalapril (
30 min, 8.31 ± 1.20 vs. 0 min, 2.61 ± 0.37 pg/ml; P < 0.05). Subjects completed 40 min of cycling
at 50.9 ± 1.5 and 50.4 ± 1.5%
O2 max [not significant (NS)]
followed by 30 min of cycling at 68.8 ± 2.4 and 69.0 ± 2.2%
O2 max (NS) in the
enalapril-infused (ACE blockade) and the control groups, respectively
(Table 1). In the control trial, plasma
concentrations of ANG II increased by approximately 4- and 12-fold
during dynamic exercise at 50 and 70%
O2 max, respectively. In contrast, ACE
blockade efficiently inhibited the exercise-induced elevation of ANG II (Fig. 1). One hour after exercise, before raising the subjects to a
30° angle on a tilt table, ANG II plasma concentrations were more
elevated in the control group compared with the ACE-blockade trial; the
values were, respectively, 10.7 ± 2.6 and 4.6 ± 0.9 pg/ml
(P < 0.05). The infusion of the ACE inhibitor was
successful in preventing a rise in ANG II concentration in response to
the passive 10-min head-up 30% tilt, whereas hormone concentrations were significantly increased in the control group (17.9 ± 3.6 pg/ml; P < 0.05) when blood was withdrawn while
subjects were still in the tilted position.
|
Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory exchange ratio at rest
and exercise.
O2, respiratory exchange ratio, heart
rate, and systolic blood pressure increased during exercise
(P < 0.05), and significant differences between the
two experiments were found neither at rest nor during exercise. Mean
arterial pressure remained stable, whereas diastolic blood pressure
decreased similarly in both groups throughout the course of exercise
compared with resting values. The perceived rate of exhaustion (Borg
scale) increased similarly in both groups during exercise.
Splanchnic O2 uptake and blood flow.
ESBF at rest was not significantly different between ACE-blockade and
control groups (Fig. 2). ESBF and
splanchnic vascular resistance, respectively, decreased and increased
progressively in both groups, reaching significant difference compared
with rest during exercise intensity of 70%
O2 max (P < 0.05). No
significant differences of ESBF and splanchnic vascular resistance were
found between the two experimental conditions. Splanchnic O2 uptake rates were similar under resting conditions in
ACE-blockade and control groups and increased during exercise
(P < 0.05) (Table 1). Hematocrit values rose,
respectively, from 45.4 ± 0.7 at rest to 47.3 ± 0.7 and
47.7 ± 1.1% in the control group and from 45.8 ± 0.5 to
48.0 ± 0.5 and 48.2 ± 0.8% in the ACE-blockade group during mild and moderate exercise. There were no significant
differences between the two conditions.
|
Arterial metabolites and hormone plasma concentrations.
Both cortisol and epinephrine plasma concentrations increased during
exercise. The concentrations of cortisol were higher during ACE
blockade compared with the control trial throughout the duration of the
protocol (P < 0.05), whereas the difference in
epinephrine levels did not attain statistical significance (Table
2 and Fig.
3, respectively). Other
counterregulatory hormones fluctuated similarly in both
ACE-blockade and control groups (Fig. 4
and Table 2). Insulin and C peptide concentrations decreased progressively and similarly during exercise in both ACE-blockade and
control groups (Table 2).
|
|
-Hydroxybutyrate concentrations were not significantly
altered by the present exercise protocol and were not influenced by ACE
blockade (Table 3).
Splanchnic exchange.
Splanchnic glucose output nearly doubled during mild exercise (50%
O2 max) and further rose to
250-300% of initial resting values during moderate exercise
(~70%
O2 max) (Fig.
5). Splanchnic glucose output at rest did
not differ between the ACE-blockade group and the control group.
Furthermore, the increased splanchnic glucose output observed during
exercise was not affected by the absence of a normal rise in plasma ANG
II concentrations in the ACE-blockade group compared with the control group. Similar values were also found both at rest and during exercise
in the ACE-blockade and control groups when endogenous glucose
production was assessed using the radioisotopic dilution method (data
not shown).
|
-hydroxybutyrate across the
splanchnic bed. Lactate, glycerol, free fatty acids, alanine, and
-hydroxybutyrate splanchnic uptakes were not affected by ACE blockade.
The uptake rate of norepinephrine across the splanchnic bed was
increased significantly (P < 0.05) in a stepwise
manner during exercise, whereas there was no significant change in the
epinephrine splanchnic exchange rate (Table
5). Release of insulin from the splanchnic bed decreased progressively (P < 0.05)
during exercise, whereas the reduction in the release of C peptide and
glucagon reached significance only during exercise at 70%
O2 max (Table 5). None of these
variables was influenced by the treatment with enalapril (Table 5).
Head-up tilt. During the short orthostatic challenge, mean arterial blood pressures were similar in both groups and did not change significantly. Mean arterial blood pressures before and during the orthostatic challenge were 78.3 ± 0.6 and 80.5 ± 0.5 mmHg and 77.1 ± 1.0 and 77.5 ± 0.5 mmHg, respectively, in ACE-blockade and control groups. After subjects had lain in the horizontal position for 1 h, the mean resting heart rate in the ACE-blockade and control groups was similar (77.9 ± 2.7 vs. 75.6 ± 2.5 beats/min, respectively). Heart rate increased significantly (P < 0.01) in both ACE-blockade (93.4 ± 1.6 beats/min) and control groups (94.4 ± 2.0 beats/min) when subjects were brought up to a 30° angle.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objective of the present study was to test the putative implication of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of splanchnic blood flow and glucose output during prolonged dynamic exercise in humans. The injection of enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, 30 min before exercise reduced the plasma concentration of ANG II at rest and abolished the increase in angiotensin during exercise. In the absence of an elevation in plasma ANG II concentration during mild and moderate exercise, the normal decrease in estimated splanchnic blood flow and the rise in glucose production were maintained, indicating that the renin-angiotensin system plays a minor role in the regulation of splanchnic blood flow and glucose output during dynamic exercise in humans.
After the exercise, we tested the response of the renin-angiotensin system to a passive head-up tilt to a 30° angle. The rise in plasma ANG II known to occur during such a procedure (27) was prevented during the enalapril trial. These data, along with the absence of an increase in plasma ANG II concentrations during exercise, demonstrate that we successfully inhibited the release of this vasoconstrictive agent into the circulation. Therefore, the lack of effect of an ACE inhibitor on splanchnic blood flow and glucose output cannot be explained by a failure of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system during exercise. The present data contrast with a report from Symons and Stebbins (30) that demonstrated a role for ANG II receptors in the regulation of splanchnic blood flow during exercise. However, that study was performed on miniswine, and the difference between those data and the data in the present study might be based on species difference. Alternatively, the difference might reflect that ACE inhibition interferes less specifically with the angiotensin system than angiotensin blockers, inhibition of vasodilator mechanisms possibly counteracting inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system during ACE inhibitor infusion. Another possibility is that compensatory mechanisms, e.g., increases in cortisol and epinephrine concentrations (Table 2 and Fig. 3), blunted the effect of ACE blockade in the present study.
Aside from ANG II, major hormones responding to exercise were also measured to verify if a compensating mechanism could have masked a potential role of ANG II in the decrease in splanchnic blood flow and the rise in glucose output. As previously described and observed again in the present experiment, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and growth hormone arterial concentrations increased in a stepwise fashion during mild and moderate exercise, and ACTH and glucagon were significantly increased during moderate exercise, whereas insulin and C peptide concentrations decreased progressively (18, 19). However, hormonal arterial concentrations did not differ during ACE blockade compared with the control trial, with the exception of cortisol levels, which were slightly higher in the former condition (Table 2). Cortisol is an integral part of the counterregulatory response to exercise in humans, and it may contribute to the elevation of hepatic glucose production during exercise (17, 32). Furthermore, cortisol may increase splanchnic vascular resistance by enhancing the arteriolar response to norepinephrine (11). However, such effects cannot be expected to occur within the first hour of elevated cortisol production and can, accordingly, not account for findings during exercise in the present study.
In physiological concentrations, epinephrine is thought to have a minor role in the regulation of hepatic glucose production during exercise in humans (18). Supporting this contention is the recent demonstration that during 60 min of exercise on a cycle ergometer, adrenalectomized patients who are epinephrine deficient have a normal hepatic glucose production and successfully maintain euglycemia (15). Similarly, the effect of epinephrine concentrations on the reduction of splanchnic blood flow during exercise is minimal. Kjær et al. (18) have reported that, in experiments with celiac ganglion blockade, splanchnic blood flow decreased normally during exercise whether or not epinephrine was infused. Therefore, it is not likely that the slightly higher epinephrine and cortisol concentrations during ACE blockade could have masked a role for ANG II in the regulation of splanchnic blood flow and glucose production during exercise, although this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. Glucagon rose with exercise despite a decrease in splanchnic release (Tables 2 and 5). This is a new observation and must most likely be due to a decreased clearance by the kidney. Insulin release decreased more than the drop in C peptide release from the splanchnic area (Table 5). This indicates an exercise-induced increase in splanchnic clearance of the hormone.
Arterial concentrations of plasma lactate were slightly higher during blockade of the renin-angiotensin system compared with when subjects were studied under the control condition (Table 3). In the present study, one could speculate, on the basis of rat studies showing the stimulating effect of ANG II on gluconeogenesis (5, 33), that the increased plasma lactate concentrations in the ACE-blockade trial were due to reduced hepatic gluconeogenesis, for which lactate is a precursor. However, this possibility is not likely because there was a similar splanchnic extraction of all major gluconeogenic precursors, i.e., lactate, glycerol, and alanine both at rest and during exercise either with or without the normal increase in ANG II concentrations (Table 4). Also, the hepatic supply and extraction of free fatty acids, which may influence hepatic glucose production, were similar in the two experiments (Table 4). The higher plasma lactate concentration observed during ACE blockade is most likely to be due to slightly greater anaerobic glycolysis from the active muscles under these conditions.
In conclusion, the present study shows that ACE blockade using enalapril does not alter the normal splanchnic blood flow and glucose output during mild and moderate prolonged cycle ergometer exercise in humans. These data suggest that ANG II does not play an important role in the regulation of these physiological responses and point to other neurohumoral factors that are yet to be determined. In addition, the study has shown that during prolonged exercise splanchnic release of both insulin and glucagon may decrease, the decrease in splanchnic release of insulin reflecting both decreased pancreatic secretion and increased hepatic clearance.
Perspectives
The present study was carried out because our knowledge about the mechanisms accounting for major adjustments to acute exercise in humans (i.e., increase in hepatic glucose production and decrease in splanchnic vascular resistance) is surprisingly scarce. Because the study has shown that also the renin-angiotensin system does not play a major role in the regulation of these physiological responses, other mechanisms must be searched for. It is likely that these mechanisms may include signaling substances (e.g., peptides), which have not been identified yet. We used an ACE inhibitor to impair the renin-angiotensin system. Such drugs are widely used in the treatment of hypertension and cardiac insufficiency. From a clinical point of view, it is worth noting that our study did not point to any major deterioration of exercise performance on administration of an ACE inhibitor. Still, caution must be exerted in extrapolations from findings in young healthy subjects to elderly, diseased patients.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank L. Kall, I. Rasmussen, and R. Kraunsøe for excellent technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by Danish National Research Foundation Grant No. 504-14 and Danish Medical Research Council Grant No. 9802636. R. Bergeron was recipient of a Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et Aide à la Recherche doctoral fellowship.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Kjær, Sports Medicine Research Unit, Bldg. 8, Dept. of Rheumatology H, Bispebjerg Hospital and Copenhagen Muscle Research Center, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark (E-mail: mkjaer{at}mfi.ku.dk).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 8 February 2001; accepted in final form 16 August 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ben-Jonathan, N,
and
Porter JG.
A sensitive radioenzymatic assay for dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine in plasma and tissue.
Endocrinology
98:
1497-1507,
1976[Abstract].
2.
Bergeron, R,
Kjær M,
Simonsen L,
Bulow J,
and
Galbo H.
Glucose production during exercise in humans: a-hv balance and isotopic-tracer measurements compared.
J Appl Physiol
87:
111-115,
1999
3.
Bjorkman, O,
Miles P,
Wasserman D,
Lickley L,
and
Vranic M.
Regulation of glucose turnover during exercise in pancreatectomized, totally insulin-deficient dogs. Effects of
-adrenergic blockade.
J Clin Invest
81:
1759-1767,
1988.
4.
Borg, G.
Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.
Scand J Rehabil Med
2-3:
92-98,
1970.
5.
Coimbra, CC,
Garofalo MA,
Foscolo DR,
Xavier AR,
and
Mogliorini RH.
Gluconeogenesis activation after intravenous angiotensin II in freely moving rats.
Peptides
20:
823-827,
1999[ISI][Medline].
6.
Coker, RH,
Krishna MG,
Lacy DB,
Allen EJ,
and
Wasserman DH.
Sympathetic drive to liver and nonhepatic splanchnic tissue during heavy exercise.
J Appl Physiol
82:
1244-1249,
1997
7.
Convertino, VA,
Keil LC,
and
Greenleaf JE.
Plasma volume, renin, and vasopressin responses to graded exercise after training.
J Appl Physiol
54:
508-514,
1983
8.
DeWitt, LM,
and
Putney JWJ
Stimulation of glycogenolysis in hepatocytes by angiotensin II may involve both calcium release and calcium influx.
FEBS Lett
160:
259-263,
1983[ISI][Medline].
9.
Farrell, PA,
Kjaer M,
Bach FW,
and
Galbo H.
B-endorphins and adrenocorticotropin response to supramaximal treadmill exercise in trained and untrained males.
Acta Physiol Scand
130:
619-625,
1987[Medline].
10.
Galbo, H,
Holst JJ,
and
Christensen NJ.
The effect of different diets and of insulin on the hormonal response to prolonged exercise.
Acta Physiol Scand
107:
19-32,
1979[ISI][Medline].
11.
Greenspan, PH,
and
Forsham FS.
Basic and Clinical Endocrinology. Los Altos, CA: Lange Medical, 1986, p. 282.
12.
Heding, LG.
Radioimmunological determination of human C-peptide in serum.
Diabetologia
11:
541-548,
1975[ISI][Medline].
13.
Hems, DA,
Rodrigues LM,
and
Whitton PD.
Glycogen phosphorylase, glucose output and vasoconstriction in the perfused rat liver. Concentration dependence of actions of adrenaline, vasopressin and angiotensin II.
Biochem J
160:
367-374,
1976[ISI][Medline].
14.
Howlett, K,
Febbraio M,
and
Hargreaves M.
Glucose production during strenuous exercise in humans: role of epinephrine.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
276:
E1130-E1135,
1999
15.
Howlett, K,
Galbo H,
Lorentsen J,
Bergeron R,
Zimmerman-Belsing T,
Bülow J,
Feldt-Rasmussen U,
and
Kjær M.
Effect of adrenaline on glucose kinetics during exercise in adrenalectomised humans.
J Physiol (Lond)
519:
911-921,
1999
16.
Kappelgaard, AM,
Nielsen MD,
and
Giese J.
Measurement of angiotensin II in human plasma: technical modifications and practical experience.
Clin Chim Acta
67:
299-306,
1976[ISI][Medline].
17.
Kjær, M.
Regulation of hormonal and metabolic responses during exercise in humans.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev
20:
161-184,
1992[Medline].
18.
Kjær, M,
Engfred K,
Fernandes A,
Secher NH,
and
Galbo H.
Regulation of hepatic glucose production during exercise in humans: role of sympathoadrenergic activity.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
265:
E275-E283,
1993
19.
Kjær, M,
Keiding S,
Engfred K,
Rasmussen K,
Sonne B,
Kirkegard P,
and
Galbo H.
Glucose homeostasis during exercise in humans with a liver or kidney transplant.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
268:
E636-E644,
1995
20.
Kjær, M,
Secher NH,
Bach FW,
and
Galbo H.
Role of motor center activity for hormonal changes and substrate mobilization in humans.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
253:
R687-R695,
1987
21.
Kjær, M,
Secher NH,
and
Galbo H.
Physical stress and catecholamine release.
Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab
1:
279-298,
1987[ISI][Medline].
22.
Puvi-Rajashingham, S,
Smith GDP,
Akinola A,
and
Mathias CJ.
Abnormal regional blood flow responses during and after exercise in human sympathetic denervation.
J Physiol (Lond)
505:
841-849,
1997[ISI][Medline].
23.
Ray-Chaudhuri, K,
Thomaides T,
Maule S,
Watson L,
Lowe S,
and
Mathias CJ.
The effect of captopril on the superior mesenteric artery and portal venous blood flow in normal man.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
35:
517-524,
1993[ISI][Medline].
24.
Rosell, S,
and
Ballard K.
Adrenergic neuro-humoral control of lipolysis in adipose tissue.
In: Muscle Metabolism During Exercise, edited by Pernow B,
and Saltin S.. New York: Plenum, 1971, p. 111-117.
25.
Rowell, LB.
Human Circulation
Regulation During Physical Stress. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1986.
26.
Rowell, LB,
Blackmon JR,
and
Bruce RA.
Indocyanine clearance and estimated hepatic blood flow during mild to maximal exercise in upright man.
J Clin Invest
43:
1677-1691,
1964.
27.
Sander-Jensen, K,
Secher NH,
Astrup A,
Christensen NJ,
Giese J,
Schwartz TW,
Warberg J,
and
Bie P.
Hypotension induced by passive head-up tilt: endocrine and circulatory mechanisms.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
251:
R742-R748,
1986
28.
Sonne, B,
Mikines KJ,
Richter EA,
Christensen NJ,
and
Galbo H.
Role of liver nerves and adrenal medulla in glucose turnover of running rats.
J Appl Physiol
59:
1640-1646,
1985
29.
Stadeager, C,
Hesse B,
Henricksen O,
Christensen NJ,
Bonde-Petersen F,
Mehlsen J,
and
Giese J.
Effects of angiotensin blockade on the splanchnic circulation in normotensive humans.
J Appl Physiol
67:
786-791,
1989
30.
Symons, JD,
and
Stebbins CL.
Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade during exercise: comparison of losartan and saralasin.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
28:
223-231,
1996[ISI][Medline].
31.
Wahren, J,
Hagenfeldt L,
and
Felig P.
Splanchnic and leg exchange of glucose, amino acids, free fatty acids during exercise in diabetes mellitus.
J Clin Invest
55:
1303-1314,
1975.
32.
Wasserman, DH.
Regulation of glucose fluxes during exercise in the postabsorptive state.
Annu Rev Physiol
57:
191-218,
1995[ISI][Medline].
33.
Wasserman, DH,
Williams PE,
Lacy DB,
Brady D,
and
Cherrington AD.
Hepatic nerves are not essential to the increase in hepatic glucose production during muscular work.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
259:
E195-E203,
1990
34.
Whitton, PD,
Rodrigues LM,
and
Hems DA.
Stimulation by vassopressin, angiotensin and oxytocin of gluconeogenesis in hepatocyte suspensions.
Biochem J
176:
893-898,
1978[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Y. Endo, R. Suzuki, N. Nagahata, N. Hayashi, A. Miura, S. Koga, and Y. Fukuba Differential arterial blood flow response of splanchnic and renal organs during low-intensity cycling exercise in women Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2322 - H2326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gonzalez and R. Manso Induction, modification and accumulation of HSP70s in the rat liver after acute exercise: early and late responses J. Physiol., April 15, 2004; 556(2): 369 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mrowka, K. Steinhage, A. Patzak, and P. B. Persson An evolutionary approach for identifying potential transcription factor binding sites: the renin gene as an example Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): R1147 - R1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schnermann Exercise Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R2 - R6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |