AJP - Regu Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282: R19-R30, 2002;
0363-6119/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, U. C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, U. C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. A.
Vol. 282, Issue 1, R19-R30, January 2002

Endogenous angiotensin modulates PGE2-mediated release of substance P from renal mechanosensory nerve fibers

Ulla C. Kopp, Michael Z. Cicha, and Lori A. Smith

Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Increasing renal pelvic pressure increases afferent renal nerve activity (ARNA) by a prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-mediated release of substance P (SP) from renal pelvic sensory nerves. We examined whether the ARNA responses were modulated by high- and low-sodium diets. Increasing renal pelvic pressure resulted in greater ARNA responses in rats fed a high-sodium than in those fed a low-sodium diet. In rats fed a low-sodium diet, increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.5 and 7.5 mmHg increased ARNA 2 ± 1 and 13 ± 1% before and 12 ± 1 and 22 ± 2% during renal pelvic perfusion with 0.44 mM losartan. In rats fed a high-sodium diet, similar increases in renal pelvic pressure increased ARNA 10 ± 1 and 23 ± 3% before and 1 ± 1 and 11 ± 2% during pelvic perfusion with 15 nM ANG II. The PGE2-mediated release of SP from renal pelvic nerves in vitro was enhanced in rats fed a high-sodium diet and suppressed in rats fed a low-sodium diet. The PGE2 concentration required for SP release was 0.03, 0.14, and 3.5 µM in rats fed high-, normal-, and low-sodium diets. In rats fed a low-sodium diet, PGE2 increased renal pelvic SP release from 5 ± 1 to 6 ± 1 pg/min without and from 12 ± 1 to 21 ± 2 pg/min with losartan in the incubation bath. Losartan had no effect on SP release in rats fed normal- and high-sodium diets. ANG II modulates the responsiveness of renal pelvic mechanosensory nerves by inhibiting PGE2-mediated SP release from renal pelvic nerve fibers.

AT1 receptors; losartan; kidney; high-sodium diet; low-sodium diet; afferent renal nerves


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ACTIVATION OF MECHANOSENSITIVE nerve fibers in the renal pelvic wall by increases in renal pelvic pressure increases ipsilateral afferent renal nerve activity (ARNA) (23-30), decreases contralateral efferent renal nerve activity (ERNA), and increases contralateral urinary sodium excretion, known as a renorenal reflex response (27).

Our previous studies demonstrated a crucial role for substance P in the activation of renal mechanosensitive nerves (25, 26, 28, 29). In the kidney, the majority of sensory nerve fibers containing substance P are located in the renal pelvic wall (13, 24, 32, 52). Stretching the renal pelvic wall by increasing renal pelvic pressure leads to increased release of bradykinin and activation of the phosphoinositide system. The increased activation of protein kinase C eventually leads to stimulation of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and increased prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis in the renal pelvic wall (23, 25). PGE2 causes a calcium-dependent release of substance P (21), which in turn increases ARNA by activation of substance P receptors in the renal pelvic area (25, 29).

Our previous studies in rats fed a normal-sodium diet showed that the threshold for activation of the renal pelvic mechanosensitive nerves is 2.5-5 mmHg (30). The low activation threshold suggests that changes in ARNA play a physiological role in the renal control of body water and sodium. Indirect support for this hypothesis is derived from studies showing that acute volume expansion increases renal pelvic pressure and ARNA (8, 15).

The natriuretic nature of the renorenal reflexes would suggest that activation of the renal pelvic mechanosensory nerve fibers may be an important factor in the spectrum of renal mechanisms activated to regulate sodium and water homeostasis. Available evidence would indicate that various mediators involved in the activation of renal pelvic mechanosensory nerve fibers, including renal COX-2 and PGE2, are regulated by changes in dietary sodium intake (17, 31, 51). Also, a high-sodium diet increases pituitary gamma -melanocyte-stimulating hormone (36), known to be involved in the renorenal reflex-induced natriuresis produced by ureteral obstruction (20). We therefore hypothesized that alterations in dietary sodium intake may modulate the afferent renal nerves and renorenal reflexes.

Numerous studies have examined the influence of dietary sodium on the arterial baroreflexes. A high-sodium diet enhances and a low-sodium diet suppresses the gain of the arterial baroreflex control of ERNA in normotensive rats (19, 41). Alterations in sodium intake produce physiological changes in endogenous ANG II. There is considerable evidence for an inhibitory role of ANG II on arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflexes (9, 11, 47). Because our present studies showed that a high-sodium diet enhanced and a low-sodium diet suppressed the ARNA responses to activation of the renal pelvic mechanosensory nerves, we hypothesized that ANG II may play a role in the altered responsiveness of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers. Interestingly, angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors have been localized in the renal pelvic wall by in situ hybridization and autoradiography (14, 18, 37, 53). Therefore, we examined whether renal pelvic perfusion with an AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, and ANG II altered the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed low- and high-sodium diets, respectively. The results from these studies suggested that endogenous ANG II modulates the responsiveness of renal mechanosensory nerves by an effect on sensory nerves in the renal pelvic wall.

AT1 receptors are widely distributed in areas in the central nervous system associated with cardiovascular control, including sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia and nodose ganglia (2, 42). Interestingly, ANG II binding sites have been shown to be transported peripherally in the aortic depressor nerve in the rat (2). In the nucleus tractus solitarius, AT1 receptors are present on substance P-containing vagal afferent nerve fibers, and ANG II has been shown to increase the release of substance P (3). Although ANG II is generally considered to be an excitatory neurotransmitter (2), there are reports that ANG II inhibits calcium current through N-type calcium channels in the sensory nodose ganglion (4). Because these studies suggested that ANG II may modulate the release of substance P from sensory nerve fibers, we examined whether changes in dietary sodium intake modulate the PGE2-mediated release of substance P from an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The study was performed on male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 220-410 g (mean 307 ± 3 g). Two weeks before the study, rats were placed on sodium-deficient pellets (ICN, sodium = 1.6 meq/kg) with tap water drinking fluid (low-sodium diet, n = 64), normal-sodium pellets (Teklad, sodium = 163 meq/kg) with tap water drinking fluid (normal-sodium diet, n = 54), or normal-sodium pellets with 0.9% NaCl drinking fluid (high-sodium diet, n = 52) (9, 11).

In Vivo Studies

Anesthesia was induced with pentobarbital sodium (0.2 mmol/kg ip) and maintained with an infusion of pentobarbital sodium (0.04 mmol · kg-1 · h-1 iv) in isotonic saline at 50 µl/min into the femoral vein. Arterial pressure was recorded from a catheter in the femoral artery. The procedures for stimulating and recording ARNA have been previously described in detail (22-30). Briefly, the left kidney was approached by a flank incision, a PE-10 catheter was placed in the right ureter for collection of urine, and a PE-60 catheter was placed in the left ureter with its tip in the pelvis. The left renal pelvis was perfused, via a PE-10 catheter placed inside the PE-60 catheter, throughout the experiment at 20 µl/min with vehicle or various renal perfusates administered in the different experimental protocols. ARNA was stimulated by increasing renal pelvic pressure. Renal pelvic pressure was increased by elevating the fluid-filled catheter above the level of the kidney. ARNA was recorded from the peripheral portion of the cut end of one renal nerve branch placed on a bipolar silver wire electrode. ARNA was integrated over 1-s intervals and measured in microvolts per second per 1 s. Postmortem renal nerve activity, which was assessed by crushing the decentralized renal nerve bundle peripheral to the recording electrode, was subtracted from all values of renal nerve activity. ARNA was expressed as a percentage of its baseline value during the control period (22-30).

Experimental Protocols

Approximately 1.5 h elapsed between the end of surgery and the start of the experiment to allow the rat to stabilize as evidenced by 30 min of steady-state urine collections and ARNA recordings.

Effects of dietary sodium on ARNA responses to graded increases in renal pelvic pressure. In rats fed the low-sodium (n = 11) and high-sodium (n = 10) diets, the left ureteral catheter was raised to increase renal pelvic pressure 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 mmHg at 15-min intervals. Each step increase in renal pelvic pressure was maintained for 3 min. The renal pelvis was not perfused.

Effects of an AT1 receptor antagonist on the ARNA response to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the low- and normal-sodium diets. Three groups were studied: two groups were fed the low-sodium diet, and one group was fed the normal-sodium diet. The experiment was divided into two parts separated by a 10-min interval. Each part consisted of two 10-min control, 3-min experimental, and 10-min recovery periods. The left ureteral catheter was raised to increase renal pelvic pressure 2.5 and 7.5 mmHg in random order during the two experimental periods. In two groups of rats, one group fed the low-sodium diet (n = 8) and one group fed the normal-sodium diet (n = 9), the renal pelvis was perfused with vehicle during the first part of the experiment and the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (0.44 mM) during the second part. The renal pelvic perfusate was switched immediately after the second recovery period. In the third group of rats, which was fed the low-sodium diet (n = 10) and served as time controls, the experimental protocol was the same, except the renal pelvis was perfused with vehicle throughout the experiment.

Effects of ANG II on ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the high-sodium diet. The left ureteral catheter was raised to increase renal pelvic pressure 2.5 and 7.5 mmHg using an experimental protocol similar to that described above for the groups fed the low- and normal-sodium diets. Two groups fed the high-sodium diet were studied: in the first group (n = 8), the renal pelvis was perfused with vehicle during the first part of the experiment and 15 nM ANG II during the second part, and in the second group (n = 11), which served as time controls, the experimental protocol was the same, except the renal pelvis was perfused with vehicle throughout the experiment.

In Vitro Studies

The procedures for stimulating the release of substance P from an isolated rat renal pelvic wall preparation have been previously described in detail (21). Briefly, renal pelvises dissected from the kidneys were placed in wells containing 400 µl of HEPES-indomethacin (0.14 µM) buffer containing various endopeptidase inhibitors maintained at 37°C. Indomethacin was included in the incubation buffer to minimize the influence of endogenous PGE2 on substance P release (21). Each well contained the pelvic wall from one kidney.

The renal pelvic walls were allowed to equilibrate for 130 min. The incubation medium was gently aspirated every 10 min for the first 120 min and every 5 min thereafter. The medium was immediately replaced with fresh HEPES-indomethacin buffer to maintain PO2 of the medium at 160-170 mmHg throughout the equilibration and experimental periods. In all groups, the protocol consisted of four 5-min control, one 5-min experimental, and four 5-min recovery periods. The incubation medium was placed in siliconized vials and stored at -80°C for later analysis of substance P.

Effects of dietary sodium on PGE2-mediated release of substance P. Two groups were studied. In the first group, renal pelvises from rats fed the low- and normal-sodium diets were exposed to 0.14, 0.70, or 3.5 µM PGE2 during the experimental period, the ipsilateral and contralateral pelvises being exposed to different concentrations of PGE2. The pelvises from rats fed the low- and normal-sodium diets were run in parallel. In the second group, consisting of renal pelvises from rats fed the high- and normal-sodium diets, the experimental protocol was the same, except these pelvises were exposed to 0.03, 0.14, or 0.70 µM PGE2 during the experimental period.

Effects of AT1 receptor blockade on PGE2-mediated release of substance P. Two groups were studied. In the first group, one renal pelvis from rats fed the low- and normal-sodium diets was incubated in HEPES-indomethacin buffer as described above. The contralateral renal pelvis was incubated in HEPES-indomethacin buffer until the start of the 20-min control period, when 0.44 mM losartan was added to the incubation buffer. During the experimental period, the ipsilateral and contralateral pelvis from each rat was exposed to the same concentration of PGE2, 0.14, 0.70, or 3.5 µM. The pelvises from rats fed the low- and normal-sodium diets were run in parallel. In the second group, consisting of renal pelvises from rats fed the high-sodium diet, the experimental protocol was the same, except these pelvises were exposed to 0.03 µM PGE2.

Drugs

Losartan was supplied by Merck (Rathway, NJ). PGE2 was acquired from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI). All other agents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise stated. Indomethacin was dissolved together with Na2CO3 (2:1 weight ratio) in HEPES buffer. ANG II and losartan were dissolved in 0.15 mM NaCl (in vivo experiments). In the in vitro experiments, losartan was dissolved in the HEPES-indomethacin buffer.

Analytic Procedure

After the rats were fed the low- or high-sodium diet for 2 wk, they were placed in metabolic cages for 48 h for measurements of urinary sodium excretion. Right urinary sodium excretion measured during the experiment was expressed per gram of kidney weight. Urinary sodium concentrations were determined with a flame photometer.

Substance P in the renal pelvic effluent was measured by ELISA as previously described in detail (21, 24).

Statistical Analysis

Ipsilateral ARNA, systemic hemodynamics, and renal excretion were measured and averaged over each period. The effects of activation of renal mechanosensory nerves were calculated by comparing the experimental value with the average value of the bracketing control and recovery periods. The Friedman two-way analysis of variance together with the shortcut analysis of variance were used to determine differences in responses within groups and the Mann-Whitney U test to determine differences in responses between groups. A significance level of 5% was chosen (43, 46). Values are means ± SE.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In rats fed the low- and high-sodium diets for >= 2 wk, urinary sodium excretion averaged 160 ±20 and 7,040 ±490 µmol/24 h, respectively, in the conscious state.

In Vivo Studies

Effects of dietary sodium on ARNA responses to graded increases in renal pelvic pressure. The natriuretic nature of the renorenal reflexes (23-30) and the regulation of various renal mediators involved in the activation of the afferent renal nerves by dietary sodium intake (17, 31, 51) suggest that changes in dietary sodium may influence the responsiveness of renal mechanosensory nerve terminals. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the responses of ipsilateral ARNA and contralateral urinary sodium excretion to graded increases in renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the high- and low-sodium diets. Increasing renal pelvic pressure in 2.5-mmHg steps resulted in graded increases in ipsilateral ARNA (Fig. 1) and contralateral urinary sodium excretion (Fig. 2) in rats fed the high- or low-sodium diet. However, the curves depicting the responses of ARNA and urinary sodium excretion in rats fed the high-sodium diet were to the left of those in rats fed the low-sodium diet. Thus each increase in renal pelvic pressure resulted in a greater ARNA and natriuretic response in rats fed the high-sodium diet than in rats fed the low-sodium diet. The threshold for activation of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers was 2.6 mmHg in rats fed the high-sodium diet and 7.6 mmHg in rats fed the low-sodium diet. Mean arterial pressure (114 ± 2 and 111 ± 2 mmHg) and heart rate (350 ± 25 and 323 ± 18 beats/min), similar in rats fed the high- and low-sodium diets, did not change during the course of the experiment.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.   Effects of graded increases in renal pelvic pressure on ipsilateral afferent renal nerve activity (ARNA) in rats fed high- and low-sodium diets. **P < 0.01 vs. zero.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.   Effects of graded increases in renal pelvic pressure on contralateral urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) in rats fed high- and low-sodium diets. **P < 0.01 vs. zero.

Effects of an AT1 receptor antagonist on the ARNA response to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the low- and normal-sodium diets. Variation in sodium intake produces physiological changes in endogenous ANG II (9, 11). ERNA and its baroreflex control are modulated by ANG II of central nervous system origin (9, 11). However, the demonstration of AT1 receptors in the muscle wall of the renal pelvis (37), where the majority of the renal sensory nerve fibers are located (24), led us to hypothesize that the impaired ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the low-sodium diet were related to an effect of ANG II on the mechanosensitive nerve terminals in the renal pelvic wall. We tested this idea by examining whether renal pelvic perfusion with losartan would alter the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the low-sodium diet. During renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle, increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.8 ± 0.1 and 7.7 ± 0.1 mmHg resulted in similar ARNA responses (Fig. 3) similar to those observed in the previous group of rats fed the low-sodium diet (Fig. 1). Renal pelvic perfusion with losartan shifted the ARNA response curve to increased renal pelvic pressure upward and to the left. Thus losartan enhanced the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure. The contralateral natriuretic responses to increased renal pelvic pressure paralleled the ARNA responses (Table 1). Renal pelvic perfusion with losartan did not alter basal ARNA, mean arterial pressure, or heart rate: 1,486 ± 131 and 1,461 ± 124 µV · s · s-1, 105 ± 4 and 105 ± 4 mmHg, and 374 ± 28 and 369 ± 30 beats/min before and during perfusion with losartan, respectively.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.   A: effects of increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.8 ± 0.1 and 7.7 ± 0.1 mmHg during renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle and 0.44 mM losartan on ARNA (paired experimental design) in rats fed the low-sodium diet. B: effects of increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.7 ± 0.1 and 7.5 ± 0.1 mmHg during renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle on ARNA (time control experiments) in rats fed the low-sodium diet. Vehicle I and II, vehicle perfusion during the first and second part, respectively, of the experiment. **P < 0.01 vs. zero. Dagger P < 0.01 vs. ARNA response during vehicle.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1.   Effects of increasing renal pelvic pressure on contralateral urinary sodium excretion in rats fed low- and normal-sodium diet

In the time control experiments in rats fed the low-sodium diet, increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.7 ± 0.1 and 7.5 ± 0.1 mmHg in the presence of vehicle resulted in reproducible increases in ipsilateral ARNA (Fig. 3B) and contralateral urinary sodium excretion (Table 1) that were similar in magnitude to those in the previous group during vehicle administration (Fig. 3A). Basal ARNA (1,626 ± 102 µV · s · s-1), mean arterial pressure (107 ± 3 mmHg), and heart rate (297 ± 12 beats/min) remained unchanged throughout the experiment.

In rats fed the normal-sodium diet, increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.6 ± 0.1 and 7 ± 0.1 mmHg resulted in similar increases in ipsilateral ARNA (Fig. 4) and contralateral urinary sodium excretion (Table 1) during renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle and losartan. Basal ARNA (1,582 ± 87 µV · s · s-1), mean arterial pressure (112 ± 2 mmHg), and heart rate (354 ± 11 beats/min) remained unchanged throughout the experiment.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.   Effects of increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.6 ± 0.1 and 7.6 ± 0.1 mmHg during renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle and 0.44 mM losartan on ARNA (paired experimental design) in rats fed the normal-sodium diet. **P < 0.01 vs. zero.

Effects of ANG II on ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the high-sodium diet. Our studies showing that renal pelvic perfusion with losartan enhanced the responsiveness of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers in rats fed the low-sodium diet suggested that the renin-angiotensin system exerted an inhibitory effect on the activation of the renal pelvic sensory nerve fibers. We tested this idea by examining the effects of renal pelvic perfusion with ANG II on the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the high-sodium diet. In the presence of vehicle, increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.7 ± 0.1 and 7.9 ± 0.1 mmHg resulted in similar increases in ipsilateral ARNA (Fig. 5) as observed in the previous group of rats fed the high-sodium diet (Fig. 1). Renal pelvic perfusion with ANG II shifted the ARNA response curve downward and to the right. Thus ANG II suppressed the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure. Increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.7 ± 0.1 and 7.9 ± 0.1 mmHg increased contralateral urinary sodium excretion 12 ± 8% from 1.4 ± 0.2 µmol · min-1 · g-1 and 63 ± 25% (P < 0.01) from 1.4 ± 0.3 µmol · min-1 · g-1, respectively, during vehicle and 9 ± 3% from 2.1 ± 0.4 µmol · min-1 · g-1 and 36 ± 10% (P < 0.02) from 2.0 ± 0.3 µmol · min-1 · g-1, respectively, during ANG II. Renal pelvic perfusion with ANG II did not alter basal ARNA, mean arterial pressure, or heart rate: 1,457 ± 145 and 1,445 ± 176 µV · s · s-1, 107 ± 3 and 107 ± 2 mmHg, and 308 ± 23 and 309 ± 24 beats/min before and during perfusion with ANG II, respectively.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5.   A: effects of increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.7 ± 0.1 and 7.9 ± 0.1 mmHg during renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle and 15 nM ANG II on ARNA (paired experimental design) in rats fed the high-sodium diet. B: effects of increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.6 ± 0 and 7.8 ± 0.1 mmHg during renal pelvic perfusion with vehicle on ARNA (time control experiments) in rats fed the high-sodium diet. **P < 0.01 vs. zero. dagger P < 0.05; Dagger P < 0.01 vs. ARNA response during vehicle.

In time control experiments, increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.6 ± 0 and 7.8 ± 0.1 mmHg resulted in reproducible increases in ipsilateral ARNA (Fig. 5B) that were similar in magnitude to those in the previous group of rats fed the high-sodium diet during vehicle perfusion (Fig. 5A). Increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.6 ± 0 and 7.8 ± 0.1 mmHg increased contralateral urinary sodium excretion 33 ± 7% from 1.0 ± 0.2 µmol · min-1 · g-1 and 41 ± 17% from 1.1 ± 0.2 µmol · min-1 · g-1, respectively, during vehicle I and 36 ± 9% from 1.6 ± 0.4 µmol · min-1 · g-1 and 37 ± 9% from 1.4 ± 0.3 µmol · min-1 · g-1, respectively, during vehicle II. Basal ARNA (1,676 ± 97 µV · s · s-1), mean arterial pressure (114 ± 2 mmHg), and heart rate (303 ± 12 beats/min) remained unchanged throughout the experiment.

In Vitro Studies

Effects of dietary sodium on PGE2-mediated release of substance P. The increase in ARNA produced by increased renal pelvic pressure is due to a PGE2-dependent release of substance P from sensory nerves in the renal pelvic wall (21). Our in vivo findings showing that renal pelvic perfusion with losartan enhanced and ANG II suppressed the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in rats fed the low- and high-sodium diets, respectively, suggest that endogenous ANG II alters the responsiveness of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers by modulating the release of substance P. We tested this idea in the isolated renal pelvic wall preparation by examining whether dietary sodium affected the PGE2-mediated release of substance P.

In rats fed the normal-sodium diet, 0.14, 0.7, and 3.5 µM PGE2 resulted in reversible increases in the renal pelvic release of substance P (P < 0.01; Fig. 6, Table 2). In rats fed the low-sodium diet, 0.14 and 0.7 µM PGE2 failed to increase renal pelvic release of substance P (Fig. 6, Table 2). PGE2 at 3.5 µM produced a small increase in renal pelvic release of substance P that was significantly less (P < 0.01) than that produced in rats fed the normal-sodium diet.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6.   Effects of 0.14 µM PGE2 on release of substance P from an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation from rats fed normal- and low-sodium diets. **P < 0.01 vs. baseline substance P release during control and recovery periods. Dagger P < 0.01, PGE2-mediated substance P release in rats fed the low-sodium diet vs. those fed the normal-sodium diet.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2.   Effects of dietary sodium on PGE2-mediated release of substance P in an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation

PGE2 at 0.03 µM produced a reversible increase in the renal pelvic release of substance P in rats fed the high-sodium diet (P < 0.01) but not in rats fed the normal-sodium diet (Fig. 7). PGE2 at 0.14 and 0.7 µM increased renal pelvic release of substance P in rats fed the normal- and high-sodium diets (Table 3). The increase in substance P produced by 0.7 µM PGE2 was significantly greater in rats fed the high-sodium diet than in rats fed the normal-sodium diet (P < 0.01).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7.   Effects of 0.03 µM PGE2 on release of substance P from an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation from rats fed normal- and high-sodium diets. **P < 0.01 vs. baseline substance P release during control and recovery periods. Dagger P < 0.01, PGE2-mediated substance P release in rats fed the high-sodium diet vs. those fed the normal-sodium diet.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3.   Effects of dietary sodium on PGE2-mediated release of substance P in an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation

Effects of AT1 receptor blockade on the PGE2-mediated release of substance P. In rats fed the low-sodium diet, 0.14 and 0.7 µM PGE2 failed to increase renal pelvic release of substance P in the absence of losartan in the incubation media (Fig. 8, Table 4), i.e., results similar to those observed in the previous groups of rats fed the low-sodium diet (Fig. 6, Table 2). However, when losartan was present in the incubation bath, 0.14 and 0.7 µM PGE2 produced reversible marked increases in the release of substance P (P < 0.01), which were significantly greater (P < 0.02) than those produced in the absence of losartan (Fig. 8, Table 4). Likewise, the increase in renal pelvic release of substance P produced by 3.5 µM PGE2 was significantly greater (P < 0.02) in the presence than in the absence of losartan in rats fed the low-sodium diet: 11.0 ± 1.4 (P < 0.01) and 3.5 ± 1.2 pg/min (P < 0.02), respectively. Basal substance P release was significantly increased (P < 0.01) in the presence of losartan in all groups.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 8.   Effects of 0.14 µM PGE2 on release of substance P from an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation in the absence and presence of 0.44 mM losartan in the incubation medium from rats fed the low-sodium diet (A) and rats fed the normal-sodium diet (B). **P < 0.01 vs. average value of substance P release during control (Cnt) and recovery (Rec) periods. dagger P < 0.02, PGE2-mediated substance P release in the presence vs. absence of losartan.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4.   Effects of losartan on PGE2-mediated release of substance P in rats fed normal- and low-sodium diets in an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation

In rats fed the normal-sodium diet, 0.14 and 0.7 µM PGE2 produced similar increases in renal pelvic release of substance P in the absence and presence of losartan in the incubation bath (Fig. 8, Table 4). PGE2 at 3.5 µM produced a slightly greater increase in renal pelvic release in the presence than in the absence of losartan: 18.4 ± 2.8 vs. 11.0 ± 2.5 pg/min (both P < 0.01). In the absence of losartan, the increases in substance P release produced by 0.14, 0.7, and 3.5 µM PGE2 were greater in rats fed the normal-sodium diet than in rats fed the low-sodium diet, i.e., results similar to those observed in the previous groups (Fig. 6, Table 2).

In rats fed the high-sodium diet, 0.03 µM PGE2 produced similar increases in renal pelvic release of substance P in the absence and presence of losartan in the incubation bath (Fig. 9).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 9.   Effects of 0.03 µM PGE2 on release of substance P from an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation in the absence and presence of 0.44 mM losartan in the incubation medium from rats fed the high-sodium diet. **P < 0.01 vs. average value of substance P release during control and recovery periods.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results of these experiments show that the ipsilateral ARNA and contralateral natriuretic responses to increased renal pelvic pressure are greater in rats fed the high-sodium diet than in rats fed the low-sodium diet. The threshold for activation of the renal pelvic mechanosensory nerve fibers is <= 2.6 mmHg in rats fed the high-sodium diet vs. 7.6 mmHg in rats fed the low-sodium diet. Renal pelvic perfusion with losartan shifted the ARNA response curve to increased renal pelvic pressure upward and to the left in rats fed the low-sodium diet. Conversely, renal pelvic perfusion with ANG II shifted the ARNA dose-response curve downward and to the right in rats fed the high-sodium diet. Further studies in an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation showed that the PGE2-mediated increase in substance P release was enhanced in rats fed the high-sodium diet and suppressed in rats fed the low-sodium diet compared with the PGE2-mediated substance P release in rats fed the normal-sodium diet. Incubating the renal pelvic wall tissue with losartan enhanced the PGE2-mediated renal pelvic release in rats fed the low-sodium diet but not in rats fed the normal- and high-sodium diets. Taken together, these findings suggest that endogenous ANG II modulates the responsiveness of renal pelvic mechanosensory nerve fibers by an inhibitory effect on the PGE2-mediated release of substance P from renal pelvic sensory nerve fibers.

Effects of Dietary Sodium on the Responsiveness of Renal Mechanosensory Nerves

In rats fed a normal-sodium diet, graded increases in renal pelvic pressure result in graded increases in ARNA with activation threshold of 2.5-5 mmHg (30). Likewise, graded increases in renal pelvic pressure resulted in graded increases in ARNA in rats fed high- and low-sodium diets. However, the ARNA response curve in rats fed the high-sodium diet is shifted to the left of that in rats fed the low-sodium diet, with the threshold for activation of the renal pelvic mechanosensory nerve fibers being <= 2.6 and 7.6 mmHg in rats fed the high- and low-sodium diets, respectively. The parallel shift in the ARNA response curves produced by dietary sodium suggests that changes in dietary sodium modulate the responsiveness of renal pelvic mechanosensory nerve fibers. Importantly, the functional responses to increased renal pelvic pressure, i.e., the contralateral natriuretic responses, paralleled the changes in ipsilateral ARNA. Thus each step increase in renal pelvic pressure resulted in a greater increase in contralateral urinary sodium excretion in rats fed the high-sodium diet than in those fed the low-sodium diet. Noteworthy are our findings that increases of renal pelvic pressure of as little as 2.6 mmHg resulted in significant increases in contralateral urinary sodium excretion in rats fed the high-sodium diet. Measurements of renal pelvic pressure in rats would suggest that the afferent renal nerves are activated by physiological increases in pelvic pressure. Basal renal pelvic pressure varies with the volume status of the animal. Renal pelvic pressure ranges from 0.7 to 3.2 mmHg during basal conditions and may reach 5-10 mmHg during increased urine flow rate and/or spontaneous renal pelvic contractions (16, 38, 44). Measurements of renal pelvic pressure in humans indicate that renal pelvic pressure in humans and rats is of similar magnitude: 1-7 mmHg during basal conditions and 6-18 mmHg during osmotic diuresis in humans (6). Because of the experimental design, urinary sodium excretion was measured only from the contralateral kidney. However, it is highly likely that increases in renal pelvic pressure would result in bilateral increases in urinary sodium excretion, since increases in renal pelvic pressure produce decreases in ipsilateral and contralateral ERNA (8, 27). Taken together, our data would suggest that activation of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers plays an important role in facilitating urinary excretion of an excess sodium load. Of interest in this context are studies showing that volume expansion results in greater increases in urinary sodium excretion from the innervated than the denervated kidneys (12). Likewise, a recent study in conscious dogs showed that urinary sodium excretion from the innervated kidney exceeds that from the denervated kidney during high sodium intake (33).

Mechanisms Involved in the Altered Sensitivity of the Renorenal Reflexes Produced by Dietary Sodium

In analogy with our findings are the numerous studies showing that a high-sodium diet enhances and a low-sodium diet suppresses the sensitivity of the arterial baroreflex control of ERNA in normotensive rats (19, 41). The enhanced sensitivity of the arterial baroreflexes produced by a high-sodium diet is, at least in part, due to a central mechanism (41). Variation in sodium intake produces physiological changes in endogenous ANG II. Previous studies have shown that similar low and high dietary sodium regimens as used in the present study result in activation and suppression of the renin-angiotensin system, respectively (9, 11). It is well established that the brain renin-angiotensin system tonically influences arterial pressure and baroreceptor regulation of ERNA (9, 11). Administering an AT1 receptor antagonist into the lateral cerebral ventricle or rostral ventrolateral medulla shifted the baroreflex curve of ERNA to changes in mean arterial pressure toward a lower level of mean arterial pressure without changing the gain (9, 11). The effect was most pronounced in rats fed the low-sodium diet, suggesting that central ANG II contributes to the increased ERNA in rats fed the low-sodium diet.

AT1 receptors are widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous system, including sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglion and nodose ganglia (2). In the kidney, AT1 receptors are located on vascular and tubular structures (40, 53) and, most importantly, in the renal pelvic wall (14, 18, 37, 53). The results of the present study showed that renal pelvic perfusion with losartan shifted the ARNA response curve to increased renal pelvic pressure upward and to the left in rats fed the low-sodium diet. In the presence of losartan, the threshold for activation of the renal mechanosensory nerves was <= 2.8 mmHg, i.e., similar to the activation threshold observed in rats fed the high-sodium diet. Losartan enhanced the contralateral natriuretic response to increasing renal pelvic pressure 2.8 mmHg, but not 7.7 mmHg. The imperfect relationship between ipsilateral ARNA and contralateral urinary sodium excretion during graded increases in renal pelvic pressure may be related to the design of the experimental protocol. Our present and previous studies (30) showed that graded increases in renal pelvic pressure resulted in graded increases in ARNA when each step of renal pelvic pressure was held for 3 min and the steps were separated by 10- to 15-min intervals, during which renal pelvic pressure was allowed to return to baseline. However, it is likely that the periods during which renal pelvic pressure was increased and then allowed to return to baseline were of insufficient duration to allow contralateral urinary sodium excretion to achieve new steady-state values. The contralateral responses to activation of renal mechanosensory nerves are the results of a complex series of events including central integrations of the renorenal reflexes and the intrarenal neural mechanisms in the contralateral kidney (12).

Importantly, renal pelvic perfusion with losartan had no effect on the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure of similar magnitudes in rats fed the normal-sodium diet. Conversely, in rats fed the high-sodium diet, renal pelvic perfusion with ANG II shifted the ARNA response curve to increased renal pelvic pressure downward and to the right. Interestingly, the ARNA response curves in the presence of losartan in rats fed the low-sodium diet and vehicle in rats fed the high-sodium diet were almost superimposable, as were the ARNA curves in the presence of vehicle in rats fed the low-sodium diet and ANG II in rats fed the high-sodium diet. The parallel shifts of the ARNA response curves by losartan and ANG II in the rats fed the low- and high-sodium diets, respectively, suggest that the responsiveness of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers is modulated by endogenous ANG II. It is not likely that the effects of dietary sodium on the activation of renal mechanosensory nerves are due to altered expression of AT1 receptors on renal sensory nerve terminals, since the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure were enhanced and suppressed by acute renal pelvic perfusion with losartan and ANG II, respectively, in rats fed the low- and high-sodium diets. Importantly, renal pelvic perfusion with losartan and ANG II did not affect mean arterial pressure or heart rate. Taken together, these studies suggest that ANG II alters the responsiveness of renal pelvic mechanosensory nerves by a peripheral renal mechanism. These findings appear to be in contrast to the extensive evidence for an almost exclusive central role for ANG II modulating the baroreflexes (2, 3, 9, 11, 42). However, there are few studies examining whether ANG II may also alter sympathetic nerve activity via a direct effect on peripheral carotid and/or aortic baroreceptors. In the study by Munch and Longhurst (39), the inhibitory effect of ANG II on aortic baroreceptor activity could not be differentiated from the concomitant vasoconstriction produced by ANG II. On the other hand, the presence of ANG II binding sites on the aortic depressor nerve (2) suggests that ANG II may have the capability of modulating the activity of the peripheral sensory nerves involved in the baroreflexes.

Role of Angiotensin on the PGE2-Mediated Release of Substance P From Renal Pelvic Sensory Nerves

To test our hypothesis that ANG II exerts its inhibitory effect on the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure by an effect on renal pelvic sensory nerve fibers, we compared the PGE2-mediated release of substance P in an isolated renal pelvic wall preparation from rats fed various levels of dietary sodium. Our results showed that the PGE2-mediated release of substance P from the renal pelvic nerves was enhanced in rats fed the high-sodium diet and suppressed in rats fed the low-sodium diet compared with rats fed the normal-sodium diet. In pelvises from rats fed the high-sodium diet, the threshold concentration of PGE2 for release of substance P was 0.03 µM vs. 0.14 µM in pelvises from rats fed the normal-sodium diet. [PGE2 at 6 nM failed to increase substance P release in rats fed the high-sodium diet, from 6.8 ± 1.3 to 7.9 ± 1.8 pg/min (n = 4).] In pelvises from rats fed the low-sodium diet, 3.5 µM PGE2 was required to produce a significant, albeit suppressed, increase in the release of substance P. Thus the shifts in the ARNA response curves to increased renal pelvic pressure, to the left in rats fed the high-sodium diet and to the right in rats fed the low-sodium diet, are paralleled by shifts in the threshold concentrations of PGE2 for substance P release.

The presence of AT1 receptors in the muscle layer of the renal pelvic wall (37), where the majority of the renal sensory nerve fibers (13, 24, 33, 53) are located, suggested that the effects produced by dietary sodium on PGE2-mediated renal pelvic release of substance P were due to changes in endogenous ANG II levels in the renal pelvic wall. This hypothesis was tested by incubating pelvises from rats fed low-, normal-, and high-sodium diets with losartan. In rats fed the low-sodium diet, losartan enhanced the release of substance P produced by >= 0.14 µM PGE2 to levels similar to those in vehicle-treated pelvises from rats fed the normal-sodium diet. Importantly, losartan had no effect on PGE2-mediated substance P release in pelvises from rats fed the normal- and high-sodium diets. These studies suggest that ANG II exerts an inhibitory effect on PGE2-mediated substance P release from renal pelvic sensory nerve terminals. Furthermore, our in vitro studies suggest that the losartan-mediated enhancement of the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in vivo is due to losartan blocking the inhibitory effects of ANG II on the PGE2-mediated release of substance P.

The inhibitory role of ANG II on the PGE2-mediated release of substance P from the isolated renal pelvic wall raises the question of the source of ANG II. There is evidence for neurons containing ANG II in areas in the central nervous system associated with cardiovascular control (42, 45). Whether ANG II is present in the renal pelvic sensory nerves, the muscle layer, and/or uroepithelium surrounding the sensory nerves in the renal pelvic wall is not known. If it is assumed that ANG II levels in the renal pelvic wall parallel intrarenal ANG II levels, it is likely that changes in dietary sodium modulate renal pelvic ANG II levels (40). It is rather unlikely that the responsiveness of the renal pelvic sensory nerves in vivo would be modified by urinary ANG II, since changes in dietary sodium do not alter urinary ANG II levels (48).

The mechanisms involved in the inhibitory effect of ANG II on substance P release are not known. However, studies in nodose ganglia showing that ANG II results in a reduction of calcium current by blocking N-type calcium channels (4) are of potential interest considering that the PGE2-mediated release of substance P from the renal pelvic nerves is blocked by an N-type calcium channel blocker (21).

The present studies focused on the mechanisms distal to PGE2 synthesis that are influenced by dietary sodium intake (Fig. 10). However, it is important to note that alterations in dietary sodium intake most likely also affect renal PGE2 synthesis per se (17, 32, 52), which could act in concert with changes in the activity of the renin-angiotensin system to modulate the release of substance P. 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 10.   Increasing renal pelvic pressure increases release of bradykinin, which activates protein kinase C (PKC), which in turn leads to activation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and increased PGE2 synthesis. PGE2 elicits a renal pelvic release of substance P with a resultant increase in ARNA (21, 23-29). ANG II exerts an inhibitory influence (dotted line) on PGE2-mediated release of substance P from renal pelvic sensory nerve fibers.

In summary, the present study shows that the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure in vivo and the PGE2-mediated release of substance P in vitro are enhanced by the high-sodium diet and suppressed by the low-sodium diet. In rats fed the low-sodium diet, losartan enhances the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure and the PGE2-mediated release of substance P to levels similar to those in vehicle-treated rats fed the normal- and high-sodium diets. Conversely, in rats fed the high-sodium diet, renal pelvic perfusion of ANG II suppresses the ARNA responses to increased renal pelvic pressure to levels similar to those in vehicle-treated rats fed the low-sodium diet. Taken together, these findings suggest that endogenous ANG II modulates the sensitivity of the renal mechanosensory nerve fibers by inhibiting the PGE2-mediated release of substance P from the sensory nerve terminals in the renal pelvic wall (Fig. 10). Enhanced activation of the renorenal reflexes may contribute to the increased urinary sodium excretion during excess sodium intake.

Perspectives

Activation of the renorenal reflexes results in decreased ERNA (27). During conditions of sodium retention, the inhibitory effect of ANG II on ARNA would suppress the inhibitory renorenal reflexes, which would contribute to the increased ERNA generally attributed to an effect of ANG II in the central nervous system (2, 9, 11). The modulatory effect of the renin-angiotensin system on the renorenal reflexes further suggests that activation of the afferent renal nerves is an important factor in the spectrum of mechanisms activated to regulate water and sodium homeostasis. During excess dietary sodium intake, the enhanced activation of the renorenal reflexes would facilitate the excretion of an increased sodium load. In this context, it is of interest that rats inbred for low urinary kallikrein excretion or mutant mice lacking bradykinin B2 receptors develop hypertension when fed a high-sodium diet (1, 34), bradykinin being an important mediator in the activation of the renal pelvic mechanosensory nerves (25) (Fig. 10). Conversely, mice overexpressing B2 receptors are hypotensive when they are fed a regular-sodium diet (50). Furthermore, in rats treated with capsaicin neonatally to destroy the sensory nerves, the natriuretic response to volume expansion is impaired (35). Moreover, a high-sodium diet increases arterial blood pressure in capsaicin-treated rats (49).

The potential importance of renorenal reflexes in contributing to increased urine output during conditions of excess sodium intake is further suggested by our findings that the responsiveness of the renal sensory nerves is impaired in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (22) and in a salt-sensitive hypertensive backcross population [F1 × Wistar-Kyoto (WKY)], where F1 = SHR × Wistar-Kyoto (10). The impairment of the renorenal reflexes in SHR is due to suppressed renal pelvic release of substance P (22). In this context, it is interesting to note that there is an increased renal responsiveness to activation of the renin-angiotensin system in young SHR (5, 7).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health O'Brien Kidney Disease Center Grant DK-52617 and Specialized Center of Research Grant HL-55006, and American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid 0150024N.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: U. C. Kopp, Dept. of Internal Medicine, VA Medical Center, Bldg. 3, Rm. 226, Highway 6W, Iowa City, IA 52246 (E-mail: ukopp{at}blue.weeg.uiowa.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 16 May 2001; accepted in final form 4 September 2001.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Alfie, ME, Sigmon DH, Pomposiello SI, and Carretero OA. Effect of high salt intake in mutant mice lacking bradykinin-B2 receptors. Hypertension 29: 483-487, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Allen, AM, Moeller I, Jenkins TA, Zhuo J, Aldred GP, Chai SY, and Mendelsohn FAO Angiotensin receptors in the nervous system. Brain Res Bull 47: 17-28, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

3.   Averill, DB, and Diz DI. Angiotensin peptides and baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow: pathways and mechanisms of the medulla oblongata. Brain Res Bull 51: 119-128, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

4.   Bacal, K, and Kunze DL. Dual effects of angiotensin II on calcium currents in neonatal rat nodose neurons. J Neurosci 14: 7159-7167, 1994[Abstract].

5.   Brännström, K, Morsing P, and Arendshorst WJ. Candesartan normalizes tubuloglomerular feedback activity in young spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: S220-S224, 1999.

6.   Bratt, C-G, Aurell M, Erlandsson B-E, Nilsson AE, and Nilsson S. Intrapelvic pressure and urinary flow rate in obstructed and nonobstructed human kidneys. J Urol 127: 1136-1142, 1982[Web of Science][Medline].

7.   Chatziantoniou, C, Daniels FH, and Arendshorst WJ. Exaggerated renal vascular reactivity to angiotensin and thromboxane in young genetically hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 259: F372-F382, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Chien, C-T, Fu T-C, Wu M-S, and Chen C-F. Role of renal nerves in volume expansion in chronic hypoxic rats. Renal Physiol Biochem 18: 153-160, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

9.   DiBona, GF, and Jones SY. Sodium intake influences hemodynamic and neural responses to angiotensin receptor blockade in rostral ventrolateral medulla. Hypertension 37: 1114-1123, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   DiBona, GF, Jones SY, and Kopp UC. Renal mechanoreceptor dysfunction: an intermediate phenotype in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 33: 472-475, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   DiBona, GF, Jones SY, and Sawin LL. Effect of endogenous angiotensin II on renal nerve activity and its arterial baroreflex regulation. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 271: R361-R367, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   DiBona, GF, and Kopp UC. The neural control of renal function. Physiol Rev 77: 57-197, 1997.

13.   Ferguson, M, and Bell C. Ultrastructural localization and characterization of sensory nerves in the rat kidney. J Comp Neurol 274: 9-16, 1988[Web of Science][Medline].

14.   Gasc, J-M, Shanmugam S, Sibony M, and Corvol P. Tissue-specific expression of type 1 angiotensin II receptor subtypes: an in situ hybridization study. Hypertension 24: 531-537, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Genovesi, S, Pieruzzi F, Wijnmaalen P, Centonza L, Golin R, Zanchetti A, and Stella A. Renal afferents signaling diuretic activity in the cat. Circ Res 73: 906-913, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Harada, T, and Constantinou CE. Renal pelvic pressure isolation from active and passive bladder pressures in the rat: the facilitating effect of urine flow rate. Urol Int 48: 284-292, 1992[Web of Science][Medline].

17.   Harris, RC, McKanna JA, Akai Y, Jacobson HR, and Dubois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with the macula densa of rat kidney and increases with salt restriction. J Clin Invest 94: 2504-2510, 1994.

18.   Healy, DP, Ye M-Q, and Troyanovskaya M. Localization of angiotensin II type 1 receptor subtype mRNA in rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 268: F220-F226, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Huang, BS, and Leenen FHH Dietary Na and baroreflex modulation of blood pressure and RSNA in normotensive vs. spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 266: H496-H502, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Humphreys, MH, Lin S-Y, and Wiedemann E. Renal nerves and the natriuresis following unilateral renal exclusion in the rat. Kidney Int 39: 63-70, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

21.   Kopp, UC, and Cicha MZ. PGE2 increases substance P release from renal pelvic sensory nerves via activation of N-type calcium channels. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 276: R1241-R1248, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Kopp, UC, Cicha MZ, Farley DM, Smith LA, and Dixon BS. Renal substance P-containing neurons and substance P receptors impaired in hypertension. Hypertension 31: 815-822, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Kopp, UC, Cicha MZ, Smith LA, Haeggström JZ, Samuelsson B, and Hökfelt T. Cyclooxygenase-2 involved in stimulation of renal mechanosensitive neurons. Hypertension 35: 373-378, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Kopp, UC, Cicha MZ, Smith LA, and Hökfelt T. Nitric oxide modulates the renal sensory nerve fibers by mechanisms related to substance P receptor activation. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 281: R279-R290, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Kopp, UC, Farley DM, Cicha MZ, and Smith LA. Activation of renal mechanosensitive neurons involves bradykinin, protein kinase C, PGE2, and substance P. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 278: R937-R946, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Kopp, UC, Farley DM, and Smith LA. Renal sensory receptor activation causes prostaglandin-dependent release of substance P. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 270: R720-R727, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Kopp, UC, Olson LA, and DiBona GF. Renorenal reflex responses to mechano- and chemoreceptor stimulation in the dog and rat. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 246: F67-F77, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Kopp, UC, and Smith LA. Inhibitory renorenal reflexes: a role for substance P or other capsaicin-sensitive neurons. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 260: R232-R239, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Kopp, UC, and Smith LA. Effects of the substance P receptor antagonist CP-96345 on renal sensory receptor activation. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 264: R647-R653, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Kopp, UC, Smith LA, and Pence A. Na+-K+-ATPase inhibition sensitizes renal mechanoreceptors activated by physiological increases in renal pelvic pressure. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 267: R1109-R1117, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Limas, C, Goldman P, Limas CJ, and Iwai J. Effect of salt on prostaglandin metabolism in hypertension-prone and -resistant Dahl rats. Hypertension 3: 219-224, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Liu, L, and Barajas L. The rat renal nerves during development. Anat Embryol (Berl) 188: 345-361, 1993[Medline].

33.   Lohmeier, TE, Hildebrandt DA, and Hood WA. Renal nerves promote sodium excretion during long-term increases in salt intake. Hypertension 33: 487-492, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Madeddu, P, Varoni MV, Demontis MP, Chao J, Simson JA, Glorioso N, and Anania V. Kallikrein-kinin system, blood pressure sensitivity to salt. Hypertension 29: 471-477, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35.   Manzini, S, Bacciarelli C, Perfumi M, and Massi M. Impairment of renal urinary excretion in neonatal, but not in adult, capsaicin-treated rats. Neurosci Lett 135: 1-4, 1992[Web of Science][Medline].

36.   Mayan, H, Ling K-T, Lee EY, Wiedemann E, Kalinyak JE, and Humphreys MH. Dietary sodium intake modulates pituitary proopiomelanocortin mRNA abundance. Hypertension 28: 244-249, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Miyazaki, Y, Tsuchida S, Nishimura H, Pope JC, Harris RC, McKanna JM, Inagami T, Hogan BLM, Fogo A, and Ichikawa I. Angiotensin induces the urinary peristaltic machinery during the perinatal period. J Clin Invest 102: 1489-1497, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

38.   Morsing, P, and Persson AEG Pelvic pressure and tubuloglomerular feedback in hydronephrosis. Renal Physiol Biochem 13: 181-189, 1990[Web of Science][Medline].

39.   Munch, PA, and Longhurst JC. Contrasting effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II on rabbit aortic baroreceptors. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H811-H820, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

40.   Navar, G, Imig JD, Zou L, and Wang CT. Intrarenal production of angiotensin II. Semin Nephrol 17: 412-422, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

41.   Ono, A, Kuwaki T, Kumada M, and Fujita T. Differential central modulation of the baroreflex by salt loading in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 29: 808-814, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

42.   Paton, JFR, and Kasparov S. Sensory channel specific modulation in the nucleus of the solitary tract. J Auton Nerv Syst 80: 117-129, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

43.   Siegel, S, and Castellan N, Jr. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988, p. 87-95, 103-111, 128-137, 174-183.

44.   Smyth, TB, Shortliffe LMD, and Constantinou CE. The effect of urinary flow and bladder fullness on renal pelvic pressure in a rat model. J Urol 146: 592-596, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

45.   Tagawa, T, Fontes MAP, Potts PD, Allen AM, and Dampney RAL The physiological role of AT1 receptors in the ventrolateral medulla. Braz J Med Biol Res 33: 643-652, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

46.   Tate, MW, and Clelland RC. Nonparametric and Shortcut Statistics in the Social, Biological Sciences. Danville, IL: Interstate, 1957, p. 111-113, 120-121.

47.   Veelken, R, Hilgers KF, Scrogin KE, Mann JFE, and Schmieder RE. Endogenous angiotensin II and the reflex response to stimulation of cardiopulmonary serotonin 5-HT3 receptors. Br J Pharmacol 125: 1761-1767, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

48.   Vos, PF, Boer P, Braam B, and Koomans HA. The origin of urinary angiotensin in humans. J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 215-223, 1994[Abstract].

49.   Wang, DH, and Qiu J. Salt-sensitive hypertension induced by sensory denervation: introduction of a new model. Hypertension 32: 649-653, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

50.   Wang, D-Z, Chao L, and Chao J. Hypotension in transgenic mice overexpressing human bradykinin B2 receptor. Hypertension 29: 488-493, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

51.   Yang, T, Singh I, Pham H, Sun D, Smart A, Schnermann JB, and Briggs JP. Regulation of cyclooxygenase expression in the kidney by dietary salt intake. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F481-F489, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

52.   Zheng, F, and Lawson SN. Neurokinin A in rat renal afferent neurons and in nerve fibres within smooth muscle and epithelium of rat and guinea-pig renal pelvis. Neuroscience 76: 1245-1255, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

53.   Zhuo, JL. Renomedullary interstitial cells: a target for endocrine and paracrine actions of vasoactive peptides in the renal medulla. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 27: 465-473, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282(1):R19-R30


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
T. Ditting, G. Tiegs, K. Rodionova, P. W. Reeh, W. Neuhuber, W. Freisinger, and R. Veelken
Do distinct populations of dorsal root ganglion neurons account for the sensory peptidergic innervation of the kidney?
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1427 - F1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, O. Grisk, M. Z. Cicha, L. A. Smith, A. Steinbach, T. Schluter, N. Mahler, and T. Hokfelt
Dietary sodium modulates the interaction between efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity and afferent renal nerve activity: role of endothelin
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): R337 - R351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, S. Y. Jones, and G. F. DiBona
Afferent renal denervation impairs baroreflex control of efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): R1882 - R1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and M. A. Yorek
Impaired responsiveness of renal sensory nerves in streptozotocin-treated rats and obese Zucker diabetic fatty rats: role of angiotensin
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R858 - R866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, L. A. Smith, J. Mulder, and T. Hokfelt
Renal sympathetic nerve activity modulates afferent renal nerve activity by PGE2-dependent activation of {alpha}1- and {alpha}2-adrenoceptors on renal sensory nerve fibers
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1561 - R1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
Differential effects of endothelin on activation of renal mechanosensory nerves: stimulatory in high-sodium diet and inhibitory in low-sodium diet
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1545 - R1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HypertensionHome page
P. Linz, K. Amann, W. Freisinger, T. Ditting, K. F. Hilgers, and R. Veelken
Sensory Neurons With Afferents From Hind Limbs: Enhanced Sensitivity in Secondary Hypertension
Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 527 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, K. Nakamura, R. M. Nusing, L. A. Smith, and T. Hokfelt
Activation of EP4 receptors contributes to prostaglandin E2-mediated stimulation of renal sensory nerves
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1269 - F1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp and M. Z. Cicha
Impaired substance P release from renal sensory nerves in SHR involves a pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): R326 - R333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. Scholz
Prostaglandins
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2003; 285(3): R512 - R514.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
Angiotensin blocks substance P release from renal sensory nerves by inhibiting PGE2-mediated activation of cAMP
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2003; 285(3): F472 - F483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
Impaired responsiveness of renal mechanosensory nerves in heart failure: role of endogenous angiotensin
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R116 - R124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
PGE2 increases release of substance P from renal sensory nerves by activating the cAMP-PKA transduction cascade
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): R1618 - R1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, U. C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, U. C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online