|
|
||||||||
1 Laboratory of Pharmacology and Chemistry, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; 3 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; 4 Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy and Marine Biomedicine and Environmental Science Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425; and 2 Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, Salsbury Cove, Maine 04672
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined endothelin-1 (ET-1) regulation of the xenobiotic efflux pump, multidrug resistance-associated protein isoform 2 (MRP2), in intact dogfish shark rectal salt gland tubules using a fluorescent substrate sulforhodamine 101 and confocal microscopy. Subnanomolar to nanomolar concentrations of ET-1 rapidly reduced the cell-to-lumen transport of sulforhodamine 101. These effects were prevented by an ETB receptor antagonist but not by an ETA receptor antagonist. Immunostaining with an antibody to mammalian ETB receptors showed specific localization to the basolateral membrane of the shark rectal gland epithelial cells. ET-1 effects on transport were blocked by a protein kinase C (PKC)-selective inhibitor, implicating PKC in ET-1 signaling. A protein kinase A (PKA)-selective inhibitor had no effect. Forskolin reduced luminal accumulation of sulforhodamine 101, but inhibition of PKA did not block the forskolin effect. Consistent with this observation, a cAMP analog that does not activate PKA reduced luminal accumulation of sulforhodamine 101. These results indicate that shark rectal gland transport on MRP2 is regulated by ET acting through an ETB receptor and PKC. In addition, cAMP affects transporter function through a PKA-independent mechanism, possibly by competition for transport.
endothelin-1; multidrug resistance-associated protein isoform 2; protein kinase C
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ONE STRATEGY ORGANISMS USE to limit the toxic effects of xenobiotics is excretory transport. Recent evidence indicates that aquatic organisms possess one or more multidrug resistance-like transport mechanisms that restrict xenobiotic uptake, drive xenobiotic excretion, and thus increase chances of survival in polluted environments (reviewed in Ref. 10). For example, Western blotting shows the presence of proteins immunologically related to p-glycoprotein in tissues from marine and freshwater invertebrates and vertebrates, and binding assays with membrane fractions show xenobiotic binding with the broad specificity characteristics of p-glycoprotein. Also, the ability of sponges, marine mussels, freshwater clams, and marine worms to limit accumulation of xenobiotics is reduced after exposure to p-glycoprotein modifiers, e.g., verapamil. Finally, several studies show induction of the multixenobiotic resistance phenotype in organisms exposed to polluted water (10). Together, these findings make a case for the presence of one or more xenobiotic excretion systems in these organisms. These transport systems appear to function at some basal level in animals living in unpolluted environments, and they are upregulated on exposure to foreign chemicals.
In recent years, we focused on the function and regulation of ATP-driven xenobiotic export pumps in killifish renal proximal tubules (12-14, 17), teleost analogs of p-glycoprotein, and the multidrug resistance-associated protein isoform 2 (MRP2). These transporters exhibit very wide but differing specificities. In general, p-glycoprotein handles cationic and uncharged compounds (3), whereas MRP2 transports anionic and uncharged compounds (9). Clearly, there is some overlap in the chemicals handled by these two multispecific transporters. In all vertebrates studied to date, such transporters are expressed at high levels in the luminal membranes of epithelial cells in the renal proximal tubule, intestine, and liver (9, 16, 21), which puts them in the right location to excrete xenobiotics into urine, bile, and gut lumen. We recently found MRP2, but not p-glycoprotein, expression in the dogfish shark rectal salt gland, an excretory tissue noted for its ability to excrete salt and fluid rather than xenobiotics (15). In this tissue, as in other excretory epithelia, MRP2 was localized to the luminal membrane of the epithelial cells. With the use of confocal microscopy, we showed that isolated rectal gland tubules exhibited MRP2-mediated transport of two large organic anions, a fluorescent methotrexate derivative and sulforhodamine 101-free acid.
The present study addresses the regulation of MRP2 function in shark rectal gland tubules. The starting point for these experiments was the observation that in teleost renal proximal tubule MRP2-mediated transport was regulated by endothelin (ET) acting through an ETB receptor and protein kinase C (PKC) (13). Hormone binding to the basolateral receptor activated PKC, which signaled decreased transport at the luminal membrane. Similar to teleosts, sharks produce ET analogs, and shark tissues express ET receptors that are pharmacologically similar to those in other vertebrates (2, 11). We show here a similar regulatory mechanism for MRP2-mediated transport in shark rectal salt gland tubules. In addition, we found evidence that cAMP affects transporter function by a protein kinase A (PKA)-independent mechanism.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), calphostin C, and H-89 were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Sulforhodamine 101-free acid, forskolin, and RP-cAMP were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, Big-ET-1, ETA receptor antagonist JKC-301, and ETB receptor antagonist RES-701-1 were obtained from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA). All other chemicals were obtained from commercial sources at the highest purity available.
Animals. Male and female dogfish sharks (2-4 kg) were collected outside of Frenchman's Bay, ME, and maintained at the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory in large circular tanks with running seawater. After sharks were pithed, glands were removed and suspended in ice-cold elasmobranch saline [containing (in mM) 270 NaCl, 4 KCl, 3 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2, 8 NaHCO3, 1 KH2PO4, 0.5 Na2SO4, and 350 urea, pH adjusted to 7.8 by equilibration with 99% O2-1% CO2].
Tubule isolation. Tubules were isolated at 4°C using a modification of the procedure of Ecay and Valentich (1). The ends of each gland and the connective tissue were removed, and the gland was minced into 1-mm cubes using razor blades. The tissue was washed three times with 15 ml of elasmobranch saline to remove blood cells and digested in 25 ml of elasmobranch saline containing 0.05 g of collagenase (Boehringer Mannheim). During digestion, the tubes were agitated and gassed with 99% O2-1% CO2. After 25 min, the digest was drawn in and out of a 25-ml pipette 10 times to break up the tubules. The mixture was allowed to settle for 30 s, and the supernatant was then removed and put into a 50-ml centrifuge tube. The supernatant was centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 45 s, and the resulting tubule pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of gassed elasmobranch saline. The tubules were stored at 4°C until used.
Confocal fluorescence microscopy. Rectal gland tubules were pipetted into a chamber (Bionique) containing 1 ml gassed elasmobranch saline, 5 µM sulforhodamine 101, and inhibitors. This fluorescent organic anion was chosen as substrate because it is relatively resistant to photobleaching and its fluorescence is insensitive to medium pH in the range 6.0-8.0 (12, 15). The chamber floor was a 4 × 4-cm glass coverslip to which the tubules adhered lightly and through which the tubules could be viewed by means of an inverted microscope; the chamber cover was a small petri dish. Tubule incubation and confocal microscopy were carried out at 18-20°C. The chamber containing renal tubules was mounted onto the stage of an Olympus FluoView inverted confocal laser-scanning microscope and viewed through a ×40 water immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.15). Excitation was provided by the 568-nm line of a krypton laser. A 570-nm dichroic filter and a 575-nm long-pass emission filter were used. Neutral density filters and low laser intensity were used to avoid photobleaching. With the photomultiplier gain set to give an average luminal fluorescence intensity of 1,500-3,000 (on a scale of 0-4,096), tissue autofluorescence was undetectable. To obtain an image, dye-loaded tubules in the chamber were viewed under reduced, transmitted light illumination, and a single tubule with well-defined lumen and undamaged epithelium was selected. The plane of focus was adjusted to cut through the center of the tubular lumen, and an image was acquired by averaging four scans. The confocal image was viewed on a high-resolution monitor and saved to an optical disk. With the use of this system, we found a linear relationship between fluorescence intensity and dye concentration (Miller et al., unpublished data). However, because of the many uncertainties in relating cellular fluorescence to actual compound concentration in cells and tissues with complex geometry, data are reported here as average measured pixel intensity rather than estimated dye concentration.
Fluorescence intensities were measured from stored images using National Institutes of Health Image 1.81 software on a Power Macintosh 9600 as described previously (15). Briefly, two or three adjacent cellular and luminal areas were selected from each tubule, and the average pixel intensity for each area was calculated after background subtraction. The values used for that tubule were the means of all the selected areas.Immunostaining. Rectal glands were washed in elasmobranch saline and fixed for 10 min at room temperature in 2% (vol/vol) formaldehyde-0.1% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde. After being washed in PBS, tubules were permeabilized in 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 in PBS, washed, and incubated for 90 min at 37°C in PBS with 20 mg/ml of a sheep-derived, anti-ETB receptor polyclonal antibody. After the tubules were washed, antibody binding was detected using a FITC-labeled donkey anti-sheep IgG (1:100) for 60 min at 37°C. Tubules were viewed with the Olympus Fluoview confocal laser-scanning microscope (488-nm line of Argon laser, 510-nm dichroic filter, and 515-nm long-pass emission filter).
Statistics. Data are given as means ± SE. Means were considered to be statistically different when the probability value was P < 0.05 with the use of an unpaired t-test.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously reported that sulforhodamine 101 crosses shark
rectal gland tubules by a two-step process (15).
Consistent with simple diffusion, uptake into cells is not
concentrative and is not affected by any inhibitor of transport or
metabolism. In contrast, transport from cell to lumen is concentrative
and inhibited by KCN, leukotriene C4, estradiol glucuronide, and
chlorodinitrobenzene. Cell-to-lumen transport appears to be mediated by
the xenobiotic export pump MRP2, which has been immunolocalized to the
luminal membrane of rectal gland epithelial cells (15).
Figure 1 shows representative
transmitted light and confocal images of a control tubule incubated in
medium containing 5 µM sulforhodamine 101. Fluorescence in the lumen
is clearly higher than in the cells, and cellular fluorescence is lower
than in the bath (Fig. 1C). A similar pattern of
fluorescence was reported previously for rectal gland tubules exposed
to sulforhodamine 101 (15).
|
The two experiments shown in Fig. 2
indicate that the addition of 0.1-10 nM ET-1 to the bath reduced
cell-to-lumen transport of 5 µM sulforhodamine 101 in a
concentration-dependent manner. With 0.1 nM ET-1, luminal fluorescence
was reduced by 33 ± 10% (P < 0.01), whereas
with 1 nM ET-1, luminal fluorescence was reduced by 58 ± 4%
(P < 0.01; Fig. 2A). Increasing the
ET-1 concentration from 1 to 10 nM caused a further reduction in
transport (Fig. 2B). Cellular fluorescence was not affected
by any concentration of ET-1. Figure 3
shows the early time course of 0.5 µM sulforhodamine 101 transport in
rectal gland tubules. In agreement with previous experiments
(15), cellular and luminal fluorescence in control tubules
rose rapidly and reached steady-state values after ~10 min. For
tubules exposed to 10 nM ET-1 from time 0 on, cellular fluorescence approximated control values, but luminal fluorescence was
significantly lower than controls at all times tested (Fig. 3). At the
earliest time for which we have data, 5 min, ET-1 reduced luminal
fluorescence by 75%. Together, these data demonstrate that ET-1 is a
potent and rapid-acting effector of MRP2-mediated transport in isolated
shark rectal gland tubules.
|
|
ETs are produced as larger inactive precursors, the prepro-ETs. These
are enzymatically cleaved to form the pro- or Big-ETs. Big-ETs are, in
turn, converted into biologically active ETs by specific ET-converting
enzymes (ECE) (6, 20). When isolated rectal gland tubules
were incubated in medium with 2 µM sulforhodamine 101 plus 10 nM
big-ET-1, luminal fluorescence was reduced to 65 ± 8% of control
values (Fig. 4), suggesting that the
tubules contained ECE activity. To determine whether this was the case,
we exposed ET-1-treated tubules to the protease inhibitor
phosphoramidon and measured sulforhodamine 101 transport.
Phosphoramidon by itself (10 µM) did not affect sulforhodamine 101 transport (not shown). However, phosphoramidon did prevent the
reduction in luminal fluorescence caused by 1 nM ET-1 (Fig. 4).
|
ETs interact with two distinct receptor subtypes, ETA and
ETB, which belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled
receptors (20). The receptor subtypes are
pharmacologically distinct, i.e., the ETA receptor displays
preferential affinity for ET-1 and ET-2 over ET-3, whereas the
ETB receptor exhibits roughly equal affinity for all three
polypeptides. On the basis of affinity profiles and the ability of
specific receptor antagonists to block the action of ET-1, our data for
killifish renal proximal tubules suggest ET action through a B receptor
subtype (13). To identify the receptor subtype responsible
for ET-1 action in rectal gland tubules, specific antagonists for each
receptor subtype were tested on their ability to reverse the
ET-1-induced reduction in sulforhodamine 101 secretion in rectal gland
tubules. Preliminary experiments showed that (as in the renal proximal
tubule; Ref. 13) neither receptor antagonist by itself
affected transport (not shown). However, at 100 nM, the ETB
receptor antagonist RES-701-1 prevented the ET-1 reduction in
sulforhodamine 101 transport, but the ETA receptor
antagonist JKC-301 did not (Fig. 5).
|
Taken together, the transport data indicate that an ETB
receptor regulates sulforhodamine 101 transport in rectal gland
tubules. In an initial attempt to identify the location of the
receptor, we immunostained tubules using mammalian antibodies to the A- and B-type ET receptors. Confocal micrographs clearly showed specific plasma membrane staining for the B-type receptor (Fig.
6). Antibody staining was predominantly
associated with the basolateral membrane; no staining was found at the
luminal membrane. These results place the shark form of the B-type ET
receptor at the correct pole of the cells for rapid activation by
hormone added to the bath.
|
One general model for ET signaling involves activation of an ET
receptor-coupled G protein, followed by activation of a phospholipase and PKC. Previous experiments have shown that MRP2-mediated transport in killifish renal proximal tubules is controlled by ET-1 acting through PKC (13). To determine whether the same pattern
held for rectal gland tubules, we exposed tubules to phorbol esters or
protein kinase inhibitors during 30-min sulforhodamine 101 transport
experiments. As shown in Fig. 7, 10 and
100 nM PMA reduced luminal accumulation of sulforhodamine 101. A
phorbol ester that does not activate PKC, 4
-PDD, at 100 nM had no
effects on transport. The PKC-selective inhibitor calphostin C (100 nM)
by itself was without effect; however, when used in combination with
100 nM PMA, calphostin C prevented the PMA-induced reduction in
sulforhodamine 101 transport into the tubular lumen (Fig. 7). Thus, as
in killifish renal proximal tubules, activation of PKC reduced
MRP2-mediated secretion in shark rectal salt gland tubules.
|
To determine whether PKC was involved in ET regulation of MRP2, we
exposed tubules to 1 nM ET-1 in the absence and presence of 100 nM
calphostin C and measured sulforhodamine 101 transport. Figure
8A shows that the
PKC-selective inhibitor prevented the reduction of transport by ET-1.
In contrast, the PKA-selective inhibitor H-89 (10 µM) was without
effect (Fig. 8B). These findings implicate PKC in the chain
of cellular events that connect activation of an ETB
receptor at the basolateral membrane with reduced transport by MRP2 at
the luminal membrane.
|
Salt secretion in rectal gland tubules is activated when gland cAMP
levels rise as a result of hormonal stimulation of adenyl cyclase.
Although the data in Fig. 8 indicate that ET-1 does not act through PKA
to reduce MRP2-mediated transport, they do not rule out the possibility
that other hormones could affect transport through PKA. To test this
possibility, we exposed tubules to the phosphodiesterase inhibitor
forskolin and measured transport of sulforhodamine 101. The
concentration of the drug chosen was one that rapidly increases cAMP
content of rectal gland tissue and that activates salt secretion in
intact glands (18). Figure 9
shows that forskolin did indeed reduce luminal accumulation of
sulforhodamine 101, but the reduction was not altered by addition of
the PKA-selective inhibitor H-89 to the medium. This result suggests
that the effects of forskolin were not mediated by PKA. One possibility
was that increased cAMP levels reduced transport directly by
competition for transport at MRP2. To test this, we incubated tubules
with RP-cAMP, a cAMP analog that does not activate PKA. This compound
caused a concentration-dependent decrease in luminal sulforhodamine 101 accumulation (Fig. 9), suggesting that cAMP could interact directly
with the transporter, possibly competing for excretory transport.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the present study with isolated shark rectal salt gland tubules show that the ATP-driven drug export pump MRP2 is under hormonal control. As in killifish renal proximal tubules (13), transport on MRP2 was reduced by subnanomolar to nanomolar concentrations of the polypeptide hormone ET-1. The hormone acted very rapidly with significant reductions in transport being evident after 5 min of exposure. Transport was also reduced by Big-ET-1, a prohormone. However, the effects of Big-ET-1 were attenuated by phosphoramidon, an inhibitor of ECE, suggesting that rectal gland tubules could convert the prohormone to ET-1. Presumably, these tubules possess a shark form of ECE on the basolateral surface, implying that they may also store and release ET. Experiments with specific ET receptor antagonists indicated that ET-1 was acting through a B-type receptor, and immunostaining with an antibody that reacts with mammalian and teleost ETB receptors indicated a basolateral, not luminal, localization. This basolateral localization of the ETB receptor explains the rapid time course of action of the hormone when it is added to the bath, i.e., applied to the basolateral surface of the tubules.
ET receptors are G protein coupled, acting through second messenger
pathways, such as PKC or PKA. In killifish renal proximal tubules, ET-1
reduced MRP2-mediated transport by acting through PKC
(13). The present data show that this pattern also holds for the shark rectal salt gland. In rectal gland tubules, ET-1 action
was mimicked by PMA, a phorbol ester that activates PKC, but not by
4
-PDD, a PMA analog that does not activate the protein kinase. PMA
was without effect in tubules treated with the PKC-selective inhibitor
calphostin C. The PKA-selective inhibitor H-89 did not block PMA
action. Consistent with ET-1 acting through PKC, hormone action was
blocked by calphostin C but not by H-89.
Figure 10 summarizes the chain of
events that signal reductions in MRP2-mediated sulforhodamine 101 transport in shark rectal salt gland tubules. This scheme and the
present results are very similar to those recently published for
control of MRP2 and p-glycoprotein in killifish renal proximal tubules
(13). In both tissues, ET-1 signaled through a basolateral
ETB receptor and through PKC to rapidly (minutes) reduce
transport from cell to lumen. These are the only data available on
rapid hormonal regulation of MRP2 function in any epithelium. The exact
mechanism by which transporter function is modified is not known in
either tissue. In both, ET-1 action was so rapid that it cannot be
explained by decreased transporter synthesis. Rather, it is likely that
PKC signaled either a change in transporter function, perhaps by
phosphorylation, or rapid removal from the plasma membrane to a
subapical compartment. In this regard, in a recent confocal imaging
study, exposing killifish proximal tubules to ET-1 caused no detectable
broadening of the apical MRP2 immunostaining pattern (20).
Thus, if the transporter had moved from the apical plasma membrane to a
subapical compartment, that movement could not be resolved at the light
level.
|
Salt secretion in the shark rectal gland is turned on by several hormones that elevate tissue cAMP levels and activate through PKA a shark homolog of the chloride channel, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (4, 18). Although we found no evidence that PKA was involved in the action of ET-1 on MRP2, forskolin did inhibit transport (present study). This inhibition was not attenuated by H-89, indicating an action of forskolin that did not involve PKA. Interestingly, a cAMP analog that does not activate PKA (RP-cAMP) reduced sulforhodamine 101 transport, and this reduction was not affected by H-89. Thus the most likely explanation for forskolin's effects on MRP2-mediated transport is that the drug raised tissue cAMP levels and the second messenger interacted directly with the transporter, competing with sulforhodamine 101 for binding and perhaps transport. This line of reasoning suggests that rectal gland stimulation of salt secretion by hormones that activate adenyl cyclase (and possibly guanyl cyclase) could also reduce excretory transport, not by PKA activation, but by competition for transport. It also suggests that cyclic nucleotides may be substrates for the transporter, a suggestion that has implications with regard to control of salt excretion (see Perspectives).
Perspectives
In what context then should we view the present data for regulation of MRP2 in the rectal gland? They show that transport in this tissue, similar to the teleost renal proximal tubule (13), is under control of PKC. At present, we do not know which PKC isoforms are activated by ET or which other hormones acting through PKC might affect MRP2 function. However, based on the present data, we can speculate on a potentially important functional relationship between MRP2 and salt secretion. At the molecular level, salt excretion mechanisms present in the shark rectal salt gland closely mirror those found in the thick ascending limb of Henle (4, 18). In that segment of the mammalian nephron and in the rectal gland, the second messengers cAMP and cGMP are stimulatory. These cyclic nucleotides cannot diffuse rapidly through lipid membranes, yet cAMP and cGMP can be found in salt gland fluid and urine (6, 7, 19), suggesting one or more specific transport mechanisms for cyclic nucleotide export. Mammalian MRP2 does have a low affinity for cyclic nucleotides (9), and Jedlitschky et al. (8) recently proposed that human MRP5 is a cyclic nucleotide export pump. The present experiments showing that forskolin and a cAMP analog reduce transport on shark rectal gland MRP2 by a mechanism not involving PKA suggest that cAMP might be an MRP2 substrate in this tissue.If shark MRP2 handled cyclic nucleotides, then the transporter could provide an additional mechanism for turning off cyclic nucleotide signaling, efflux of the second messenger. Such a link between MRP2 and control of salt secretion suggests chemicals that impact MRP2 function through signaling (ET and other hormones acting through PKC) or competition for transport (glutathione conjugates) could alter the balance of factors that control salt secretion. Consider, for example, the control of salt secretion by C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), which can act directly on rectal gland epithelial cells to increase cGMP production and stimulate salt secretion (5, 19). Staurosporine reduces the stimulatory effect of CNP, suggesting involvement of PKC (19). Surprisingly, phorbol ester by itself did not stimulate secretion, nor did 8-bromo-cGMP. However, when given in concert, phorbol ester plus 8-bromo-cGMP did stimulate salt secretion. These results were interpreted by Silva et al. (19) to mean that CNP signaled through both PKC and protein kinase G, but that both systems had to be activated before salt secretion increased. The present results suggesting that MRP2 can transport cyclic nucleotides and that transport is inversely correlated with PKC activity suggest another interpretation: CNP directly stimulates salt secretion in the rectal gland by activating signaling through guanyl cyclase, but activation of PKC serves, at least in part, to reduce MRP2-mediated efflux of cGMP and thus sustain elevated intracellular cyclic nucleotide levels. Additional experiments are needed to directly test this hypothesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
K. Karnaky, Jr., was a Senior fellow of the Salisbury Cove Research Fund of the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory (publication number 192 of the Grice Marine Biology Laboratory, University of Charleston).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. S. Miller, Laboratory of Pharmacology and Chemistry, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (E-mail: miller{at}niehs.nih.gov).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpregu.00333.2001
Received 12 June 2001; accepted in final form 8 November 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ecay, TW,
and
Valentich JD.
Chloride secretagogues stimulate inositol phosphate formation in shark rectal gland tubules cultured in suspension.
J Cell Physiol
146:
407-416,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
2.
Evans, DH,
Gunderson M,
and
Cegelis C.
ETB-type receptors mediate endothelin-stimulated contraction in the aortic vascular smooth muscle of the spiny dogfish shark, Squalus acanthias.
J Comp Physiol [B]
165:
659-664,
1996[Medline].
3.
Ford, JM,
and
Hait WN.
Pharmacology of drugs that alter multidrug resistance in cancer.
Pharmacol Rev
42:
155-199,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Forrest, JN.
Cellular and molecular biology of chloride secretion in the shark rectal gland: regulation by adenosine receptors.
Kidney Int
49:
1557-1562,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Gregor, R,
Bleich M,
Warth R,
Thiele I,
and
Forrest JN.
The cellular mechanisms of Cl
secretion induced by C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). Experiments on isolated in vitro perfused rectal gland tubules of Squalus acanthias.
Pflügers Arch
438:
15-22,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Gunning, ME,
Ingelfinger JR,
King AJ,
and
Brenner BM.
Vasoactive peptides and the kidney.
In: The Kidney, edited by Brenner BM,
and Rector FC, Jr.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1996, p. 627-712.
7.
Jackson, EK,
Herzer WA,
Zaichuan M,
Mi Z,
Vyas SJ,
and
Kost CK.
Low-dose angiotensin II reduces urinary cyclic AMP excretion in spontaneously hypertensive, but not normotensive, rats: independence from hypertension and renal hemodynamic effects of angiotensin.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
291:
115-123,
1999
8.
Jedlitschky, G,
Burchell B,
and
Keppler D.
The multidrug resistance protein 5 functions as an ATP-dependent export pump for cyclic nucleotides.
J Biol Chem
275:
30069-30074,
2000
9.
Konig, J,
Nies AT,
Cui Y,
Leier I,
and
Keppler D.
Conjugate export pumps of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) family: localization, substrate specificity, and MRP2-mediated drug resistance.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1461:
377-394,
1999[Medline].
10.
Kurelec, B.
A new type of hazardous chemical: the chemosensitizers of multixenobiotic resistance.
Environ Health Perspect
105, Suppl4:
855-860,
1997.
11.
Lodhi, KM,
Sakaguchi H,
Hirose S,
and
Hagiwara H.
Localization and characterization of a novel receptor for endothelin in the gills of the rainbow trout.
J Biochem (Tokyo)
118:
376-379,
1995
12.
Masereeuw, R,
Russel FGM,
and
Miller DS.
Multiple pathways of organic anion secretion in renal proximal tubule revealed by confocal microscopy.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
271:
F1173-F1182,
1996
13.
Masereeuw, R,
Russel FGM,
and
Miller DS.
Endothelin B receptor-mediated regulation of ATP-driven drug secretion in renal proximal tubule.
Mol Pharmacol
57:
59-67,
2000
14.
Miller, DS.
Daunomycin secretion by killifish renal proximal tubules.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
269:
R370-R379,
1995
15.
Miller, DS,
Masereeuw R,
Henson J,
and
Karnaky KJ, Jr.
Excretory transport of xenobiotics by dogfish shark rectal gland tubules.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R697-R705,
1998
16.
Schaub, TP,
Kartenbeck J,
Konig J,
Vogel O,
Witzgall R,
Kriz W,
and
Keppler D.
Expression of the conjugate export pump encoded by the mrp2 gene in the apical membrane of kidney proximal tubules.
J Am Soc Nephrol
8:
1213-1221,
1997[Abstract].
17.
Schramm, U,
Fricker G,
Wenger R,
and
Miller DS.
p-Glycoprotein-mediated secretion of a fluorescent cyclosporin analogue by teleost renal proximal tubules.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
268:
F46-F52,
1995
18.
Silva, P,
Solomon RJ,
and
Epstein FH.
The rectal gland of Squalus acanthias: a model for the transport of chloride.
Kidney Int
49:
1552-1556,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Silva, P,
Solomon RJ,
and
Epstein FH.
Mode of activation of salt secretion by C-type natriuretic peptide in the shark rectal gland.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R1725-R1732,
1999
20.
Sokolovsky, M.
Endothelin receptor subtypes, and their role in transmembrane signaling mechanisms.
Pharmacol Ther
68:
435-471,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Terloux, SA,
Masereeuw R,
Russel FGM,
and
Miller DS.
Nephrotoxicants induce endothelin release and signaling in renal proximal tubules: effect on drug efflux.
Mol Pharmacol
59:
1433-1440,
2001
22.
Thiebaut, F,
Tsuruo T,
Hamadam H,
Gottesman MM,
Pastan I,
and
Willingham MC.
Cellular localization of the multidrug-resistance gene product P-glycoprotein in normal human tissues.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:
7735-7738,
1987
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. E. Wever, R. Masereeuw, D. S. Miller, X. M. Hang, and G. Flik Endothelin and calciotropic hormones share regulatory pathways in multidrug resistance protein 2-mediated transport Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): F38 - F46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Baehr, G. Fricker, and D. S. Miller Fluorescein-methotrexate transport in dogfish shark (Squalus acanthias) choroid plexus Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): R464 - R472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Granger Endothelin Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): R298 - R301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Pritchard Comparative models and biological stress Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): R807 - R809. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |