|
|
||||||||
Circulatory Control Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Auckland Medical School, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One method for discerning the role of the renal sympathetic nerves in the regulation of renal function has been to chronically denervate one kidney. One concern with this approach is that increased renal responsiveness to plasma levels of norepinephrine may develop over time. This may reduce the apparent magnitude of the effect of the renal nerves or indeed completely mask their effect. In the present experiment, we used the rabbit unilateral denervated kidney model to examine the acute renal blood flow responses to phenylephrine to determine if there were differences between the responses in chronically denervated kidneys compared with either intact or acutely denervated kidneys. In addition, we examined the responses in rabbits that had been made hypertensive using a continuous infusion of ANG II for 7 wk. We found that chronic denervation did not result in increased renal responsiveness to phenylephrine compared with either the intact or acutely denervated kidney, suggesting that differences in renal function between renal nerve-intact and -denervated kidneys observed in previous studies are unlikely to be confounded by supersensitivity. These results suggest that the unilateral denervated kidney model is a valid model to study the role of the renal nerves in the regulation of renal function.
sympathetic nervous system; renal denervation; renal blood flow
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A POPULAR METHOD for discerning the role of the renal sympathetic nerves in the regulation of renal function has been to chronically denervate one kidney (1, 7). One concern with this approach is that increased renal responsiveness to plasma levels of norepinephrine may develop over time, often termed denervation supersensitivity. This may reduce the apparent magnitude of the effect of the renal nerves or indeed completely mask their effect.
While the issue of denervation supersensitivity is clearly of some importance, unfortunately it is also one of debate. Krayacich and co-workers (3) examined the renal responses to norepinephrine infusions of the chronically denervated (7-10 days) and the contralateral ganglionically blocked kidney in rats. They found that with norepinephrine infusions, the denervated kidney showed significantly greater decreases in renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerular filtration rate than the ganglionically blocked kidney. When the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained at preganglionic blockade levels with an infusion of arginine vasopressin, the denervated kidney still showed greater responses in RBF, glomerular filtration rate, and sodium excretion than the ganglionically blocked kidney (4). However, the methodology in these studies involved comparing the responses in the chronically denervated kidney with the acutely sympathetically blocked kidney using ganglionic blockade, which may have produced nonspecific compensation in other cardiovascular control mechanisms. Conversely, other reports indicate the denervated kidney does not become supersensitive to physiological levels of circulating norepinephrine. Lohmeier et al. (9) observed no differences in sodium excretion between the innervated and chronically denervated kidneys (2 wk postdenervation) in response to infusions of norepinephrine at physiologically relevant levels. However, at supraphysiological levels of norepinephrine, they observed sustained differences in sodium excretion from the innervated and the denervated kidneys.
Chronic renal denervation has also been used to look at the role of the renal nerves in pathological conditions such as hypertension (6-8). In this case, other mediators of vascular tone may interact with the ability of the sympathetic nervous system to regulate renal function. The vasoconstrictor responses to adrenergic nerve stimulation have been shown to be augmented by ANG II (11), and ANG II affects transmission at the nerve terminals (15). The response of the blood vessels to norepinephrine may also be potentiated by ANG II (16). It is conceivable that while the chronically denervated kidney may not be supersensitive to norepinephrine in the normotensive situation, with high ANG II levels occurring during some hypertensive models, the denervated kidney may become supersensitive to norepinephrine. If indeed this is the case, then the use of the unilateral denervated model to examine sympathetic responses in high-ANG II models of hypertension is questionable.
In the present experiment, we examined the acute RBF responses to phenylephrine to determine if there were differences between the responses in chronically denervated and either intact or acutely denervated kidneys. In addition, we examined the responses in rabbits that had been made hypertensive using a continuous infusion of ANG II for 7 wk.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal preparation. Experiments were conducted on New Zealand White rabbits (mean wt = 2.7 ± 0.2 kg) and were approved by the University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee. Throughout the study, the rabbits were fed daily (100 g standard rabbit pellets supplemented with hay, carrots, and apples) at 0900, and water was available ad libitum. The room was kept at a constant temperature (18°C) and dark-light cycle (lights on from 0600 to 1800).
Animals were divided into two groups; one group was made hypertensive, and the other was a normotensive group. Baseline blood pressure (BP) measurements under conscious conditions were made in all animals via the central ear artery. All rabbits then underwent denervation of the right kidney. Under halothane anesthesia, the right kidney was approached via a retroperitoneal incision, and the renal artery and nerves were exposed. The renal sympathetic nerves were identified under a dissecting microscope. All the visible nerves were destroyed along the length of the artery. The artery was painted with isopropyl alcohol. In addition, during the same surgery, hypertension was induced in six rabbits using a continuous infusion of ANG II (50 ng · kg
1 · min
1) via the
jugular vein through an osmotic pump (model 2ML, Alzet).
BP measurement was subsequently repeated in both hypertensive and
normotensive groups at 1, 2, and 6 wk after the osmotic pump was
inserted. The BP measurements at weeks 1 and 2 were conducted to ensure that BP remained elevated with ANG II
infusion. Because the osmotic pumps were patent for only 4 wk, the
pumps were replaced after 4 wk. The BP measurement at 6 wk was
conducted to ensure that change of the pump at 4 wk was successful. The
change of pump was done under anesthesia induced by intravenous
infusion of propofol (Diprivan, 10 mg/kg). The old pump was
disconnected from the catheter, and the new pump was inserted.
Experimental preparation.
After 7 wk of either continuous ANG II or control, all rabbits were
subjected to an acute experiment. Induction of anesthesia was by
intravenous administration of pentobarbital sodium (90-150 mg
Nembutal; Virbac Laboratories) and immediately followed by endotracheal
intubation and artificial respiration. Anesthesia was maintained
throughout the surgery and experiment by pentobarbital sodium infusion
(30-50 mg/h). A catheter was inserted into the central ear artery
to monitor arterial pressure. In addition, the marginal veins in both
ears were also cannulated. During surgery, Hartman's solution was
continuously infused at a rate of 10.8 ml · kg
1 · h
1 to replace
fluid losses. A heated blanket was used throughout the surgery and
experiment to maintain body temperature at 36°C. The left kidney was
approached via a retroperitoneal incision, and the renal artery and
nerves were carefully exposed. A transit time flow probe (type 2SB,
connected to a T206 flowmeter; Transonic Systems) was placed around the
renal artery. The right kidney was also approached via a
retroperitoneal incision, and a transit time flow probe was placed
around the right renal artery. Animals were left for 30 min to enable
all variables to stabilize before commencing the experimental protocol.
Experimental protocol. RBF responses of both the left (renal nerve intact) and right (chronically denervated) kidneys were recorded to bolus intravenous injections of phenylephrine (2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 75 µg) (Sigma) in random order. The different doses were made up in 200 µl of saline, and each dose was flushed with 0.5 ml of saline. After the doses were complete, the left renal nerve was carefully sectioned distal to the flow probe. Subsequently, the RBF responses to the phenylephrine injection were repeated. Thus comparison was made in the RBF response between acute and chronically denervated kidneys to phenylephrine.
At the conclusion of the experiment, each animal was killed with an intravenous overdose of pentobarbital sodium (300 mg). The kidneys were then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
80°C to allow
norepinephrine concentrations to be determined. The norepinephrine
concentrations were calculated by high-performance liquid
chromatography. Briefly, the kidney samples (0.5 g) were homogenized
with 0.4 M perchloric acid (with 5 mM reduced glutathione) (5 ml) and
3.5 µM dihydroxybenzylamine (100 µl) and centrifuged at 4,500 rpm
at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was used to calculate the
norepinephrine concentrations.
Data acquisition. BP and RBF to both left and right kidney signals were digitized at 500 Hz and continuously displayed on a computer, allowing continuous sampling of MAP (mmHg) and RBF (ml/min). Heart rate (HR; beats/min) was derived from the MAP waveform. During each experiment, data from each variable were saved continuously at 500 Hz.
Statistical analysis. Mean RBF, BP, and HR were calculated for the 1-min period before phenylephrine and the maximum response during each injection of phenylephrine. Comparisons between the intact and chronically denervated kidneys were done using an ANOVA. For comparisons with the acutely denervated kidney, results were compared using an ANOVA with a double repeated-measures design. The independent variable was the RBF after acute left renal denervation. The model used the RBF before acute left renal denervation as a covariant for the RBF after denervation. The left and right RBFs were assigned as repeated measures to account for both of them being measures in the same animal. The other factors were the group and the dose of phenylephrine. Data are presented as means ± SE. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normotensive animals (n = 9).
Baseline RBF between the chronically denervated right kidney and the
left kidney (initially renal nerve intact) was not significantly different (26 ± 5 and 25 ± 3 ml/min, respectively) for the
normotensive group. The mean dose responses to phenylephrine infusion
in the innervated and denervated kidneys are shown in Fig.
1. No significant difference in the RBF
response to phenylephrine infusion was observed between the intact and
chronically denervated kidneys.
|
|
|
Hypertensive animals (n = 6).
In animals that received continuous ANG II, BP increased from 77 ± 1 mmHg before ANG II to 104 ± 6 mmHg (conscious BP) after 6 wk
of ANG II. There was no significant change in HR (214 ± 11 beats/min before ANG II and 198 ± 7 beats/min after 6 wk of ANG II). Baseline RBF between the chronically denervated right kidney and
the intact left kidney was not significantly different (26 ± 6 and 28 ± 6 ml/min, respectively) in the hypertensive group. Following the same protocol as the normotensive animals, the blood flow
responses to phenylephrine were measured in the two kidneys. Under
anesthesia, the BP of the hypertensive animals fell to a mean of
82 ± 6 mmHg. The RBF responses of the innervated and the denervated kidneys to phenylephrine are shown in Fig.
4. Again, no significant difference was
observed in the RBF responses to phenylephrine in the innervated and
chronically denervated kidneys.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we found that chronic denervation did not
result in increased renal responsiveness to phenylephrine compared with
either the renal nerve-intact or acutely denervated kidneys, suggesting
that differences in renal function between intact and denervated
kidneys observed in previous studies are unlikely to be confounded by
supersensitivity (1, 6). Previously, it has been shown
that denervation results in increased expression of
-receptors for
norepinephrine in the rat kidney (14). Blockade of
-receptors has also been shown to blunt the increased response to
norepinephrine in sodium excretion of the denervated kidney compared
with the innervated kidney in the dog (12). Thus it was
logical to propose that renal denervation resulted in increased sensitivity to circulating norepinephrine. If indeed chronic
denervation does lead to supersensitivity, differences between the
innervated and denervated kidneys will be confounded by this
supersensitivity. Given the number of research groups that have used
chronic denervation (1) as a means to assess the role of
the renal nerves, this issue is potentially a major confounding variable.
Our results agree with the previous studies by Lohmeier et al. (9), who used the unilaterally denervated kidney preparation in the dog. Sodium excretion was measured in the intact and denervated kidneys in response to continuous norepinephrine infusions. While there were transient changes in sodium excretion between the two kidneys, there were no sustained differences in the sodium excretions between the two kidneys in response to high physiological levels of norepinephrine. The transient increases in sodium excretion by the innervated kidney were attributed to sympathoinhibition. These authors compared the denervated kidney with the innervated kidney. In addition to supersensitivity of the chronically denervated kidney, another difference between the two kidneys under this condition is the presence of changes in renal sympathetic nerve activity during changes in BP. Baroreflex-induced changes in RBF resulting from changes in BP are a potential confounding factor in examining the supersensitivity of the chronically denervated kidney. For this reason, in the present study we compared the sensitivity of the chronically denervated kidney to the renal nerve-intact and acutely denervated condition. We found no difference in the response to phenylephrine infusion in the chronically denervated kidney compared with either the intact or acutely denervated contralateral kidney. Our results suggest that the presence of the renal nerves does not confound the results when comparing the sensitivity of intact and chronically denervated kidneys.
Our finding of a lack of denervation supersensitivity is in contrast to the conclusions reached by Kline and Mercer (2) and Krayacich and co-workers (3, 4), who found that the chronically denervated kidney had a greater decrease in blood flow with norepinephrine infusions. It must be mentioned that the above authors used a continuous infusion of norepinephrine, whereas we used boluses of phenylephrine. The above authors also used ganglionic blockade to eliminate reflex control of renal function in the innervated kidney. We chose to physically denervate the left kidney to eliminate the decrease in pressure that would occur with ganglionic blockade. Unlike ganglionic blockade, physical denervation of the nerves to the left kidney did not result in a fall in BP.
In previous studies, the issue of supersensitivity has been examined generally up to 15 days after denervation of the kidney (2-4, 9). One possibility is that reinnervation of the kidney can occur after extended time periods, e.g., 2-3 mo. While evidence suggests regeneration of the adrenergic nerves does occur, there is no evidence of regeneration even after 3 mo in the dog (10). Previously, we have used chronic renal denervation for 4 wk and measured the RBF differences between intact and denervated kidneys (1). Besides denervation supersensitivity, one potential criticism is that the renal nerves may reinnervate during this time. However, in the present study we showed significant reductions in the norepinephrine content of the chronically denervated kidney, suggesting reinnervation was not a confounding issue.
Renal denervation has been shown to increase ANG II receptors in the glomeruli of the denervated kidney (13). This is a potentially confounding factor if chronic denervation is a method used in studies involving ANG II. However, in our study, chronic ANG II infusion did not result in increased sensitivity of the chronically denervated kidney to phenylephrine. The finding of comparable RBFs in both the innervated and denervated kidneys during ANG II infusion in both the present study in rabbits, and as has previously been described in dogs (6), also argues against an exaggerated response of the denervated kidney to ANG II.
Limitations. In the present study, we used infusions of phenylephrine and recorded the RBF responses. The RBF responses we recorded are comparable to that observed using electrical stimulation of the renal nerves in the rabbit (5). Furthermore, we have observed similar decreases in RBF under reflex activation of sympathetic activity using hypoxia, suggesting the responses to phenylephrine were well within the physiological range.
It should also be remembered that adrenergic stimulation does not only cause vascular responses but also leads to release of renin via the juxtaglomerular cells. We have shown that the vascular response of the chronically denervated kidney to phenylephrine is not exaggerated. However, it is conceivable that chronic denervation may lead to increased sensitivity of the juxtaglomerular cells in one kidney compared with the other. The increased renin release by one kidney and subsequent changes in ANG II will similarly affect both kidneys. Thus, because we did not measure renin release, we cannot rule out that the juxtaglomerular apparatus of the chronically denervated kidney might be sensitized.Perspectives
The inherent difficulties in making long-term direct recordings of sympathetic nerve activity have hindered researchers interested in neural control. Indirect assessment of sympathetic influences such as chronic denervation and measurement of some functional parameter were developed to try and circumvent this limitation. However, a persistent concern was always that the model used may itself have produced compensatory changes. It is therefore with some relief that we have shown that the chronically denervated kidney of the rabbit is not supersensitive to phenylephrine compared with either the intact or acutely denervated kidney. These results suggest that the unilateral denervated kidney model is a valid model to study the role of the renal nerves in the regulation of renal function both under normotensive and hypertensive situations.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge the help of Dr. A. Stewart with the analysis of the data and the help of Dr. T. Yandle with the norepinephrine concentration measurements. We also acknowledge the assistance of Dr. M. Navakatikyan.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This research was funded by the Marsden Fund of New Zealand, the Auckland Medical Research Foundation, the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust, and the University of Auckland.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. C. Malpas, Circulatory Control Laboratory, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Auckland Medical School, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand (E-mail: s.malpas{at}auckland.ac.nz).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpregu.00404.2001
Received 11 July 2001; accepted in final form 25 October 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Barrett, CJ,
Navakatikyan MA,
and
Malpas SC.
Long-term control of renal blood flow: what is the role of the renal nerves?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
280:
R1534-R1545,
2001
2.
Kline, RL,
and
Mercer PF.
Functional reinnervation and development of supersensitivity to NE after renal denervation in rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
238:
R353-R358,
1980.
3.
Krayacich, J,
Kline RL,
and
Mercer PF.
Supersensitivity to NE alters renal function of chronically denervated rat kidneys.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
252:
F856-F864,
1987
4.
Krayacich, J,
Kline RL,
and
Mercer PF.
Supersensitivity to norepinephrine in chronically denervated kidneys: evidence for a postsynaptic effect.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
65:
2219-2224,
1987[ISI][Medline].
5.
Leonard, BL,
Evans RG,
Navakatikyan MA,
and
Malpas SC.
Differential neural control of intrarenal blood flow.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
279:
R907-R916,
2000
6.
Lohmeier, TE,
and
Hildebrandt DA.
Renal nerves promote sodium excretion in angiotensin-induced hypertension.
Hypertension
31:
429-434,
1998
7.
Lohmeier, TE,
Hildebrandt DA,
and
Hood WA.
Renal nerves promote sodium excretion during long-term increases in salt intake.
Hypertension
33:
487-492,
1999
8.
Lohmeier, TE,
Lohmeier JR,
Haque A,
and
Hildebrandt DA.
Baroreflexes prevent neurally induced sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
279:
R1437-R1448,
2000
9.
Lohmeier, TE,
Reinhart GA,
Mizelle HL,
Han M,
and
Dean MM.
Renal denervation supersensitivity revisited.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R1239-R1246,
1998
10.
Nomura, G,
Kurosaki M,
Takabatake T,
Kibe Y,
and
Takeuchi J.
Reinnervation and renin release after unilateral renal denervation in the dog.
J Appl Physiol
33:
649-655,
1972
11.
Povolny, KM,
Jung RW,
Kraft E,
and
Zimmerman BG.
Adrenergic potentiation by angiotensin II in isolated canine cutaneous arteries: effect of bathing media and calcium.
Blood Vessels
14:
105-115,
1977[ISI][Medline].
12.
Sadowski, J,
and
Portalska E.
Denervated and intact kidney responses to norepinephrine infusion in conscious dogs.
J Auton Nerv Syst
6:
373-379,
1982[ISI][Medline].
13.
Tucker, BJ,
Mundy CA,
Maciejewski AR,
Printz MP,
Ziegler MG,
Pelayo JC,
and
Blantz RC.
Changes in glomerular hemodynamic response to angiotensin II after subacute renal denervation in rats.
J Clin Invest
78:
680-688,
1986.
14.
Woodcock, EA,
Morris MJ,
McLeod JK,
and
Johnston CI.
Specific increase in renal
1-adrenergic receptors following unilateral renal denervation.
J Recept Res
5:
133-146,
1985[ISI][Medline].
15.
Zimmerman, BG.
Actions of angiotensin on adrenergic nerve endings.
Fed Proc
37:
199-202,
1978[ISI][Medline].
16.
Zimmerman, BG.
Blockade of adrenergic potentiating effect of angiotensin by 1-Sar-8-Ala-angiotensin II.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
185:
486-492,
1973
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ditting, K. F. Hilgers, A. Stetter, P. Linz, C. Schonweiss, and R. Veelken Renal sympathetic nerves modulate erythropoietin plasma levels after transient hemorrhage in rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1099 - F1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. McBryde, S.-J. Guild, C. J. Barrett, J. W. Osborn, and S. C. Malpas Cardiovascular Control: Angiotensin II-based hypertension and the sympathetic nervous system: the role of dose and increased dietary salt in rabbits Exp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 92(5): 831 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Lohmeier, D. A. Hildebrandt, T. M. Dwyer, A. M. Barrett, E. D. Irwin, M. A. Rossing, and R. S. Kieval Renal Denervation Does Not Abolish Sustained Baroreflex-Mediated Reductions in Arterial Pressure Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 373 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |